Abstract
The density structure and average density of the oceanic crust have implications for various geological and geophysical problems, including interpretations of gravity data, the variation of lithospheric bouyancy in relation to age, and role and fate of the crust in subduction. But no systematic evaluation of oceanic crustal density has been made and estimates range from 2.85 to 3.0 Mg m−3 (refs 1–3). We have made an evaluation based on seismic refraction data in combination with drilling results, laboratory studies of seismic properties of oceanic and ophiolitic rocks, and ophiolite lithostratigraphy. Our preferred value for the mean density of the oceanic crust is 2.89±0.04 Mg m−3
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watts, A. B. J. geophys. Res. 83, 5989–6004 (1978).
Molnar, P. & Atwater, T. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 41, 330–340 (1978).
Pennington, W. D. Tectonophysics 102, 377–398 (1984).
Christensen, N. I. & Salisbury, M. H. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 13, 57–86 (1975).
Spudich, P. & Orcutt, J. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 18, 627–645 (1980).
Houtz, R. & Ewing, J. J. geophys. Res. 81, 2490–2498 (1976).
Hyndman, R. D. & Drury, M. J. J. geophys. Res. 81, 4042–4052 (1976).
Kirkpatrick, R. J. J. geophys. Res. 84, 178–188 (1979).
Anderson, R. N. et al. Nature 300, 589–594 (1982).
Hamano, Y. Init. Rep. DSDP Legs 51, 53 Part 2, 1457–1466 (1980).
Salisbury, M. H. et al. Init. Rep. DSDP Legs 51, 53 Part 2, 1579–1597 (1980).
Karato et al. Init. Rep. DSDP Legs 69, 675–682 (1981).
Purdy, G. M. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 72, 115–137 (1983).
Salisbury, M. H. & Christensen, N. I. J. geophys. Res. 83, 805–817 (1978).
Christensen, N. I. & Smewing, J. D. J. geophys. Res. 86, 2545–2556 (1981).
Christensen, N. I. & Salisbury, M. H. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 68, 675–688 (1982).
Christensen, N. I. Tectonophysics 47, 131–157 (1978).
Christensen, N. I. & Salisbury, M. H. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 15, 367–375 (1972).
Christensen, N. I. & Salisbury, M. H. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 19, 461–470 (1973).
Fountain, D. M. et al. Mar. Geol. 19, M75–M80 (1975).
Carlson, R. L. & Wilkens, R. H. Geodyn. Ser. 11, 127–136 (1983).
Cann, J. R. & Von Herzon, R. P. Init. Rep. DSDP Leg 69, 281–299 (1981).
Becker, K. et al. Nature 300, 594–598 (1982).
Raitt, R. in The Sea Vol. 3 (ed. Hill, M. N.) 85–102 (Wiley, New York, 1963).
Shor, G. G. in The Sea Vol. 7 (ed. Maxwell, A.) 3–27 (Wiley, New York, 1971).
Lewis, B. T. R. & Snydsman, W. Nature 266, 340–344 (1977).
Carlson, R. L. et al. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 51, 171–180 (1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, R., Raskin, G. Density of the ocean crust. Nature 311, 555–558 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/311555a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/311555a0
This article is cited by
-
Crustal density structure investigation of the East China Sea and adjacent regions using wavenumber domain 3D density imaging method
Earth, Planets and Space (2024)
-
A local lithospheric structure model for Vietnam derived from a high-resolution gravimetric geoid
Earth, Planets and Space (2021)
-
The study of crustal structures in the southwestern part of the Baltic Sea by modeling of gravity data
Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2021)
-
Comparison of Different Methods for a Moho Modeling Under Oceans and Marginal Seas: A Case Study for the Indian Ocean
Surveys in Geophysics (2021)
-
Estimating a combined Moho model for marine areas via satellite altimetric - gravity and seismic crustal models
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.