Abstract
Morphological changes in dendritic spines have been implicated in connective plasticity in brain circuitry, but the underlying pathway leading from synaptic transmission to structural change is unknown. Using primary neurons expressing GFP-tagged proteins, we found that profilin, a regulator of actin polymerization, is targeted to spine heads when postsynaptic NMDA receptors are activated and that actin-based changes in spine shape are concomitantly blocked. Profilin targeting was triggered by electrical stimulation patterns known to induce the long-term changes in synaptic responsiveness associated with memory formation. These results suggest that, in addition to electrophysiological changes, NMDA receptor activation initiates changes in the actin cytoskeleton of dendritic spines that stabilize synaptic structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crick, F. Do dendritic spines twitch? Trends Neurosci. 5, 44–46 (1982).
Matus, A., Ackermann, M., Pehling, G., Byers, H.R. & Fujiwara, K. High actin concentrations in brain dendritic spines and postsynaptic densities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 7590–7594 (1982).
Harris, K.M. & Kater, S.B. Dendritic spines: cellular specializations imparting both stability and flexibility to synaptic function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 341–371 (1994).
Halpain, S. Actin and the agile spine: how and why do dendritic spines dance? Trends Neurosci. 23, 141–146 (2000).
Matus, A. Actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines. Science 290, 754–758 (2000).
Geinisman, Y., Berry, R.W., Disterhoft, J.F., Power, J.M. & Van der Zee, E.A. Associative learning elicits the formation of multiple-synapse boutons. J. Neurosci. 21, 5568–5573 (2001).
Lendvai, B., Stern, E.A., Chen, B. & Svoboda, K. Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo. Nature 404, 876–881 (2000).
Knott, G.W., Quairiaux, C., Genoud, C. & Welker, E. Formation of dendritic spines with GABAergic synapses induced by whisker stimulation in adult mice. Neuron 34, 265–273 (2002).
Trachtenberg, J.T. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002).
Ottersen, O.P. & Helm, P.J. Neurobiology: How hardwired is the brain? Nature 420, 751–752 (2002).
Fischer, M., Kaech, S., Knutti, D. & Matus, A. Rapid actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines. Neuron 20, 847–854 (1998).
Dunaevsky, A., Tashiro, A., Majewska, A., Mason, C. & Yuste, R. Developmental regulation of spine motility in the mammalian central nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13438–13443 (1999).
Kim, C.H. & Lisman, J.E. A role of actin filaments in synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 19, 4314–4324 (1999).
Krucker, T., Siggins, G.R. & Halpain, S. Dynamic actin filaments are required for stable long-term potentiation (LTP) in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6856–6861 (2000).
Carlsson, L., Nystrom, L.E., Sundkvist, I., Markey, F. & Lindberg, U. Actin polymerizability is influenced by profilin, a low molecular weight protein in non-muscle cells. J. Mol. Biol. 115, 465–483 (1977).
Buss, F., Temm-Grove, C., Henning, S. & Jockusch, B.M. Distribution of profilin in fibroblasts correlates with the presence of highly dynamic actin filaments. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 22, 51–61 (1992).
Rothkegel, M. et al. Plant and animal profilins are functionally equivalent and stabilize microfilaments in living animal cells. J. Cell. Sci. 109, 83–90 (1996).
Witke, W., Sutherland, J.D., Sharpe, A., Arai, M. & Kwiatkowski, D.J. Profilin I is essential for cell survival and cell division in early mouse development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3832–3836 (2001).
Honore, B., Madsen, P., Andersen, A.H. & Leffers, H. Cloning and expression of a novel human profilin variant, profilin II. FEBS Lett. 330, 151–155 (1993).
Artola, A. & Singer, W. Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission and its relationship to long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci. 16, 480–487 (1993).
Yang, S.N., Tang, Y.G. & Zucker, R.S. Selective induction of LTP and LTD by postsynaptic [Ca2+]i elevation. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 781–787 (1999).
Bliss, T.V. & Collingridge, G.L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361, 31–39 (1993).
Bear, M.F. & Malenka, R.C. Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 389–399 (1994).
Martin, S.J., Grimwood, P.D. & Morris, R.G. Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 649–711 (2000).
Dudek, S.M. & Bear, M.F. Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 4363–4367 (1992).
Carroll, R.C., Lissin, D.V., von Zastrow, M., Nicoll, R.A. & Malenka, R.C. Rapid redistribution of glutamate receptors contributes to long-term depression in hippocampal cultures. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 454–460 (1999).
Reinhard, M. et al. The proline-rich focal adhesion and microfilament protein VASP is a ligand for profilins. Embo J. 14, 1583–1589 (1995).
Gertler, F.B., Niebuhr, K., Reinhard, M., Wehland, J. & Soriano, P. Mena, a relative of VASP and Drosophila Enabled, is implicated in the control of microfilament dynamics. Cell 87, 227–239 (1996).
Kang, F., Laine, R.O., Bubb, M.R., Southwick, F.S. & Purich, D.L. Profilin interacts with the Gly-Pro-Pro-Pro-Pro-Pro sequences of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP): implications for actin- based Listeria motility. Biochemistry 36, 8384–8392 (1997).
Liao, D., Zhang, X., O'Brien, R., Ehlers, M.D. & Huganir, R.L. Regulation of morphological postsynaptic silent synapses in developing hippocampal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 37–43 (1999).
Rumpel, S., Hatt, H. & Gottmann, K. Silent synapses in the developing rat visual cortex: evidence for postsynaptic expression of synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci. 18, 8863–8874 (1998).
Petralia, R.S. et al. Selective acquisition of AMPA receptors over postnatal development suggests a molecular basis for silent synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 31–36 (1999).
Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N. & Gan, W.B. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 420, 812–816 (2002).
Roelandse, M., Welman, A., Wagner, U., Hagmann, J. & Matus, A. Focal motility determines the geometry of dendritic spines. Neuroscience (in the press).
Finkel, T., Theriot, J.A., Dise, K.R., Tomaselli, G.F. & Goldschmidt-Clermont, P.J. Dynamic actin structures stabilized by profilin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1510–1514 (1994).
Hajkova, L., Nyman, T., Lindberg, U. & Karlsson, R. Effects of cross-linked profilin:beta/gamma-actin on the dynamics of the microfilament system in cultured cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 256, 112–121 (2000).
Dickinson, R.B. & Purich, D.L. Clamped-filament elongation model for actin-based motors. Biophys. J. 82, 605–617 (2002).
Suetsugu, S., Miki, H. & Takenawa, T. The essential role of profilin in the assembly of actin for microspike formation. Embo J. 17, 6516–6526 (1998).
Christofi, G., Nowicky, A.V., Bolsover, S.R. & Bindman, L.J. The postsynaptic induction of nonassociative long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 219–229 (1993).
Mulkey, R.M. & Malenka, R.C. Mechanisms underlying induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Neuron 9, 967–975 (1992).
Artola, A., Hensch, T. & Singer, W. Calcium-induced long-term depression in the visual cortex of the rat in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 984–994 (1996).
Star, E.N., Kwiatkowski, D.J. & Murthy, V.N. Rapid turnover of actin in dendritic spines and its regulation by activity. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 239–246 (2002).
Fukazawa, Y. et al. Hippocampal LTP is accompanied by enhanced f-actin content within the dendritic spine that is essential for late LTP maintenance in vivo. Neuron 38, 447–460 (2003).
Soderling, T.R. & Derkach, V.A. Postsynaptic protein phosphorylation and LTP. Trends Neurosci. 23, 75–80 (2000).
Isaac, J. Protein Phosphatase 1 and LTD. Synapses are the architects of depression. Neuron 32, 963–966 (2001).
Frey, U., Krug, M., Reymann, K.G. & Matthies, H. Anisomycin, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, blocks late phases of LTP phenomena in the hippocampal CA1 region in vitro. Brain Res. 452, 57–65 (1988).
Nguyen, P.V., Abel, T. & Kandel, E.R. Requirement of a critical period of transcription for induction of a late phase of LTP. Science 265, 1104–1107 (1994).
McGaugh, J.L. Time-dependent processes in memory storage. Science 153, 1351–1358 (1966).
Frey, U. & Morris, R.G. Synaptic tagging: implications for late maintenance of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci. 21, 181–188 (1998).
Martin, K.C. & Kosik, K.S. Synaptic tagging—who's it? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 813–820 (2002).
Acknowledgements
We thank B. Jockusch for profilin II-GFP cDNA, J. Mosbacher and A. Malgaroli for advice with electrical field stimulation, and B. Bettler and P. Flor for advice and pharmacological agents.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Fig. 1.
Distribution of Profilin II-GFP and unmodified, soluble GFP in dendrites of transfected hippocampal pyramidal neurons. (a) In ca. 4% of neurons profilin II-GFP is highly enriched in dendritic spines (arrowheads) compared to the dendrite shaft. (b) In ca. 44% of transfected cells profilin II was evenly distributed between spines and shaft. (c) In all cells expressing unmodified GFP the soluble marker is evenly distributed throughout dendrite shafts and spines. (d) Percentages of transfected hippocampal neurons showing spine enrichment of profilin II-GFP or unmodified GFP * ++, cells showing enrichment in all spines; + cells showing enrichment in some spines; - cells showing no spine enrichment. (n = total number of cells examined for each construct). Scale bar: 10 μm (JPG 18 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2.
Low magnification images showing profilin II-GFP distribution in dendrites of two profilin II-GFP transfected cells from independently established cultures. After 25 days in vitro each culture was exposed to 10 μM glutamate for 30 min and a live cell image captured before (0') and after (30') treatment. Scale bars: 10μm (JPG 18 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 3.
Profilin II remains concentrated in spine heads after withdrawal of the targeting stimulus. (a) Segment of a dendrite before stimulation. Letters next to boxes identify individual dendritic spines shown in detail in panels d, e and f. (b) The same dendritic segment after 30 min exposure to 5 μM glutamate showed accumulation of profilin II-GFP in spine heads. (c) 45 min after glutamate was washed out, profilin II was still strongly concentrated in spine heads. (d-f) Detail of individual spines shown in the boxed areas of panel a. The contrast has been inverted for clarity so that areas of high fluorescence appear dark. (d,e,f) spines before glutamate treatment. (d',e',f') the same spines 45 min after glutamate was removed. Scale bars: (a) 5 μm, (d,e,f) 1 μm. (JPG 18 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 4.
Stimulation procedures used to induce profilin targeting do not compromise the health of hippocampal neurons. (a) Neurons (21 DIV) were stimulated by exposure to either 5 μM glutamate, 5 μM NMDA, or recording medium lacking Mg2+. 12 hours later after treatment cells were stained with propidium iodide to stain nuclei of dead cells. Hoechst was used to stain all nuclei. (b) Diagram indicating the percentage of dead cells for each treatment. 8 regions containing 7-15 cells of 3 differently established cell cultures for each treatment were randomly chosen and analyzed (mean ± s.e.). Treatments with 5 μM glutamate, 5 μM NMDA and zero Mg2+ do not lead to a significant increase in cell death (p > 0.1; compared to non-treated cells). By comparison, application of 100 μM glutamate, which has been shown to have excitotoxic effects (Choi, D.W. , 1988. Neuron 1, 623-634), induces cell death in most cells examined (p < 0.01; two tailed T-test). (PDF 71 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 5.
Expression of CFP-G(GP5)3 destabilizes spine structures when transfected in mature neurons. Differently established cultures (n = 5) were transfected at DIV 18 with CFP-G(GP5)3 and cells were analyzed 2-4 days after transfection (n = 8). Control cells of the same cultures were transfected with YFP-actin and examined for spine morphology (a, a') Dendritic segment of a cell expressing CFP-G(GP5)3 having destabilized spine structures (b, b') Control cell expressing YFP-actin having normal spine shapes. (c, d) An independent culture in which a cell expressing CFP-G(GP5)3 has irregularly shaped spines (c) whereas a cell expressing YFP-actin has spines of normal morphology (d). (JPG 24 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 6.
Transgenic mice express profilin II-GFP at low levels. Expression levels of profilin II-GFP was compared between transfected hippocampal neurons and neurons derived from transgenic animals. Neurons were grown in cell culture for 3 weeks and five randomly-selected cells were analyzed for their expression level by calculating the average fluorescence pixel intensities. Neurons derived from transgenic mice have an averaged pixel intensity of 140.3 ± 16.1 whereas transfected neurons have a average value of 375.9 ± 147.2 (both measurements mean ± s.d.; arbitrary units). (PDF 9 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 7
(Supplementary data to Fig. 4). Low frequency stimulation induces profilin targeting to dendritic spines and simultaneously stabilizes dendritic spine morphology. Neurons were doubly transfected to express both profilin II-YFP and CFP-actin and the culture was subjected to LTD-pattern stimulation (900 pulses at 1 Hz). The distribution of profilin II-YFP before (upper panel) and 30 min after (lower panel) the onset of stimulation showing the redistribution of profilin to spine heads. (See Supplementary Video 1) (PDF 279 kb)
Supplementary Video 1.
Time-lapse recording of CFP-actin before stimulation began showing that dendritic spines change shape rapidly under resting conditions. Recordings are of 6 min duration at 1 frame every 15 sec. (MOV 769 kb)
Supplementary Video 2.
Time-lapse recording of CFP-actin 30 min later showing that dendritic spines had become morphologically stable following following LTD-pattern stimulation. Recordings are of 6 min duration at 1 frame every 15 sec. (MOV 840 kb)
Supplementary Video 3.
(Supplementary data to Fig. 4). Low frequency stimulation induces stabilization of dendritic spine morphology visualized by recording GFP-actin dynamics. To demonstrate that spine motility was not influenced by overexpression of YFP-tagged profilin, the experiment shown in Supplementary Videos 1 and 2 was repeated using neurons transfected with GFP-actin alone where only endogenous profilin is present. This is a time-lapse recording made prior to stimulation showing rapid actin-based motility in dendritic spines under resting conditions. (MOV 878 kb)
Supplementary Video 4
(Supplementary data to Fig. 4). Low frequency stimulation induces stabilization of dendritic spine morphology visualized by recording GFP-actin dynamics. To demonstrate that spine motility was not influenced by overexpression of YFP-tagged profilin, the experiment shown in Supplementary Videos 1 and 2 was repeated using neurons transfected with GFP-actin alone where only endogenous profilin is present. This is a time-lapse recording made 30 min after stimulation with 900 pulses at 1 Hz spine showing that following stimulation actin dynamics are suppressed. Recording settings are as for Supplementary Videos 1 and 2. (MOV 878 kb)
Supplementary Video 5
(Supplementary data to Fig. 4). Dendritic spine motility is arrested between 10 to 20 minutes after the onset of low frequency stimulation. This is a time-lapse recording of a GFP-actin transfected neuron made prior to low frequency stimulation (recording settings as for the first video) showing the motile character of dendritic spines under control conditions. (MOV 902 kb)
Supplementary Video 6
(Supplementary data to Fig. 4). Dendritic spine motility is arrested between 10 to 20 minutes after the onset of low frequency stimulation. This shows that 10 min after the start of stimulation spines are still motile but motility declines progressively over the next 10 min at which time spine morphology has become stable. (MOV 1278 kb)
Supplementary Video 7
(Supplementary data to Fig. 6). Z-axis scan of Z-series image stack taken of the hippocampus section shown in Fig. 6a. (MOV 569 kb)
Supplementary Video 8
(Supplementary data to Fig. 6). Rotatable image of the area shown in Fig. 6a. (MOV 1374 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ackermann, M., Matus, A. Activity-induced targeting of profilin and stabilization of dendritic spine morphology. Nat Neurosci 6, 1194–1200 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1135
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1135
This article is cited by
-
Functional interdependence of the actin regulators CAP1 and cofilin1 in control of dendritic spine morphology
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)
-
Integrated miRNA-/mRNA-Seq of the Habenulo-Interpeduncular Circuit During Acute Nicotine Withdrawal
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Intra- and extracellular β-amyloid overexpression via adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer impairs memory and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Gephyrin: a key regulatory protein of inhibitory synapses and beyond
Histochemistry and Cell Biology (2018)
-
Mechanisms regulating dendritic arbor patterning
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2017)