Abstract
Onset of flowering is controlled by environmental signals such as light and temperature. Molecular-genetic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have focused on daily light duration, or photoperiod, and transient exposure to winter-like temperatures, or vernalization1. Yet ambient growth temperature, which is strongly affected by current changes in global climate2, has been largely ignored. Here, we show that genes of the autonomous pathway, previously thought only to act independently of the environment as regulators of the floral repressor FLC (ref. 1), are centrally involved in mediating the effects of ambient temperature. In contrast to wild-type plants and those mutant in other pathways, autonomous-pathway mutants flower at the same time regardless of ambient temperature. In contrast, the exaggerated temperature response of cryptochrome-2 mutants is caused by temperature-dependent redundancy with the phytochrome A photoreceptor. As with vernalization and photoperiod, ambient temperature ultimately affects expression of the floral pathway integrator FT.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Simpson, G.G. & Dean, C. Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time? Science 296, 285–289 (2002).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed.) Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002).
Halevy, H.A. CRC Handbook of Flowering (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985).
Long, S.P. & Woodward, F.I. (eds.). Plants and Temperature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
Sparks, T.H., Jeffree, E.P. & Jeffree, C.E. An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phenological records from the UK. Int. J. Biometeorol. 44, 82–87 (2000).
Menzel, A., Estrella, N. & Fabian, P. Spatial and temporal variability of the phenological seasons in Germany from 1951 to 1996. Global Change Biol. 7, 657–666 (2001).
Fitter, A.H. & Fitter, R.S. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296, 1689–1691 (2002).
Koornneef, M., Hanhart, C.J. & van der Veen, J.H. A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 57–66 (1991).
Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C., Blankestijn-de Vries, H., Hanhart, C.J. & Peeters, A.J.M. Genetic interactions among late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics 148, 885–892 (1998).
Wilson, R.N., Heckman, J.W. & Somerville, C.R. Gibberellin is required for flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under short days. Plant Physiol. 100, 403–408 (1992).
Guo, H., Yang, H., Mockler, T.C. & Lin, C. Regulation of flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science 279, 1360–1363 (1998).
Macknight, R. et al. FCA, a gene controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA-binding domains. Cell 89, 737–745 (1997).
Whitelam, G.C. et al. Phytochrome A null mutants of Arabidopsis display a wild-type phenotype in white light. Plant Cell 5, 757–768 (1993).
Ahmad, M. & Cashmore, A.R. HY4 gene of A. thaliana encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor. Nature 366, 162–166 (1993).
Reed, J.W., Nagatani, A., Elich, T.D., Fagan, M. & Chory, J. Phytochrome A and phytochrome B have overlapping but distinct functions in Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol. 104, 1139–1149 (1994).
Mockler, T.C., Guo, H., Yang, H., Duong, H. & Lin, C. Antagonistic actions of Arabidopsis cryptochromes and phytochrome B in the regulation of floral induction. Development 126, 2073–2082 (1999).
Bagnall, D.J., King, R.W. & Hangarter, R.P. Blue-light promotion of flowering is absent in hy4 mutants of Arabidopsis. Planta 200, 278–280 (1996).
Michaels, S.D. & Amasino, R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11, 949–956 (1999).
Sheldon, C.C. et al. The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell 11, 445–458 (1999).
Sheldon, C.C., Rouse, D.T., Finnegan, E.J., Peacock, W.J. & Dennis, E.S. The molecular basis of vernalization: the central role of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3753–3758 (2000).
Michaels, S.D. & Amasino, R.M. Loss of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity eliminates the late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and autonomous pathway mutations but not responsiveness to vernalization. Plant Cell 13, 935–941 (2001).
Samach, A. et al. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science 288, 1613–1616 (2000).
Lee, H. et al. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 14, 2366–2376 (2000).
Borner, R. et al. A MADS domain gene involved in the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 24, 591–599 (2000).
Kardailsky, I. et al. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286, 1962–1965 (1999).
Kobayashi, Y., Kaya, H., Goto, K., Iwabuchi, M. & Araki, T. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286, 1960–1962 (1999).
Suárez-López, P. et al. CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature 410, 1116–1120 (2001).
Xiong, L., Schumaker, K.S. & Zhu, J.K. Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell 14, S165–S183 (2002).
Johansson, J. et al. An RNA thermosensor controls expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes. Cell 110, 551–561 (2002).
Harmer, S.L. et al. Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science 290, 2110–2113 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank N.Y. Kwon, C. Vu and R. You for technical assistance; T. Dabi and J. Werner for growing flc fve mutants; J.M. Martínez-Zapater for communicating unpublished information; R. Amasino, G. Coupland, M. Koornneef, I. Lee and the National Science Foundation (NSF)-supported A. thaliana stock center for material; C. Fankhauser and O. Nilsson for discussions; and R. Amasino, J. Lohmann, M. Schmid, P. Wigge and X. Wu for comments on the manuscript. M.A.B. was supported by fellowships from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Human Frontier Science Program (HFSPO), and by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science. J.H.A. was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation through the Plant Metabolism Research Center, Kyung Hee University, and the Crop Functional Genomics Center of the 21C Frontier Program. D.W. was supported by grants from HFSPO, NSF and United States Department of Agriculture. D.W. is a Director of the Max Planck Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blázquez, M., Ahn, J. & Weigel, D. A thermosensory pathway controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 33, 168–171 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1085
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1085
This article is cited by
-
HDF1, a novel flowering time regulator identified in a mutant suppressing sensitivity to red light reduced 1 early flowering
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Flowering in sugarcane-insights from the grasses
3 Biotech (2023)
-
Genome-wide association study for temperature response and photo-thermal interaction of flowering time in soybean using a panel of cultivars with diverse maturity groups
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2023)
-
Genome-wide Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Gene Regulatory Network in Star Fruit Flower Blooming
Tropical Plant Biology (2023)
-
Genome-wide analysis and identification of the PEBP genes of Brassica juncea var. Tumida
BMC Genomics (2022)