Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Radiation-induced nondisjunction in mouse oocytes

Abstract

BECAUSE chromosomal trisomy is found with relatively high frequencies in congenital malformations and spontaneous abortions in man, the aetiology of abnormal segregation is a pressing problem. One possible factor is exposure of women to diagnostic X rays1–8. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster indicate that nondisjunction can be induced by exposure of females to X rays9,10 especially if the flies are old11,12. Russell13 reported an increase in induced monosomy in mice by examining the progeny of matings with sex-linked markers. But many aneuploids may be lethal and the dosages used by Russell were large enough to cause loss of chromosomes by breakage. Recent advances in the technique of culturing mouse oocytes in vitro (ref. 14, modified by E. P. Evans and C. E. Ford) have made it possible to circumvent these difficulties by examining meiotic chromosomes in second metaphase. The following experiment was designed to examine the effect of low doses of whole-body irradiation on chromosome segregation during first meiotic division in the oocytes of young female mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Uchida, I. A., and Curtis, E. J., Lancet, ii, 848–850 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schull, W. J., and Neel, J. V., Lancet, i, 537–538 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sigler, T. T., Lilienfeld, A. M., Cohen, A. M., and Westlake, J. E., Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 117, 374–399 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Uchida, I. A., Holunga, R., and Lawler, C., Lancet, ii, 1045–1049 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marmol, J. G., Scriggins, A. L., and Vollman, R. F., Am. J. Obstet Gynec., 104, 533–543 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Villumsen, A. L., Environmental factors in congenital malformations (F.A.D.L.s Forlag, København, Arhus, Odense, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stevenson, A. C., Mason, R., and Edwards, K. D., Lancet, ii, 1335–1337 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alberman, E., Polani, P. E., Fraser Roberts, J. A., Spicer, C. C., Elliott, M., and Armstrong, E., Ann. Hum. Genet., 36, 195–208 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mavor, J. W., J. exp. Zool., 39, 381–432 (1924).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Traut, H., Mutat. Res., 1, 157–162 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patterson, J. T., Brewster, W., and Winchester, A. M., J. Hered., 23, 325–333 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Uchida, I. A., Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 4, 402–408 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell, L. B., Science, 133, 1795–1803 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarkowski, A. K., Cytogenetics, 5, 394–400 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Röhrborn, G., Humangenetik, 16, 123–125 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamamoto, M., Shimada, T., Endo, A., and Watanabe, G., Nature new Biol., 244, 206–208 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton, H. D., Awa, A. A., Sofuni, T., Neriishi, S., and Honda, T., Fourth Int. Conf. Birth Defects Abstracts (Vienna, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

UCHIDA, I., LEE, C. Radiation-induced nondisjunction in mouse oocytes. Nature 250, 601–602 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/250601a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/250601a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing