Abstract
The mammalian circadian clock resides in neurons of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Light entrains phase resetting of the clock using the retino-hypothalamic tract, via release of glutamate. Nighttime light exposure causes rapid, transient induction of clock and immediate–early genes implicated in phase-shifting the pacemaker. Here we show that a nighttime light pulse caused phosphorylation of Ser10 in histone H3's tail, in SCN clock cells. The effect of light was specific, and the kinetics of H3 phosphorylation were characteristic of the early response, paralleling c-fos and Per1 induction. Using fos-lacZ transgenic mice, we found that H3 phosphorylation and Fos induction occurRed in the same SCN neurons. Systemic treatment with the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen prevented light-induced c-fos and Per1 expression and H3 phosphorylation, indicating that one signaling pathway governs both events. Our results suggest that dynamic chromatin remodeling in the SCN occurs in response to a physiological stimulus in vivo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The central mammalian circadian clock is located in neurons of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus1,2,3. The pacemaker activity of the SCN is autonomous, as it functions in constant darkness and in the absence of external light stimuli1,2,3; however, it can be entrained by environmental light–dark cycles4. In rodents, at least three neural pathways link the retina to the SCN: first, the direct, monosynaptic retino-hypothalamic tract (RHT), whose main neurotransmitters seem to be excitatory amino acids such as glutamate5,6; second, the indirect multisynaptic projection from the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), which acts via the release of the protein neurotransmitter neuropeptide Y and the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)7,8; third, an indirect pathway arising from the dorsal and median raphe nucleus, in which serotonin is the main neurotransmitter9. Although the RHT alone seems necessary and sufficient to mediate light entrainment10, interference with the IGL and/or dorsal raphe nucleus transmission11 can modify the response of the SCN to light.
In mammals kept in darkness, a light pulse during the subjective night (that is, the time of the day corresponding to the dark period in a normal light–dark cycle) causes phase-shifting of the SCN-controlled rhythms4. The phase-shift stimulated by light triggers gene expression within the SCN, including the rapid and transient activation of clock genes, such as Per1 and Per2 (refs. 12, 13) and of immediate early genes (IEGs), such as c-fos, fos-B, jun-B, nur77 and zif268 (refs. 14, 15). These changes in gene expression have been implicated in phase-shifting the pacemaker16,17. Although the photic regulation of c-fos expression in the SCN has been extensively studied, the pivotal events enabling dynamic regulation at the chromosomal level are not yet known.
Light pulses induce activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK)18, and thus possibly modulate the physiological function of substrates within the SCN. In particular, light pulses induce phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB (cAMP response-element binding protein) on serine 133 (ref. 19), the essential phospho-acceptor site that enables the recruiting of the co-activator CBP, a protein with histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity20. Factors of the CREB family are involved in circadian rhythmicity both in Drosophila21 and mammals22.
Modifications occurring on histone tails are primary events that contribute to the dynamic process of chromatin remodeling, an essential step in transcriptional regulation23. Both chromatin remodeling factors and covalent histone modifications facilitate access of transcription factors to chromatin, and regulate expression of a wide range of genes24. A number of post-translational modifications occur on histone tails (for review, see ref. 23). Among these, inducible phosphorylation at serine 10 of the histone H3 N-terminal tail in response to a mitogenic stimulus represents the best characterized link between activation of a signal transduction pathway and chromatin modification. Phosphorylation occurs in a subset of histone H3 molecules in a rapid and transient manner, paralleling the induction profile of early response genes25,26. We previously identified the MAPK-activated RSK2 kinase as a candidate for epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced phosphorylation of H3 (ref. 25). RSK2 is also involved in EGF-induced CREB phosphorylation and c-fos expression in fibroblasts27, establishing a direct link between signaling to chromatin and induction of IEGs. Finally, phosphorylation on Ser10 greatly enhances the subsequent HAT-mediated acetylation on the closely located Lys14 on the H3 tail, underscoring the primary importance of phosphorylation28. Our knowledge of histone modifications is mostly based on studies in cell culture systems; histone modification function in vivo is basically unexplored.
Here we report that the photic stimulus has previously unrecognized profound effects on chromatin remodeling in non-proliferating neurons. A light pulse applied to mice during the subjective night induced the phosphorylation of the histone H3 in the ventrolateral SCN, but not in the pineal gland or retina. This transient modification occurred with early response kinetics, paralleling the induction of the c-fos gene. Moreover, H3 phosphorylation and gene induction were blunted by the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen, which counteracts light effects on the SCN29,30. Our results provide in vivo evidence of chromatin remodeling in the vertebrate nervous system in response to an external stimulus.
Results
Light-inducible histone H3 phosphorylation in the SCN
Two groups of mice were placed for 2 weeks on a 12–12 hour light–dark (LD) cycle and then transferred to constant darkness (DD) for 4 days. At different circadian times (CT; CT0 corresponds to lights on), one group of mice was directly killed, whereas the second group was exposed to light for 15 minutes and then returned to darkness for 15 additional minutes before dissection. Phosphorylation was determined by immunofluorescence in whole-brain cryosections using a specific antibody directed against a phosphorylated Ser10 H3 peptide (P-H3; ref. 31). There was no spontaneous phosphorylation of H3 in the SCN at any time of the circadian cycle (Fig. 1a). A light pulse induces prominent H3 phosphorylation in the SCN, though only during the subjective night (when light causes phase-shift of the clock; for example, a delay at CT15 and an advance at CT21)4, and densitometric analysis confirmed that the photic stimulation was statistically significant (Fig. 1b). No H3 phosphorylation was present in other brain areas. The SCN ventrolateral region, an area that displays maximal induction of c-fos in response to light14, displayed maximal H3 phosphorylation. Therefore, as for immediate early gene expression, H3 phosphorylation was induced by retinal illumination and was gated by the circadian clock.
Confocal analysis of SCN sections from mice light-stimulated at CT21 showed a nuclear staining pattern specific for the euchromatin (Fig. 1c). The staining, as previously observed in EGF-induced fibroblasts25, was not uniform over the nucleus, although it appeared more diffused as compared to the nuclear speckles observed in fibroblasts. This may be ascribed to the distinct experimental settings, as well as to the diverse signaling pathways involved; in our previous study, growth factors led to cell proliferation25, whereas here light elicited a dynamic response in non-proliferating neurons.
No H3 phosphorylation in retina and pineal gland
In mammals, the SCN receives photic information from the retina, which also contains a circadian pacemaker3. Circadian timing information is then relayed from the SCN to the pineal gland, thereby controlling the rhythmic release of the hormone melatonin1,3. We thus studied the consequence of photic stimulation on H3 phosphorylation in these areas. Western blot analyses were done on pineal gland extracts during a normal light–dark cycle (data not shown), and after a light pulse at CT9 and CT21 (Fig. 2a). In both cases, no H3 phosphorylation was detectable. In eye samples collected at CT21, following or not following a light pulse, no H3 phosphorylation was observed (Fig. 2b). Also in retinal sections from mice stimulated or not stimulated with light at CT21 (Fig. 2c), CT3, CT9 and CT15 (data not shown), no signal was present, although control CREB phosphorylation was detected in the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers (Fig. 2c). Thus, light-induced H3 phosphorylation seemed to be restricted to the cells of the central clock. These results stressed the specificity of SCN cells as receptors of the light signal, and of their capability to transduce the signal into a selected phosphorylation of one histone tail.
Coupling H3 phosphorylation with c-fos expression
To study the time course of H3 phosphorylation after photic induction, we stimulated animals with light for 15 minutes and returned them to the dark for various lengths of time before dissection. Other mice were exposed to light for five minutes and then killed immediately (Fig. 3a). We used serial sections from individual mice to probe c-fos gene expression and H3 phosphorylation in parallel. Expression of VIP was used as a control32. As for c-fos inducibility14, short light pulses were sufficient to induce H3 phosphorylation. Histone H3 phosphorylation peaks 30 minutes after the onset of light, whereas three hours later it is no longer detectable. Thus, the timing of H3 phosphorylation closely coincides with the early gene response (Fig. 3b).
To verify that induction of H3 phosphorylation and early gene expression occur concomitantly in the same SCN neurons in response to the light stimulus, we used transgenic fos-lacZ mice33. In these mice, β-galactosidase (β-gal) expression driven by the c-fos promoter was inducible by a light-pulse at CT21, during the subjective night33. Nuclei positive for H3 phosphorylation, but not for β-gal, were detected one hour after the CT21 light pulse (data not shown). Two hours after the light pulse, β-gal- positive and double-labeled nuclei were visible (Fig. 3c). Almost half of β-gal-positive nuclei (Cy3 labeled) also exhibited P-H3 staining (FITC labeled), whereas all P-H3 positive nuclei were also stained with the anti-β-gal antibody (Fig. 3d). These data provide strong evidence that the two events occur concurrently in a large subset of SCN neurons.
Baclofen blocks light-induced H3 phosphorylation
The administration of the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen is known to inhibit phase-shifts induced by light during the subjective night, as well as c-fos gene expression29,30. We thus considered whether a pharmacological treatment modulating light-dependent effects on the clock would also interfere with the signaling routes required for H3 phosphorylation. Mice, entrained on a L12–D12 cycle for two weeks and housed in DD for four days, were injected intraperitoneally with baclofen or a saline solution at CT3, CT9, CT15 or CT21. After 10 minutes, animals were exposed to a 15-minute light pulse, and then placed in the dark for 15 minutes before dissection. We then analyzed gene expression and histone H3 phosphorylation in the SCN of these mice (Fig. 4).
Baclofen alone had no effect on IEGs or clock gene expression in the SCN at any time. On the other hand, baclofen strongly reduced c-fos induction in response to light at CT15 and CT21. A similar effect was observed on the light-induced expression of clock gene Per1. Transcript levels of Per1 oscillate during the day, peaking during the light period in the SCN12,13. As for c-fos, Per 1 expression is induced by light during the subjective night12,13. Daytime high levels of Per1 were not blunted by baclofen (Fig. 4; CT3 and CT9), demonstrating that the effect of the drug is specific for the light-induced expression.
H3 phosphorylation closely followed c-fos and Per1 expression, as baclofen powerfully reduced the light-induced effect (Figs. 4 and 5b). Some P-H3 positive nuclei remained in the mediolateral part of the SCN, which is consistent with what we and others29 have observed for c-fos induced expression. These results strongly suggest that the same signaling routes within the SCN are involved in this chromatin modification as in IEG and clock gene expression.
H3 phosphorylation in the supraoptic nucleus
GABA mediates neurotransmission from the SCN to magnocellular neurons in other hypothalamic nuclei, such as the paraventricular nucleus and the supraoptic nucleus (SON)34,35. Moreover, various treatments induce Fos protein expression in the SON36,37. We asked whether induction of H3 phosphorylation accompanies c-fos gene activation in other neuronal settings. Thus, we explored the effect of baclofen administration and found that it triggered c-fos gene inducibility in cells of the SON (Fig. 5a). This induction was concomitant with a robust induction of H3 phosphorylation. Importantly, the baclofen-dependent induction of both c-fos gene expression and H3 phosphorylation was not clock regulated; it was observed at any time of the day. Moreover, the two regulatory events in the SON were independent of the light effect. Thus, although regulation was very different in the SON compared to the SCN (Fig. 5b), c-fos expression and H3 phosphorylation were still tightly coupled. These observations provide another independent and strong physiological link between these molecular events.
Discussion
Gene regulation requires condensation and decondensation of chromatin23,24. One key step in this process is regulation of histone modifications, of which acetylation and phosphorylation have been the most studied cases23. Clock function relies greatly on transcriptional regulation. The generation of physiological circadian rhythms involves transcriptional regulatory feedback loops2,3, and one initial step in the integration of environmental stimuli is the rapid induction of a panel of genes12,13,14,15. Here, phase-shift-inducing light stimulation profoundly affected SCN cell physiology by triggering a major histone modification, possibly a primary event of the transcriptional cascade leading to regulated clock function.
Light treatment of mice during the subjective night elicits powerful induction of immediate-early genes, an event that seems to be important for clock phase-shifting16,17,38, although a more complex scenario is possible39,40. The data presented here provide evidence for a tight link between this transcriptional event and H3 phosphorylation in the SCN. First, the accumulation of c-fos mRNA and of P-H3 present strikingly overlapping kinetics. Second, both events occur in the same region of the SCN, mainly in the ventrolateral region. Third, a high proportion of SCN neurons show colocalization of β-galactosidase and P-H3 signal in light-treated fos-lacZ transgenic mice. Fourth, induction of c-fos (and Per1) and H3 phosphorylation in reponse to light are severely blunted upon treatment with baclofen. These notions suggest that H3 phosphorylation is involved in the transcriptional response to light in the SCN, and therefore significantly participates in the phase-shift events induced by this stimulus. However, additional experiments are needed to causally link H3 phosphorylation to these processes. Previous studies in EGF-stimulated fibroblasts indicated that the same signal transduction pathway leads to a concerted phosphorylation of CREB and the H3 tail25,27,41. A parallel with the SCN is interesting, as CREB phosphorylation is also induced in response to light19. The panel of genes activated by light in the SCN is likely to be different because P-H3 labeling covers large patches throughout the nucleus, which contrast with the speckles observed in fibroblasts upon EGF stimulation25(Fig. 1c).
Using c-fos-lacZ transgenic mice, we showed that H3 phosphorylation and c-fos promoter induction occurred in the same SCN neurons (Fig. 3c and d). However, some uncoupling was present. The most likely explanation was that scoring by immunoreaction only partially reflected the overlapping of the two events. Indeed, whereas the P-H3 antibody revealed an early response event, the anti-β-gal signal was the result of accumulated β-gal protein generated with slower kinetics. Thus, many β-gal-positive nuclei were not P-H3 positive, because the phosphorylation signal was long gone while the highly stable β-gal protein was still immunoreactive.
Induced H3 phosphorylation in the SCN and SON constituted a demonstration of non-mitotic H3 phosphorylation in vivo. The same modification was elicited, in each case, by very different stimuli. In the SCN, the light signal is transmitted through the RHT via the neurotransmitter glutamate and the ionotropic NMDA receptor6. In the SON, metabotropic GABA receptors are likely involved, because the response is stimulated by the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen. Given the distinct effectors used by these two types of receptors42,43, the intracellular pathways leading to H3 phosphorylation in vivo are likely to differ profoundly. Consistent with this notion is the observation that the mode of regulation in the two hypothalamic nuclei is distinct: in the SCN, H3 phosphorylation was light dependent, gated by the clock, and blocked by baclofen; in the SON, the response was equivalent at any time of the day, was independent of lighting conditions, and was induced by baclofen. The SON has an important involvement in osmoregulation, through osmosensitivity of its magnocellular neurosecretory cells and neurohypophysial hormone release44. H3 phosphorylation, and in general chromatin remodeling, may be involved in hormonal response governed by this physiological pathway.
In addition to counteracting the effect of light on IEG gene expression, baclofen blunts both the Per1 gene response and H3 phosphorylation. Several studies have addressed the question of the physiological role of GABA in the SCN45,46. GABA may be a coupling agent between SCN cells45, as it is able to acutely inhibit SCN neuron firing rate (through GABAB receptors) and shift the phase of these neurons (through GABAA receptors). In addition, it synchronizes SCN cells in culture when administered at regular times45. Finally, GABA seems to modulate gap junction communication between SCN neurons46. The involvement of additional chromatin modifications in a number of neuronal settings, and in response to a number of stimuli, is still to be explored.
Which H3 kinase is acting in response to light in the SCN? RSK2 is the H3 kinase in EGF-stimulated fibroblasts25. Other kinases, including MSK1 and PKA, have the capacity to phosphorylate H3 in vitro and are therefore among possible SCN candidates26,47. All the above-mentioned kinases belong to the AGC group of protein kinases23. The search for the light-induced H3 kinase may reveal essential elements of the light transducing pathway and their links to central clock elements.
The molecular pathways by which light influences the circadian cycle are not fully recognized, although advances in various organisms implicate light-transducing molecules in clock function48,49,50. Here we demonstrate that light acts directly on nuclear function by inducing a distinct histone modification, thus influencing the state of higher chromatin organization. This light-induced chromatin modification is gated by the clock. Our results also demonstrate that multiple signaling pathways may converge to specific chromatin sites to elicit the same histone modification.
Methods
Animals and tissue preparation.
We used wild-type 129/Sv mice, although similar results were obtained using other mouse strains. Trangenic mice (fos-lacZ) were obtained from T. Curran33. All animals were 7–12 week-old males. Mice were entrained on a L12–D12 (12 h light–12 h dark) for two weeks, and then placed in constant darkness (DD) for four days. They were then exposed to a 15-min light pulse and placed back in the dark for 15 min (unless otherwise mentioned). Baclofen (10 mg/kg), dissolved in 0.9% NaCl, or saline solution alone, was administered intraperitoneally 10 min before the light pulse. Mice were decapitated and dissected under dim red light conditions. Tissues to be assayed by western blot analysis were homogenized in boiling Laemmli buffer. For immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, tissues were placed in OCT and frozen on dry ice and 10-μm thick coronal cryosections were prepared.
In situ hybridization.
VIP (cloned by PCR from genomic mouse DNA, nucleotides 3095–3262 of the Genbank sequence X74297), c-fos and mPer1 (nucleotides 1–336 of ORF, Genbank sequence AF022992) [35S]-labeled antisense riboprobes were prepared by in vitro transcription (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin). As a control for nonspecific signal, consecutive sections were hybridized with c-fos, VIP and mPer1 sense probes.
Immunohistochemistry.
Brain sections were fixed in 1×PBS solution (pH 7.5) containing 4% paraformaldehyde, and then blocked for 1 h in 5% normal goat serum in 1×PBS/0.05% Tween-20. For Ser-10-phosphorylated H3 (P-H3) immunolabeling, sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000 final dilution, Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, New York). Slides were washed and incubated with a secondary antibody (CY™3 conjugated anti-rabbit serum, 1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, Pennsylvania). Immunostained sections were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, Roche, Mannheim, Germany) before microscopy.
For double-labeling experiments, sections were incubated with a mouse monoclonal β-galactosidase-specific antibody (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) and the P-H3 rabbit polyclonal antibody, and then incubated with a CY™3 conjugated anti-mouse serum and a fluorescein (FITC) conjugated anti-rabbit serum (1:100 and 1:200 respectively, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).
We acquired images with DMLB Leica microscope with a HBO100W lamp. Confocal images were acquired on a Leica DMRE microscope. We analyzed retinal sections by the peroxidase-labeled detection method, and we introduced an additional step to block endogenous peroxidase activity.
Western blot analysis.
Protein extracts were resolved by standard SDS-PAGE. Samples were electroblotted onto Protan nitrocellulose (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). Membranes were incubated in PBS/5% low-fat milk and specific antibody for 12 h at 4°C. Donkey, anti-rabbit HRP antibodies were used to reveal immunocomplexes by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, Illinois).
References
Klein, D., Moore, R. Y. & Reppert, S. M. Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: The Mind's Clock (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1991).
Dunlap, J. C. Molecular bases for circadian clocks. Cell 96, 271–290 (1999).
Cermakian, N. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Multilevel regulation of the circadian clock. Nat. Reviews Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 59–67 (2000).
Daan, S. & Pittendrigh, C. S. A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. II. The variability of phase response curves. J. Comp. Physiol. 106, 253–266 (1976).
Moore, R. Y. & Lenn, N. Y. A retinohypothalamic projection in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 146, 1–14 (1972).
Ding, J. M. et al. Resetting the biological clock: mediation of nocturnal circadian shifts by glutamate and NO. Science 266, 1713–1717 (1994).
Card, J. P. & Moore, R. Y. Organization of lateral geniculate-hypothalamic connections in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 284, 135–147 (1989).
Moore, R. Y. & Speh, J. C. GABA is the principal neurotransmitter of the circadian system. Neurosci. Lett. 150, 112–116 (1993).
Pickard, G. E. & Rea, M. A. Serotonergic innervation of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus and photic regulation of circadian rhythms. Biol. Cell 89, 513–523 (1997).
Johnson, R. F., Moore, R. Y. & Morin, L. P. Loss of entrainment and anatomical plasticity after lesions of the hamster retinohypothalamic tract. Brain Res. 460, 297–313 (1988).
Harrington, M. E. & Rusak, B. Lesions of the thalamic intergeniculate leaflet alter hamster circadian rhythms. J. Biol. Rhythms. 1, 309–325 (1986).
Albrecht, U., Sun, Z. S., Eichele, G. & Lee, C. C. A differential response of two putative mammalian circadian regulators, mper1 and mper2, to light. Cell 91, 1055–1064 (1997).
Shearman, L. P., Zylka, M. J., Weaver, D. R., Kolakowski, L. F. Jr. & Reppert, S. M. Two period homologs: circadian expression and photic regulation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Neuron 19, 1261–1269 (1997).
Kornhauser, J. M., Nelson, D. E., Mayo, K. E. & Takahashi, J. S. Photic and circadian regulation of c-fos gene expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuron 5, 127–134 (1990).
Morris, M. E., Viswanathan, N., Kuhlman, S., Davis, F. C. & Weitz, C. J. A screen for genes induced in the suprachiasmatic nucleus by light. Science 279, 1544–1547 (1998).
Wollnik, F. et al. Block of c-Fos and JunB expression by antisense oligonucleotides inhibits light-induced phase shifts of the mammalian circadian clock. Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 388–393 (1995).
Akiyama, M. et al. Inhibition of light- or glutamate-induced mPer1 expression represses the phase shifts into the mouse circadian locomotor and suprachiasmatic firing rhythms. J. Neurosci. 19, 1115–1121 (1999).
Obrietan, K., Impey, S. & Storm, D. R. Light and circadian rhythmicity regulate MAP kinase activation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 693–700 (1998).
Ginty, D. D. et al. Regulation of CREB phosphorylation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus by light and a circadian clock. Science 260, 238–241 (1993).
De Cesare, D., Fimia, G. M. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Signaling routes to CREM and CREB: plasticity in transcriptional activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 281–285 (1999).
Belvin, M. P., Zhou, H. & Yin, J. C. The Drosophila dCREB2 gene affects the circadian clock. Neuron 22, 777–787 (1999).
Obrietan, K., Impey, S., Smith, D., Athos, J. & Storm, D. R. Circadian regulation of cAMP response element-mediated gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17748–17756 (1999).
Cheung, P., Allis, C. D. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Signaling to chromatin through histone modifications. Cell 103, 263–271 (2000).
Workman, J. L. & Kingston, R. E. Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 545–579 (1998).
Sassone-Corsi, P. et al. Requirement of Rsk-2 for epidermal growth factor-activated phosphorylation of histone H3. Science 285, 886–891 (1999).
Thomson, S. et al. The nucleosomal response associated with immediate-early gene induction is mediated via alternative MAP kinase cascades: MSK1 as a potential histone H3/HMG-14 kinase. EMBO J. 18, 4779–4793 (1999).
De Cesare, D., Jacquot, S., Hanauer, A. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Rsk-2 activity is necessary for epidermal growth factor-induced phosphorylation of CREB protein and transcription of c-fos gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12202–12207 (1998).
Cheung, P. et al. Synergistic coupling of histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation in response to epidermal growth factor. Mol. Cell 5, 905–915 (2000).
Colwell, C. S., Kaufman, C. M. & Menaker, M. Photic induction of Fos in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus is inhibited by baclofen but not by diazepam or bicucullin. Neurosci. Lett. 163, 177–181 (1993).
Gillespie, C. F. et al. GABAergic regulation of light-induced c-Fos immunoreactivity within the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J. Comp. Neurol. 411, 683–692 (1999).
Hendzel, M. J. et al. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106, 348–360 (1997).
Silver, R. et al. Multiple regulatory elements result in regional specificity in circadian rhythms of neuropeptide expression in mouse SCN. Neuroreport 10, 3165–3174 (1999).
Robertson, L. M. et al. Regulation of c-fos expression in transgenic mice requires multiple interdependent transcription control elements. Neuron 14, 241–252 (1995).
Cui, L. N., Saeb-Parsy, K. & Dyball, R. E. Neurones in the supraoptic nucleus of the rat are regulated by a projection from the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 502, 149–159 (1997).
Cui, L. N., Coderre, E. & Renaud, L. P. GABA(B) presynaptically modulates suprachiasmatic input to hypothalamic paraventricular magnocellular neurons. Am. J. Physiol. 278, R1210–1216 (2000).
Wang, K., Guldenaar, S. E. & McCabe, J. T. Fos and Jun expression in rat supraoptic nucleus neurons after acute vs. repeated osmotic stimulation. Brain Res. 746, 117–125 (1997).
Berquin, P., Bodineau, L., Gros, F. & Larnicol, N. Brainstem and hypothalamic areas involved in respiratory chemoreflexes: a Fos study in adult rats. Brain Res. 857, 30–40 (2000).
Honrado, G. I. et al. The circadian system of c-fos deficient mice. J. Comp. Physiol. A 178, 563–570 (1996).
Colwell, C. S., Kaufman, C. M. & Menaker, M. Phase-shifting mechanisms in the mammalian circadian system: new light on the carbachol paradox. J. Neurosci. 13, 1454–1459 (1993).
Weber, E. T., Gannon, R. L., Michel, A. M., Gillette, M. U. & Rea, M. A. Nitric oxide synthase inhibitor blocks light-induced phase shifts of the circadian activity rhythm, but not c-fos expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the Syrian hamster. Brain Res. 692, 137–142 (1995).
Xing, J., Ginty, D. D. & Greenberg, M. E. Coupling of the RAS-MAPK pathway to gene activation by RSK2, a growth factor-regulated CREB kinase. Science 273, 959–963 (1996).
Hollmann, M. & Heinemann, S. Cloned glutamate receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 31–108 (1994).
Bormann, J. The 'ABC' of GABA receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 16–19 (2000).
Bourque, C. W. & Oliet, S. H. Osmoreceptors in the central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59, 601–619 (1997).
Liu, C. & Reppert, S. M. GABA synchronizes clock cells within the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Neuron 25, 123–128 (2000).
Shinohara, K., Hiruma, H., Funabashi, T. & Kimura, F. GABAergic modulation of gap junction communication in slice cultures of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroscience 96, 591–596 (2000).
Shibata, K., Inagaki, M. & Ajiro, K. Mitosis-specific histone H3 phosphorylation in vitro in nucleosome structures. Eur. J. Biochem. 192, 87–93 (1990).
Ceriani, M. F. et al. Light-dependent sequestration of TIMELESS by CRYPTOCHROME. Science 285, 553–556 (1999).
van der Horst, G. T. et al. Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for maintenance of circadian rhythms. Nature 398, 627–630 (1999).
Whitmore, D., Foulkes, N. S. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Light acts directly on organs and cells in culture to set the vertebrate circadian clock. Nature 404, 87–91 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Curran for the fos-lacZ transgenic mouse line. We thank H. Tei for the mPer1 cDNA, J. L. Vonesch for advice with confocal microscopy, E. Borrelli for reading the manuscript and E. Heitz and M. Rastegar for technical assistance. We thank Z. Travnickova, D. Whitmore, N. Foulkes, M. Pando and all members of the Sassone-Corsi laboratory for discussions and help. C.C. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the European Community and N.C. by a Human Frontier Science Program long-term fellowship and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research postdoctoral fellowship. This work was supported by grants from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Régional, Fondation de la Recherche Médicale, Université Louis Pasteur, Human Frontier Science Program, Organon (Akzo/Nobel) and Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crosio, C., Cermakian, N., Allis, C. et al. Light induces chromatin modification in cells of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Neurosci 3, 1241–1247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/81767
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/81767
This article is cited by
-
PER2 mediates CREB-dependent light induction of the clock gene Per1
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Rebelled epigenome: histone H3S10 phosphorylation and H3S10 kinases in cancer biology and therapy
Clinical Epigenetics (2020)
-
Metabolic rivalry: circadian homeostasis and tumorigenesis
Nature Reviews Cancer (2020)
-
Disruption of the Molecular Circadian Clock and Cancer: An Epigenetic Link
Biochemical Genetics (2020)
-
Circadian rhythms in the three-dimensional genome: implications of chromatin interactions for cyclic transcription
Clinical Epigenetics (2019)