Abstract
One of the most important functions of vision is to direct actions to objects1. However, every time that vision is used to guide an action, retinal motion signals are produced by the movement of the eye and head as the person looks at the object or by the motion of other objects in the scene. To reach for the object accurately, the visuomotor system must separate information about the position of the stationary target from background retinal motion signals—a long-standing problem that is poorly understood2,3,4,5,6,7. Here we show that the visuomotor system does not distinguish between these two information sources: when observers made fast reaching movements to a briefly presented stationary target, their hand shifted in a direction consistent with the motion of a distant and unrelated stimulus, a result contrary to most other findings8,9. This can be seen early in the hand's trajectory (∼120 ms) and occurs continuously from programming of the movement through to its execution. The visuomotor system might make use of the motion signals arising from eye and head movements to update the positions of targets rapidly and redirect the hand to compensate for body movements.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jeannerod, M. The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal-Directed Movements (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988)
De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Res. 31, 1619–1626 (1991)
Kowler, E. Eye Movements and their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990)
Nishida, S. & Johnston, A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 397, 610–612 (1999)
Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception 19, 611–616 (1990)
Smeets, J. B. J. & Brenner, E. Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 19–31 (1995)
Whitney, D. & Cavanagh, P. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neurosci. 3, 954–959 (2000)
Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G. & Nagle, M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 5, 692–700 (1979)
Wong, E. & Mack, A. Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 48, 123–131 (1981)
Desmurget, M. & Grafton, S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 423–431 (2000)
Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D. & Prablanc, C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320, 748–750 (1986)
Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R. & Jeannerod, M. The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp. Brain Res. 79, 431–435 (1990)
Pelisson, D., Prablanc, C., Goodale, M. A. & Jeannerod, M. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Exp. Brain Res. 62, 303–311 (1986)
Prablanc, C. & Martin, O. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J. Neurophysiol. 67, 455–469 (1992)
Brenner, E. & Smeets, J. B. J. Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. J. Mot. Behav. 29, 297–310 (1997)
Abrams, R. A. & Landgraf, J. Z. Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Percept. Psychophys. 47, 349–359 (1990)
Bacon, J. H., Gordon, A. & Schulman, P. H. The effect of two types of induced-motion displays on perceived location of the induced target. Percept. Psychophys. 32, 353–359 (1982)
Bridgeman, B., Peery, S. & Anand, S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Percept. Psychophys. 59, 456–469 (1997)
Lepecq, J. C., Jouen, F. & Dubon, D. The effect of linear vection on manual aiming at memorized directions of stationary targets. Perception 22, 49–60 (1993)
Masson, G., Proteau, L. & Mestre, D. R. Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans. Vision Res. 35, 837–852 (1995)
Sheth, B. R. & Shimojo, S. In space, the past can be recast but not the present. Perception 29, 1279–1290 (2000)
Yamagishi, N., Anderson, S. J. & Ashida, H. Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 973–977 (2001)
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C. & Xing, J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 303–330 (1997)
Buneo, C. A., Jarvis, M. R., Batista, A. P. & Andersen, R. A. Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 416, 632–636 (2002)
Henriques, D. Y., Klier, E. M., Smith, M. A., Lowy, D. & Crawford, J. D. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J. Neurosci. 18, 1583–1594 (1998)
Berry, M. J. 2nd, Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A. & Meister, M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398, 334–338 (1999)
Hayes, A. Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1341–1345 (2000)
Snowden, R. J. Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Curr. Biol. 8, 1343–1345 (1998)
Whitaker, D., McGraw, P. V. & Pearson, S. Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects. Vision Res. 39, 2999–3009 (1999)
Blouin, J., Gauthier, G. M., van Donkelaar, P. & Vercher, J. L. Encoding the position of a flashed visual target after passive body rotations. NeuroReport 6, 1165–1168 (1995)
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Ladich, D. Pulham, C. Thomas, L. Van Cleeff, E. Veinsreideris and H. Yang. This work was supported by grants from US National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute to D.W., and from Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canada Research Chairs Program to M.A.G.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitney, D., Westwood, D. & Goodale, M. The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Nature 423, 869–873 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01693
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01693
This article is cited by
-
The relationship between the implicit visuomotor control and the motor planning accuracy
Experimental Brain Research (2021)
-
Distinct temporal developments of visual motion and position representations for multi-stream visuomotor coordination
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Is the manual following response an attempt to compensate for inferred self-motion?
Experimental Brain Research (2019)
-
Postural responses to target jumps and background motion in a fast pointing task
Experimental Brain Research (2018)
-
Planning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2013)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.