Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize physician–parent counseling and delivery room resuscitation of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 473 California neonatologists detailing counseling patterns, resuscitation thresholds, and acceptance of parental decision making.
RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. After 23 weeks' gestation, >80% of neonatologists counseled parents expecting ELBW infants. All (>99%) counseled parents about mortality; >25% reported not discussing limiting resuscitation or death despite resuscitation. Decisions to limit resuscitation were affected by congenital anomalies, parents' wishes, or perceptions of pain, suffering, and quality of life. Nearly 70% of neonatologists supported parental decision making at 22 to 23 weeks, whereas 66% to 74% responded that parents should not be allowed to make nonresuscitation decisions after 26 weeks. Median resuscitation thresholds were 23 weeks (range 20–28) and 500 g (range 350–1000).
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatologists' failure to discuss nonresuscitation options, variations in resuscitation thresholds, and unwillingness to accept nonresuscitation decisions for more mature ELBW infants may restrict parental decision making.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preliminary results presented at the annual meeting of the California Association of Neonatologists, Carmel, California, February 1997, and at the Society for Pediatric Research, May 1997.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colin Partridge, J., Freeman, H., Weiss, E. et al. Delivery Room Resuscitation Decisions for Extremely Low Birthweight Infants in California. J Perinatol 21, 27–33 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200477
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200477
This article is cited by
-
Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2018)
-
A national survey of obstetricians' attitudes toward and practice of periviable intervention
Journal of Perinatology (2015)
-
Comparing obstetricians’ and neonatologists’ approaches to periviable counseling
Journal of Perinatology (2015)
-
The influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveries
Journal of Perinatology (2015)
-
Decision-making in the delivery room: a survey of neonatologists
Journal of Perinatology (2007)