Key Points
-
The 2R hypothesis, which states that two rounds of genome duplication occurred during the early evolution of vertebrates, is difficult to test because its predictions are not clear.
-
Map-based studies have tended to support the 2R hypothesis, whereas tree-based (phylogenetic) studies have not.
-
Inaccurate phylogenetic trees, gene conversion and ancient tandem duplications can all interfere with tree-based approaches to testing the 2R hypothesis.
-
We know little about the molecular basis of diploidization, the evolutionary process by which a tetraploid species 'decays' to become a diploid.
-
Different loci can appear to have different duplication dates due to either segmental allotetraploidy or independent diploidization of each locus.
-
The draft sequence of the human genome does not provide strong support for the 2R hypothesis.
-
Extensive gene deletion and genomic rearrangement could potentially obliterate any evidence of paleopolyploidy, even if it had occurred.
Abstract
Thirty years after Susumu Ohno proposed that vertebrate genomes are degenerate polyploids, the extent to which genome duplication contributed to the evolution of the vertebrate genome, if at all, is still uncertain. Sequence-level studies on model organisms whose genomes show clearer evidence of ancient polyploidy are invaluable because they indicate what the evolutionary products of genome duplication can look like. The greatest mystery is the molecular basis of diploidization, the evolutionary process by which a polyploid genome turns into a diploid one.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Spofford, J. B. Phylogenetic mechanism. Science 175, 617 –618 (1972).
Lewin, B. Genes in tandem. Nature 230, 314 (1971).
Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1970).
Nadeau, J. H. & Taylor, B. A. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 814–818 ( 1984).
Ohno, S. Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature 244, 259–262 (1973).
Nadeau, J. H. in Advanced Techniques in Chromosome Research (ed. Adolph, K. W.) 269–296 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991).
Schughart, K., Kappen, C. & Ruddle, F. H. Duplication of large genomic regions during the evolution of vertebrate homeobox genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7067–7071 (1989).
Ruddle, F. H., Bentley, K. L., Murtha, M. T. & Risch, N. Gene loss and gain in the evolution of the vertebrates. Development S155–S161 (1994).
Hughes, A. L. Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 565–576 (1999).
Skrabanek, L. & Wolfe, K. H. Eukaryote genome duplication — where's the evidence? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 694–700 (1998).
Ohno, S. Gene duplication and the uniqueness of vertebrate genomes circa 1970–1999 . Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 517– 522 (1999).
Meyer, A. & Schartl, M. Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 699–704 (1999).
Holland, P. W. H. Introduction: gene duplication in development and evolution. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 515–516 (1999).
Martin, A. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the 'one-to-four' rule. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 89–93 (2001).
Wang, Y. & Gu, X. Evolutionary patterns of gene families generated in the early stage of vertebrates. J. Mol. Evol. 51, 88–96 (2000).
Nadeau, J. H. & Sankoff, D. Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution . Genetics 147, 1259–1266 (1997).
Martin, A. P. Increasing genomic complexity by gene duplication and the origin of vertebrates . Am. Nat. 154, 111–128 (1999).
Llorente, B. et al. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts. 18. Comparative analysis of chromosome maps and synteny with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 487, 101–112 (2000).
Gibson, T. J. & Spring, J. Evidence in favour of ancient octaploidy in the vertebrate genome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 259–264 (2000).
Wolfe, K. Robustness — it's not where you think it is. Nature Genet. 25, 3–4 (2000 ).
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
Lundin, L. G. Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. Genomics 16, 1–19 (1993).A classic paper that identified numerous apparent duplicated chromosomal regions in mammals.
Katsanis, N., Fitzgibbon, J. & Fisher, E. M. C. Paralogy mapping: identification of a region in the human MHC triplicated onto human chromosomes 1 and 9 allows the prediction and isolation of novel PBX and NOTCH loci. Genomics 35, 101–108 ( 1996).
Kasahara, M., Nakaya, J., Satta, Y. & Takahata, N. Chromosomal duplication and the emergence of the adaptive immune system. Trends Genet. 13, 90–92 ( 1997).
Pébusque, M.-J., Coulier, F., Birnbaum, D. & Pontarotti, P. Ancient large scale genome duplications: phylogenetic and linkage analyses shed light on chordate genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1145–1159 (1998).
Wraith, A. et al. Evolution of the neuropeptide Y receptor family: gene and chromosomal duplications deduced from the cloning and mapping of the five receptor subtypes in pig. Genome Res. 10, 302–310 (2000).
Spring, J. Vertebrate evolution by interspecific hybridisation — are we polyploid? FEBS Lett. 400, 2–8 (1997).
Sidow, A. Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 715–722 (1996).
Hughes, A. L. Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 854–870 (1998). One of the first reports of wildly heterogeneous duplication date estimates from genes thought to form a duplicated chromosomal region.
Hughes, A. L., da Silva, J. & Friedman, R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. (in the press).
Wolfe, K. H. & Shields, D. C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708–713 (1997).
Pál, C., Papp, B. & Hurst, L. D. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics (in the press).
Vision, T. J., Brown, D. G. & Tanksley, S. D. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis . Science 290, 2114– 2117 (2000).
Smith, N. G., Knight, R. & Hurst, L. D. Vertebrate genome evolution: a slow shuffle or a big bang? Bioessays 21, 697– 703 (1999).
Friedman, R. & Hughes, A. L. Gene duplication and the structure of eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 11, 373 –381 (2001).
Gaut, B. S. & Doebley, J. F. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6809–6814 ( 1997).
Gaut, B. S., Le Thierry d'Ennequin, M., Peek, A. S. & Sawkins, M. C. Maize as a model for the evolution of plant nuclear genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7008–7015 (2000).
Gaut, B. S. Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses. Genome Res. 11, 55– 66 (2001).Interesting exploration of methods for statistically testing genome duplication hypotheses.
Allendorf, F. W. & Danzmann, R. G. Secondary tetrasomic segregation of MDH-B and preferential pairing of homeologues in rainbow trout. Genetics 145, 1083– 1092 (1997).
Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4447–4452 (1998).
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 ( 2000).Supplementary figure 1 ( http://www.tigr.org/~salzberg/MUMmer-index.html ) contains dot-matrix DNA comparisons of all pairs of Arabidopsis chromosomes.
Amores, A. et al. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282, 1711–1714 ( 1998).
Postlethwait, J. H. et al. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 10, 1890– 1902 (2000).
Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 548– 554 (1999).
Hughes, A. L. Adaptive evolution of genes and genomes (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1999).
Hurst, L. D. The evolution of genomic anatomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 108–112 (1999).
Mewes, H. W. et al. Overview of the yeast genome. Nature 387, S7–S65 (1997).
Coissac, E., Maillier, E. & Netter, P. A comparative study of duplications in bacteria and eukaryotes: the importance of telomeres. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 1062–1074 (1997).
Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Updated map of duplicated regions in the yeast genome. Gene 238, 253– 261 (1999).
Baumgartner, U., Hamilton, B., Piskacek, M., Ruis, H. & Rottensteiner, H. Functional analysis of the Zn(2)Cys(6) transcription factors Oaf1p and Pip2p. Different roles in fatty acid induction of β-oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22208–22216 (1999).
Vision, T. J. & Brown, D. G. in Comparative Genomics: Empirical and Analytical Approaches to Gene Order Dynamics, Map Alignment and the Evolution of Gene Families (eds Sankoff, D. & Nadeau, J. H.) 479– 491 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000).
Llorente, B. et al. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts. 20. Evolution of gene redundancy compared to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 487, 122–133 (2000).
Keogh, R. S., Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Evolution of gene order and chromosome number in Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and related fungi. Yeast 14, 443–457 ( 1998).
Seoighe, C. et al. Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14433– 14437 (2000).
Louis, E. J. The chromosome ends of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 11, 1553–1573 (1995).
Ku, H. M., Vision, T., Liu, J. & Tanksley, S. D. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9121– 9126 (2000).
Paterson, A. H. et al. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell 12, 1523–1540 ( 2000).
Graur, D. & Li, W.-H. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1999).
Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151– 1155 (2000).Global study of the frequency of occurrence and degree of divergence of duplicated genes in several eukaryotic genomes. This paper shows that duplicated genes arise at a high rate but have a short half-life.
Gibson, T. J. & Spring, J. Genetic redundancy in vertebrates: polyploidy and persistence of genes encoding multidomain proteins. Trends Genet. 14, 46–49 (1998).
Hughes, A. L. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256, 119–124 (1994).
Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531– 1545 (1999).
Lynch, M. & Force, A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154, 459–473 (2000).
Blanchard, J. L. & Lynch, M. Organellar genes: why do they end up in the nucleus? Trends Genet. 16 , 315–320 (2000).
Wagner, A. The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions. Genetics 154, 1389–1401 (2000).
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to K. Hokamp, A. McLysaght and L. Skrabanek for discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Related links
DATABASE LINKS
FURTHER INFORMATION
The Arabidopsis Information Resource
The Zebrafish Information Network
Glossary
- SYNTENY
-
The property of being located on the same chromosome.
- ANEUPLOIDY
-
Presence of extra copies, or no copies, of some chromosomes.
- HOX GENE CLUSTERS
-
Tandem arrays of homeobox genes that have crucial roles in development. There are four Hox clusters in humans but only one in invertebrates.
- AUTOPOLYPLOIDY
-
Doubling the copy number of each chromosome in a species.
- ALLOPOLYPLOIDY
-
The fusion of two distinct parental species to form a hybrid, the genome of which is the sum of the two parental genomes.
- ORTHOLOGUES
-
Homologous genes that originated through speciation (for example, human α-globin and mouse α-globin).
- DICOT
-
The larger subclass of angiosperms that has two seed leaves (cotyledons) in the embryo.
- MOLECULAR CLOCK
-
The principle that any gene or protein has a near-constant rate of evolution in all organisms, which means that the amount of sequence divergence between two sequences will be proportional to the amount of time elapsed since their shared ancestor existed.
- OUTGROUP
-
A species or sequence that is known to diverge earlier than the other species or sequences being analysed.
- OHNOLOGUE
-
A pair of duplicate genes (paralogues) produced by the process of genome duplication.
- PARALOGUES
-
Homologous genes that originated by gene duplication (for example, human α-globin and human β-globin).
- HOMOLOGUES
-
Genes that share a common ancestor and are usually similar in sequence.
- TOPOLOGY
-
The branching arrangement of a phylogenetic tree.
- TELEOST
-
Bony fish.
- TETRAPOD
-
Four-limbed animal.
- GENE CONVERSION
-
Non-reciprocal allelic exchange.
- BOOTSTRAP ANALYSIS
-
Type of statistical analysis to test the reliability of certain branches in the evolutionary tree. The bootstrap proceeds by re-sampling the original data, with replacement, to create a series of bootstrap samples of the same size as the original data. The bootstrap value of a node is the percentage of times that node is present in the set of trees constructed from the new data sets.
- QUADRIVALENT
-
A cytological structure in which four copies of a chromosome are aligned on the meiotic spindle.
- BIVALENT
-
A cytological structure in which two copies of a chromosome are aligned on the meiotic spindle.
- HOMEOLOGUES
-
Sister chromosomes (or sister loci) resulting from polyploidy in plants.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolfe, K. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet 2, 333–341 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35072009
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35072009
This article is cited by
-
LC–MS/MS based characterisation and differential expression of proteins in Himalayan snow trout, Schizothorax labiatus using LFQ technique
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Polyploidy and diploidization in soybean
Molecular Breeding (2023)
-
Structural and functional analysis of CCT family genes in pigeonpea
Molecular Biology Reports (2022)
-
Gradual evolution of allopolyploidy in Arabidopsis suecica
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)
-
Reconstruction of proto-vertebrate, proto-cyclostome and proto-gnathostome genomes provides new insights into early vertebrate evolution
Nature Communications (2021)