Abstract
Arising from: M. Holmström et al. Nature 451, 970–972 (2008)10.1038/nature06600; Holmström et al. reply
Using numerical simulation, Holmström et al.1 proposed a plausible alternative explanation of the observed Lyman-α absorption that was seen during the transit of HD 209458b (ref. 2). They conclude that radiation pressure alone cannot explain the observations and that a peculiar stellar wind is needed. Here we show that radiation pressure alone can in fact produce the observed high-velocity hydrogen atoms. We also emphasize that even if the stellar wind is responsible for the observed hydrogen, to have a sufficient number of atoms for charge exchange with stellar wind, the energetic neutral atom (ENA) model also needs a significant escape from the planet atmosphere of similar amplitude as quoted in ref. 2.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The simulation of ref. 1 is aimed at reproducing the observed absorption spectrum in Lyman-α with 15 ± 4% absorption between -130 and 100 km s-1 (refs 2, 3). A mechanism is needed to produce hydrogen atoms at these high velocities exceeding the planet escape velocity. We previously proposed that hydrogen atoms in the exosphere are naturally accelerated by the stellar radiation pressure2,4; however, Holmström et al.1 concluded that radiation pressure alone cannot explain the observation. Nonetheless, in their work, the strength of the radiation pressure has been artificially reduced to a value 2 to 5 times lower than the solar value, whereas the observed Lyman-α line strength and profile shows that it is significantly larger than the solar value. The low radiation pressure assumed by Holmström et al.1 is valid only at high radial velocity. However, if low radiation pressure is assumed, high velocities are not reached, which therefore explains the different conclusion reached by Holmström et al.1. We believe that the treatment of the link between the radiation pressure and radial velocity needs to be corrected.
To show that the radiation pressure can explain the observed spectrum, we calculated the modelled Lyman-α profile with radiation pressure alone, in the same way as done in Fig. 3 of ref. 1 for the ENA model. This calculation is done taking into account the strength and profile of the Lyman-α line, and the corresponding variation of radiation pressure as a function of radial velocity. Planetary and stellar gravities are also included. These differences explain the different results obtained with radiation pressure alone in the two models. The result plotted in Fig. 1 shows that the resulting profiles are similar in the two models (radiation pressure alone and ENA with reduced radiation pressure), and neither possible model can be favoured. Radiation pressure cannot be excluded as an explanation of the observed spectrum.
Although we agree that the ENA model is a plausible scenario, we do not believe that ENAs can explain the observations better than a classical scenario with radiation pressure. The ENA model requires extraordinary conditions for the wind parameters (high temperature and low velocity) which are not constrained by any other observations, whereas the radiation pressure as measured in the Lyman-α spectrum can self-consistently explain the observations.
References
Holmström, M. et al. Energetic neutral atoms as the explanation for the high-velocity hydrogen around HD 209458b. Nature 451, 970–972 (2008)
Vidal-Madjar, A. et al. An extended upper atmosphere around the extrasolar planet HD209458b. Nature 422, 143–146 (2003)
Vidal-Madjar, A. et al. Exoplanet HD 209458b (Osiris). Evaporation strengthened. Astrophys. J. 676, L57–L60 (2008)
Vidal-Madjar, A. & Lecavelier des Etangs, A. “Osiris” (HD209458b), an Evaporating Planet. ASP Conf. Series 321, 152–159 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
PowerPoint slides
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A. & Désert, JM. The origin of hydrogen around HD 209458b. Nature 456, E1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07402
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07402
This article is cited by
-
Hydrogen ENA-cloud observation and modeling as a tool to study star-exoplanet interaction
Astrophysics and Space Science (2011)
-
Holmström et al. reply
Nature (2008)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.