Abstract
Type II familial synpolydactyly is rare and is known to have variable expression. However, no previous papers have attempted to review these variations. The aim of this paper was to review these variations and show several of these variable expressions in two families. The classic features of type II familial synpolydactyly are bilateral synpolydactyly of the third web spaces of the hands and bilateral synpolydactyly of the fourth web spaces of the feet. Several members of the two families reported in this paper showed the following variations: the third web spaces of the hands showing syndactyly without the polydactyly, normal feet, concurrent polydactyly of the little finger, concurrent clinodactyly of the little finger and the ‘homozygous’ phenotype. It was concluded that variable expressions of type II familial synpolydactyly are common and awareness of such variations is important to clinicians.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Type II familial synpolydactyly is rare and it has been reported in <30 families.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 It is characterized by bilateral synpolydactyly of the third web spaces of the hands and bilateral synpolydactyly of the fourth web spaces of the feet. It is inherited as autosomal dominant and the mutation has been localized to 2q31 (HOXD13).5, 6, 7 In this paper, we report on two families with an emphasis on variations of expression of this rare form of inherited nonsyndromal syndactyly. These variations have not been previously reviewed in the literature.
Case reports
The first family
The family had a history of synpolydactyly type II for several generations on the mother's side (Table 1). The mother and her three children were affected and were examined (Figure 1). The feet were normal in all affected members. One child showed a variation in the form of synpolydactyly of the little finger, which was an isolated finding in the left hand and was concurrent with synpolydactyly of the third web in the right hand.
The second family
The parents in this family were first-degree cousins and the family had a history of synpolydactyly type II for several generations. Both parents had isolated clinodactyly of the little finger. They had a total of six children, of which four were affected. The two boys had similar features in the hands with feet involvement whereas the two girls had similar features in the hands with no feet involvement as shown in Table 1 and Figure 2.
Discussion
The classic features of type II synpolydactyly include bilateral synpolydactyly of the third web spaces of the hands and bilateral synpolydactyly of the fourth web spaces of the feet. Our cases are not only rare but they also show several variations of this form of syndactyly. We have reviewed the literature and tabulated these variations (Table 2).
In 1968, Cross et al3 reviewed the world literature (there were only 14 reported families in 1968) and stressed on the fact that some hands may show the third web space syndactyly without any polydactyly and that the feet may be normal. These two features were seen in the two affected girls of the second family. Sayli et al10 showed that some family members may show polydactyly of the little finger and this was seen in one child of the first family. Several authors5, 11, 12 showed that clinodactyly of the little finger may be a concurrent or isolated feature, indicating that the responsible gene may be expressed as an isolated clinodactyly and this was seen in the parents of the second family. Finally, Akarsu et al1 and Muragaki et al7 have described the ‘homozygous’ phenotype that is characterized by short hands, polygonal metacarpals/metatarsals, accessory carpal bones and tarsometatarsal fusion. These findings were seen in the two affected boys of the second family.
In conclusion, variations of type II familial synpolydactyly are common and our report summarizes these variations from the literature and shows them in two families.
References
Akarsu AN, Akhan O, Sayli BS, Sayli U, Baskaya G, Sarfarazi M : A large Turkish kindred with syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly). 2. Homozygous phenotype? J Med Genet 1995; 32: 435–441.
Camera G, Camera A, Pozzolo S, Costa M, Montero R : Synpolydactyly (type II syndactyly) with aplasia/hypoplasia of the middle phalanges of the toes: report on a family with eight affected members in four generations. Am J Genet 1995; 55: 244–246.
Cross HE, Lerberg DB, McKusick VA : Type II syndactyly. Am J Hum Genet 1968; 20: 368–380.
De Smet L, Fabry G : Type II syndactyly or synpolydactyly. Acta Orthop Belg 1992; 58: 209–212.
Kjaer KW, Hedeboe J, Bugge M et al: HOXD13 polyalanine tract expression in classical synpolydactyly type Vordingborg. Am J Med Genet 2002; 110: 116–121.
Merlob P, Grunebaum M : Type II syndactyly or synpolydactyly. J Med Genet 1986; 23: 237–241.
Muragaki Y, Mundlos S, Upton J, Olsen BR : Altered growth and branching patterns in synpolydactyly caused by mutations in HOXD13. Science 1996; 272: 548–551.
Ridler MAC, Laxova R, Dewhurst K, Saldana-Garcia P : A family with syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly). Clin Genet 1977; 12: 213–220.
Sarfarazi M, Karsu AN, Sayli BS : Localization of the syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly) locus to 2q31 region and identification of tight linkage to HOXD8 intragenic marker. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4: 1453–1458.
Sayli BA, Akarsu AN, Sayli U, Akhan O, Ceylaner S, Sarfarazi M : A large Turkish kindred with syndactyly type II (synpolydactyly). 1. Field investigation, clinical and pedigree data. J Med Genet 1995; 32: 421–434.
Temtamy SA, McKusick VA : The genetics of hand malformations. in Begsma DB (ed): Birth Defects Original Article Series. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1978, Vol 14, pp 302.
Thomsen O : Einige Eigentuemlich Keiten der erblichen poly un syndaktylie bei Menschen. Acta Med Scan 1927; 65: 609–644.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Qattan, M. Type II familial synpolydactyly: report on two families with an emphasis on variations of expression. Eur J Hum Genet 19, 112–114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.127
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.127