Abstract
Objective:
To compare the management options, risks and thematic content that obstetricians and neonatologists discuss in periviable counseling.
Study Design:
Sixteen obstetricians and 15 neonatologists counseled simulated patients portraying a pregnant woman with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks of gestation. Transcripts from video-recorded encounters were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed for informational content and decision-making themes.
Result:
Obstetricians more frequently discussed antibiotics (P=0.005), maternal risks (<0.001) and cesarean risks (<0.005). Neonatologists more frequently discussed neonatal complications (P=0.044), resuscitation (P=0.015) and palliative options (P=0.023). Obstetricians and neonatologists often deferred questions about steroid administration to the other specialty. Both specialties organized decision making around medical information, survival, quality of life, time and support. Neonatologists also introduced themes of values, comfort or suffering, and uncertainty.
Conclusion:
Obstetricians and neonatologists provided complementary counseling content to patients, yet neither specialty took ownership of steroid discussions. Joint counseling and/or family meetings may minimize observed redundancy and inconsistencies in counseling.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doron MW, Veness-Meehan KA, Margolis LH, Holoman EM, Stiles AD . Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 1998; 102 (3): 574–582.
Bastek TK, Richardson DK, Zupancic JA, Burns JP . Prenatal consultation practices at the border of viability: a regional survey. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (2): 407–413.
Sanders MR, Donohue PK, Oberdorf MA, Rosenkrantz TS, Allen MC . Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol 1995; 15 (6): 494–502.
Partridge JC, Freeman H, Weiss E, Martinez AM, Kilpatrick S . Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely low birthweight infants in California. J Perinatol 2001; 21 (1): 27–33.
Martinez AM, Weiss E, Partridge JC, Freeman H, Kilpatrick S . Management of extremely low birth weight infants: perceptions of viability and parental counseling practices. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92 (4 Pt 1): 520–524.
Janvier A, Barrington K, Farlow B . Communication with parents concerning withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining interventions in neonatology. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38 (1): 38–46.
Stokes TA, Watson KL, Boss RD . Teaching antenatal counseling skills to neonatal providers. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38 (1): 47–51.
Raju TN, Mercer BM . Periviable birth: management and counseling issues—part 2. Semin Perinatol 2014; 38 (1): 1.
Raju TN, Mercer BM, Burchfield DJ, Joseph GF . Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. J Perinatol 2014; 34 (5): 333–342.
Iams JD, Donovan EF, Rose B, Prasad M . What we have here is a failure to communicate: obstacles to optimal care for preterm birth. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38 (3): 517–528.
Barnato AE, Mohan D, Downs J, Bryce CL, Angus DC, Arnold RM . A randomized trial of the effect of patient race on physicians' intensive care unit and life-sustaining treatment decisions for an acutely unstable elder with end-stage cancer. Crit Care Med 2011; 39 (7): 1663–1669.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L . How Many Interviews Are Enough? Field Methods 2006; 18 (1): 59–82.
Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W . Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. Jama 1999; 282 (24): 2313–2320.
Tucker Edmonds B, Krasny S, Srinivas S, Shea J . Obstetric decision-making and counseling at the limits of viability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (3): 248 e241–245.
Corbin JM, Strauss AC . Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd edn. Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA 2007.
Boss RD, Donohue PK, Roter DL, Larson SM, Arnold RM . "This is a decision you have to make": using simulation to study prenatal counseling. Simul Healthc 2012; 7 (4): 207–212.
Kavanaugh K, Moro TT, Savage TA, Reyes M, Wydra M . Supporting parents' decision making surrounding the anticipated birth of an extremely premature infant. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2009; 23 (2): 159–170.
Kavanaugh K, Savage T, Kilpatrick S, Kimura R, Hershberger P . Life support decisions for extremely premature infants: report of a pilot study. J Pediatr Nurs 2005; 20 (5): 347–359.
Boss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ, West AM, Donohue PK . Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (3): 583–589.
Grobman WA, Kavanaugh K, Moro T, DeRegnier RA, Savage T . Providing advice to parents for women at acutely high risk of periviable delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (5): 904–909.
Tucker Edmonds B, McKenzie F, Fadel WF, Matthias MS, Salyers MP, Barnato AE et al. Using simulation to assess the influence of race and insurer on shared decision-making in periviable counseling. Simul Healthc. In Press 2014.
Acknowledgements
This publication was made possible in part by Grant Number KL2 TR000163 (A Shekhar, PI) from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tucker Edmonds, B., McKenzie, F., Panoch, J. et al. Comparing obstetricians’ and neonatologists’ approaches to periviable counseling. J Perinatol 35, 344–348 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.213
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.213
This article is cited by
-
Decision-making approaches for children with life-limiting conditions: results from a qualitative phenomenological study
BMC Medical Ethics (2022)
-
Joint periviability counseling between neonatology and obstetrics is a rare occurrence
Journal of Perinatology (2020)
-
Neonatology in Austria: ethics to improve practice
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (2020)
-
Creation of a Decision Support Tool for Expectant Parents Facing Threatened Periviable Delivery: Application of a User-Centered Design Approach
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2019)
-
Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2018)