Abstract
Centre–surround receptive field organization is a ubiquitous property in mammalian visual systems, presumably tailored for extracting image features that are differentially distributed over space1. In visual motion, this is evident as antagonistic interactions between centre and surround regions of the receptive fields of many direction-selective neurons in visual cortex2,3,4,5,6. In a series of psychophysical experiments we make the counterintuitive observation that increasing the size of a high-contrast moving pattern renders its direction of motion more difficult to perceive and reduces its effectiveness as an adaptation stimulus. We propose that this is a perceptual correlate of centre–surround antagonism, possibly within a population of neurons in the middle temporal visual area. The spatial antagonism of motion signals observed at high contrast gives way to spatial summation as contrast decreases. Evidently, integration of motion signals over space depends crucially on the visibility of those signals, thereby allowing the visual system to register motion information efficiently and adaptively.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman, J., Miezin, F. & McGuinness, E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local–global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 407–430 (1985)
Allman, J., Miezin, F. & McGuinness, E. Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception 14, 105–126 (1985)
Born, R. T. & Tootell, R. B. Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area. Nature 357, 497–499 (1992)
Eifuku, S. & Wurtz, R. H. Response to motion in extrastriate area MSTl: Center–surround interactions. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 282–296 (1998)
Jones, H. E., Grieve, K. L., Wang, W. & Sillito, A. M. Surround suppression in primate V1. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 2011–2028 (2001)
Raiguel, S. E., van Hulle, M. M., Xiao, D. K., Marcar, V. L. & Orban, G. A. Shape and spatial distribution of receptive fields and antagonistic motion surround in the middle temporal area (V5) of the macaque. Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 2064–2082 (1995)
Born, R. T., Groh, J. M., Zhao, R. & Lukasewycz, S. J. Segregation of object and background motion in visual area MT: Effects of microstimulation on eye movements. Neuron 26, 725–734 (2000)
Nakayama, K. & Loomis, J. M. Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception 3, 63–80 (1974)
Gautama, T. & Van Hulle, M. M. Function of center–surround antagonism for motion in visual area MT/V5: A modeling study. Vision Res. 41, 3917–3930 (2001)
Buracas, G. T. & Albright, T. D. Contribution of area MT to perception of three-dimensional shape: Computational study. Vision Res. 361, 869–887 (1996)
Westheimer, G. Spatial interaction in human cone vision. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 190, 139–154 (1967)
Anderson, S. J. & Burr, D. C. Spatial summation properties of directionally sensitive mechanisms in human vision. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1330–1339 (1991)
Watson, A. B. & Turano, K. The optimal motion stimulus. Vision Res. 35, 325–336 (1995)
Kapadia, M. K., Westheimer, G. & Gilbert, C. D. Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12073–12078 (1999)
Levitt, J. B. & Lund, J. S. Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature 387, 73–76 (1997)
Sceniak, M. P., Ringach, D. L., Hawken, M. J. & Shapley, R. Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nature Neurosci. 2, 733–739 (1999)
Albright, T. D. Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 1106–1130 (1984)
Nakayama, K. & Silverman, G. H. Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 267–274 (1985)
Dobkins, K. R. & Albright, T. D. in High-level Motion Processing (ed. Watanabe, T.) 53–94 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998)
Huk, A. C., Ress, D. & Heeger, D. J. Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron 32, 161–172 (2001)
Murakami, I. & Shimojo, S. Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity. Vision Res. 35, 1835–1844 (1995)
Sachtler, W. L. & Zaidi, Q. Effect of spatial configuration on motion aftereffects. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1433–1449 (1993)
Verghese, P. & Stone, L. S. Perceived visual speed constrained by image segmentation. Nature 381, 161–163 (1996)
Derrington, A. M. & Goddard, P. A. Failure of motion discrimination at high contrasts: Evidence for saturation. Vision Res. 29, 1767–1776 (1989)
Gegenfurtner, K. R. et al. Chromatic properties of neurons in macaque MT. Vis. Neurosci. 11, 455–466 (1994)
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. & Movshon, J. A. The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 12, 4745–4765 (1992)
Cavanagh, P., MacLeod, D. I. & Anstis, S. M. Equiluminance: Spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1428–1438 (1987)
Sclar, G., Maunsell, J. H. & Lennie, P. Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Res. 30, 1–10 (1990)
Rees, G., Friston, K. & Koch, C. A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nature Neurosci. 3, 716–723 (2000)
Kastner, S. et al. Modulation of sensory suppression: Implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1398–1411 (2001)
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Schall, B. Borghuis, S. Shorter-Jacobi and A. Panduranga for comments on the experiments and manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the NIH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tadin, D., Lappin, J., Gilroy, L. et al. Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature 424, 312–315 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01800
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01800
This article is cited by
-
Visual surround suppression at the neural and perceptual levels
Cognitive Neurodynamics (2023)
-
Investigating the neurochemistry of the human visual system using magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Brain Structure and Function (2022)
-
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Reduction of higher-order occipital GABA and impaired visual perception in acute major depressive disorder
Molecular Psychiatry (2021)
-
Opposing effects of selectivity and invariance in peripheral vision
Nature Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.