Abstract
Previously, we showed that the 5-HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 reduces cocaine self-administration, and the ability of cocaine to reinstate responding after extinction of drug-seeking behavior. The present experiments extended these findings further by determining whether the effects of Ro60-0175 on self-administration were sustained with repeated treatment, and whether Ro60-0175 altered reinstatement induced by the pharmacological stressor yohimbine, or by the context in which self-administration occurred. In Experiment 1, Ro60-0175 (1āmg/kg, s.c.) reduced cocaine (0.25āmg/infusion) self-administration maintained by a progressive ratio schedule. This reduction was sustained over eight daily injections. In Experiment 2, rats self-administered cocaine in daily 2āh sessions for 15 days on a FR1 schedule. Following extinction, yohimbine (1āmg/kg, i.p.) reinstated responding, and this effect was reduced dose dependently by Ro60-0175 (0.3ā3āmg/kg, s.c.). In Experiment 3, rats were trained to respond for cocaine on a FR1 schedule in a distinct environmental context (A); responding was then extinguished in a different context (B). Reinstatement tests occurred in either context A or B. Responding was reinstated only when rats were tested in the original self-administration context (A). This reinstatement was reduced dose dependently by Ro60-0175. All effects of Ro60-0175 were blocked by the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084. Thus, Ro60-0175, acting via 5-HT2C receptors, reduces cocaine self-administration and cocaine-seeking triggered by a stressor and by drug-associated cues. The effects of Ro60-0175 do not exhibit tolerance within the 8-day test period. These results indicate that selective 5-HT2C receptor agonists may be a useful pharmacological strategy for treatment of drug abuse.
Similar content being viewed by others
INTRODUCTION
The 5-HT2C receptor has a widespread distribution in mammalian brain tissue and is especially abundant in dopaminergic cell body regions of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (VTA), as well as in terminal projection areas of the nucleus accumbens, striatum, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Abramowski et al, 1995; Eberle-Wang et al, 1997; Pompeiano et al, 1994). The moderately selective 5HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 (Martin et al, 1998) reduces the firing rate of mesolimbic DA neurons originating in the VTA, leading to a reduction in DA release in terminal regions of the nucleus accumbens and frontal cortex (Di Matteo et al, 2000a, 2000b; Gobert et al, 2000). These effects are reversed by the selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 (Di Matteo et al, 2000a; Gobert et al, 2000). Additionally, acute 5-HT2C receptor block with SB242084 increases the burst-firing of dopaminergic neurons in the VTA leading to increased release of DA in the nucleus accumbens (Di Matteo et al, 1999; Gobert et al, 2000). Thus, it appears that 5-HT2C receptors may exert a tonic inhibitory influence over the activity of ascending DA neurons.
This bi-directional modulation of dopamine function by 5-HT2C receptors is apparent at the behavioral level as well. Many of the behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulants such as cocaine involve increased activity of mesolimbic dopamine function (eg, Callahan et al, 1991; Kelly and Iversen, 1976; Pettit et al, 1984). A number of studies have now shown that 5-HT2C receptor agonists attenuate cocaine-stimulated locomotor activity (Filip et al, 2004; Filip and Cunningham, 2003; Fletcher et al, 2004; Grottick et al, 2000). Ro60-0175 also reduced responding for intravenous infusions of cocaine under both fixed ratio (FR) and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement (Grottick et al, 2000). Following extinction of self-administration behavior cocaine is able to reinstate responding, and this effect of cocaine was also attenuated by Ro60-0175 (Grottick et al, 2000). In contrast to the effects of activating the 5-HT2C receptor, blockade of 5-HT2C receptors produced the opposite profile of effects. Thus, the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 enhanced cocaine-induced locomotor activity, responding for cocaine, and the response reinstating effects of cocaine (Fletcher et al, 2002).
On the basis of this evidence there have been a number of recent suggestions that the 5-HT2C receptor might be a valid target for the development of medications for treating drug abuse (Bubar and Cunningham, 2006; Di Giovanni et al, 2006; Higgins and Fletcher, 2003; Ji et al, 2006). In the present experiments, we have explored further the potential utility of a 5-HT2C receptor agonist for drug abuse. To date all of the available data concerning the effects of manipulating 5-HT2C receptor activity on drug self-administration and other aspects of drug abuse behavior have been derived from studies using acute treatment. Tolerance can develop rapidly to some of the effects of 5-HT acting drugs including 5-HT2C receptor agonists (Fone et al, 1998; Hayashi et al, 2005; Rowland, 1994; Wang et al, 1995; Yamauchi et al, 2004). From a clinical perspective, such a rapid loss of efficacy would not be desirable. Therefore, the first experiment investigated the ability of the 5-HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 to alter responding for cocaine following daily treatment.
One of the most serious aspects in the treatment of drug abuse is the potential for relapse after a period of abstinence (Mendelson and Mello, 1996; O'Brien, 1997). Previously, we have shown that 5-HT2C receptor activation attenuates the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior induced by a priming injection of cocaine (Grottick et al, 2000). Two other types of stimulus that elicit relapse in humans, or reinstate responding in abstinent animals, are stressors and drug-associated cues (for reviews see Bossert et al, 2005; Shaham et al, 2003). Therefore, the second objective of the work was to examine whether the ability of Ro60-0175 to attenuate reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior extended to situations in which reinstatement was initiated by a stressor, or by drug-paired cues. To this end, we first examined the effect of Ro60-0175 on response reinstatement induced by the pharmacological stressor yohimbine. Yohimbine is an Ī±-2 adrenoceptor antagonist that induces anxiety and panic attacks in humans and anxiety-like responses in animals (Bremner et al, 1996a, 1996b; Charney et al, 1987). Opioid-dependent patients exhibit anxiety-like responses and withdrawal symptoms following treatment with yohimbine, and these states are accompanied by drug cravings (Stine et al, 2002). In animals, yohimbine reinstates responding for cocaine (Lee et al, 2004) methamphetamine (Shepard et al, 2004), and alcohol (Le et al, 2005). Second, we examined the ability of Ro60-0175 to attenuate responding induced by contextual cues previously associated with cocaine self-administration (Crombag et al, 2002). Ro60-0175 has approximately 10-fold selectivity for the 5-HT2C over the 5-HT2A receptor, although it is non-selective compared to the 5-HT2B receptor (eg Porter et al, 1999). Therefore, to confirm the role of 5-HT2C receptors in mediating effects of Ro60-0175, we also examined whether the effects of Ro60-0175 could be reversed by the selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 (Kennett et al, 1997).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
Adult male SpragueāDawley rats (Charles River, Quebec) weighing 280ā320āg at the beginning of each study were used. They were housed in clear plastic, rectangular, and solid-bottomed cages. The housing room was maintained on a 12āh light/dark cycle (lights off at 0800āh) and at a temperature of 22Ā±2Ā°C. Access to food was restricted as detailed below. All training and testing was conducted during the dark phase. Experimental procedures and manipulations conformed to the guidelines laid down by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and were approved by the CAMH Animal Care Committee.
Surgery
The rats were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine for implantation of a catheter into the right jugular vein. Catheters were constructed from two lengths of silastic tubing, differing in outer diameter, and connected by a small piece of heat-shrunk tubing. The smaller diameter tubing (o.d=0.025 inches) was inserted into the right jugular vein. The larger diameter tubing (o.d.=0.046 inches) was connected to a length of 22āga stainless-steel tubing that was cemented inside a nylon bolt. This terminal end of the catheter exited between the scapulae, and was anchored there by means of sutures and a small piece of Marlex mesh. Following surgery animals were injected with the antibiotic Penlong (1āml/kg) to minimize the incidence of post-surgical infection. Catheters were flushed daily with 0.05ā0.1āml of a 0.9% saline solution containing 5āIU/ml heparin and 800āIU streptokinase to maintain patency. Rats were allowed a 1-week period to recover from surgery.
Apparatus
Testing was conducted in operant chambers measuring 28ācm long, 21ācm wide and 21ācm high (Med Associates Inc., St Albans, VT). Each chamber contained two response levers 4.5ācm wide and 7ācm above the floor of the chamber, and a stimulus light located 6ācm above each lever. A counterbalanced arm held a fluid swivel above the ceiling of the chamber. The swivel was attached at one end by Tygon tubing to a syringe mounted on a motor-driven syringe pump (Razel) located outside the chamber. At the other end of the swivel a length of Tygon tubing, encased in a stainless-steel tether, connected the animal's catheter to the syringe via the swivel. Each chamber was illuminated by a house light and housed in a sound-attenuating box equipped with a ventilating fan.
For the contextual reinstatement experiments two distinct training and testing contexts were used. Sixteen boxes were divided into two sets of eight, each set being housed in a different testing room. See Experiment 3a for further details of the two contexts.
Drugs
Ro60-0175 ((S)-2-(chloro-5-fluoro-indol-1-yl)-1-methylethylamine 1ā:ā1 C4H4O4) was synthesized within the PRPN Chemistry Department at F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel. Ro60-0175 was dissolved in 0.9% saline and injected s.c. SB242084 (6-chloro-5-methyl-1-[2-(2-methylpyridyl-3-oxy)-pyrid-5-yl carbomyl] indoline) was synthesized in the Department of Chemistry, Vernalis Research Ltd (Wokingham, UK), and prepared in 0.9% saline solution containing 8% hydroxypropyl-Ī²-cyclodextrin and 25āmM citric acid and injected by the i.p. route. Yohimbine hydrochloride (17-hydroxyyohimban-16-carboxylic acid methyl ester hydrochloride) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Yohimbine was dissolved in distilled H2O and injected by the i.p. route. Cocaine hydrochloride was purchased from Medisca, Canada. Cocaine was dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline. A 0.22āĪ¼m filter placed between the syringe and the drug delivery line was used to maintain sterility of the solution. All doses are expressed in terms of the free base.
Procedures
Experiment 1a: Effect of daily treatment with Ro60-0175 on cocaine self-administration
Before surgery rats were trained to lever press for food pellets. Rats were food restricted (approximately 18āg/day) placed in the operant chambers and trained to press the left lever for food (45āmg Noyes pellets) according to a FR 1 schedule. Rats were allowed a maximum of 100 pellets during daily 30āmin sessions. Any rats failing to obtain 100 pellets by the 3rd day of training were placed in the operant boxes overnight and allowed 300 food pellets delivered according to the FR1 schedule. A stainless-steel dish filled with water was also placed inside the operant chamber during this session. Thereafter, rats were placed in the chamber only during the 30āmin daytime session. Once rats had received 100 pellets on each of three consecutive days they were considered lever-trained, and were subsequently maintained on approximately 20āg of lab chow per day. One week after catheters were implanted rats were allowed to respond for infusions (0.1āml during 5.5ās) of cocaine (0.25āmg/infusion delivered in 0.1āml) on a FR1 schedule. Each infusion was accompanied by a stimulus light that remained on for a 20ās time-out period after the infusion. Once responding was stable, a progressive ratio schedule was implemented in which the number of responses required to obtain an infusion increased for successive infusions. The progression was derived from the equation: response ratio=[5e(0.2 Ć infusion no.)ā5], and yielded response ratios of 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 62, 77, 95, 118, etc (Richardson and Roberts, 1996). Sessions lasted until a period of 1āh without an infusion had elapsed, or were a maximum of 5āh in length. The number of infusions earned before this breaking point was recorded. The infusion dose was held constant at 0.25āmg/infusion throughout. Testing began when break points did not vary by more than 15% on three consecutive days. At this point, rats were assigned to two groups matched for daily number of cocaine infusions. One group received injections of 1āmg/kg Ro60-0175 (s.c.) 15āmin before being placed in the self-administration chambers; the other groups received injections of saline. Testing was conducted on eight consecutive days. Eight rats in the saline group and eight rats in the Ro60-0175 group completed the experiment.
Experiment 1b: Interaction between SB242084 and Ro60-0175 on cocaine self-administration
A further nine rats were trained to respond for cocaine (0.25āmg/infusion) as described above. Once breaking points were stable drug testing began. Each rat was tested on four occasions spaced a minimum of 72āh apart. On these test days rats were first injected with 0.5āmg/kg SB242084 or its vehicle (i.p.), 30āmin later they received an injection of 1āmg/kg Ro60-0175 (s.c.) or saline. Fifteen minutes later rats were placed in the drug self-administration chambers. The order of treatments was determined from Latin Squares with approximately equal numbers of animals being tested at each treatment level. On non-drug test days the usual self-administration session was in effect.
Experiment 2a: Effects of Ro60-0175 on reinstatement induced by yohimbine
The experimental design for this experiment, and all subsequent experiments, involved three phases: cocaine self-administration, extinction of bar-pressing, and tests for reinstatement. Eleven rats were trained to respond for cocaine (0.25āmg/infusion) delivered according to a FR1 schedule, as outlined above. Again cocaine infusions were accompanied by illumination of the stimulus light for 20ās. Self-administration sessions were 2āh in duration; 15 sessions were run on consecutive days. At the end of this period, extinction conditions were in effect. Here drug syringes were removed from the pumps so that responses on the previously active lever activated the stimulus light but no longer delivered cocaine infusions. Extinction sessions were run for 8 days at which point responding on the active lever had reached a low, stable level of <15 responses in 2āh. At this point rats were tested on five occasions separated by a minimum period of 72āh. On these occasions, rats were first given a 2āh extinction session with no drug treatments. At the end of this period, the animals received an injection of 1āmg/kg yohimbine or saline (i.p.) and returned to the home cage. Thirty minutes later rats received a second injection of Ro60-0175 or saline (s.c.); 15āmin later rats were returned to the self-administration chamber for another 2āh extinction session. The five-treatment combinations that were tested were: vehicle saline, and 1āmg/kg yohimbine in combination with saline, 0.3, 1, and 3āmg/kg Ro60-0175. The order of treatments was determined from Latin Squares. On the days between tests, rats were run as normal with a 2āh extinction session. The dose of yohimbine was chosen based on a consideration of published work (Shepard et al, 2004) and the results of a pilot study.
Experiment 2b: Interaction between SB242084 and Ro60-0175 on reinstatement induced by yohimbine
Nine rats went through the same cocaine self-administration and extinction procedures as described for Experiment 2a. In this experiment, extinction was conducted for 12 days before reinstatement testing began. Four testing days were conducted. On each test all rats received injections of 1āmg/kg yohimbine at the end of a 2āh extinction phase and were returned to the home cage. Fifteen minutes later rats were treated with 0.5āmg/kg SB242084 or its vehicle, followed 30āmin later by 1āmg/kg Ro60-0175 or saline. After a further 15 min, rats were returned to the self-administration chamber for a 2āh extinction session. All rats were tested under all four-treatment combinations spaced at least 72āh apart; the order of treatments was determined from Latin Squares.
Experiment 3a: Effects of Ro60-0175 on reinstatement induced by contextual cues
This experiment examined the effects of Ro60-0175 on the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking induced by contextual cues. The experiment required the use of two different contexts in which the three phases of the experiment (self-administration, extinction, and reinstatement) were conducted. The experiment began with the acquisition of cocaine self-administration (15 days), followed by extinction training (22 days) and testing for reinstatement of cocaine seeking (10 days). Rats were assigned to a reinstatement group (n=8) or a control group (n=8). For rats in the reinstatement group cocaine self-administration occurred in one context (A), extinction occurred in the alternative context (B), and reinstatement testing was conducted in context A. For the control group self-administration occurred in context A, and extinction and reinstatement both occurred in context B. In one context, operant chambers had a textured Plexiglas floor insert; the chamber houselight, and the ventilating fans within the sound-attenuating chamber were both turned on. Sessions in this context began 2āh following light offset in the colony room. In the alternate context, operant chambers were located in a different area of the lab. These chambers had the standard stainless-steel rod floors; the houselight and ventilating fans were both turned off. Sessions in the alternate context began 5āh following light offset in the colony room.
For the cocaine self-administration phase rats were trained to respond for cocaine infusions (0.25āmg in 0.1āml over 5.5ās) according to a FR1 schedule as described for Experiments 1 and 2. Cocaine infusions were accompanied by a 20ās illumination of the houselight during which time further lever presses were recorded but not reinforced. Fifteen 2āh sessions of self-administration were conducted. During the extinction phase syringes were removed from the pumps, responses on the formerly active lever activated the stimulus light but no longer delivered cocaine infusions. During the reinstatement phase each rat was tested four times beginning 15āmin after treatment with 0.3, 1, and 3āmg/kg Ro60-0175 and saline. The order of treatment was determined from Latin Squares. Tests were spaced at least 72āh apart, and rats were run under their appropriate extinction conditions on intervening days.
Experiment 3b: Interaction between SB242084 and Ro60-0175 on reinstatement induced by contextual cues
This experiment used eight rats in the reinstatement group, and eight rats in the control group. The behavioral procedures for self-administration, extinction, and reinstatement were identical to those for Experiment 3a. On reinstatement days rats were tested with every combination of 0.5āmg/kg SB242084 or its vehicle and 1āmg/kg Ro60-0175 or saline. The injections were given 30āmin apart, and testing began 15āmin after the second injection. The order of treatment was determined from Latin Squares. Tests were spaced at least 72āh apart, and rats were run under their appropriate extinction conditions on intervening days.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica version 7.1 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK). Data from Experiment 1a were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance with Ro60-0175 as a between subjects factor and days as a within subjects factor. In Experiment 1b, a repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was used with SB242084 and Ro60-0175 as factors. Data from Experiment 2a were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance; active and inactive lever responses were analyzed separately. For Experiment 2b, a two-way analysis of variance, with Ro60-0175 and SB242084 as within-subjects factors, was used. Data from Experiment 3a were analyzed with a three-way analysis of variance with group (control and reinstatement) as a between subjects factor and dose of Ro60-0175 and lever as within subjects factors. For Experiment 3b, data for active and inactive lever responses were analyzed separately. Each analysis involved group as a between-subjects factor and Ro60-0175 and SB242084 as within subjects factors. All post hoc comparisons were made using the NewmanāKeuls test with Ī±=0.05.
RESULTS
Experiment 1a: Effect of Daily Treatment with Ro60-0175 on Cocaine Self-Administration
The results of this experiment are shown in Figure 1. Animals were assigned to matched groups for drug-treatment based on baseline performance and so there were no significant effects of group assignment during baseline (p>0.1). During the drug-treatment phase one rat treated with Ro60-0175 showed unusually erratic responding ranging from 9 to 24 infusions; data from this animal were omitted from all of the analyses. Rats treated with Ro60-0175 responded for significantly fewer infusions than rats treated with saline (F(1,ā14)=11.27, p<0.01). This effect was stable across the testing period; neither the main effect of days (F(7,ā98)=0.6, p>0.7) nor the interaction between Ro60-0175 and days (F(7,ā98)=2.13, p>0.9) was significant. An identical pattern of results was found for active lever responses (data not shown). Averaged across days, saline-treated rats emitted 1025Ā±338 responses per session, whereas rats treated with Ro60-0175 made 319Ā±124 responses. Figure 2 shows representative cumulative response records from rats treated with saline or 1āmg/kg Ro60-0175. These clearly show that the regularity of responding seen in control animals was preserved in drug-treated animals, but that these animals reached their break-points earlier.
Experiment 1b: Interaction between SB242084 and Ro60-0175 on Responding for Cocaine
Figure 3 shows that Ro60-0175 reduced responding for cocaine and that this effect was reversed by SB242084. There were significant main effects of Ro60-0175 (F(1,ā8)=50.1, p<0.001) and SB242084 (F(1,ā8)=77.1, p<0.0001) and a significant interaction (F(1,ā8)=23.27, p<0.001).
Experiment 2a: Effects of Ro60-0175 on Reinstatement Induced by Yohimbine
Over the course of 15 days rats self-administered an average total of 498Ā±36 infusions of cocaine. Over the last 3 days of self-administration the average daily number of infusions was 33.5Ā±3.0 infusions. As can be seen in Figure 4a, during the extinction phase responding decreased steadily over days (F(7,ā70)=9.75, p<0.001). For reinstatement tests responding on the active and inactive levers were analyzed separately. For active lever responding a significant main effect of treatment was found (F(4,ā40)=12.42, p<0.001). Post hoc testing showed that yohimbine treatment alone increased responding relative to vehicle injection, and that this response was attenuated dose dependently by Ro60-0175. A significant main effect of treatment was also found for responding on the inactive lever (F(4,ā40)=5.16, p<0.01); this was entirely due to the fact that responding under yohimbine alone was slightly, but significantly higher than under all other treatment combinations (p<0.05).
Experiment 2b: Interaction between SB242084 and Ro60-0175 on Reinstatement Induced by Yohimbine
Over the course of 15 days rats self-administered an average total of 539Ā±27 infusions of cocaine. Over the last 3 days of self-administration the average daily number of infusions was 33.9Ā±1.5. During extinction responding decreased steadily over days (F(9,ā72)=21.34, p<0.001) (see Figure 5a). Figure 5b and c show that the effects of Ro60-0175 on yohimbine-induced reinstatement were reversed by SB242084. For responding on the previously active lever the main effects of Ro60-0175 and SB242084, as well as their interaction were all significant (smallest F(1,ā8)=6.33, p<0.03). Post hoc comparisons confirmed that, relative to vehicle treatment, Ro60-0175 reduced responding and that this effect was prevented by SB242084 pretreatment. For responding on the previously inactive lever there were no significant effects (p>0.2).
Experiment 3a: Effects of Ro60-0175 on Reinstatement Induced by Contextual Cues
During the self-administration phase rats in the control group responded for an average total of 386.8Ā±46.3 infusions, and rats in the reinstatement group responded for 344.9Ā±54.9 infusions. Average daily infusions, calculated over the last 3 days of self-administration were 29.8Ā±5.4 (control) and 30.6Ā±5.6 (reinstatement) infusions. These differences were not significant (p>0.1). Responding during the extinction phase is shown in Figure 6a. There was no influence of group on extinction responding (p>0.6). Responding was higher on the active vs inactive lever (F(1,ā14)=36.14, p<0.001) and declined over sessions (F(21,ā294)=13.16, p<0.001). Figure 6b and c show that Ro60-0175 reduced reinstatement induced by contextual cues. Overall, responding was higher in the reinstatement group than in the control group (F(1,ā14)=12.62, p<0.003) and on the active vs the inactive lever (F(1,ā14)=23.85, p<0.0001). The overall three-way interaction was significant (F(3,ā42)=10.00, p<0.001). Tests of simple interactions showed that the interaction between group and dose of Ro60-0175 was significant for responses on the active lever (F(3,ā42)=10.09, p<0.001) but not the inactive lever (p>0.3). Tests of simple main effects then showed that the main effect of dose was significant only in the reinstatement group (F(3,ā21)=13.09, p<0.001) and not the control group (p>0.3). Post hoc tests showed that all three doses of Ro60-0175 significantly reduced responding on the active lever in the reinstatement group.
Experiment 3b: Interaction between SB242084 and Ro60-0175 on Reinstatement Induced by Contextual Cues
During the self-administration phase rats in the control group responded for an average total of 391.0Ā±99.8 infusions, and rats in the reinstatement group responded for 459.3Ā±66.5 infusions. Average daily infusions for the last 3 days of self-administration were 31.5Ā±7.8 (control) and 35.6Ā±5.6 (reinstatement) infusions. These differences were not significant (p>0.1). Responding during the extinction phase is shown in Figure 7a. There was no influence of group on extinction responding (p>0.6). Responding was higher on the previously active vs inactive lever (F(1,ā14)=17.32, p<0.001) and declined over sessions (F(21,ā294)=12.60, p<0.001). Figure 7b and c show that the ability of Ro60-0175 to reduce reinstatement induced by contextual cues was reversed by SB242084. For active lever responses there was an overall significant main effect of group (F(1,ā14)=5.60, p<0.03) with responding being higher in the reinstatement group than the control group. The main effects of Ro60-0175 (F(1,ā14)=11.81, p<0.01) and SB242084 (F(1,ā14)=4.62, p<0.05) were significant, but the interactions involving these two factors were not significant (p>0.2). Post hoc comparisons showed that Ro60-0175 reduced responding compared to vehicle in the reinstatement group, and that this effect was prevented by pretreatment with SB242084. For responding on the inactive lever, there were no significant main effects or interactions (all p>0.08).
DISCUSSION
Three main findings emerged from these experiments. First, we confirmed that the 5-HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 reduces cocaine self-administration and found that this effect is sustained with daily injections over a period of 8 days. Second, Ro60-0175 attenuated the reinstatement of responding for cocaine, elicited by the pharmacological stressor yohimbine as well as by contextual cues that had previously been associated with self-administered cocaine. Third, the effects of Ro60-0175 were blocked by the highly selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084, confirming that Ro60-0175 reduces cocaine self-administration and reinstatement of responding through stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors.
Studies in vitro have demonstrated that the 5-HT2C receptor undergoes rapid desensitization and internalization following agonist activation (Berg et al, 2001), suggesting a potential for tolerance development to the effects of 5-HT2C receptor agonists. The results of the first study in this report show that the ability of Ro60-0175 to reduce responding for cocaine was sustained over eight daily injections. This demonstrates that any 5-HT2C receptor desensitization that might be induced by Ro60-0175 is not sufficient to produce tolerance to the effect of Ro60-0175 to reduce responding for cocaine. These results are in agreement with other reports showing a lack of tolerance to the anorectic actions of Ro60-0175 (Hayashi et al, 2005; Vickers et al, 2000). However, there are reports of rapid tolerance, developing within 7 days, to the anorectic effects of the 5-HT2C receptor agonists m-CPP and YM 438 (Hayashi et al, 2005). The reasons why tolerance develops to the effects of some 5-HT2C receptor agonists but not others are not known. It may be that any variations in tolerance profiles between these 5-HT2C receptor agonists relate to how these compounds differentially activate distinct intracellular signalling pathways coupled to 5-HT2C receptors (eg Berg et al, 2001; Stout et al, 2002), a phenomenon termed functional selectivity (Urban et al, 2007).
In addition to reducing responding for cocaine, and to inhibiting reinstatement, Ro60-0175 reduces other behaviors including feeding (Hewitt et al, 2002) operant responding for food (Grottick et al, 2000) and for nicotine (Grottick et al, 2001). Therefore, it needs to be considered that this profile simply reflects a broad, non-specific impairment of behavior. This seems unlikely for several reasons. First, although Ro60-0175 can reduce motor capacity, as assessed by rotarod performance (Grottick et al, 2000), this is not seen at the doses of 0.3ā1āmg/kg that inhibit responding for cocaine, and reduce reinstatement. Second, in the present experiments, Ro60-0175 had no significant effects on responding on the inactive lever in the self-administration study or both reinstatement studies. Finally, in the cocaine self-administration experiment rats treated with Ro60-0175 still completed several hundred responses showing that their ability to perform the task was not impaired. Responding on a PR schedule generally follows a consistent pattern. Infusions are taken in a reasonably regular fashion; each is generally followed by a pause in responding and preceded by a burst of responding. As shown by the representative cumulative records, the general structure of behavior was not obviously affected by Ro60-0175, other than the earlier termination of responding. Similarly, observational studies have shown that Ro60-0175 reduces food intake without disrupting the temporal patterning of feeding-related behaviors (Hewitt et al, 2002). Overall, these data suggest that treatment with Ro60-0175 produces a blunted motivational state that results in reduced responding for drug and non-drug reinforcers.
Consistent with previous work (Lee et al, 2004; Le et al, 2005; Shepard et al, 2004) the results of Experiment 2 show that the pharmacological stressor yohimbine reinstated responding following extinction of self-administration. This responseāreinstating effect of yohimbine was blocked dose dependently by Ro60-0175. Stress-induced reinstatement has been studied most frequently using footshock. This work has shown that the circuitry involved in mediating reinstatement induced by footshock overlaps substantially with that involved in mediating reinstatement induced by drug-associated cues and by drug priming (Shaham et al, 2003). Thus, regions such as the VTA, the PFC and the nucleus accumbens are all part of the circuitry involved in these different types of reinstatement (Bossert et al, 2006, 2004; Capriles et al, 2003; Fuchs et al, 2005; McFarland et al, 2004; McFarland and Kalivas, 2001). Local infusion of a D1 receptor antagonist into the PFC blocked footshock-induced reinstatement suggesting that such reinstatement could result from enhanced dopaminergic activity in the PFC (Capriles et al, 2003). Yohimbine activates a number of brain regions that are also activated by footshock, including the nucleus accumbens, the VTA and the PFC (Funk et al, 2006; Singewald et al, 2003). This latter finding, coupled with the effectiveness of dopamine receptor blockade in the PFC to reverse footshock-induced reinstatement, is intriguing in light of the fact that Ro60-0175 reduces the stress-induced rise in extracellular dopamine in the PFC (Pozzi et al, 2002). That effect is mediated at the level of DA cell bodies rather than in the PFC itself, since it was induced by local infusion of Ro60-0175 into the VTA but not the PFC. Overall, a possible hypothesis for the mechanism underlying the effect of Ro60-0175 to reduce yohimbine (stress)-induced reinstatement is that it results from inhibition of mesocorticolimbic DA activity.
A further brain region that is involved in mediating footshock-induced reinstatement, and which is also activated by yohimbine (Funk et al, 2006), is the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) (Erb et al, 2001). The fact that this structure appears to have high density of 5-HT2C receptors (Clemett et al, 2000) suggests that the BNST is an alternative site where 5-HT2C receptor activation could alter the functioning of circuitry involved in mediating stress-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior.
Another class of stimulus that can trigger reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior is drug-associated cues. In keeping with previous reports (Bossert et al, 2006, 2004; Crombag et al, 2002), the present experiments showed that the context in which cocaine was initially self-administered was a strong stimulus for reinstating responding that had been extinguished in a different context. Thus, under control conditions rats that were returned to the self-administration context, after extinction in a different context, showed an increase in responding compared to rats that remained in the extinction context. This reinstatement response was reduced by previous treatment with Ro60-0175, at a dose as low as 0.3āmg/kg. Interestingly this dose is lower than that typically required to reduce cocaine self-administration, locomotor activity, and especially cocaine-induced reinstatement (Grottick et al, 2000). The 5-HT releaser fenfluramine reduced reinstatement of responding elicited by response contingent presentations of discrete cues that had been paired with cocaine (Burmeister et al, 2004). That effect was blocked by SB242084 providing further evidence that stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors inhibits cue-induced reinstatement.
While the neurochemical substrates underlying contextual cue-induced reinstatement are not fully understood, the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 and the D2 receptor antagonist raclopride both inhibited context-induced responding in animals with a history of cocaine self-administration (Crombag et al, 2002). This implies a role for dopamine in mediating this form of reinstatement. In terms of neuroanatomical substrates, both the VTA and the nucleus accumbens appear to be important elements of the circuitry mediating this behavior since microinfusion of the group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist LY379268 into these areas reduced context-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking (Bossert et al, 2004, 2006). Previous work with 5-HT2C receptor agonists including Ro60-0175 indicates that 5-HT2C receptor activation reduces the activity of the mesolimbic dopamine system (Di Matteo et al, 2000a, 2000b; Gobert et al, 2000) probably via an action at the VTA (Fletcher et al, 2004). Thus, a logical candidate mechanism for the effects of Ro60-0175 on context-induced reinstatement is that this response results from dampened mesolimbic DA activity. Other sites, such as the PFC, may be involved as well. Inactivation of this area attenuates reinstatement induced by contextual cues (Fuchs et al, 2005), and the locomotor stimulant, and discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine are reduced by activation of 5-HT2C receptors in the PFC (Filip and Cunningham, 2003), suggesting a functional role for these cortical receptors.
It appears that there are several points of entry in the underlying mediating circuitry for 5-HT2C receptor activation to inhibit reinstatement of drug seeking. Although the mechanisms that are involved are not known at this point, interactions with mesolimbic and mesocortical dopamine systems appear to be obvious candidates. Future studies involving local infusions of 5-HT2C receptor agonists into sites such as the VTA and PFC would elucidate sites in the brain where 5-HT2C agonists act to alter reinstatement.
Agonists of the 5-HT2C receptor reduce food intake, weight gain, and several aspects of drug-taking behavior in laboratory animals (Grottick et al, 2000; Higgins and Fletcher, 2003). The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant similarly reduces feeding and behaviors related to drug abuse (Tucci et al, 2006). Peripherally localized peptide hormones such as leptin and ghrelin are critical for the maintenance of metabolic and energy homeostasis. Recently, they have been shown also to have a modulatory effect on VTA cell firing, and to influence central reward pathways (Abizaid et al, 2006; Fulton et al, 2006; Hommel et al, 2006). Thus, there is evidence that several different neurotransmitters and peptides affect both feeding and reward-related behaviors. Indeed, Volkow and Wise (2005) have pointed out commonalities in the neurobiological and behavioral processes contributing to obesity and substance abuse (Volkow and Wise, 2005). They have suggested further that treatment strategies, including medications, used in the treatment of one disorder might fruitfully be applied to treatment of the other. Several 5-HT2C receptor agonists are being developed as potential anti-obesity agents (Miller, 2005; Nilsson, 2006), with early results suggesting promising clinical efficacy of lorcaserin in the treatment of obesity (Jandacek, 2005). The present data suggest that the anti-obesity effects of 5-HT2C agonists may be due to their effect on dopaminergic reward mechanisms; in addition to those hypothalamic circuits that are more directly linked to the physiological control of aspects of feeding behavior such as satiety and energy homeostasis (Heisler et al, 2002). Finally, the findings that 5-HT2C receptor stimulation reduces drug-taking and reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviors without the development of tolerance, provide strong evidence that selective 5-HT2C receptor agonists might be a useful treatment for aspects of drug abuse.
References
Abizaid A, Liu ZW, Andrews ZB, Shanabrough M, Borok E, Elsworth JD et al (2006). Ghrelin modulates the activity and synaptic input organization of midbrain dopamine neurons while promoting appetite. J Clin Invest 116: 3229ā3239.
Abramowski D, Rigo M, Duc D, Hoyer D, Staufenbiel M (1995). Localization of the 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptor protein in human and rat brain using specific antisera. Neuropharmacology 34: 1635ā1645.
Berg KA, Stout BD, Maayani S, Clarke WP (2001). Differences in rapid desensitization of 5-hydroxytryptamine2A and 5- hydroxytryptamine2C receptor-mediated phospholipase C activation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299: 593ā602.
Bossert JM, Ghitza UE, Lu L, Epstein DH, Shaham Y (2005). Neurobiology of relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking: an update and clinical implications. Eur J Pharmacol 526: 36ā50.
Bossert JM, Gray SM, Lu L, Shaham Y (2006). Activation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates context-induced relapse to heroin seeking. Neuropsychopharmacology 31: 2197ā2209.
Bossert JM, Liu SY, Lu L, Shaham Y (2004). A role of ventral tegmental area glutamate in contextual cue-induced relapse to heroin seeking. J Neurosci 24: 10726ā10730.
Bremner JD, Krystal JH, Southwick SM, Charney DS (1996a). Noradrenergic mechanisms in stress and anxiety: I. Preclinical studies. Synapse 23: 28ā38.
Bremner JD, Krystal JH, Southwick SM, Charney DS (1996b). Noradrenergic mechanisms in stress and anxiety: II. Clinical studies. Synapse 23: 39ā51.
Bubar MJ, Cunningham KA (2006). Serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors as potential targets for modulation of psychostimulant use and dependence. Curr Top Med Chem 6: 1971ā1985.
Burmeister JJ, Lungren EM, Kirschner KF, Neisewander JL (2004). Differential roles of 5-HT receptor subtypes in cue and cocaine reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 660ā668.
Callahan PM, Appel JB, Cunningham KA (1991). Dopamine D1 and D2 mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine and cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 103: 50ā55.
Capriles N, Rodaros D, Sorge RE, Stewart J (2003). A role for the prefrontal cortex in stress- and cocaine-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168: 66ā74.
Charney DS, Woods SW, Goodman WK, Heninger GR (1987). Neurobiological mechanisms of panic anxiety: biochemical and behavioral correlates of yohimbine-induced panic attacks. Am J Psychiatry 144: 1030ā1036.
Clemett DA, Punhani T, Duxon MS, Blackburn TP, Fone KC (2000). Immunohistochemical localisation of the 5-HT2C receptor protein in the rat CNS. Neuropharmacology 39: 123ā132.
Crombag HS, Grimm JW, Shaham Y (2002). Effect of dopamine receptor antagonists on renewal of cocaine seeking by reexposure to drug-associated contextual cues. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 1006ā1015.
Di Giovanni G, Di Matteo V, Pierucci M, Benigno A, Esposito E (2006). Central serotonin2C receptor: from physiology to pathology. Curr Top Med Chem 6: 1909ā1925.
Di Matteo V, Di Giovanni G, Di Mascio M, Esposito E (1999). SB 242084, a selective serotonin2C receptor antagonist, increases dopaminergic transmission in the mesolimbic system. Neuropharmacology 38: 1195ā1205.
Di Matteo V, Di Giovanni G, Di Mascio M, Esposito E (2000a). Biochemical and electrophysiological evidence that Ro 60-0175 inhibits mesolimbic dopaminergic function through serotonin2C receptors. Brain Res 865: 85ā90.
Di Matteo V, Di Mascio M, Di Giovanni G, Esposito E (2000b). Acute administration of amitriptyline and mianserin increases dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens: possible involvement of serotonin2C receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 150: 45ā51.
Eberle-Wang K, Mikeladze Z, Uryu K, Chesselet MF (1997). Pattern of expression of the serotonin2C receptor messenger RNA in the basal ganglia of adult rats. J Comp Neurol 384: 233ā247.
Erb S, Salmaso N, Rodaros D, Stewart J (2001). A role for the CRF-containing pathway from central nucleus of the amygdala to bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158: 360ā365.
Filip M, Bubar MJ, Cunningham KA (2004). Contribution of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT2 receptor subtypes to the hyperlocomotor effects of cocaine: acute and chronic pharmacological analyses. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310: 1246ā1254.
Filip M, Cunningham KA (2003). Hyperlocomotive and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are under the control of serotonin2C (5-HT2C) receptors in rat prefrontal cortex. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 306: 734ā743.
Fletcher PJ, Chintoh AF, Sinyard J, Higgins GA (2004). Injection of the 5-HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 into the ventral tegmental area reduces cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 308ā318.
Fletcher PJ, Grottick AJ, Higgins GA (2002). Differential effects of the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist M100907 and the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 on cocaine-induced locomotor activity, cocaine self-administration and cocaine-induced reinstatement of responding. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 576ā586.
Fone KC, Austin RH, Topham IA, Kennett GA, Punhani T (1998). Effect of chronic m-CPP on locomotion, hypophagia, plasma corticosterone and 5-HT2C receptor levels in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 123: 1707ā1715.
Fuchs RA, Evans KA, Ledford CC, Parker MP, Case JM, Mehta RH et al (2005). The role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus in contextual reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30: 296ā309.
Fulton S, Pissios P, Manchon RP, Stiles L, Frank L, Pothos EN et al (2006). Leptin regulation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway. Neuron 51: 811ā822.
Funk D, Li Z, Le AD (2006). Effects of environmental and pharmacological stressors on c-fos and corticotropin-releasing factor mRNA in rat brain: Relationship to the reinstatement of alcohol seeking. Neuroscience 138: 235ā243.
Gobert A, Rivet JM, Lejeune F, Newman-Tancredi A, Adhumeau-Auclair A, Nicolas JP et al (2000). Serotonin2C receptors tonically suppress the activity of mesocortical dopaminergic and adrenergic, but not serotonergic, pathways: a combined dialysis and electrophysiological analysis in the rat. Synapse 36: 205ā221.
Grottick AJ, Corrigall WA, Higgins GA (2001). Activation of 5-HT2C receptors reduces the locomotor and rewarding effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 157: 292ā298.
Grottick AJ, Fletcher PJ, Higgins GA (2000). Studies to investigate the role of 5-HT2C receptors on cocaine- and food-maintained behavior. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295: 1183ā1191.
Hayashi A, Suzuki M, Sasamata M, Miyata K (2005). Agonist diversity in 5-HT2C receptor-mediated weight control in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 178: 241ā249.
Heisler LK, Cowley MA, Tecott LH, Fan W, Low MJ, Smart JL et al (2002). Activation of central melanocortin pathways by fenfluramine. Science 297: 609ā611.
Hewitt KN, Lee MD, Dourish CT, Clifton PG (2002). Serotonin 2C receptor agonists and the behavioural satiety sequence in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71: 691ā700.
Higgins GA, Fletcher PJ (2003). Serotonin and drug reward: focus on 5-HT2C receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 480: 151ā162.
Hommel JD, Trinko R, Sears RM, Georgescu D, Liu ZW, Gao XB et al (2006). Leptin receptor signaling in midbrain dopamine neurons regulates feeding. Neuron 51: 801ā810.
Jandacek RJ (2005). APD-356 (Arena). Curr Opin Investig Drugs 6: 1051ā1056.
Ji SP, Zhang Y, Van Cleemput J, Jiang W, Liao M, Li L et al (2006). Disruption of PTEN coupling with 5-HT2C receptors suppresses behavioral responses induced by drugs of abuse. Nat Med 12: 324ā329.
Kelly PH, Iversen SD (1976). Selective 6OHDA-induced destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 40: 45ā56.
Kennett GA, Wood MD, Bright F, Trail B, Riley G, Holland V et al (1997). SB 242084, a selective and brain penetrant 5-HT2C receptor antagonist. Neuropharmacology 36: 609ā620.
Le AD, Harding S, Juzytsch W, Funk D, Shaham Y (2005). Role of alpha-2 adrenoceptors in stress-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking and alcohol self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 179: 366ā373.
Lee B, Tiefenbacher S, Platt DM, Spealman RD (2004). Pharmacological blockade of alpha2-adrenoceptors induces reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in squirrel monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 686ā693.
Martin JR, Bos M, Jenck F, Moreau J, Mutel V, Sleight AJ et al (1998). 5-HT2C receptor agonists: pharmacological characteristics and therapeutic potential. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 913ā924.
McFarland K, Davidge SB, Lapish CC, Kalivas PW (2004). Limbic and motor circuitry underlying footshock-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. J Neurosci 24: 1551ā1560.
McFarland K, Kalivas PW (2001). The circuitry mediating cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci 21: 8655ā8663.
Mendelson JH, Mello NK (1996). Management of cocaine abuse and dependence. N Engl J Med 334: 965ā972.
Miller KJ (2005). Serotonin 5-HT2c receptor agonists: potential for the treatment of obesity. Mol Interv 5: 282ā291.
Nilsson BM (2006). 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT2C) receptor agonists as potential antiobesity agents. J Med Chem 49: 4023ā4034.
O'Brien CP (1997). A range of research-based pharmacotherapies for addiction. Science 278: 66ā70.
Pettit HO, Ettenberg A, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1984). Destruction of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens selectively attenuates cocaine but not heroin self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 84: 167ā173.
Pompeiano M, Palacios JM, Mengod G (1994). Distribution of the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor family mRNAs: comparison between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 23: 163ā178.
Porter RH, Benwell KR, Lamb H, Malcolm CS, Allen NH, Revell DF et al (1999). Functional characterization of agonists at recombinant human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptors in CHO-K1 cells. Br J Pharmacol 128: 13ā20.
Pozzi L, Acconcia S, Ceglia I, Invernizzi RW, Samanin R (2002). Stimulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT2C) receptors in the ventrotegmental area inhibits stress-induced but not basal dopamine release in the rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurochem 82: 93ā100.
Richardson NR, Roberts DC (1996). Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods 66: 1ā11.
Rowland NE (1994). Tolerance to the anorectic effect of dexfenfluramine in rats: role of serotonin, cholecystokinin, and neuropeptide Y. Physiol Behav 55: 201ā207.
Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J (2003). The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168: 3ā20.
Shepard JD, Bossert JM, Liu SY, Shaham Y (2004). The anxiogenic drug yohimbine reinstates methamphetamine seeking in a rat model of drug relapse. Biol Psychiatry 55: 1082ā1089.
Singewald N, Salchner P, Sharp T (2003). Induction of c-Fos expression in specific areas of the fear circuitry in rat forebrain by anxiogenic drugs. Biol Psychiatry 53: 275ā283.
Stine SM, Southwick SM, Petrakis IL, Kosten TR, Charney DS, Krystal JH (2002). Yohimbine-induced withdrawal and anxiety symptoms in opioid-dependent patients. Biol Psychiatry 51: 642ā651.
Stout BD, Clarke WP, Berg KA (2002). Rapid desensitization of the serotonin2C receptor system: effector pathway and agonist dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 957ā962.
Tucci SA, Halford JC, Harrold JA, Kirkham TC (2006). Therapeutic potential of targeting the endocannabinoids: implications for the treatment of obesity, metabolic syndrome, drug abuse and smoking cessation. Curr Med Chem 13: 2669ā2680.
Urban JD, Clarke WP, von Zastrow M, Nichols DE, Kobilka BK, Weinstein H et al (2007). Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320: 1ā13.
Vickers SP, Benwell KR, Porter RH, Bickerdike MJ, Kennett GA, Dourish CT (2000). Comparative effects of continuous infusion of mCPP, Ro 60-0175 and d-fenfluramine on food intake, water intake, body weight and locomotor activity in rats. Br J Pharmacol 130: 1305ā1314.
Volkow ND, Wise RA (2005). How can drug addiction help us understand obesity? Nat Neurosci 8: 555ā560.
Wang Y, Joharchi N, Fletcher PJ, Sellers EM, Higgins GA (1995). Further studies to examine the nature of dexfenfluramine-induced suppression of heroin self-administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 120: 134ā141.
Yamauchi M, Tatebayashi T, Nagase K, Kojima M, Imanishi T (2004). Chronic treatment with fluvoxamine desensitizes 5-HT2C receptor-mediated hypolocomotion in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 78: 683ā689.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an operating Grant to PJF from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. We thank Dr Yavin Shaham and Dr Jennifer Bossert for their advice on the procedures for measuring reinstatement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Disclosure/Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher, P., Rizos, Z., Sinyard, J. et al. The 5-HT2C Receptor Agonist Ro60-0175 Reduces Cocaine Self-Administration and Reinstatement Induced by the Stressor Yohimbine, and Contextual Cues. Neuropsychopharmacol 33, 1402ā1412 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301509
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301509
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Novel Pharmacological Agents for the Treatment of Cocaine Use Disorder
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports (2022)
-
Repeated 7-Day Treatment with the 5-HT2C Agonist Lorcaserin or the 5-HT2A Antagonist Pimavanserin Alone or in Combination Fails to Reduce Cocaine vs Food Choice in Male Rhesus Monkeys
Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
-
A short history of the 5-HT2C receptor: from the choroid plexus to depression, obesity and addiction treatment
Psychopharmacology (2017)
-
Pharmacological evidence that 5-HT2C receptor blockade selectively improves decision making when rewards are paired with audiovisual cues in a rat gambling task
Psychopharmacology (2017)
-
Effects of the serotonin 2C receptor agonist WAY163909 on the abuse-related effects and mesolimbic dopamine neurochemistry induced by abused stimulants in rhesus monkeys
Psychopharmacology (2017)