Abstract
In 1950, a quarter of a century after his first-ever nonlinear optical experiment when intensity-dependent absorption was observed in uranium-doped glass, Sergey Vavilov predicted that birefringence, dichroism and polarization rotatory power should be dependent on light intensity. It required the invention of the laser to observe the barely detectable effect of light intensity on the polarization rotatory power of the optically active lithium iodate crystal, the phenomenon now known as the nonlinear optical activity, a high-intensity counterpart of the fundamental optical effect of polarization rotation in chiral media. Here we report that a plasmonic metamaterial exhibits nonlinear optical activity 30 million times stronger than lithium iodate crystals, thus transforming this fundamental phenomenon of polarization nonlinear optics from an esoteric phenomenon into a major effect of nonlinear plasmonics with potential for practical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Since its discovery by François J.D. Arago in 1811 (ref. 1), optical activity, that is the ability to rotate the polarization state of light, has acquired great importance in spectroscopy, analytical chemistry, crystallography and molecular biology, and it is associated with the biochemistry of life2. It is now well understood that the effect is linked to chirality. In dissipative media optical activity manifests itself as circular birefringence, leading to polarization rotation, and circular dichroism, that is, differential transmission of circularly polarized waves, that yields a change of the degree of ellipticity of the propagating wave. In contrast to the Faraday effect, which causes polarization rotation in the presence of static magnetic fields, polarization rotation due to natural optical activity is reciprocal and it does not distinguish between opposite directions of wave propagation.
The dependence of optical activity on the intensity of light was discussed by Vavilov in 1950 (ref. 3), a quarter of a century after the first effect of light self-action, the intensity-dependent absorption, was observed in uranium-doped glass4. The symmetry, wave propagation and quantum mechanical description of the phenomenon that later acquired the name of nonlinear optical activity (NOA) was then rigorously derived5,6,7,8,9,10,11.
Observation of NOA due to the fast electronic mechanism of nonlinearity became possible in 1979, using a high-intensity single-mode nanosecond-pulsed laser and the natural crystal of lithium iodate that is simultaneously a highly nonlinear and strongly optically active medium12 (Fig. 1a). Shortly after that, transient pump-probe measurements of NOA were performed in the chiral cholesteric phase of a liquid crystal exploiting the thermal mechanism of nonlinearity13. Thermal NOA was also seen in optically active crystals14,15,16. Since then NOA has been observed in a number of chiral liquids17,18,19,20. Nevertheless, the effect remained challenging to detect, making it unsuitable for routine practical applications, even in spectroscopy.
Although NOA in natural media was weak, hopes have been growing that a stronger effect could be found in artificial media. Indeed, an observation of optical activity in artificial media (twisted jute) in the millimeter wave part of the spectrum was reported by J.Bose as far back as 1898 (ref. 21). Recently, with the development of metamaterials (periodic media structured on the subwavelength scale), it has become possible to design optimized photonic structures with specific optical activity orders of magnitude larger than in natural media22,23,24,25. It was found, for instance, that artificial circular birefringence could be so strong that, whereas it is normally a correction to the refractive index, in some metamaterials it makes the refractive index negative for one circular polarization26,27. Moreover, recent experiments in waveguides revealed that a chiral inclusion containing a varactor nonlinear element forces a strong intensity-dependent rotation of the polarization state of microwave radiation and exhibits asymmetric transmission28. At the same time, resonant local field enhancement in plasmonic metamaterials can dramatically amplify the nonlinear response of hybridized materials, such as silicon29,30 and carbon nanotubes31, and even the metal forming the metamaterial framework itself32,33.
The phenomenon of natural optical activity is inextricably linked to chirality. In many optically active media, chirality resides in the left–right asymmetry of the constituent components of the medium. For instance, a liquid consisting of only one form of chiral molecules, that is, molecules that are not congruent with their mirror image, is likely to exhibit optical activity. Here the best known natural example is sugar solution where optical activity is routinely used to measure the concentration of the syrup. Optical activity may also result from chiral arrangements of non-chiral molecules, as it may be found in crystals of quartz or lithium iodate. Chirality can also emerge from the mutual arrangement of the beam of light and the medium, creating what is known in crystallography as a screw direction. For instance a regular array of oriented molecules that are not chiral in their own right, could make an arrangement with a beam of light that lacks mirror symmetry and shows optical activity34,35. In general, only crystals whose point group contains no inversion centre could have screw directions. Polarization rotation in certain symmetric crystal classes is underpinned by this mechanism of optical activity36, which is also routinely observed in liquid crystals37 and metamaterials38. True circular birefringence and dichroism can be found in these cases.
Here we report that a plasmonic metamaterial exhibits a huge NOA in the optical part of the spectrum. It is 30 million times stronger than in the lithium iodate crystal12. This colossal magnitude of the nonlinear polarization effect was achieved by combining strong metamaterial optical activity due to extrinsic chirality with strong metamaterial optical nonlinearity: in this artificial medium, the figure of merit that represents specific nonlinear polarization rotation (° per cm) per unit of optical intensity (W cm−2) is 3×10−4°cm W−1(compare with 10−11°cm W−1 for lithium iodate). As a result, nonlinear rotation on the order of degrees can be seen at an average laser power level of only a few milliwatts.
Results
Optical activity due to extrinsic chirality
The metamaterial consists of a periodic array of asymmetric split ring slits, which were cut by focussed ion-beam milling through a 50 nm thick gold film supported by a 500 μm thick fused quartz substrate. The overall size of the metamaterial array is 100 ×100 μm2 with a period of 425 nm, and the individual meta-molecules lack inversion symmetry (Fig. 1b). Figure 2 illustrates the origin of chirality and optical activity in this material for oblique incident angles. It is caused by circular differential forward scattering of incident photons that may be traced down to the scattering contributions of the unit cell's effective electric d and magnetic m dipole moments induced by the incident wave. It is well known from the molecular theory that optical activity requires the molecule to exhibit magnetic and electric responses simultaneously in such a way that there is a non-zero projection of the induced magnetic dipole on the induced electric dipole2,39. In this case, the forward scattered wave will exhibit polarization rotation, as electric and magnetic dipoles will emit orthogonal polarization components with a phase lag. The mechanism for extrinsic chirality in metamaterials is illustrated by the finite element method simulations in Fig. 2 for a single meta-molecule excited by an incident y-polarized wave. At normal incidence, the field distribution in the unit cell of the metamaterial is mirror-symmetric with respect to the y-direction. The total electric and magnetic moments of the unit cell oscillate along strictly perpendicular directions; no optical activity is observed in this case (Fig. 2a). At oblique incidence, the total induced magnetic and electric moments are tracing ellipses, whose main axes are no longer perpendicular and conditions are right for the meta-molecule to scatter with a polarization change. This polarization effect is optical activity and it will change sign with changing chirality of the arrangement, as illustrated by Fig. 2b,c.
Measurements of linear optical activity and anisotropy
We studied linear and intensity-dependent optical activity using a femtosecond mode-locked tunable laser with 115 fs pulse duration and 80 MHz repetition rate. Figure 3 illustrates the metamaterial's linear (low-power) optical properties for wavelengths between 930 and 954 nm, where the metamaterial has a plasmonic resonance and optical activity is largest. In general, in media of low symmetry optical activity coexists with anisotropy that manifests itself as differential refraction (birefringence) and transmission (dichroism) for orthogonal linear polarizations.
On propagation through an optically active and anisotropic medium, a wave with initially linear polarization becomes elliptically polarized and its polarization azimuth rotates. For moderate polarization changes, it may be shown that rotation of the polarization azimuth contains contributions resulting from circular birefringence α and linear dichroism β, while the ellipticity of the transmitted wave will contain contributions from circular dichroism η and linear birefringence φ. These four contributions can be separated by measuring polarization rotation and ellipticity angle as functions of the input polarization azimuth of an initially linearly polarized wave, providing α, β, η, φ≪π (see Methods).
Figure 3 presents measurements of circular birefringence and dichroism (optical activity) and linear birefringence and dichroism (anisotropy) in the metamaterial sample, observed as functions of wavelength at the incident angle of 20° to the normal (measurements taken at −20° show rotation and ellipticity angles of the same magnitude but opposite signs). We note that optical activity is the dominant contribution to the polarization azimuth and ellipticity changes at the resonance wavelength of 942 nm; here anisotropy contributes only up to 12% to the total polarization azimuth rotation and 30% to ellipticity. Detailed measurements of the intensity-dependent polarization changes, reported below, were performed at this wavelength.
Measurements of nonlinear optical activity
The intensity dependence of optical activity was studied using the same laser source as for the linear characterization. While we performed the linear measurements at an average power of 50 μW, the laser power was ramped up to 5 mW for nonlinear measurements, which corresponds to a peak intensity of I=2 GW cm−2 as the beam is focused to a spot size of 8 μm in diameter. This is sufficient to see a profound change of the light polarization state with intensity, as illustrated by Fig. 4a,b. Here results are represented in terms of changes relative to the low-intensity values of circular birefringence Δα and circular dichroism Δη. The most obvious effect of increasing intensity is a suppression of optical activity; at 942 nm polarization rotation is reduced by 1.0°, whereas the ellipticity angle drops 0.5°.
To determine the strength of NOA, we shall be concerned with the gradient of the polarization azimuth rotation change with increasing incident intensity that is measured to be about Δα/I=−0.8°cm2 per GW, before nonlinear rotation starts to saturate above 1 GW cm−2. Here nonlinearity resides in the gold film of thickness 53 nm along the direction of propagation. Thus, the specific constant of NOA is Ω=3×10−4°cm W−1 (this accounts for the 50% reflection of the metamaterial sample). This is more than 7 orders of magnitude stronger than NOA in natural materials such as LiIO3 (10−11°cm W−1 (ref. 12)), sucrose (2×10−11°cm W−1 (refs 17,20)), α-pinene (≤10−11°cm W−1 (ref. 20)) and ruthenium salt solution18,19.
The spectral dependence of NOA is shown by Fig. 4c,d. Nonlinear circular birefringence becomes more pronounced towards shorter wavelengths, whereas nonlinear circular dichroism changes sign at about 937 nm. As illustrated by Fig. 3a, the increase of light intensity reduces the overall polarization rotation throughout the studied spectral range.
Discussion
The nonlinearity of the metamaterial resides in the nonlinearity of its metal framework. It is mainly caused by the nonlinear process of direct two-photon absorption between the d and sp states in the gold band structure (Fig. 4e). Here direct two-photon absorption occurs through a virtual state when the energy ω of two incident photons is combined to bridge the gap ΔE=2.4 eV, between the d states and states above the Fermi level: ΔE/2<ω<ΔE. As the energy gap cannot be bridged by individual photons directly, 'Fermi-smearing', which dominates the nonlinearity of gold in the visible, is less important in our case. This inherited nonlinearity of gold is resonantly enhanced more than 300 times by the nanostructure through the virtue of strong field concentration at the edges of the grooves, which support a plasmonic mode (see bright hot-spots of field maps in Fig. 2)32. Pump-probe experiments32 also confirmed that this is a very fast nonlinearity, because its main mechanism requires both the pump and the probe photons to be present simultaneously. This degenerate cubic optical nonlinearity gives rise to a nonlinear absorption coefficient on the order of 10−5 m W−1. Importantly, the spectral maxima of the absorption nonlinearity and optical activity in this metamaterial overlap, as they are underpinned by the same plasmonic resonance, which arises from the asymmetry of the metamaterial pattern25,32. The asymmetry of the plasmonic structure results in excitation of a strong anti-phased current mode through weak free-space coupling, which ensures low radiation losses and therefore a narrow Fano-type optical resonance40. Here two-photon absorption reduces not only the intensity of light transmitted through the nanostructure, but it also hampers the chiral dipole scattering efficiency by dampening the underlying plasmon oscillations. Manifestation of this is a suppression of circular birefringence at high intensities (Fig. 3a).
It may be expected that similarly large nonlinear polarization effects can be observed at resonances in a wide range of plasmonic metamaterials. In particular, large NOA may also occur in intrinsically three-dimensionally chiral metamaterials while chiral plasmonic interfaces41 may show nonlinear versions of other polarization effects such as asymmetric transmission42.
In summary, we report that engineering of chiral and nonlinear optical properties in a plasmonic metamaterial allows the observation of NOA that is millions of times stronger than in natural crystals. Observation of this giant polarization effect provides a powerful illustration that nanoscale nonlinear plasmonics of metamaterials offers extremely strong effects unfolding in nanoscale volumes of nonlinear medium that could lead to applications in modulation of light intensity and polarization in nanophotonic devices.
Methods
Definition of polarization parameters
The polarization state of polarized light is characterized by the polarization azimuth Φ and the ellipticity angle ζ which are defined by the polarization ellipse, that is, the trace of the end of the electric field vector as seen by an observer looking into the beam (Fig. 5a).
Separation of optical activity and optical anisotropy
On propagation through an optically active and anisotropic medium, a wave with initially linear polarization becomes elliptically polarized and its polarization azimuth rotates. For moderate polarization changes, it may be shown that the polarization azimuth change ΔΦ contains contributions resulting from circular birefringence α and linear dichroism β. On the other hand, the ellipticity angle ζ of the initially linearly polarized wave after interacting with the sample will contain contributions from circular dichroism η and linear birefringence φ.
Indeed, in the slow envelope approximation, evolution of the polarization state of light in linear media is governed by the following set of equations for the components of the four-dimensional Stokes vector S, which in a Cartesian coordinate frame can be written as follows (formula 3.24, ref. 10):
Here z is the propagation direction, k and ω are the wave number and frequency, c is the speed of light, E is the electric field vector, σα are Pauli spin matrices, δij is the Kronecker delta, and (formulae 3.19 and 3.21, ref. 10)
where are cartesian components of the dielectric coefficient describing anisotropy and Γijz are cartesian components of the nonlocality tensor describing optical activity. They are defined by the constitutive equation for the nonlocal anisotropic response (formula 2.14, ref. 10):
Therefore, it follows from the linear nature of equation (1) that small changes of the Stokes vector components and, thus, small polarization changes that are induced by the anisotropic and nonlocal effects are additive.
Now, by measuring the sample's polarization rotation ΔΦ and ellipticity angle ζ as functions of the input polarization azimuth Φin of an initially linearly polarized wave, one can separate these four contributions, providing α, β, η, ≪π.
Precise formulae for these contributions are given by formulae 3.41, 3.48 and 3.49 in ref. 10. For our consideration, here it is important that, for initially linearly polarized waves, polarization rotation and induced ellipticity are proportional to Re(Γxyz) and Im(Γxyz) describing circular birefringence and circular dichroism, correspondingly. Polarization rotation and induced ellipticity also have components that oscillate with the incident polarization azimuth Φin as sin(2Φin). They are proportional to linear dichroism described by Im(−) and linear birefringence described by Re(−).
Within this approximation, we retrieve circular birefringence α by measuring the Φin-independent (average) component of the polarization azimuth rotation; we retrieve circular dichroism η by measuring the Φin-independent (average) component of the ellipticity angle; we retrieve data on linear birefringence φ by measuring the amplitude of oscillation of the ellipticity angle with the incident polarization azimuth; we retrieve data on linear dichroism β by measuring the amplitude of oscillation of the polarization azimuth rotation with the incident polarization azimuth (Fig. 5b,c).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Ren, M. et al. Giant nonlinear optical activity in a plasmonic metamaterial. Nat. Commun. 3:833 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1805 (2012).
References
Arago, F. J. D. Mémoire sur une modification remarquable qu'éprouvent les rayons lumineux dans leur passage à travers certains corps diaphanes et sur quelques autres nouveaux phénomènes d'optique. Mémoires de la classe des sciences math. et phys. de l'Institut Impérial de France 1, 93 (1811).
Barron, L. D. Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Vavilov, S. I. Mikrostruktura Sveta (Microstructure of Light), USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing, Moscow, 1950.
Wawilow, S. I. & Lewschin, W. L. Die Beziehungen zwischen Fluoreszenz und Phosphoreszenz in festen und flüssigen Medien. Z. Phys. 35, 920–936 (1926).
Zheludev, I. S. Axial tensors of the third rank and the physical effects they describe. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 9, 418–420 (1965).
Akhmanov, S. A. & Zharikov, V. I. Nonlinear optics of gyrotropic media. JETP Lett. 6, 137–140 (1967).
Kielich, S. Natural and magneto-optical rotation in the presence of an intense light beam. Phys. Lett. 25A, 517–518 (1967).
Atkins, P. W. & Barron, L. D. Quantum field theory of optical birefringence phenomena. I. Linear and nonlinear optical rotation P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat. 304, 303–317 (1968).
Petrenko, A. & Zheludev, N. Physical mechanisms of nonlinear optical activity in crystals. Optica Acta 31, 1177–1184 (1984).
Svirko, Y. P. & Zheludev, N. I. Polarization of Light in Nonlinear Optics, Wiley, New York, (1998).
Zheludev, N., Petrenko, A., Svirko, I. & Filippova, G. Nonlinear optical activity in weakly and strongly nonlinear media: direct and cascade processes-bistability and stochasticity. Akademiia Nauk SSSR Izvestiia Seriia Fizicheskaia 48, 603–610 (1984).
Akhmanov, S. A., Zhdanov, B. V., Zheludev, N. I., Kovrigin, A. I. & Kuznetsov, V. I. Nonlinear optical activity in crystals. JETP Lett. 29, 264–268 (1979).
Garibyan, O. V., Zhdanov, B. V., Zheludev, N. I., Kovrigin, A. I. & Kuznetsov, V. I. Thermal nonlinear optical rotation in cholesteric liquid crystals. Kristallografiya (Soviet Physics Crystallography) 26, 787–791 (1981).
Vlasov, D. & Zaitsev, V. Experimental observation of nonlinear optical activity. JETP Lett. 14, 112–115 (1971).
Borshch, V. V., Lisitsa, M. P., Mozol', P. E. & Fekeshgazi, I. V. Self-induced rotation of the direction of polarization of light in crystals of 422 symmetry. Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 8, 393–395 (1978).
Zheludev, N., Ruddock, I. & Illingworth, R. Intensity dependence of thermal nonlinear optical activity in crystals. Appl. Phys. B 49, 65–67 (1989).
Cameron, R. & Tabisz, G. Observation of two-photon optical rotation by molecules. Mol. Phys. 90, 159–164 (1997).
Mesnil, H. & Hache, F. Experimental evidence of third-order nonlinear dichroism in a liquid of chiral molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4257–4260 (2000).
Mesnil, H. et al. Experimental observation of nonlinear circular dichroism in a pump-probe experiment. Chem. Phys. Lett. 338, 269–276 (2001).
Markowicz, P. et al. Modified z-scan techniques for investigations of nonlinear chiroptical effects. Opt. Exp. 12, 5209–5214 (2004).
Bose, J. On the rotation of plane of polarisation of electric waves by a twisted structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 63, 146–152 (1898).
Plum, E., et al. Giant optical gyrotropy due to electromagnetic coupling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 223113 (2007).
Kuwata-Gonokami, M. et al. Giant optical activity in quasi-two-dimensional planar nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 227401 (2005).
Decker, M. et al. Strong optical activity from twisted-cross photonic metamaterials. Opt. Lett. 34, 2501–2503 (2009).
Plum, E. et al. Metamaterials: optical activity without chirality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113902 (2009).
Rogacheva, A. V ., Fedotov, V. A., Schwanecke, A. S . & Zheludev, N. I . Giant gyrotropy due to electromagnetic-field coupling in a bilayered chiral structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 177401 (2006).
Plum, E. et al. Metamaterial with negative index due to chirality. Phys. Rev. B 79, 035407 (2009).
Shadrivov, I. V., Fedotov, V. A., Powell, D. A., Kivshar, Y. S. & Zheludev, N. I. Electromagnetic wave analogue of an electronic diode. New J. Phys. 13, 033025 (2011).
Cho, D. et al. Ultrafast modulation of optical metamaterials. Opt. Express 17, 17652–17657 (2009).
Dani, K. et al. Subpicosecond optical switching with a negative index metamaterial. Nano Lett. 9, 3565–3569 (2009).
Nikolaenko, A. E. et al. Carbon nanotubes in a photonic metamaterial. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 153902 (2010).
Ren, M. et al. Nanostructured plasmonic medium for terahertz bandwidth all-optical switching. Adv. Mater. 23, 5540–5544 (2011).
Wurtz, G. et al. Designed ultrafast optical nonlinearity in a plasmonic nanorod metamaterial enhanced by nonlocality. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 107–111 (2011).
Hameka, H. Resonance fluorescence in gases and molecular crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 38, 2090–2111 (1963).
Buckingham, A. & Dunn, M. Optical activity of oriented molecules. J. Chem. Soc. A 38, 1988–1991 (1971).
Sirotin, Y. & Shaskolskaya, M. Fundamentals of Crystal Physics, Imported Pubn, (1983).
Williams, R. Optical rotatory effect in the nematic liquid phase of p-azoxyanisole. Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 342–344 (1968).
Plum, E., Fedotov, V. A. & Zheludev, N. I. Optical activity in extrinsically chiral metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 191911 (2008).
Condon, E. Theories of optical rotatory power. Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 432–457 (1937).
Khardikov, V. V., Iarko, E. O. & Prosvirnin, S. L. Trapping of light by metal arrays. J. Opt. 12, 045102 (2010).
Papakostas, A & Potts, A, Bagnall D. M., Prosvirnin, S. L., Coles H. J., Zheludev N. I. Optical manifestations of planar chirality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107404 (2003).
Fedotov, V. A. et al. Asymmetric propagation of electromagnetic waves through a planar chiral structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167401 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Edward Rogers, Kevin F. MacDonald, Jun-Yu Ou and Andrey Nikolaenko for assistance with experiment and preparation of samples. This work was supported by The Leverhulme Trust, The Royal Society (London), the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (programme grant EP/G060363/1) and the P. R. China ('111 Project' grant B07013 and '973 Program' grant 2007CB307002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The idea of the experiment was conceived by N.I.Z. and E.P., M.R. assembled the polarimeter and carried out the measurements. N.I.Z. wrote the paper with assistance from E.P. All authors discussed the results and analysed the data; J.J.X. and N.I.Z. supervised the work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, M., Plum, E., Xu, J. et al. Giant nonlinear optical activity in a plasmonic metamaterial. Nat Commun 3, 833 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1805
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1805
This article is cited by
-
Stretchable Chiral Metamaterial for Flexible Control of Broadband Asymmetric Transmission
Plasmonics (2023)
-
All-optical modulation of quantum states by nonlinear metasurface
Light: Science & Applications (2022)
-
Third-harmonic Mie scattering from semiconductor nanohelices
Nature Photonics (2022)
-
Nonlinear meta-optics towards applications
PhotoniX (2021)
-
Lithography-free IR polarization converters via orthogonal in-plane phonons in α-MoO3 flakes
Nature Communications (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.