A single incriminating fingerprint can land someone in jail. But, Laura Spinney finds, there is little empirical basis for such decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A simple checklist, that is all it takes: a cluster randomized controlled field trial on improving the treatment of suspected terrorists by the police
Journal of Experimental Criminology Open Access 27 April 2020
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
A Review of the FBI's Handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case (Office of the Inspector General Oversight and Review Division, 2006).
Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (National Academies, 2009).
Dror, I. E. & Charlton, D. J. Forensic Identification 56, 600-616 (2006).
Leadbetter, M. Fingerprint Whorld 33, 231 (2007).
Additional information
See Editorial, page 325 ; Opinion, page 351 ; and online at www.nature.com/scienceincourt .
Laura Spinney is a freelance writer based in Lausanne, Switzerland.
Related links
Related links
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spinney, L. Science in court: The fine print. Nature 464, 344–346 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/464344a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/464344a
This article is cited by
-
A simple checklist, that is all it takes: a cluster randomized controlled field trial on improving the treatment of suspected terrorists by the police
Journal of Experimental Criminology (2021)