Abstract
We examined the relationship between p53 levels before and after irradiation, radiation-induced cell cycle delays, apoptotic cell death and radiosensitivity in a panel of eight human tumour cell lines. The cell lines differed widely in their clonogenic survival after radiation, (surviving fraction at 2 Gy: SF2=0.18-0.82). Constitutive p53 protein levels varied from 2.2 +/- 0.4 to 6.3 +/- 0.3 optical density units (OD) per 10(6) cells. p53 after irradiation (6 Gy) also varied between the cell lines, ranging from no induction to a 1.6-fold increase in p53 levels 4 h after treatment. p53 function was also assessed by G1 cell cycle arrest after irradiation. The cellular response to radiation, measured as G0/G1 arrest, and the induction of apoptosis were in good agreement. However, a trace amount of DNA ladder formation was found in two cell lines lacking G1 arrest. Overall cellular radiosensitivity correlated well with the level of radiation-induced G1 arrest (correlation coefficient r=0.856; P=0.0067), with p53 constitutive levels (r=0.874, P=0.0046), and with p53 protein fold induction (r=-0.882, P=0.0038). Our data suggest that (1) the constitutive p53 level, (2) G1 arrest after irradiation, or (3) the p53 protein response to radiation may be good predictive tests for radiosensitivity in some cell types.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siles, E., Villalobos, M., Valenzuela, M. et al. Relationship between p53 status and radiosensitivity in human tumour cell lines. Br J Cancer 73, 581–588 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.101
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.101