Does society need protecting from scientific advances? Most emphatically not, so long as scientists themselves and their employers are committed to full disclosure of what they know.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Wolpert, L. The Unnatural Nature of Science (Faber, London, 1992).
Kevles, D. J. In the Name of Eugenics (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1985).
Rhodes, R. The Making of the Atomic Bomb (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1986).
Kennedy, I. in Predicting the Future (eds Howe, L. & Wain, A.) 96-117 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolpert, L. Is science dangerous?. Nature 398, 281–282 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/18543
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/18543
This article is cited by
-
The warrior in the machine: neuroscience goes to war
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2014)
-
Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2004)
-
Scientists must bridge the communication gap
Nature (1999)
