Abstract
Purpose To compare a new automated system for the measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with the established manual Seditainer method.
Methods Two hundred and twelve patients undergoing investigation for giant cell arteritis or other systemic vasculitides had ESR measurements by both the established manual Seditainer and the new laboratory-based automated system. The results were compared by correlation coefficient and mean difference. The limits of agreement with confidence intervals were also calculated.
Results Across the range of results from 1 to 120 mm/h, the correlation coefficient was 0.844. The automated method had a mean negative bias of 9.8 mm/h (95% confidence interval: -12.2 to -7.4 mm/h). The wide scatter of results produced limits of agreement (± 2 standard deviations) between the two methods of 45 to 26 mm/h. There were seven results that were underestimated by the automated system which were clinically significant.
Conclusions There is a wide degree of scatter between the two sets of results. The automated system has a negative bias when compared with the manual method. There is a propensity for the automated system to sporadically underestimate the true result, sometimes to a degree that is clinically significant. The authors therefore cannot recommend replacement of the manual Seditainer system at the present time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Gabay C, Kushner I . Acute phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 1999;340:448–54.
Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Raman R, Zimmerman B . Giant cell arteritis: validity and reliability of various diagnostic criteria. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:285–96.
Fernandez-Herlihy L . Temporal arteritis: clinical aids to diagnosis. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1797–801.
Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Beat AM, Stevens MB, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1122–9.
Westergren A . Studies of the suspension stability of the blood in pulmonary tuberculosis. Acta Med Scand 1921;54:247–82.
Patton WN, Meyer PJ, Stuart J . Evaluation of sealed vacuum extraction method (Seditainer) for the measurement of eryhthrocyte sedimentation rate. J Clin Pathol 1989;42:313–7.
Hurd C, Knight T . Laboratory evaluation of the Seditainer ESR system. Becton Dickinson, Between Towns Road, Cowley, Oxford, UK: 1986.
Imafuku Y, Yoshida H, Greenfield S, Rabinovitch A . Automated measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and its relation to red cell concentration and plasma proteins. Hematol Cell Ther 1998;40:27–32.
Harvey PA, Tandon R, Singh AK . Automated ESR analysis in 20 min. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:396.
Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;I:307–10.
Keltner JL . Giant cell arteritis signs and symptoms. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1101–10.
International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology. Guidelines on selection of laboratory tests for monitoring the acute phase response. J Clin Pathol 1988;41:1203–12.
Manna R, Latteri M, Cristiano G, Todaro L, Scuderi F, Gasbarrini G . Anticardiolipin antibodies in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: a study of 40 cases. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:208–10.
Kyle V . Laboratory investigations including liver in polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis. Ballieres Clin Rheumatol 1991;5:475–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Browning, A., Burbidge, A. & Hodgkins, P. Comparison of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate measured in the eye casualty department by the Seditainer method with an automated system. Eye 13, 754–757 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1999.222
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1999.222