Abstract
THE role of phase change in the development of plagues of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal), has been debated for many years1–5. Much confusion has arisen because changes in behaviour, form and colour, which have all been used as indicators of phase status, do not proceed at the same rates. It is generally agreed, however, that behavioural changes are crucial in phase transformation. The subject at issue in the population dynamics of the desert locust is whether plagues, periods when extensive areas are infested by successive generations of gregarious populations, originate from an upsurge in numbers and associated transformation from the solitary-living to the gregarious state, or from successful breeding by gregarious populations postulated to survive continuously throughout the interplague recession periods3. Fundamental questions about the strategy of plague prevention depend on determining which of these hypotheses is correct1,3,4,6.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gunn, D. L., A. Rev. Ent., 5, 279–300 (1960).
Kennedy, J. S., Colloques int. Cent. natn. Rech. scient., No. 114, 283–297 (1962).
Rainey, R. C., 13th Int. Congr. Ent., Moscow, 1968, 2, 379 (1971).
Roffey, J., Popov, G., and Hemming, C. F., Bull. ent. Res., 59, 675–680 (1970).
Waloff, Z., Anti-Locust Mem., No. 9 (1966).
Bennett, L. V., thesis, Univ. London (1974).
Magor, J., thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (1962).
Pedgley, D., Symmons, P. M., Weather, 23, 484–492 (1968).
Symmons, P. M., Bull. ent. Res., 58, 803–809 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BENNETT, L. Development of a desert locust plague. Nature 256, 486–487 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/256486a0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/256486a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.