Abstract
Objective:
To illustrate the use and potential efficiency of the co-twin control design for testing behavioral economic theories of child nutrition.
Design:
Co-twin control design, in which participating twins ate an ad libitum lunch on two laboratory visits. At visit 1, child food choices were not reinforced. On visit 2, twins were randomized to conditions such that one twin was reinforced for each fruit and vegetable serving consumed during lunch (‘contingent’) while his co-twin was reinforced irrespective of food intake (‘non-contingent’).
Subjects:
Six male twins, 5 years old, from three monozygotic twin pairs.
Measurements:
Ad libitum intake of total energy (kcals), fat (kcals), and fruits and vegetables (servings) from the protocol test meals on the two visits.
Results:
Compared to twins receiving non-contingent reinforcement, twins receiving contingent reinforcement increased fruit and vegetable intake by 2.0 servings, reduced fat intake 106.3 kcals, and reduced total energy intake by 112.7 kcals. The relative efficiency of the co-twin control design compared to a conventional between-groups design of unrelated children was most powerful for detecting ‘substitution effects’ (i.e., reduced total energy and fat intake) more so than for detecting increased fruit and vegetable intake.
Conclusion:
Genetically informative studies, including the co-twin control design, can provide conceptually elegant and efficient strategies for testing environmental theories of child nutrition and obesity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Bickel WK, Vuchinich RE . Reframing Health Behavior Change with Behavioral Economics. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2000.
Epstein LH . Application of behavioral economic principles to treatment of childhood obesity. In: Allison DB, Pi-Sunyer FX (eds). Obesity Treatment: Establishing Goals, Improving Outcomes, and Reviewing the Research Agenda. Plenum Press: New York, 1995, pp 113–119.
Epstein LH, Saelens BE . Behavioral economics of obesity: food intake and energy expenditure. In: Bickel WK, Vuchinich RE (eds). Reframing Health Behavior Change with Behavioral Economics. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2000, pp 293–311.
Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, Beddome M, Kilanowski CK, Paluch R . Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obes Res 2001; 9: 171–178.
Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Consalvi A, Riordan K, Scholl T . Effects of manipulating sedentary behavior on physical activity and food intake. J Pediatr 2002; 140: 334–339.
Hursh SR, Bauman RA . The behavioral analysis of deman. In: Green LK (ed). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Ablex: Norwood, NJ, 1987, pp 117–165.
Bickel WK, Madden GJ, Petry NM . The price of change: the behavioral economics of drug dependence. Behav Ther 1998; 29: 545–565.
Reiss S, Havercamp S . The sensitivity theory of motivation: implications for psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 1996; 34: 621–632.
Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Kilanowski CK, Raynor HA . The effect of reinforcement or stimulus control to reduce sedentary behavior in the treatment of pediatric obesity. Health Psychol 2004; 23: 371–380.
Epstein LH, Wright SM, Paluch RA, Leddy JJ, Hawk Jr LW, Jaroni JL et al. Relation between food reinforcement and dopamine genotypes and its effect on food intake in smokers. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 82–88.
Duffy DL . The co-twin control design. In: Spector TD, Snieder H, MacGregor MJ (eds). Advances in Twin and Sib-pair Analysis. Greenwich Medical Media Ltd: London, 2000, pp 54–66.
Goldfield GS, Epstein LH . Can fruits and vegetables and activities substitute for snack foods? Health Psychol 2002; 21: 299–303.
Baranowski T, Smith M, Hearn MD, Lin LS, Baranowski J, Doyle C et al. Patterns in children's fruit and vegetable consumption by meal and day of the week. J Am Coll Nutr 1997; 16: 216–223.
Resnicow K, Davis-Hearn M, Smith M, Baranowski T, Lin LS, Baranowski J et al. Social-cognitive predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in children. Health Psychol 1997; 16: 272–276.
Faith MS, Keller KL, Matz P, Johnson SL, Lewis R, Jorge MA et al. Project Grow-2-Gether: a study of the genetic and environmental influences on child eating and obesity. Twin Res 2002; 5: 472–475.
Pedhazur LJ, Schmelkin LP . Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 1991.
Carr AB, Martin NG, Whitfield JB . Usefulness of the co-twin control design in investigations as exemplified in a study of effects of ascorbic acid on laboratory test results. Clin Chem 1981; 27: 1469–1470.
Maes HH, Neale MC, Eaves LJ . Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity. Behav Genet 1997; 27: 325–351.
de Castro JM . Genetic influences on daily intake and meal patterns of humans. Physiol Behav 1993; 53: 777–782.
de Castro JM . Independence of genetic influences on body size, daily intake, and meal patterns of humans. Physiol Behav 1993; 54: 633–639.
Christian JC, Kang KW . Efficiency of human monozygotic twins in studies of blood lipids. Metabolism 1972; 21: 691–699.
Keller KL, Pietrobelli A, Must S, Faith MS . Genetics of eating and its relation to obesity. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2002; 4: 176–182.
Faith MS, Pietrobelli A, Nunez C, Heo M, Heymsfield SB, Allison DB . Evidence for independent genetic influences on fat mass and body mass index in a pediatric twin sample. Pediatrics 1999; 104: 61–67.
Faith MS, Keller KL, Johnson SL, Pietrobelli A, Matz PE, Must S et al. Familial aggregation of energy intake in children. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 844–850.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH Grants K08MH01530 and R01 HD42169
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faith, M., Rose, E., Matz, P. et al. Co-twin control designs for testing behavioral economic theories of child nutrition: methodological note. Int J Obes 30, 1501–1505 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803333
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803333