Abstract
Why are some humans considered more beautiful than others? Theory suggests that sexually reproducing organisms should choose mates displaying characters indicative of high genotypic or phenotypic quality1. Attraction to beautiful individuals may therefore be an adaptation for choosing high-quality mates2,3,4,5,6. Culturally invariant standards of beauty in humans have been taken as evidence favouring such an adaptationist explanation of attraction3,4,5,6,7; however, if standards of beauty are instead no more than artefacts of culture, they should vary across cultures3,4,5,6. Here we show that male preference for women with a low waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is not culturally universal, as had previously been assumed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 1994).
Barber, N. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16, 395–424 (1995).
Symons, D. in Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture (eds Abramson, P. R. & Pinkerton, S. D.) 80-120 (Univ. Chicago Press, 1995).
Buss, D. M. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 1–49 (1989).
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B. & Wu, C. H. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 261–279 (1995).
Jones, D. & Hill, K. Hum. Nature 4, 271–296 (1993).
Perrett, D. I., May, K. A. & Yoshikawa, S. Nature 368, 239–242 (1994).
Singh, D. . Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 293–307 (1993).
Singh, D. Hum. Nature 6, 51–68 (1995).
Furnham, A., Tan, T. & McManus, C. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 22, 539–549 (1997).
Henss, R. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 19, 479–488 (1995).
Shepard, G. H. J. Amazon. Lang. 1, 20–57 (1997).
Pinker, S. The Language Instinct (Harper, New York, 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, D., Shepard, G. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?. Nature 396, 321–322 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/24512
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/24512
This article is cited by
-
Cross-Cultural Preferences for Women’s Waist to Hip Ratio and Men’s Shoulder to Hip Ratio: Data From Iran, Norway, Poland, and Russia
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology (2024)
-
Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth’s Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Appearance Enhancements
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2022)
-
Waist-to-Hip Ratio as Supernormal Stimuli: Effect of Contrapposto Pose and Viewing Angle
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2020)
-
Waist-to-hip ratio, body-mass index, age and number of children in seven traditional societies
Scientific Reports (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.