Abstract
The anteroposterior identity of cranial neural crest cells is thought to be preprogrammed before these cells emigrate from the neural tube. Here we test this assumption by developing techniques for transposing cells in the hindbrain of mouse embryos, using small numbers of cells in combination with genetic and lineage markers. This technique has uncovered a surprising degree of plasticity with respect to the expression of Hox genes, which can be used as markers of different hindbrain segments and cells, in both hindbrain tissue and cranial neural crest cells. Our analysis shows that the patterning of cranial neural crest cells relies on a balance between permissive and instructive signals, and underscores the importance of cell-community effects. These results reveal a new role for the cranial mesoderm in patterning facial tissues. Furthermore, our findings argue against a permanently fixed prepatterning of the cranial neural crest that is maintained by passive transfer of positional information from the hindbrain to the periphery.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lumsden, A. & Krumlauf, R. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis . Science 274, 1109–1115 (1996).
Lumsden, A. & Keynes, R. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424– 428 (1989).
Lumsden, A., Sprawson, N. & Graham, A. Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113, 1281–1291 (1991).
Köntges, G. & Lumsden, A. Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. Development 122, 3229–3242 (1996).
Serbedzija, G., Fraser, S. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Vital dye analysis of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo. Development 116, 297 –307 (1992).
Sechrist, J., Serbedzija, G. N., Scherson, T., Fraser, S. E. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Segmental migration of the hindbrain neural crest does not arise from its segmental generation. Development 118, 691–703 (1993).
Le Douarin, N. The Neural Crest (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983).
Noden, D. M. Origins and patterning of craniofacial mesenchymal tissues. J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol. Suppl. 2, 15– 31 (1986).
Noden, D. The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues. Dev. Biol. 96, 144– 165 (1983).
Couly, G., Grapin-Botton, A., Coltey, P., Ruhin, B. & Le Douarin, N. M. Determination of the identity of the derivatives of the cephalic neural crest: incompatibility between Hox gene expression and lower jaw development. Development 128, 3445–3459 ( 1998).
Krumlauf, R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78, 191–201 (1994).
Hunt, P. et al. A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the head . Nature 353, 861–864 (1991).
Saldivar, J., Krull, C., Krumlauf, R., Ariza-McNaughton, L. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Rhombomere of origin determines autonomous versus environmentally regulated expression of Hoxa3 in the avian embryo . Development 122, 895– 904 (1996).
Hunt, P., Clarke, J. D. W., Buxton, P., Ferretti, P. & Thorogood, P. Stability and plasticity of neural crest patterning and branchial arch Hox code after extensive cephalic crest rotation. Dev. Biol. 198, 82– 104 (1998).
Guthrie, S. et al. Neuroectodermal autonomy of Hox-2.9 expression revealed by rhombomere transpositions. Nature 356, 157–159 (1992).
Kuratani, S. C. & Eichele, G. Rhombomere transposition repatterns the segmental organization of cranial nerves and reveals cell-autonomous expression of a homeodomain protein. Development 117 , 105–117 (1993).
Prince, V. & Lumsden, A. Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest. Development 120, 911– 923 (1994).
Grapin-Botton, A., Bonnin, M.-A., Ariza-McNaughton, L., Krumlauf, R. & LeDouarin, N. M. Plasticity of transposed rhombomeres: Hox gene induction is correlated with phenotypic modifications. Development 121, 2707–2721 (1995).
Itasaki, N., Sharpe, J., Morrison, A. & Krumlauf, R. Reprogramming Hox expression in the vertebrate hindbrain: influence of paraxial mesoderm and rhombomere transposition. Neuron 16, 487–500 (1996).
Grapin-Botton, A., Bonnin, M.-A. & Le Douarin, N. Hox gene induction in the neural tube depends on three parameters: competence, signal supply and paralogue group. Development 124, 849–859 (1997).
Gould, A., Itasaki, N. & Krumlauf, R. Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway. Neuron 21, 39–51 (1998).
Noden, D. Patterning of avian craniofacial muscles. Dev. Biol. 116, 347–356 (1986).
Trainor, P. A., Tan, S. S. & Tam, P. P. L. Cranial paraxial mesoderm — regionalization of cell fate and impact on craniofacial development in mouse embryos. Development 120, 2925–2932 (1994).
Pöpperl, H. et al. Segmental expression of Hoxb1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/Pbx. Cell 81, 1031–1042 ( 1995).
Maconochie, M. et al. Cross-regulation in the mouse HoxB complex: the expression of Hoxb2 in rhombomere 4 is regulated by Hoxb1. Genes Dev. 11, 1885–1896 (1997).
Nonchev, S. et al. Segmental expression of Hoxa-2 in the hindbrain is directly regulated by Krox-20. Development 122, 543 –554 (1996).
Maconochie, M. et al. Regulation of Hoxa2 in cranial neural crest cells involves members of the AP-2 family. Development 126, 1483–1494 (1999).
Marshall, H. et al. Retinoic acid alters hindbrain Hox code and induces transformation of rhombomeres 2/3 into a 4/5 identity. Nature 360, 737–741 (1992).
Lee, Y. M. et al. Retinoic acid stage-dependently alters the migration pattern and identity of hindbrain neural crest cells. Development 121, 825–837 (1995).
Chazaud, C., Chambon, P. & Dollé, P. Retinoic acid is required in the mouse embryo for left-right asymmetry determination and heart morphogenesis. Development 126, 2589–2596 (1999).
Xu, Q., Alldus, G., Holder, N. & Wilkinson, D. G. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain . Development 121, 4005– 4016 (1995).
Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V. & Wilkinson, D. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399, 267–271 (1999).
Kulesa, P. Neural crest cell dynamics revealed by time-lapse video microscopy of whole chick explant cultures. Dev. Biol. 204, 327–344 (1998).
Frohman, M. A., Boyle, M. & Martin, G. R. Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene; analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm. Development 110, 589–607 (1990).
Golding, J., Trainor, P., Krumlauf, R. & Gassman, M. Defects in pathfinding by cranial neural crest cells in mice lacking the neuregulin receptor ErbB4. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 103 –109 (2000).
Gould, A., Morrison, A., Sproat, G., White, R. & Krumlauf, R. Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns. Genes Dev. 11, 900–913 ( 1997).
Manzanares, M. et al. The role of kreisler in segmentation during hindbrain development. Dev. Biol. 211, 220– 237 (1999).
Sturm, K. & Tam, P. P. L. Isolation and culture of whole postimplantation embryos and germ layer derivatives. Methods Enzymol. 225, 164–190 ( 1993).
Whiting, J. et al. Multiple spatially specific enhancers are required to reconstruct the pattern of Hox-2.6 gene expression. Genes Dev. 5, 2048–2059 (1991).
Trainor, P. A. & Tam, P. P. L. Cranial paraxial mesoderm and neural crest of the mouse embryo — codistribution in the craniofacial mesenchyme but distinct segregation in the branchial arches. Development 121, 2569–2582 (1995).
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Mealyer for help with animal husbandry; C. Akins for help with FACS analysis; J. Golding and M. Gassmann for sharing unpublished results; and D. Wilkinson, M. Bronner-Fraser and members of the Krumlauf laboratory for valuable discussions. P.T. was supported by EMBO and HFSP postdoctoral fellowships. This work was funded by Core MRC Programme support and an EEC Biotechnology Network grant (#BIO4 CT-960378) to R.K.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.K.
Supplementary information is available on Nature Cell Biology’s World-Wide Web site (http://cellbio.nature.com) or as paper copy from the London editorial office of Nature Cell Biology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trainor, P., Krumlauf, R. Plasticity in mouse neural crest cells reveals a new patterning role for cranial mesoderm. Nat Cell Biol 2, 96–102 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35000051
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35000051
This article is cited by
-
The spatial phenotype of genotypically distinct meningiomas demonstrate potential implications of the embryology of the meninges
Oncogene (2021)
-
Augmented BMP4 signal impairs tongue myogenesis
Journal of Molecular Histology (2021)
-
A Hox-TALE regulatory circuit for neural crest patterning is conserved across vertebrates
Nature Communications (2019)
-
Prevention of Treacher Collins syndrome craniofacial anomalies in mouse models via maternal antioxidant supplementation
Nature Communications (2016)