Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Efficient transfection of tumors facilitated by long-term therapeutic ultrasound in combination with contrast agent: from in vitro to in vivo setting

Cancer Gene Therapy volume 14, pages 306–315 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) is a promising non-viral clinical approach for the delivery of genes. This study demonstrates the efficient delivery and localization of DNA in subcutaneous tumors facilitated by TUS application and examines the contribution of ultrasound contrast-agent (USCA) addition on transfection. The study addresses the importance of in vivo optimization when using long-term TUS and USCA based on data achieved in vitro. In vitro results showed that transfection of TrampC2 prostate cancer (Pca) cells using genes encoding for luciferase and green fluorescent protein was enhanced when DNA and Optison were added together and TUS was applied for 20 or 30 min. In vivo results showed that the highest transfection was achieved when Optison and DNA were co-injected intratumoraly, and TUS was applied for 20 min. Using Optison significantly increased protein distribution in the tumor. However, in vivo expression level was decreased by two and four fold at 7 and 14 days, respectively, post-TUS. The study establishes the potential of intratumoral delivery of DNA–Optison, followed by TUS as an effective, non-toxic, gene delivery method that could provide a safe, clinical alternative to current viral gene delivery approaches where short-term gene expression is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pouton CW, Seymour LW . Key issues in non-viral gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 46: 187–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawase A, Nomura T, Yasuda K, Kobayashi N, Hashida M, Takakura Y . Disposition and gene expression characteristics in solid tumors and skeletal muscle after direct injection of naked plasmid DNA in mice. J Pharm Sci 2003; 92: 1295–1304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Francis SE, Cumberland DC, Crossman DC, Newman CM . Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery. Gene Therapy 2000; 7: 2023–2027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller DL, Pislaru SV, Greenleaf JE . Sonoporation: mechanical DNA delivery by ultrasonic cavitation. Somat Cell Mo Genet 2002; 27: 115–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Aoki M, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto K et al. Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle. Gene Therapy 2002; 9: 372–380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Newman CM, Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Cumberland DC . Ultrasound gene therapy: on the road from concept to reality. Echocardiography 2001; 18: 339–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duvshani-Eshet M, Machluf M . Therapeutic ultrasound optimization for gene delivery: a key factor achieving nuclear DNA localization. J Control Release 2005; 108: 513–528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bao S, Thrall BD, Miller DL . Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 953–959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huber PE, Pfisterer P . In vitro and in vivo transfection of plasmid DNA in the dunning prostate tumor R3327-AT1 is enhanced by focused ultrasound. Gene Ther 2000; 7: 1516–1525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hauff P, Seemann S, Reszka R, Schultze-Mosgau M, Reinhardt M, Buzasi T et al. Evaluation of gas-filled microparticles and sonoporation as gene delivery system: feasibility study in rodent tumor models. Radiology 2005; 236: 572–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller DL, Quddus J . Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 661–667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller DL, Song J . Tumor growth reduction and DNA transfer by cavitation-enhanced high-intensity focused ultrasound in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 887–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manome Y, Nakamura M, Ohno T, Furuhata H . Ultrasound facilitates transduction of naked plasmid DNA into colon carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 2000; 11: 1521–1528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Namba T, Yamasaki K, Hashiya N et al. Local delivery of plasmid DNA into rat carotid artery using ultrasound. Circulation 2002; 105: 1233–1239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ng KY, Liu Y . Therapeutic ultrasound: its application in drug delivery. Med Res Rev 2002; 22: 204–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA . A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22: 1131–1154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li T, Tachibana K, Kuroki M . Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice-initial results. Radiology 2003; 229: 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bekeredjian R, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV . Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 329–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duvshani-Eshet M, Baruch L, Kesselman E, Shimoni E, Machluf M . Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy. Gene Therapy 2006; 13: 163–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Duvshani-Eshet M, Adam D, Machluf M . The effects of albumin-coated microbubbles in DNA delivery mediated by therapeutic ultrasound. J Control Release 2006; 112: 156–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu QL, Liang HD, Partridge T, Blomley MJ . Microbubble ultrasound improves the efficiency of gene transduction in skeletal muscle in vivo with reduced tissue damage. Gene Therapy 2003; 10: 396–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Liang HD, Dong B, Lu QL, Blomley MJ . Gene transfer with microbubble ultrasound and plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle of mice: comparison between commercially available microbubble contrast agents. Radiology 2005; 237: 224–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miao CH, Brayman AA, Loeb KR, Ye P, Zhou L, Mourad P et al. Ultrasound enhances gene delivery of human factor IX plasmid. Hum Gene Ther 2005; 16: 893–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hashiya N, Aoki M, Tachibana K, Taniyama Y, Yamasaki K, Hiraoka K et al. Local delivery of E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using ultrasound with microbubble agent (Optison) inhibits intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in rat carotid artery model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 317: 508–514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Inagaki H, Suzuki JI, Ogawa M, Taniyama Y, Morishita R, Isobe M . Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated NF-kappaB decoy transfection attenuates neointimal formation after arterial injury in mice. J Vasc Res 2005; 43: 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anwer K, Kao G, Proctor B, Anscombe I, Florack V, Earls R et al. Ultrasound enhancement of cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to primary tumors following systemic administration. Gene Therapy 2000; 7: 1833–1839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazhar D, Waxman J . Gene therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2004; 93: 465–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Aneed A . Current strategies in cancer gene therapy. Eur J Pharmacol 2004; 498: 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baker KG, Robertson VJ, Duck FA . A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 1351–1358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saxena J, Sharma N . Ultrasonically mediated drug delivery. Biomater Appl 1993; 7: 277–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carstensen EL, Gracewski S, Dalecki D . The search for cavitation in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 1377–1385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Apfel RE, Holland CK . Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulls, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 179–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller DL, Quddus J . Diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies induces capillary rupture in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 10179–10184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Koike H, Tomita N, Azuma H, Taniyama Y, Yamasaki K, Kunugiza Y et al. An efficient gene transfer method mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles into the kidney. J Gene Med 2005; 7: 108–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kennedy JE, ter Haar GR, Wu F, Gleeson FV, Roberts IS, Middleton MR et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of tissue response to high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 851–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le Duc A et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol 2003; 17: 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakakima Y, Hayashi S, Yagi Y, Hayakawa A, Tachibana K, Nakao A . Gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. Cancer Gene Ther 2005; 12: 884–889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shimamura M, Sato N, Taniyama Y, Kurinami H, Tanaka H, Takami T et al. Gene transfer into adult rat spinal cord using naked plasmid DNA and ultrasound microbubbles. J Gene Med 2005; 7: 1468–1474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Avigail Morgenstern for the help with the animal studies and Dr. Efrat Goren for helpful advices and discussion. This work is supported by The Israel Science Foundation (ISF Grant no. 700/05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, The Technion -Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    M Duvshani-Eshet & M Machluf

Authors
  1. M Duvshani-Eshet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Machluf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Machluf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duvshani-Eshet, M., Machluf, M. Efficient transfection of tumors facilitated by long-term therapeutic ultrasound in combination with contrast agent: from in vitro to in vivo setting. Cancer Gene Ther 14, 306–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7701015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7701015

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links