Abstract
Species are largely predicted to shift poleward as global temperatures increase, with this fingerprint of climate change being already observed across a range of taxonomic groups and, mostly temperate, geographic locations1,2,3,4,5. However, the assumption of uni-directional distribution shifts does not account for complex interactions among temperature, precipitation and species-specific tolerances6, all of which shape the direction and magnitude of changes in a species’ climatic niche. We analysed 60 years of past climate change on the Australian continent, assessing the velocity of changes in temperature and precipitation, as well as changes in climatic niche space for 464 Australian birds. We show large magnitude and rapid rates of change in Australian climate over the past 60 years resulting in high-velocity and multi-directional, including equatorial, shifts in suitable climatic space for birds (ranging from 0.1 to 7.6 km yr−1, mean 1.27 km yr−1). Overall, if measured only in terms of poleward distribution shifts, the fingerprint of climate change is underestimated by an average of 26% in temperate regions of the continent and by an average of 95% in tropical regions. We suggest that the velocity of movement required by Australian species to track their climatic niche may be much faster than previously thought and that the interaction between temperature and precipitation changes will result in multi-directional distribution shifts globally.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walther, G-R. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395 (2002).
Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).
Root, T. L. et al. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421, 57–60 (2003).
Chen, I-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).
Hickling, R., Roy, D. B., Hill, J. K., Fox, R. & Thomas, C. D. The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 450–455 (2006).
Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Sys. 37, 637–669 (2006).
Loarie, S. R. et al. The velocity of climate change. Nature 462, 1052–1055 (2009).
Jump, A. S. & Peñuelas, J. Running to stand still: Adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1010–1020 (2005).
Bradshaw, W. E. & Holzapfel, C. M. Evolutionary response to rapid climate change. Science 312, 1477–1478 (2006).
Murphy, H. T., VanDerWal, J. & Lovett-Doust, J. Signatures of range expansion and erosion in eastern North American trees. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1233–1244 (2010).
Hughes, L. Climate change and Australia: Trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecol. 28, 423–443 (2003).
IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K. & Reisinger, A.) (IPCC, 2007).
Reside, A. E., Vanderwal, J. J., Kutt, A. S. & Perkins, G. C. Weather not climate, defines distributions of vagile bird species. PLoS One 5, e13569 (2010).
Thomas, C. D. Climate, climate change and range boundaries. Divers. Distrib. 16, 488–495 (2010).
Williams, S. E., Bolitho, E. E. & Fox, S. Climate change in Australian tropical rainforests: an impending environmental catastrophe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 270, 1887–1892 (2003).
Tingley, M. W., Monahan, W. B., Beissinger, S. R. & Moritz, C. Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19637–19643 (2009).
Gregory, R. D. et al. An indicator of the impact of climatic change on European bird populations. PLoS ONE 4, e4678 (2009).
Devictor, V. et al. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nature Clim. Change 2, 121–124 (2012).
Chambers, L. E., Hughes, L. & Weston, M. A. Climate change and its impact on Australia’s avifauna. Emu 105, 1–20 (2005).
Olsen, P. Wingspan Vol. 14 (suppl.) (2007).
Dawson, T. P., Jackson, S. T., House, J. I., Prentice, I. C. & Mace, G. M. Beyond predictions: Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332, 53–58 (2011).
Tewksbury, J. J., Huey, R. B. & Deutsch, C. A. Ecology—putting the heat on tropical animals. Science 320, 1296–1297 (2008).
Jones, D. A., Wang, W. & Fawcett, R. High-quality spatial climate datasets for Australia. Aust. Met. Ocean. J. 58, 233–248 (2009).
Vincenty, T. Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Surv. Rev. 23, 88–93 (1975).
VanDerWal, J., Falconi, L., Januchowski, S., Shoo, L. P. & Storlie, C. SDMTools: Species distribution modelling tools: Tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R package version 1.1-6 (2011).
Blakers, M., Davies, S. & Reilly, P. The Atlas of Australian Birds (Royal Australian Ornithologists Union, 1984).
Barrett, G., Silcocks, A., Simon, B., Cunningham, R. & Poulter, R. The New Atlas of Australian Birds (Royal Australian Ornithologists Union, 2003).
Williams, S. E. et al. Distributions, life-history specialization, and phylogeny of the rain forest vertebrates in the Australian Wet Tropics. Ecology 91, 2493 (2010).
Reside, A. E., Watson, I., VanDerWal, J. & Kutt, A. S. Incorporating low-resolution historic species location data decreases performance of distribution models. Ecol. Model. 222, 3444–3448 (2011).
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).
Phillips, S. J. & Dudik, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31, 161–175 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleagues B. Laurance, E. Vanderduys and B. Phillips for their comments on the paper. This work was financially supported by James Cook University, the Centre for Tropical Biodiversity & Climate Change and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.V., A.S.K. and A.E.R. conceived the study. J.V., A.S.K., B.L.B. and A.E.R. designed the study. G.C.P. and J.J.P. collated and vetted data. J.V., H.T.M., G.C.P., B.L.B. and J.J.P. performed the analysis. H.T.M. and J.V. wrote the paper. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 674 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 1 (MOV 1575 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Movie 2 (MOV 1474 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
VanDerWal, J., Murphy, H., Kutt, A. et al. Focus on poleward shifts in species' distribution underestimates the fingerprint of climate change. Nature Clim Change 3, 239–243 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1688
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1688
This article is cited by
-
Warming, not acidification, favours survival of non-indigenous over native gammarid species
Biological Invasions (2024)
-
Global spatial distribution of Prosopis juliflora - one of the world’s worst 100 invasive alien species under changing climate using multiple machine learning models
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (2024)
-
Primates facing climate crisis in a tropical forest hotspot will lose climatic suitable geographical range
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Empirical estimation of habitat suitability for rare plant restoration in an era of ongoing climatic shifts
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Data integration reveals dynamic and systematic patterns of breeding habitat use by a threatened shorebird
Scientific Reports (2023)