Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To compare work of breathing and breathing asynchrony during bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) vs variable-flow (VF)-NCPAP in premature infants.
STUDY DESIGN:
We studied 18 premature infants of birth weight <1500 g who required NCPAP for mild respiratory distress. Each infant was studied on bubble and VF-NCPAP at 8, 6, 4, and 0 cmH2O. Tidal volumes were obtained by calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography. Esophageal pressure estimated intrapleural pressure. Inspiratory and resistive work of breathing were calculated from pressure–volume data. Breathing asynchrony was assessed with phase angle. The results at all NCPAP levels were referenced to VF-NCPAP values at 8 cmH2O.
RESULTS:
Provision of NCPAP with either device decreased inspiratory work of breathing, tidal volume, and minute ventilation relative to NCPAP of 0 cmH2O. Bubble NCPAP did not decrease resistive work of breathing relative to 0 cmH2O. Resistive work of breathing (p=0.01), respiratory rate (p<0.03), and phase angle (p=0.002) were all greater with bubble compared to VF-NCPAP.
CONCLUSION:
The more labored and asynchronous breathing seen with bubble NCPAP may lead to higher failure rates over the long term than with VF-NCPAP.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark RH, Gerstmann DR, Jobe AH, et al. Lung injury in neonates: causes, strategies for prevention, and long-term consequences. J Pediatr 2002;139:478–486.
Jobe AH, Bancalari E . NICHD/NHLBI/ORD Workshop Summary: bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1723–1729.
Moa G, Nilsson K, Zetterstrom H, et al. A new device for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the newborn: an experimental study. Crit Care Med 1988;16:1238–1242.
Lee KS, Dunn MS, Fenwickk M, Shennan AT . A comparison of underwater bubble continuous positive airway pressure with ventilator-derived continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate 1998;73:69–75.
Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, et al. Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices. Pediatrics 2001;107:304–308.
Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, et al. Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001;108:682–685.
Courtney SE, Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, et al. Changes in lung volume and work of breathing: a comparison of two variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2003;36:248–252.
Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, et al. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. New Engl J Med 1971;284:1333–1340.
Kattwinkel J, Fleming D, Cha CC, et al. A device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure by the nasal route. Pediatrics 1973;52:131–134.
Morley C . Continuous distending pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;81:F152–F156.
Thibeault DW, Mabry SM, Ekekezie II, et al. Lung elastic tissue maturation and perturbations during the evolution of chronic lung disease. Pediatrics 2000;106:1452–1459.
Ho JJ, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG . Early versus delayed initiation of continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrom in preterm infants. The Cochrane Library 2002; (2).
Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ . Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. The Cochrane Library 1997; (1).
De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, et al. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. The Cochrane Library 2002; (4).
Stefanescu BM, Murphy WP, Hansell BJ, et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2003;112:1031–1038.
Mazzela M, Bellini C, Calevo MG, et al. A randomized control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F86–F90.
Blackson T, Irwin-Sherman T, Touch SM, et al. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure does not augment ventilation. Pediatr Res 2003;53:360A.
Morley CJ, Lau R, De Paoli A, et al. Does underwater bubbling improve gas exchange of babies on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized crossover trial. Pediatr Res 2003;53:360A.
Colaizy TT, McEvoy C, Crichton C, et al. Bubble vs conventional CPAP: a prospective, randomized pilot study. Pediatr Res 2004;55:466A.
Klausner JF, Lee AY, Hutchison AA . Decreased imposed work with a new nasal continuous positive airway pressure device. Pediatr Pulmonol 1996;22:188–194.
Childs PRN . A comparison of flow phenomena and functionality of two nCPAP systems. Neonatal Intensive Care 2000;13:13–20.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Leonid Liptsen, MD for his schematic of our bubble NCPAP system.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Statistical Consultant: Gerald Arnold, PhD MPH, Senior Statistician Research, Planning and Evaluation, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Funded in part by SensorMedics, Inc.
Presented in part at the Society for Pediatric Research annual meeting in San Francisco, CA, May 2004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liptsen, E., Aghai, Z., Pyon, K. et al. Work of Breathing During Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Comparison of Bubble vs Variable-Flow Devices. J Perinatol 25, 453–458 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211325
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211325
This article is cited by
-
Current Controversies and Advances in Non-invasive Respiratory Support for Preterm Infants
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics (2022)
-
Nasal Jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus Bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: an open label, randomized controlled trial
Journal of Perinatology (2015)
-
Continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates: An update of current evidence and implications for developing countries
Indian Pediatrics (2015)
-
Weaning preterm infants from continuous positive airway pressure: evidence for best practice
World Journal of Pediatrics (2015)
-
Intra-gastric Pressures in Neonates Receiving Bubble CPAP
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics (2015)