Abstract
In recent years, many organizations have sought to align their financial goals with environmental ones by identifying strategies that maximize profits while minimizing environmental impacts. Examples of this ‘win–win’ approach can be found across a wide range of industries, from encouraging the reuse of hotel towels, to the construction of energy efficient buildings, to the large-scale initiatives of multi-national corporations1,2,3. Although win–win strategies are generally thought to reflect positively on the organizations that employ them, here we find that people tend to respond negatively to the notion of profiting from environmental initiatives. In fact, observers may evaluate environmental win–wins less favourably than profit-seeking strategies that have no environmental benefits. The present studies suggest that how those initiatives are communicated to the general public may be of central importance. Therefore, organizations would benefit from carefully crafting the discourse around their win–win initiatives to ensure that they avoid this type of backlash.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Laszlo, C. Sustainable Value: How the World’s Leading Companies are Doing Well by Doing Good (Stanford Univ. Press, 2008).
Esty, D. C., Winston, A. S., Stella, F. & Pepera, B. Green to gold Brilliance Audio on MP3-CD (Wiley, 2008).
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N. & Quigley, J. M. Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 2492–2509 (2010).
Tetlock, P. E. & McGraw, A. P. Theoretically framing relational framing. J. Consum. Psychol. 15, 35–37 (2005).
Heyman, J. & Ariely, D. Effort for payment a tale of two markets. Psychol. Sci. 15, 787–793 (2004).
Newman, G. E. & Cain, D. M. Tainted altruism: when doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psychol. Sci. 25, 648–655 (2014).
Fiske, A. P. The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychol. Rev. 99, 689–723 (1992).
Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 12–24 (1979).
Ariely, D., Bracha, A. & Meier, S. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 544–555 (2009).
Aggarwal, P. The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. J. Consum. Res. 31, 87–101 (2004).
Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T. & Lerner, M. J. Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: the exchange fiction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 144–151 (2002).
Miller, D. T. The norm of self-interest. Am. Psychol. 54, 1053–1060 (1999).
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L. & Goode, M. R. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314, 1154–1156 (2006).
Newman, G. E. & Shen, J. Y. The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 973–983 (2012).
Muradian, R. et al. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win–win solutions. Conserv. Lett. 6, 274–279 (2013).
Bowles, S. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: evidence from economic experiments. Science 320, 1605–1609 (2008).
Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K. & Postmes, T. Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Clim. Change 3, 413–416 (2013).
Delmas, M. A., Fischlein, M. & Asensio, O. I. Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy 61, 729–739 (2013).
Evans, L. et al. Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Clim. Change 3, 122–125 (2013).
Spence, A., Leygue, C., Bedwell, B. & O’Malley, C. Engaging with energy reduction: does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behaviour? J. Environ. Psychol. 38, 17–28 (2014).
Stock, K. Patagonia’s ‘buy less’ plea spurs more buying. Bloomberg Business (23 August 2013).
Markman, E. M. Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction (Learning, Development & Conceptual Change) (MIT Press, Bradford, 1989).
Markman, E. M. in Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization (ed. Neisser, U.) Ch. 1 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987).
Moreau, C. P., Markman, A. B. & Lehmann, D. R. “What is it?” Categorization flexibility and consumers’ responses to really new products. J. Consum. Res. 27, 489–498 (2001).
Walker, K. & Wan, F. The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. J. Bus. Ethics 109, 227–242 (2012).
Delmas, M. A. & Cuerel Burbano, V. The drivers of greenwashing. Calif. Manage. Rev. 54, 64–87 (2011).
Csutora, M. One more awareness gap? The behaviour—impact gap problem. J. Consum. Policy 35, 145–163 (2012).
Auger, P. & Devinney, T. Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. J. Bus. Ethics 76, 361–383 (2007).
Carrington, M., Neville, B. & Whitwell, G. Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. J. Bus. Ethics 97, 139–158 (2010).
Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M. & Dhar, R. When going green backfires: how firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. J. Consum. Res. 41, 823–839 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge funding support provided by the Sobotka Collaborative Research Fund through the Yale Center for Business and the Environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors designed Experiments 1–4, analysed the data from Experiments 1–4, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1235 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makov, T., Newman, G. Economic gains stimulate negative evaluations of corporate sustainability initiatives. Nature Clim Change 6, 844–846 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3033
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3033
This article is cited by
-
Impact of green HRM practices on sustainable performance: mediating role of green innovation, green culture, and green employees’ behavior
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
-
Inducing Corporate Social Responsibility: Should Investors Reward the Responsible or Punish the Irresponsible?
Journal of Business Ethics (2022)
-
Institutional challenges for corporate participation in payments for ecosystem services (PES): insights from Southeast Asia
Sustainability Science (2018)