Abstract
THE D″ layer lies at the bottom of the Earth's rocky mantle, and separates it from the liquid metal-alloy core. This region, extending from the core–mantle boundary to a few hundred kilometres above (Fig. 1), is geodynamically analogous to the more easily studied lithosphere, at the top of the mantle. The structure of D″ may reflect the style of lower-mantle convection, the nature of core–mantle interaction and perhaps even the fate of subducting lithosphere1. Observations of lithospheric seismic anisotropy have provided valuable insight into the nature of the upper-mantle boundary layer, but discussion of lower-mantle seismic anisotropy has been somewhat contentious2–5. Here we present evidence, from seismic waves that have traversed the lowermost mantle beneath the Caribbean region, for a zone of seismic anisotropy below the D″ discontinuity, which in this region lies 250 km above the core–mantle boundary. The anisotropy is most probably due to horizontal layering or aligned inclusions of a material with differing shear-wave velocity. If D″ is a graveyard for subducted lithosphere, a plausible explanation of the anisotropy may be the contrast between cold lithospheric mantle and material that formerly constituted the oceanic crust, which may have lower shear-wave velocity owing to the presence of melt.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loper, D. E. & Lay, T. J. geophys. Res. 100, 6397–6420 (1995).
Vinnik, L., Farra, V. & Romanowicz, B. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 519–522 (1989).
Vinnik, L., Romanowicz, B., LeStunff, Y. & Makeyeva, L. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1657–1660 (1995).
Lay, T. & Young, C. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1373–1376 (1991).
Maupin, V. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 87, 1–,32 (1995).
Masters, T. G., Bolton, H. F. & Shearer, P. M. Eos (abstr.) 73, 201 (1992).
Su, W.-J., Woodward, R. L. & Dziewonski, A. M. J. geophys. Res. 99, 16429–16454 (1994).
Wysession, M. E., Okal, E. A. & Bina, C. R. J. geophys. Res. 97, 8749–8764 (1992).
Lay, T. & Helmberger, D. V. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 75, 799–837 (1983).
Weber, M. & Davis, J. P. Geophys. J. Int. 102, 231–255 (1990).
Garnero, E. J., Helmberger, D. V. & Grand, S. P. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 79, 335–347 (1993).
Kendall, J.-M. & Shearer, P. M. J. geophys. Res. 99, 11575–11590 (1994).
Nataf, H.-C. & Houard, S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2371–2374 (1993).
Kendall, J.-M. & Nangini, C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 399–401 (1996).
Silver, P. G. & Chan, W. W. Nature 335, 34–39 (1988).
Bostock, M. G. & Cassidy, J. F. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 5–8 (1995).
Vinnik, L. P., Kind, R., Kosarev, G. L. & Makeyeva, L. I. Geophys. J. Int. 99, 549–559 (1989).
Meade, C. P., Silver, G. & Kaneshima, S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1293–1296 (1995).
Doornbos, D. J., Spiliopoulos, S. & Stacey, F. D. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 41, 225–239 (1986).
Weber, M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 2531–2534 (1994).
Backus, G. E. J. geophys. Res. 67, 4427–4440 (1962).
Tandon, G. P. & Weng, G. J. Polymer Composites 5, 327–333 (1984).
Sayers, C. Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 2933–2944 (1992).
Schmeling, H. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 41, 34–57 (1985).
Faul, U. H., Toomey, D. R. & Waff, H. S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 29–32 (1994).
Knittle, E. & Jeanloz, R. Science 251, 1438–1443 (1991).
Jeanloz, R. A. Rev. Earth planet. Sci. 18, 357–386 (1990).
Creager, K. C. & Jordan, T. H. J. geophys. Res. 91, 3573–3589 (1986).
Van der Hilst, R., Engdahl, R. & Spakman, W. Geophys. J. Int. 105, 264–302 (1993).
Grand, S. P. J. geophys. Res. 99, 11591–11621 (1994).
Silver, P. G., Carlson, R. W. & Olson, P. A. Rev. Earth planet. Sci. 16, 477–541 (1988).
Christensen, U. R. & Hofmann, A. W. J. geophys. Res. 99, 19867–19884 (1994).
Shen, G. & Lazor, P. J. geophys. Res. 100, 17699–17713 (1995).
Engebretson, D. C., Kelley, K. P., Cashman, H. J. & Richards, M. A. GSA Today 2, 93–100 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kendall, JM., Silver, P. Constraints from seismic anisotropy on the nature of the lowermost mantle. Nature 381, 409–412 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381409a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381409a0
This article is cited by
-
Mantle deformation and seismic anisotropy beneath Northeast India inferred from SKKS birefringence
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica (2021)
-
Mantle Deformation Beneath India Inferred from Shear Wave Splitting
Journal of the Geological Society of India (2021)
-
Ultra-low velocity zone heterogeneities at the core–mantle boundary from diffracted PKKPab waves
Earth, Planets and Space (2017)
-
Characterization of the D″ beneath the Galapagos Islands using SKKS and SKS waveforms
Earthquake Science (2011)
-
Deformation of the lowermost mantle from seismic anisotropy
Nature (2010)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.