Abstract
Background:
Pattern of fat distribution rather than obesity is of importance for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The accurate measurement of total and regional fat mass requires sophisticated and often expensive methods that have limited applicability in the clinical setting.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to evaluate body fat distributions by ultrasound (US) as a gold standard method for measuring visceral, preperitoneal and subcutaneous fat layers and comparing with anthropometric results, and then to find the most reliable anthropometric measurement in childhood obesity.
Materials and methods:
Study group of 51 obese children (21 F, 30 M) (mean age±s.d.: 11.5±2.6 years) and control group of 33 non-obese children (17 F, 16 M) (mean age±s.d.: 12.2±2.7 years) were recruited for this study. Anthropometric measurements as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist/hip ratio (WHR), triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were taken from all the participants. Abdominal preperitoneal (P), subcutaneous (S) fat at their maximum (max) and minimum (min) thickness sites, visceral (V), triceps (TrUS) and subscapular (SsUS) fat thicknesses were also measured ultrasonographically.
Results:
In the obese group, BMI was significantly correlated with US measurements of fat thicknesses, except Pmin and SsUS, whereas in the control group, BMI was significantly correlated with all US fat measurements. The relation of US measurements with skinfold thickness and WC was more significant in the control than in the obese group. No relation between WHR and US fat thickness measurements was found in both groups. Multiple regression analysis, using V as the dependent variable and anthropometric parameters, gender and the group as the independent variables, revealed BMI was the best single predictor of V (R2: 0.53).
Conclusion:
This study suggests that the validity of the anthropometric skinfold thickness in the obese children is low. Despite the limitations reported in the literature, in our study, BMI provides the best estimate of body fat. WHR in children and adolescents is not a good index to show intra-abdominal fat deposition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Gidding SS, Bao W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS . Effects of secular trends in obesity on coronary risk factors in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr 1995; 127: 868–874.
Flegal KM, Troiano RP . Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 807–818.
Chinn S, Rona RJ . Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity in three cross sectional studies of British Children. 1974–1994. BMJ 2001; 322: 24–26.
Daniels SR, Khoury PR, Morrison JA . The utility of body mass index as a measure of body fatness in children and adolescents: difference by race and gender. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 804–807.
Onis M, Habicht JP . Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 64: 650–658.
Prentice AM . Body mass index standards for children. BMJ 1998; 354: 1874–1875.
Barlow SE, Dietz WH . Obesity evaluation and treatment: expert committee recommendations. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 29.
Maynard LM, Wisemandle W, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Guo SS, Siervogel RM . Childhood body composition in relation to body mass index. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 344–350.
Miller J, Rosenbloom A, Silverstein J . Childhood obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 4211–4218.
Borkan GA, Hults DE, Cardarelli J, Burrows BA . Comparison of ultrasound and skin fold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness. Am J Phys Anthropol 1982; 58: 307–313.
Fanelli MT, Kurczmarski RJ . Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 39: 703–709.
Dixon AK . Abdominal fat assessed by computed tomography: sex difference in distribution. Clin Radiol 1983; 34: 189–191.
Lee MMC, Ng CK . Postmortem studies of skinfold caliper measurement and actual thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue. Hum Biol 1965; 37: 91–103.
Haymes EM, Lundergren HM, Loomis JL, Buskirk ER . Validity of the ultrasonic technique as a method of measuring subcutaneous adipose tissue. Ann Hum Biol 1976; 3: 245–251.
Himes JH, Roche AF, Siervogel RM . Compressibility of skinfolds and the measurement of subcutaneous fatness. Am J Clin Nutr 1979; 32: 1734–1740.
Wells JCK . A critique of the expression of paediatric body composition data. Arch Dis Child 2001; 85: 67–72.
Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S . Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 460–468.
Treuth MS, Hunter GR, Kekes ST . Estimating intraabdominal adipose tissue in women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62: 527–532.
Goran MI, Kaskoun MC, Shuman WP . Intraabdominal adipose tissue in young children. Int J Obes 1995; 19: 279–283.
Fox K, Peters D, Armstrong N, Sharpe P, Bell M . Abdominal fat deposition in 11-year-old children. Int J Obes 1993; 17: 11–16.
De Ridder CM, De Boer RW, Seidell JC . Body fat distribution in pubertal girls quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes 1992; 16: 443–449.
Goran M . Visseral fat in Children: influence of obesity, anthropometry, ethnicity, gender, diet, and growth. Am J Hum Biol 1999; 11: 201–207.
Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Todexco T, Andreis IAB, Poracacci C et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra-abdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18: 563–567.
Suzuki R, Watanabe S, Hirai Y, Akıyama K, Nıshıde T, Matsushıma Y et al. Abdominal wall fat index, estimated by ultrasonography, for assessment of the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat in the abdomen. Am J Med 1993; 95: 309–314.
Armellini F, Zamboni M, Robbi R, Todesco T, Rigo L, Bergamo AIA et al. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography. Int J Obes 1993; 17: 209–214.
Tornaghi G, Raiteri R, Pozzato C, Rispoili A, Bramani M, Cipolat M et al. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. Int J Obes 1994; 18: 771–775.
Caucchi E, Piatti PM, Orena C, Pontiroli AE, Martine E, Paesano PL et al. Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of intra-abdominal fat? A comparison with computed tomography. Radiol Med 1997; 94: 329–334.
Sabir N, Pakdemirli E, Sermez Y, Zencir M, Kazil S . Sonographic assessment of changes in thickness of different abdominal fat layers in response to diet in obese women. J Clin Ultrasound 2003; 31: 26–30.
Marshall WA, Tanner JM . Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Childhood 1970; 45: 13–23.
Marshall WA, Tanner JM . Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Childhood 1969; 44: 291–303.
Cole TJ, Bellini MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH . Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240–1243.
Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Bergamo AIA, Robbi R, Marchi M et al. Sonography detection of small intra-abdominal fat variations. Int J Obes 1991; 15: 847–852.
Gidding SS, Leibel RL, Daniels S, Rosenbaum M, Van HL, Marx GR . Understanding obesity in youth: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on atherosclerosis and hypertension in the Young and Nutrition Committee American Heart Association Writing Group. Circulation 1996; 94: 3383–3387.
Zonderland ML, Erich WB, Erkelens DW, Kortlandt W, Wit JM, Huisveld IA et al. Plasma lipids and apoproteins, body fat distribution and body fatness in early pubertal children. Int J Obese 1990; 14: 1036–1046.
Caprio S, Hyman LD, Limb C, McCarthy S, Lange R, Sherwin RS et al. Central adiposity and its metabolic correlates in obese adolescent girls. Am J Physiol 1995; 269: 118–126.
Tamura A, Mori T, Hara Y, Komıyama A . Preperitoneal fat thickness in childhood obesity: Association with serum insulin concentration. Pediatr Int 2000; 42: 155–159.
Nishina M, Kıkuchi T, Yamazaki H, Kamede K, Hıura M, Uchiyama M . Relationship among systolic blood pressure, serum insulin and leptin, and visceral fat accumulation in obese children. Hypertens Res 2003; 26: 281–288.
Tershakovec AM, Kuppler KM, Zemel BS, Katz L, Weinzimer S, Harty MP et al. Body composition and metabolic factors in obese children and adolescents. Int J Obes 2003; 27: 19–24.
Asayama K, Dobashi K, Hayashibe H, Kodera K, Uchida N, Nkane T et al. Threshold values of visceral fat measures and their anthropometric alternatives for metabolic derangement in Japanese obese boys. Int J Obes 2002; 26: 208–213.
Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH . Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography. Am J Nutr 1982; 36: 172–177.
Rössner S, Bo WJ, Hiltbrandt E, Hinson W, Karstaedt N, Santiago P et al. Adipose tissue determinations in cadavers: a comparison between cross-sectional planimetry and computed tomography. Int J Obes 1990; 14: 893–902.
Slyper AH . Childhood obesity, adipose tissue distribution, and the pediatric practioner. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 1–9.
Yamaguchi J, Oguni T, Konishi K, Mino M . Abdominal adiposity with respect to the proportion of intra-abdominal visceral fat to extra-abdominal fat (V/S ratio) in Japanese childhood obesity. Pathophysiol 1996; 3: 29–35.
Must A, Dallal GE, Dietz WH . Reference data for obesity: 85th and 95th percentiles of body mass index (Wt/ht2) and triceps skinfold thickness. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53: 839–846.
Himes JH, Dietz WH . Guidelines for owerweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 59: 307–316.
Bandini LG, Dietz WH . Assessment of body fatness in childhood obesity: evaluation of laboratory and anthropometric techniques. J Am Diet Assoc 1987; 87: 1344–1348.
Kannel WB, Cupples LA, Ramaswami R, Stokes J, Kreger BE, Higgins M . Regional obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. K Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 183–190.
Masuda T, Imai K, Komiya S . Relationship of anthropometric indices of body cardiovascular risk in Japanese women. Ann Physiol Anthropol 1993; 12: 135–144.
Taylor RW, Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A . Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry, in children aged 3-19 years. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 490–495.
Forbes G . The abdomen: Hip ratio normative data and observations on selected patients. Int J Obes 1990; 14: 149–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semiz, S., özgören, E. & Sabir, N. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity. Int J Obes 31, 53–58 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803414
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803414
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Effects of resistance training on heat shock response (HSR), HSP70 expression, oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolism in middle-aged people
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry (2024)
-
Genetic contribution to waist-to-hip ratio in Mexican children and adolescents based on 12 loci validated in European adults
International Journal of Obesity (2019)
-
Sonographic assessment of abdominal fat distribution during the first year of infancy
Pediatric Research (2015)
-
Methodologies to assess paediatric adiposity
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) (2015)
-
Validity of parentally reported versus measured weight, length and waist in 7- to 9-year-old children for use in follow-up studies
European Journal of Pediatrics (2014)