Abstract
Many eating studies in psychology, consumer behavior and marketing journals are dismissed, because they focus on how much one serves and not how much is eaten. We develop a means of estimating the percentage of self-served food that is consumed under various conditions. An aggregate analysis was conducted of studies where participants served themselves food and where actual intake was measured. Analyses explored what percentage of food was consumed depending on population, food and situational cues and generally showed that adults consistently consume the vast majority (91.7%) of what they serve themselves. This was higher for meals (92.8%) than for snacks (76.1%) and higher when a person was not distracted (97.1%) than when he or she was distracted (88.8%). The percentage eaten did not vary between lab (90.7%) and field settings (91.9%). Because many eating behavior studies outside of nutrition measure food selection, but not intake, the aggregate estimates presented in this research can enable obesity, nutrition and public health researchers to extrapolate how much may have been eaten in such studies. Doing so will extend their relevance to better understanding eating behavior and better developing solutions to overeating.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and Obesity. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Kral TVE, Meengs JS, Wall DE . Increasing the portion size of a packaged snack increases energy intake in men and women. Appetite 2004; 42: 63–69.
Rolls BJ, Engell D, Birch LL . Serving portion size influences 5-year-old but not 3-year-old children's food intakes. J Am Diet Assoc 2000; 100: 232–234.
Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS . Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 1207–1213.
Wansink B, van Ittersum K . Portion size me: plate size can decrease serving size, intake, and food waste. J Exp Psychol Appl 2014; 19: 320–332.
Geier AB, Rozin P, Doros G . Unit bias. Psychol Sci 2006; 17: 521–525.
Crombie IK, Davies HTO . What is a meta-analysis? Hayward Medical Communications. Available from www.whatisseries.co.uk 2009.
Farley JU, Lehmann DR, Sawyer A . Empirical marketing generalization using meta-analysis. Mark Sci 1995; 14: G36–G46.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
Wansink B, van Ittersum K . Extraverted children are more biased by bowl sizes than introverts. PLoS One 2013; 8: e78224.
Wansink B, Shimizu M, Brumberg A . How vegetables make the meal: their hedonic and heroic impact on perceptions of the meal and of the preparer. Public Health Nutr 2013; 16: 1988–1994.
Van Ittersum K, Wansink B . Plate size and color suggestibility: the Delboeuf illusion’s bias on serving and eating behavior. J Consum Res 2012; 39: 215–228.
Wansink B, Tal A, Shimizu M . First foods most: after 18-hour fast, people drawn to starches first and vegetables last. Arch Int Med 2012; 172: 961–963.
Van Kleef E, Shimizu M, Wansink B . Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012; 44: 66–70.
Shimizu M, Wansink B . Watching food-related television increases caloric intake in restrained eaters. Appetite 2011; 57: 661–664.
Van Kleef E, Shimizu M, Wansink B . Food compensation: do exercise ads change food intake? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 6.
Just DR, Wansink B . The flat-rate pricing paradox: conflicting effects of 'all-you-can-eat' buffet pricing. Rev Econ Stat 2011; 93: 193–200.
Shimizu M, Payne CR, Wansink B . When snacks become meals: how hunger and environmental cues bias food intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010; 7: 63.
Garg N, Wansink B, Inman JJ . The influence of incidental affect on consumers’ food intake. J Mark 2007; 71: 194–206.
Adams MA, Pelletier RL, Zive MM, Sallis JF . Salad bars and fruit and vegetable consumption in elementary schools: a plate waste study. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 1789–1792.
Branen L, Fletcher J, Myers L . Effects of pre-portioned and family-style food service on preschool children's food intake and waste at snacktime. J Res Child Educ 1997; 12: 88–95.
Just DR, Turvey CG, Wansink B . Biosecurity terrorism, food safety, and food consumption behavior: using experimental psychology to analyze economic behavior. J Agr Resour Econ 2009; 34: 91–108.
Koh J, Pliner P . The effects of degree of acquaintance, plate size, and sharing on food intake. Appetite 2009; 52: 595–602.
Wansink B, Cheney M . Super bowls: serving bowl size and food consumption. JAMA 2005; 293: 1727–1728.
Wansink B, van Ittersum K, Payne CR . Larger bowl size increases the amount of cereal children request, consume, and waste. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 323–326.
Rollins K . Working paper Kitchen Geography and Food Serving Behavior. Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA.
Wansink B, Chandon P . Can low-fat nutrition labels lead to obesity? Obesity 2006; 14: A49–A50.
McFerran B, Dahl DW, Fitzsimons GJ, Morales AC . I’ll have what she's having: effects of body type on the food choices of others (Study 1). J Consum Res 2009; 36: 915–929.
Acknowledgements
BW conceived of and designed the study. BW and KJ determined eligibility for inclusion in analysis. Based on these criteria, KJ contacted authors, selected the studies, compiled and analyzed the reported data. BW drafted the paper, and BW and KJ reviewed the manuscript and approved it for submission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wansink, B., Johnson, K. The clean plate club: about 92% of self-served food is eaten. Int J Obes 39, 371–374 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.104
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.104
This article is cited by
-
Depicted serving size: cereal packaging pictures exaggerate serving sizes and promote overserving
BMC Public Health (2017)
-
Controlled testing of novel portion control plate produces smaller self-selected portion sizes compared to regular dinner plate
BMC Obesity (2017)
-
Adults only: why don’t children belong to the clean-plate club?
International Journal of Obesity (2015)
-
The not so clean plate club: food self-served won’t always result in food eaten
International Journal of Obesity (2015)