Abstract
There are two principal mechanisms that are responsible for the ability of an organism's physiological and developmental processes to compensate for mutations. In the first, genes have overlapping functions, and loss-of-function mutations in one gene will have little phenotypic effect if there are one or more additional genes with similar functions. The second mechanism has its origin in interactions between genes with unrelated functions, and has been documented in metabolic and regulatory gene networks. Here I analyse, on a genome-wide scale, which of these mechanisms of robustness against mutations is more prevalent. I used functional genomics data from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to test hypotheses related to the following: if gene duplications are mostly responsible for robustness, then a correlation is expected between the similarity of two duplicated genes and the effect of mutations in one of these genes. My results demonstrate that interactions among unrelated genes are the major cause of robustness against mutations. This type of robustness is probably an evolved response of genetic networks to stabilizing selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang, Y.K., Schnegelsberg, P.N.J., Dausman, J. & Jaenisch, R. Functional redundancy of the muscle-specific transcription factors myf5 and myogenin. Nature 379, 823– 825 (1996).
Saga, Y., Yagi, T., Ikawa, Y., Sakakura, T. & Aizawa, S. Mice develop normally without tenascin. Genes Dev. 6, 1821–1831 (1992).
Cadigan, K.M., Grossniklaus, U. & Gehring, W.J. Functional redundancy: the respective roles of the 2 sloppy paired genes in Drosophila segmentation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6324–6328 ( 1994).
Gonzalez-Gaitan, M., Rothe, M., Wimmer, E.A., Taubert, H. & Jackle, H. Redundant functions of the genes knirps and knirps-related for the establishment of anterior Drosophila head structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 8567– 8571 (1994).
Hanks, M., Wurst, W., Ansoncartwright, L., Auerbach, A.B. & Joyner, A.L. Rescue of the en-1 mutant phenotype by replacement of en-1 with en-2. Science 269, 679–682 (1995).
Hoffmann, F.M. Drosophila-abl and genetic redundancy in signal transduction. Trends Genet. 7, 351–356 (1991).
Dun, R.B. & Fraser, A.S. Selection for an invariant character–lsquo;vibrissa number’–in the house mouse. Nature 181, 1018–1019 (1958).
Rendel, J.M. Canalization of the scute phenotype of Drosophila. Evolution 13, 425–439 (1959).
Rendel, J.M. in Quantitative Genetic Variation (eds Thompson, J.N. & Thoday, J.M.) 139–156 (Academic, New York, 1979).
Waddington, C.H. The Strategy of the Genes (Macmillan, New York, 1959).
Rutherford, S.L. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 buffers development against genetic variation and could link capacity for morphogenic change with environmental stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 9 , 2511–2511 (1998).
Kacser, H. & Burns, J.A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639–666 (1981).
Smith, V., Chou, K.N., Lashkari, D., Botstein, D. & Brown, P.O. Functional analysis of the genes of yeast chromosome V by genetic footprinting. Science 275, 464–464 (1997).
Tautz, D. Redundancies, development and the flow of information. Bioessays 14, 263–266 ( 1992).
Fell, D. Understanding the Control of Metabolism (Portland, Miami, 1997).
Dykhuizen, D.E., Dean, A.M. & Hartl, D.L. Metabolic flux and fitness. Genetics 115, 25–31 (1987).
Hartl, D.L., Dykhuizen, D.E. & Dean, A.M. Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics 111, 655–674 (1985).
Dykhuizen, D. & Hartl, D.L. Selective neutrality of 6pgd allozymes in Escherichia coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics 96, 801–817 ( 1980).
Edwards, S. & Palsson, B.O. Systems properties of the Haemophilus influenzae rd metabolic genotype. J. Biol. Chem. 274 , 17410–17416 (1999).
Wagner, A. Does evolutionary plasticity evolve? Evolution 50, 1008–1023 (1996).
Nadeau, J.H. & Sankoff, D. Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution. Genetics 147, 1259–1266 (1997).
Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K.H. Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4447–4452 (1998).
Li, X.L. & Noll, M. Evolution of distinct developmental functions of 3 Drosophila genes by acquisition of different cis-regulatory regions. Nature 367, 83– 87 (1994).
Chu, S. et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282, 699–705 ( 1998).
DeRisi, J.L., Iyer, V.R. & Brown, P.O. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278, 680– 686 (1997).
Spellman, P.T. et al. Comprehensive identification of cell-cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3273–3297 (1998).
Wolfe, K.H. & Shields, D.C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708–713 (1997).
Thatcher, J.W., Shaw, J.M. & Dickinson, W.J. Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 253–257 (1998).
Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).
Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K.H. Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 548– 554 (1999).
Winzeler, E.A. et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).
Hubbard, T.J.P., Ailey, B., Brenner, S.E., Murzin, A.G. & Chothia, C. SCOP, structural classification of proteins database: applications to evaluation of the effectiveness of sequence alignment methods and statistics of protein structural data. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 1147–1154 (1998).
Doolittle, R.F. Convergent evolution: the need to be explicit. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 15–18 ( 1994).
Galperin, M.Y., Walker, D.R. & Koonin, E.V. Analogous enzymes: independent inventions in enzyme evolution. Genome Res. 8, 779– 790 (1998).
Wagner, G.P., Booth, G. & Bagherichaichian, H. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51, 329–347 ( 1997).
Wagner, A. Redundant gene functions and natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 1–16 (1999 ).
Wagner, A. The role of pleiotropy, population size fluctuations, and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of redundant gene functions. Genetics 154, 1389–1401 ( 2000).
Bradshaw, V.A. & McEntee, K. DNA damage activates transcription and transposition of yeast Ty retrotransposons. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218, 465–474 (1989).
Paquin, C.E. & Williamson, V.M. Temperature effects on the rate of Ty transposition. Science 226, 53 –55 (1984).
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. Biometry (Freeman, New York, 1981).
Waterman, M.S. General methods of sequence comparison. Bull. Math. Biol. 46, 473–500 (1984).
Altschul, S.F. et al. Gapped Blast and Psi-Blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
Dayhoff, M., Schwartz, R.M. & Orcutt, B.C. in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure (ed. Dayhoff, M.) 345–352 (National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring, 1978).
Pearson, W.R. Searching protein-sequence libraries: comparison of the sensitivity and selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and Fasta algorithms. Genomics 11, 635–650 (1991).
Henikoff, S. & Henikoff, J.G. Amino-acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10915–10919 (1992).
Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny inference package) version 3.2. Cladistics 5, 164–166 (1989).
Comeron, J.M. A method for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 1152– 1159 (1995).
Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. & Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 ( 1990).
Acknowledgements
I thank E. Charnov, W. Fontana, P. d'Haeseleer, R. Miller, M. Lynch, D. Natvig and M. Werner-Washburne for discussions on the subject. Th financial and computational support of the Santa Fe Institute and of the Albuquerque High Performance Computing Center is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, A. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nat Genet 24, 355–361 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/74174
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/74174
This article is cited by
-
Establishment of regeneration system of Pyrus and the genetic stability analysis of regenerated population
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2023)
-
Degeneracy measures in biologically plausible random Boolean networks
BMC Bioinformatics (2022)
-
Using phenotypic plasticity to understand the structure and evolution of the genotype–phenotype map
Genetica (2022)
-
A Simple Evolutionary Model of Genetic Robustness After Gene Duplication
Journal of Molecular Evolution (2022)
-
Aligning functional network constraint to evolutionary outcomes
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2020)