Abstract
In the classical model of chick wing digit-patterning1, the polarizing region—a group of cells at the posterior margin of the early bud—produces a morphogen gradient, now known to be based on Sonic hedgehog (Shh)2,3, that progressively specifies anteroposterior positional identities in the posterior digit-forming region4. Here we add an integral growth component to this model by showing that Shh-dependent proliferation of prospective digit progenitor cells is essential for specifying the complete pattern of digits across the anteroposterior axis. Inhibiting Shh signalling in early wing buds reduced anteroposterior expansion, and posterior digits were lost because all prospective digit precursors formed anterior structures. Inhibiting proliferation also irreversibly reduced anteroposterior expansion, but instead anterior digits were lost because all prospective digit precursors formed posterior structures. When proliferation recovered in such wings, Shh transcription was maintained for longer than normal, suggesting that duration of Shh expression is controlled by a mechanism that measures proliferation. Rescue experiments confirmed that Shh-dependent proliferation controls digit number during a discrete time-window in which Shh-dependent specification normally occurs. Our findings that Shh signalling has dual functions that can be temporally uncoupled have implications for understanding congenital and evolutionary digit reductions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tickle, C., Summerbell, D. & Wolpert, L. Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 254, 199–202 (1975)
Riddle, R. D., Johnson, R. L., Laufer, E. & Tabin, C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75, 1401–1416 (1993)
Ros, M. A. et al. The chick oligozeugodactyly (ozd) mutant lacks sonic hedgehog function in the limb. Development 130, 527–537 (2003)
Yang, Y. et al. Relationship between dose, distance and time in Sonic Hedgehog-mediated regulation of anteroposterior polarity in the chick limb. Development 124, 4393–4404 (1997)
Wolpert, L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular formation. J. Theor. Biol. 25, 1–47 (1969)
Cooke, J. & Summerbell, D. Cell cycle and experimental pattern duplication in the chick wing during embryonic development. Nature 287, 697–701 (1980)
Smith, J. C. & Wolpert, L. Pattern formation along the anteroposterior axis of the chick wing: the increase in width following a polarizing region graft and the effect of X-irradiation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 63, 127–144 (1981)
Summerbell, D. The control of growth and the development of pattern across the anteroposterior axis of the chick limb bud. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 63, 161–180 (1981)
Harfe, B. D. et al. Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell 118, 517–528 (2004)
Vargesson, N. et al. Cell fate in the chick limb bud and relationship to gene expression. Development 124, 1909–1918 (1997)
Scherz, P. J., McGlinn, E., Nissim, S. & Tabin, C. J. Extended exposure to Sonic hedgehog is required for patterning the posterior digits of the vertebrate limb. Dev. Biol. 308, 343–354 (2007)
Roy, S. & Ingham, P. W. Hedgehogs tryst with the cell cycle. J. Cell Sci. 115, 4393–4397 (2002)
Zwilling, E. & Hansborough, L. Interactions between limb bud ectoderm and mesoderm in the chick embryo. III. Experiments with polydactylous limbs. J. Exp. Zool. 132, 219–239 (1956)
Davey, M. G. et al. The chicken talpid3 gene encodes a novel protein essential for Hedgehog signaling. Genes Dev. 20, 1365–1377 (2006)
Ocker, M. & Schneider-Stock, R. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: signalling towards p21(cip1/waf1). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39, 1367–1374 (2007)
Alberch, P. & Gale, E. A. Size dependence during the development of the amphibian foot. Colchicine-induced digital loss and reduction. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 76, 177–197 (1983)
Gabriel, M. L. The effect of local applications of colchicine on Leghorn and polydactylous chick embryos. J. Exp. Zool. 101, 339–350 (1946)
Ohsugi, K., Gardiner, D. M. & Bryant, S. V. Cell cycle length affects gene expression and pattern formation in limbs. Dev. Biol. 189, 13–21 (1997)
Scherz, P. J., Harfe, B. D., McMahon, A. P. & Tabin, C. J. The limb bud Shh-Fgf feedback loop is terminated by expansion of former ZPA cells. Science 305, 396–399 (2004)
Barnes, E. A., Kong, M., Ollendorff, V. & Donoghue, D. J. Patched1 interacts with cyclin B1 to regulate cell cycle progression. EMBO J. 20, 2214–2223 (2001)
Sharony, R. et al. Preaxial ray reduction defects as part of valproic acid embryofetopathy. Prenat. Diagn. 13, 909–918 (1993)
Phiel, C. J. et al. Histone deacetylase is a direct target of valproic acid, a potent anticonvulsant, mood stabilizer, and teratogen. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36734–36741 (2001)
Alessandri, J. L. et al. Syndrome de Feingold. Arch. Pédiatr. 7, 637–640 (2000)
Shapiro, M. D., Hanken, J. & Rosenthal, N. Developmental basis of evolutionary digit loss in the Australian lizard Hemiergis. J. Exp. Zool. 297B, 48–56 (2003)
Smith, J. C. Evidence for a positional memory in the development of the chick wing bud. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 52, 105–113 (1979)
Nieto, A., Patel, K. & Wilkinson, D. G. in Methods in Cell Biology (ed. Bronner Fraser, M.) 219–235 (Academic, San Diego, 1996)
Drossopoulou, G. et al. A model for anteroposterior patterning of the vertebrate limb based on sequential long- and short-range Shh signalling and Bmp signalling. Development 127, 1337–1348 (2000)
Summerbell, D., Lewis, J. H. & Wolpert, L. Positional information in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 244, 492–496 (1973)
Saunders, J. W. & Gasseling, M. T. in Mesenchymal–Epithelial Interactions (eds Fleichmeyer, R. & Billingham, R. E.) 78–97 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1968)
Hamburger, V. & Hamilton, H. L. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49–92 (1951)
Acknowledgements
We thank: the Medical Research Council (C.T., M.T.) and the Royal Society (C.T., R.M. and Y.Y.) for funding; ARK Genomics (Edinburgh), the Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council and the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology for EST clones; K. Ball for the p21cip1 vector; D. Burt for talpid3 embryos; J. Richman for Shh protein; R. Clarke for FACS. M.T. thanks A. Münsterberg for support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-8 with Legends and Supplementary Tables 1-2. (PDF 1454 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Towers, M., Mahood, R., Yin, Y. et al. Integration of growth and specification in chick wing digit-patterning. Nature 452, 882–886 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06718
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06718
This article is cited by
-
Fgf signalling triggers an intrinsic mesodermal timer that determines the duration of limb patterning
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Overexpression of sonic hedgehog enhances the osteogenesis in rat ectomesenchymal stem cells
Cell and Tissue Banking (2022)
-
Generation of extracellular morphogen gradients: the case for diffusion
Nature Reviews Genetics (2021)
-
Mechanisms of bone development and repair
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2020)
-
Limb patterning genes and heterochronic development of the emu wing bud
EvoDevo (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.