A disappointing myopia seems to have afflicted your '2020 visions' (Nature 463, 26–32; 2010), with just one female among the 20 contributors. This sends the wrong message at a time when women scientists are still striving for better representation.
Diversity among thought leaders is there if you look for it. You no longer have to look far among academics. Today, for example, women of vision are heads of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Harvard, Princeton and Brown universities; and the universities of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Cambridge.
Consider the Nobel prize. In 2009, it was awarded to five women (three of them scientists) and eight men, the narrowest gender gap since its inception.
The scientific community in 2020 should reflect the talent pipeline of 2010. Women are now well placed, if they stay the course, to enhance diversity in science. But they will need encouragement, support and opportunities if the barriers that have traditionally stymied diversity are to drop away.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Readers are welcome to comment on the next 10 years for science, at http://go.nature.com/htW8uM
See also
Political instability may be a contributor in the coming decade
Could a boom in technologies trap Feynman's simulator?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andrews, N., Kornbluth, S. & Stokke, D. Women: diversity among leaders is there if you look. Nature 463, 608 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/463608d
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/463608d