Abstract
We show that human Cdc14A phosphatase1 interacts with interphase centrosomes, and that this interaction is independent of microtubules and Cdc14A phosphatase activity, but requires active nuclear export. Disrupting the nuclear export signal (NES) led to Cdc14A being localized in nucleoli, which in unperturbed cells selectively contain Cdc14B (ref. 1). Conditional overproduction of Cdc14A, but not its phosphatase-dead or NES-deficient mutants, or Cdc14B, resulted in premature centrosome splitting and formation of supernumerary mitotic spindles. In contrast, downregulation of endogenous Cdc14A by short inhibitory RNA duplexes (siRNA) induced mitotic defects including impaired centrosome separation and failure to undergo productive cytokinesis. Consequently, both overexpression and downregulation of Cdc14A caused aberrant chromosome partitioning into daughter cells. These results indicate that Cdc14A is a physiological regulator of the centrosome duplication cycle, which, when disrupted, can lead to genomic instability in mammalian cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
In the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae2,3 and Schizosaccharomyces pombe4,5, both exit from mitosis and coordination of cytokinesis require the Cdc14 (Flp1) phosphatase. In mammals, distinct genes encode two members of the Cdc14 family, Cdc14A and Cdc14B (ref. 1). To investigate how human Cdc14 phosphatases function in cell-cycle progression, we generated derivatives of the U-2-OS cell line6 that conditionally express Cdc14A and Cdc14B in a tetracycline-repressible manner (Fig. 1a). Although inducing Cdc14B did not have a major effect on the distribution of cells in different parts of the cell cycle (data not shown), conditional overproduction of both Myc- and green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Cdc14A led to progressive cell death, accompanied by accumulation of pre-G1 DNA fragments and gradual elimination of cells at the G2–M transition (Fig. 1b, and data not shown). The cell-death peak was preceded by abnormalities in almost 50% of mitotic cells, including multipolar mitotic spindles and lagging and missegregated chromosomes (Fig. 1c). When the transgenes were repressed, there was no measurable alteration in cell-cycle progression in any of the clones when compared to parental cells (less than 10% had abnormal cell divisions).
The ability of Cdc14A to deregulate cell division in stages before cytokinesis and/or mitotic exit suggested that at least some features of the human phosphatase are distinct from its yeast counterpart. The appearance of multipolar mitotic spindles led us to investigate a potential link between Cdc14A and the cellular microtubule-organizing centres (MTOCs)7,8,9. An antiserum to the amino terminus of human Cdc14A specifically recognized a single band of the expected size on immunoblots of total cell extracts (Fig. 2a). Apart from a weak cytoplasmic signal, immunofluorescence analysis revealed a pronounced centrosomal staining in interphase U-2-OS cells (Fig. 2b). That these Cdc14A-decorated organelles are centrosomes was confirmed by co-localization with γ-tubulin (Fig. 2b). Although the cytosolic Cdc14A was readily detectable in dividing cells, the bulk of the centrosome-associated, Cdc14A-specific signal disappeared after entry into mitosis (Fig. 2b), indicating that a significant fraction of Cdc14A dissociates from the centrosomes at the G2–M transition. Both Myc-tagged Cdc14A analysed in fixed cells, and its GFP-tagged counterpart (GFP constructs also contain the Myc tag)in live cells, confirmed that the protein is found in the cytoplasm and on centrosomes of interphase cells (Fig. 2c) and is reduced (but not entirely absent) on spindle poles during mitosis (data not shown). Because a mouse antiserum against full-length human Cdc14A also confirmed the results obtained with the rabbit antibody (data not shown), we conclude that both endogenous and ectopic Cdc14A proteins localize to the cytosol and interact with interphase MTOCs, a pattern reminiscent of established centrosome regulators10.
Next, we determined what Cdc14A requires for its normal subcellular distribution. Interaction with centrosomes is independent of the intrinsic catalytic activity of Cdc14A, as GFP-tagged phosphatase-dead Cdc14A localized to interphase centrosomes and became reduced on mitotic spindle poles in a manner indistinguishable from the wild-type protein (Fig. 2d). Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP)11 performed on wild-type centrosome-associated GFP–Cdc14A showed that the majority of the GFP signal on the pulse-bleached centrosome recovered quickly; this recovery occurred with similar kinetics in cells pretreated with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole (Fig. 2e). The latter findings indicate that Cdc14A is a genuine centrosomal protein, the majority of which undergoes a dynamic, microtubule-independent turnover.
To test whether the accumulation of Cdc14A in cytosolic compartments, including centrosomes, involves regulation of protein transport across the nuclear envelope, we subjected the cells expressing GFP–Cdc14A to leptomycin B (LMB), an inhibitor of chromosomal region maintenance (CRM1)-dependent nuclear export12. Indeed, a short treatment with LMB caused the majority of Cdc14A to be redistributed from the cytosol to nucleoli (Fig. 3a). Analyses of a series of truncated versions of Cdc14A showed that deleting the region between amino acids 343 and 393 was necessary and sufficient to mimic the effect of LMB (data not shown). This region contains a small domain rich in large, hydrophobic amino acids typical of an NES13,14 (Fig. 3b). To test the function of this putative NES, we generated a cell line that conditionally expressed a NES-deficient variant of Cdc14A, in which methionine and isoleucine residues (Met362 and Ile364) were changed to alanine residues (Fig. 3c). Indeed, the induced Cdc14A(ΔNES) accumulated in nucleoli, colocalized with nucleolin (Fig. 3c, upper panels), and lost its ability to associate with centrosomes (Fig. 3c, lower panels). Identical results were obtained with another mutant of Cdc14A, in which isoleucine (Ile355) and leucines residues (Leu356 and Leu359) in the NES were substituted with alanine residues (data not shown). Although the NES-containing region of Cdc14A is required to keep Cdc14A out of the nucleus, it is insufficient to localize Cdc14A to the centrosomes (Fig. 3d). Analysis of a series of Cdc14A deletion mutants revealed that sequences both N- and carboxy-terminal of the central NES might be involved in centrosome localization. Deleting amino acids 1–343 and 393–623, respectively, reduced the ability of the truncated proteins to interact with interphase centrosomes (Fig. 3d). Therefore, the NES is a prerequisite for proper localization of Cdc14A, but the specific centrosome localization signal is complex and involves regions both N- and C-terminal of the NES.
These data suggested that, in principle, human Cdc14 phosphatases could be regulated by periodic sequestration in nucleoli, similar to their yeast counterparts1,2,3,4,15. But, as demonstrated above, endogenous (as well as the ectopic) wild-type Cdc14A in fixed cells and GFP–Cdc14A in live cells always localized to centrosomes and never to nucleoli. Instead, we found that the nucleolus may harbour a distinct Cdc14 isoform that can avoid nuclear export. Conditionally expressed wild-type Cdc14B (ref. 1) accumulated in the nucleoli immediately after the induced protein became detectable (Fig. 3e). Cdc14B-associated fluorescence in the cytoplasm was negligible (Fig. 3e), Cdc14B did not colocalize with centrosomal markers, and its localization was unaltered by LMB treatment (data not shown). Whether this indicates that Cdc14B is a true functional homologue of the yeast counterparts requires further investigation. Mammalian Cdc14A, on the other hand, probably fulfils other, previously unrecognized function(s) related to the periodic activities of the major cellular MTOCs. As such, Cdc14A seems to have evolved an active, nuclear-export mechanism that prevents its nucleolar sequestration, which would otherwise lead to a functional inactivation of Cdc14A. This idea is consistent with what happens when wild-type Cdc14A is transiently overexpressed — this resulted in a ∼sevenfold increase in the amount of centrosome-bound Cdc14A, followed by a rapidly deregulated progression through mitosis in 47 ± 3% of all dividing cells (assessed by the number of multiple mitotic spindles and chromatin abnormalities; Fig. 1c). In contrast, neither NES-deficient Cdc14A nor wild-type Cdc14B (both localized in nucleoli) increased the frequency of mitotic abnormalities above the background level (7 ± 2%) observed in parental cells (data not shown). Thus, the compartmentalization of distinct mammalian Cdc14 phosphatases through selective nuclear export might ensure that Cdc14A fulfils its centrosome-associated function(s) and does not disrupt that of the nucleolar Cdc14B.
To test whether the Cdc14A phosphatase might directly regulate the centrosome-duplication cycle, we examined cell lines conditionally expressing wild-type or phosphatase-dead Cdc14A, synchronized in early S phase before the transgenes were induced. Inducing wild-type Cdc14A after release from the synchronization block and before the first wave of cell division was sufficient to generate mitotic cells with more than two centrosomes composed of both pericentriolar material and centrioles (Fig. 4a). Generation of multiple poles that can produce spindles, observed in almost 75% of all dividing cells, was indeed accompanied by a corresponding increase in the number of functional mitotic spindles (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S1), which triggered unequal partitioning of chromosomes into multiple daughter cells (see Supplementary Information, Movie 1). Therefore, the mitotic defects induced by elevated Cdc14A are not just a consequence of abnormal mitotic exit and/or cytokinesis from the preceding cell cycles, and the excess of Cdc14A could indeed interfere with physiological mechanisms restricting centrosome duplication to one round within the given cell-division cycle.
Next, we assayed the consequences of inducing wild-type and phosphatase-dead Cdc14A in cells stably arrested in S-phase by an extended double-thymidine treatment. Virtually all centrosomes in control and phosphatase-dead Cdc14A-expressing cells appeared as paired doublets, each containing two duplicated centrioles (Fig. 4b), whereas inducing wild-type Cdc14A triggered centrosome splitting in 50% of these S-phase cells (Fig. 4b). Again, the separated centrosomes contained both pericentriolar material and centrioles (Fig. 4b). Several pieces of evidence indicate that the premature centrosome splitting in cells overproducing Cdc14A occurred within a genuine S phase and not as a consequence of an unscheduled exit into G2 and M. Thus, cells with separated centrosomes did not have morphological signs of mitosis, and early mitotic targets, such as histone H3, had not been phosphorylated. Moreover, DNA synthesis did not occur — regardless of the amount of ectopic Cdc14A — as long as the cells remained arrested, but resumed rapidly after the block (excess thymidine in the culture medium) was removed (data not shown). We conclude that the excess Cdc14A can induce premature centrosome splitting in the absence of mitosis.
Finally, we studied the consequences of downregulating endogenous Cdc14A. Transient transfection of siRNA oligonucleotides that target Cdc14A mRNA in HeLa cells led to a quantitative decrease in the amount of endogenous Cdc14A protein (Fig. 4c). Detailed analysis of cells exposed to Cdc14A siRNA duplexes (but not those transfected with control, sense RNA) had a complex phenotype which indicates that the cell-division and centrosome-duplication processes can be uncoupled. Flow cytometry measurements between 48 and 72 hours after treatment with Cdc14A-directed siRNA showed an increase in cells with a 4N DNA content (from 16 ± 3% to 28 ± 2%). Time-lapse videomicroscopy revealed that this was not a result of cells accumulating in G2 phase but a consequence of failure to complete cell division. Of the cells that attempted to divide in the observation period, 43 ± 6% failed to generate two separated daughter cells, whereas similar defects were detected in only 11% of the mock-treated cells. Many of the observed mitotic abnormalities culminated in a formation of bi-nucleated cells and included: an abortive anaphase attempt (see Supplementary Information, Movie 2); and a failure to undergo the cytoplasmic abscission (see Supplementary Information, Movie 3). Because the outcome of such mitotic abnormalities (cells with two sets of chromosomes) was opposite to what we observed after Cdc14A overexpression (partitioning of the chromosomal pool into three or more smaller nuclei), and because our previous data showed that the excess of Cdc14A induced premature centrosome splitting, we reasoned that the inability to execute productive mitosis in the Cdc14A-deprived cells might have been associated with the lack of centrosome separation. Indeed, immunofluorescence analysis with antibodies to both pericentriolar and centriole-specific markers revealed a decreased proportion of cells with separated centrosomes after treatment with Cdc14A-directed siRNA (6 ± 2% compared with 17 ± 4% in mock-treated cells). The difference between Cdc14A siRNA-treated and control cells was probably even more pronounced because the lack of productive cell division in the Cdc14A-deficient cells was lethal, resulting in a detachment and loss of many productively transfected cells (data not shown). Despite this, virtually all the remaining bi-nucleated cells formed as a consequence of Cdc14A deprivation (representing 10 ± 2% of the entire siRNA-treated cell population compared with less than 2% in mock-treated cells) shared one unseparated centrosome pair (Fig. 4d). The appearance of such cells is consistent with a defect in the centrosome-duplication cycle. A recent study16 showed that separation and migration of a mother centriole, and its transient interaction with the microtubule network within the midbody connecting two daughter cells, was required for cytoplasmic abscission, an event that marks the final step of cytokinesis. In our experiments, the inability to separate centrosomes might have impaired release of the mother centriole and could explain both the fusion of nearly separated cells (see Movie 3) and the significant increase in bi-nucleated cells with one shared centrosome after the siRNA-mediated downregulation of Cdc14A (Fig. 4d).
Collectively, our data provide the first evidence that a mammalian Cdc14 phosphatase is involved in regulating the centrosome-duplication cycle. The dynamic interaction of Cdc14A with centrosomes reported here may help generate a balance between centrosomal phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events that control essential regulatory processes, such as the switch between centrosome cohesion and centrosome separation. Interestingly, antibody-mediated neutralization or overexpression of the truncated form of C-Nap1, an established regulator of centrosome cohesion, resulted in a premature centrosome splitting10 similar to that observed in our cells with deregulated Cdc14A. It has been proposed that aneuploidy in at least some human cancers may be caused by centrosome malfunction7. Our findings that deregulated Cdc14A abolishes the centrosome-division cycle and leads to chromosome missegregation indicate that this phosphatase might be involved in multistep tumorigenesis17, promoting chromosomal instability.
Methods
Plasmids
Cdc14A and Cdc14B cDNAs (accession numbers AF064102.1 and AF064104.1, respectively) were obtained from H. Charbonneau and cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing an N-terminal Myc epitope tag. Myc-tagged Cdc14A and Cdc14B were moved into the tetracycline-repressible pBI vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). To generate pBI-Myc-GFP–Cdc14A, enhanced GFP (EGFP) cDNA lacking a stop codon was amplified from pEGFP-N1 (Clontech) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and cloned into pBI-Myc–Cdc14A. The Cdc14AΔNES (Met362→Ala/Ile364→Ala) and Cdc14APD (Cys278→Ser) mutants were generated using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).
Cell culture
Derivatives of the U-2-OS cell line6 conditionally expressing Cdc14 alleles were generated by transfection with the respective transgenes in pBI plasmids, and cultured as described previously6. Derepression of the transgenes was induced by culturing the cells in tetracycline-free medium for the duration specified in the figure legends. When indicated, nocodazole (Sigma) and leptomycin B (gift from M. Yoshida) was added to culture medium at a concentration of 4 μg ml−1 and 10 ng ml−1, respectively. Synchronization of cells in early S phase by double-thymidine treatment has been described previously18.
Antibodies
Bacterially purified glutathione-S-transferase (GST) protein fused to the N-terminal part of Cdc14A (residues 1–390) was used to raise an antiserum in rabbits. Detailed characterization of this and other Cdc14A reagents is provided elsewhere (B.K.K., Z.A. Zimmerman, H. Charbonneau, P.K.J., unpublished observations). Mouse antibody to nucleolin (MS-3) and goat antiserum to γ-tubulin (C-20) were from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA), and mouse antibody to Eg5 was from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Phospho-specific rabbit antiserum to histone 3 was from Upstate Biotechnology (Charlottesville, VA). Mouse monoclonal antibodies to the Myc epitope (9E10) and the pericentriolar antigen (CTR 453) were gifts from G. Evan and M. Bornens, respectively. Rabbit serum against centrin was donated by E. Nigg.
Microscopy
Cells grown on glass coverslips were immunostained with the combinations of antibodies specified in figure legends. Fluorescence and differential interference contrast (DIC) images were captured and processed using a Zeiss 510 laser-scanning microscope mounted on Axiovert 100M. Matching confocal planes were analysed in all co-localization studies. For live imaging, cells induced to express GFP–Cdc14A were plated on Lab-Tek chambered coverglass (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY), supplied with CO2-independent medium (Invitrogen), and kept on a heated stage (37 °C) throughout the image acquisition. For FRAP analysis11, a single bleach pulse was generated by 20 iterations of the 488-nm argon laser set to the maximal energy output over the entire centrosome. The total bleaching time did not exceed 500 ms. Subsequently, 20–30 single-section imaging scans were collected at a maximum rate (∼1.5 s intervals) with the laser power attenuated to 2% of the bleach intensity. FRAP curves were generated from background-subtracted fluorescence intensity values, quantified in Metamorph (Universal Imaging, Downington, PA), and expressed as relative values to pre-bleached signal (set to 100%). Each measurement was reproduced at least three times in different experiments. Time-lapse videomicroscopy was performed on cells cultured on a heated microscope stage, supplied with CO2-independent medium, and overlaid with mineral oil. DIC images were acquired every 3 min using a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (CoolSnap, Roper Scientific, Tuscon, AZ) and subsequently processed by the Metamorph software package.
RNA interference (RNAi)
RNAi was carried out as described previously19. The sequence of the region targeted by the siRNA, 5′-GCA CAG TAA ATA CCC ACT ATT-3′, corresponded to bases 89–109 located downstream of the first nucleotide of the start codon of the Cdc14A cDNA. Transfection of HeLa cells was performed by Oligofectamine reagent (Invitrogen). Final concentration of the siRNA duplex in culture medium was 100 nM.
Accession codes
References
Li, L., Ernsting, B. R., Wishart, M. J., Lohse, D. L. & Dixon, J. E. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29403–29406 (1997).
Shou, W. et al. Cell 97, 233–244 (1999).
Visintin, R., Hwang, E. S. & Amon, A. Nature 398, 818–823 (1999).
Trautmann, S. et al. Curr. Biol. 11, 931–940 (2001).
Cueille, N. et al. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2649–2664 (2001).
Lukas, J., Sørensen, C. S., Lukas, C., Santoni-Rugiu, E. & Bartek, J. Oncogene 18, 3930–3935 (1999).
Hinchcliffe, E. H. & Sluder, G. Genes Dev. 15, 1167–1181 (2001).
Mayor, T., Meraldi, P., Stierhof, Y. D., Nigg, E. A. & Fry, A. M. FEBS Lett. 452, 92–95 (1999).
Tassin, A. M. & Bornens, M. Biol Cell 91, 343–354 (1999).
Mayor, T., Stierhof, Y. D., Tanaka, K., Fry, A. M. & Nigg, E. A. J. Cell Biol. 151, 837–846 (2000).
White, J. & Stelzer, E. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 61–65 (1999).
Fukuda, M. et al. Nature 390, 308–311 (1997).
Henderson, B. R. & Eleftheriou, A. Exp. Cell Res. 256, 213–224 (2000).
Hagting, A., Karlsson, C., Clute, P., Jackman, M. & Pines, J. EMBO J. 17, 4127–4138 (1998).
Visintin, R. & Amon, A. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 372–377 (2000).
Piel, M., Nordberg, J., Euteneuer, U. & Bornens, M. Science 291, 1550–1553 (2001).
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Nature 396, 643–649 (1998).
Clute, P. & Pines, J. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 82–87 (1999).
Elbashir, S. M. et al. Nature 411, 494–498 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Bornens, H. Charbonneau, G. Evan, E. Nigg and M. Yoshida for reagents, and the Danish Cancer Society, Human Frontier Science Programme, the John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (grants GM54811, GM60439) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Movie 1
Transient overexpression of Cdc14A induces generation of multiple daughter cells. U-2-OS-Cdc14A(wt) cells were synchronized by doublethymidime treatment, released, and induced to express the transgene. After 14 h, the cells were subjected to time-lapse videomicroscopy. Elapsed time (hours:minutes) is indicated in the upper right corner. Scale bar is indicated in the first frame. (MOV 1818 kb)
Movie 2
Impaired cytokinesis after the siRNA-mediated dowregulation of Cdc14A. HeLa cells were transfected by the siRNA duplexes (100 nM) directed to the bases 89-109 of the human Cdc14A coding sequence and subjected to time-lapse videomicroscopy. Recording was initiated 48 h after transfection and the elapsed time (hours:minutes) is indicated in the upper right corner. This dividing cell underwent anaphase, attempted to generate a cleavage furrow but failed to execute a productive cytokinesis. As a result, the cell re-entered a G1-like state with doubled DNA content. Scale bar is indicated in the first frame. (MOV 1545 kb)
Movie 3
Delayed cell fusion after the siRNA-mediated downregulation of Cdc14A. HeLa cells were transfected by the siRNA duplexes (100 nM) directed to the bases 89-109 of the human Cdc14A coding sequence and subjected to time-lapse videomicroscopy. Recording was initiated 48 h after transfection and the elapsed time (hours:minutes) is indicated in the upper right corner. This cell underwent a rapid and apparently normal anaphase and telophase, but the two emerging daughter cells remained connected by a narrow cytoplasmic bridge with a discernible, central located midbody. The lack of its productive abscission led eventually to a cytoplasmic fusion and generation of a bi-nuclear cell. Scale bar is indicated in the first frame. (MOV 2884 kb)
Figure 1
Transient overexpression of Cdc14A induces formation of multipolar mitotic spindle. U-2-OS-Cdc14A(wt) cells were synchronized by doublethymidine treatment, released, and induced to express the transgene. After 14 h, the cells were fixed and co-immunostained by antibodies to a mitotic spindle motor protein (Eg5) and centriolar marker (centrin). (PDF 104 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mailand, N., Lukas, C., Kaiser, B. et al. Deregulated human Cdc14A phosphatase disrupts centrosome separation and chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol 4, 318–322 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb777
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb777
This article is cited by
-
Wip1 controls the translocation of the chromosomal passenger complex to the central spindle for faithful mitotic exit
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2021)
-
Biochemical analyses reveal amino acid residues critical for cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of human Cdc14A phosphatase by cyclin-dependent kinase 1
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
The anaphase promoting complex impacts repair choice by protecting ubiquitin signalling at DNA damage sites
Nature Communications (2017)
-
Cdc14 phosphatase: warning, no delay allowed for chromosome segregation!
Current Genetics (2016)
-
Mutant p53 drives multinucleation and invasion through a process that is suppressed by ANKRD11
Oncogene (2012)