Abstract
Antiferromagnetism is relevant to high-temperature (high-Tc) superconductivity because copper oxide and iron arsenide superconductors arise from electron- or hole-doping of their antiferromagnetic parent compounds1,2,3,4,5,6. There are two broad classes of explanation for antiferromagnetism: in the ‘local moment’ picture, appropriate for the insulating copper oxides1, antiferromagnetic interactions are well described by a Heisenberg Hamiltonian7,8; whereas in the ‘itinerant model’, suitable for metallic chromium, antiferromagnetic order arises from quasiparticle excitations of a nested Fermi surface9,10. There has been contradictory evidence regarding the microscopic origin of the antiferromagnetic order in iron arsenide materials5,6, with some favouring a localized picture11,12,13,14,15 and others supporting an itinerant point of view16,17,18,19,20. More importantly, there has not even been agreement about the simplest effective ground-state Hamiltonian necessary to describe the antiferromagnetic order21,22,23,24,25. Here, we use inelastic neutron scattering to map spin-wave excitations in CaFe2As2 (refs 26, 27), a parent compound of the iron arsenide family of superconductors. We find that the spin waves in the entire Brillouin zone can be described by an effective three-dimensional local-moment Heisenberg Hamiltonian, but the large in-plane anisotropy cannot. Therefore, magnetism in the parent compounds of iron arsenide superconductors is neither purely local nor purely itinerant, rather it is a complicated mix of the two.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Since the discovery of static antiferromagnetic order (with a spin structure as in Fig. 1a) in the parent compounds of iron pnictide superconductors5,6, much effort has been focused on understanding the role of spin dynamics in the superconductivity of these materials11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. A determination of the effective magnetic exchange coupling and ground-state Hamiltonian in the parent compounds of these materials is important because such an understanding will provide the basis against which superconductivity-induced changes can be identified. Using inelastic neutron scattering, we have measured the dispersion of spin-wave excitations in CaFe2As2 (refs 26, 27), one of the parent compounds of the FeAs-based superconductors, and determined the effective magnetic exchange interactions. If the static long-range antiferromagnetic order shown in Fig. 1a for the parent compounds of iron-based superconductors originates from a collective spin-density-wave order instability of itinerant electrons like in chromium, the velocity of spin-wave excitations c should be c=(vevh/3)1/2, where ve and vh are the electron and hole Fermi velocity, respectively9. Furthermore, spin-wave excitations should exhibit longitudinal and transverse polarization, and damp into single-particle excitations (Stoner continuum) through the transfer of an electron (spin) from the majority to the minority band at high energies as shown schematically in Fig. 1c (ref. 10). On the other hand, if magnetic order in iron pnictides has a local moment origin as in the parent compounds of the copper oxides1, one should observe well-defined (essentially instrumental resolution limited) spin waves throughout the Brillouin zone and magnetic coupling between local moments should be dominated by direct and super-exchange interactions (Fig. 1d)11,12,13,14,15. In recent neutron scattering experiments, the presence of itinerant magnetic excitations and a Stoner continuum have been suggested in BaFe2As2(ref. 24) and CaFe2As2 (ref. 25). Whereas low-energy spin waves in CaFe2As2 can be described by a classical Heisenberg Hamiltonian, a Stoner line broadening was reported to develop above 100 meV (or wave vector Q=(1.2,0,1) reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.) or ∼0.2 r.l.u. in reduced wave vector from the zone centre (1,0,1)) with no localized spin waves near the zone boundary25. Furthermore, the authors find that a Heisenberg Hamiltonian with effective in-plane nearest-neighbours (Fig. 1a, J1a and J1b), next-nearest-neighbour (Fig. 1a, J2) and out-of-plane (Fig. 1a, Jc) exchange couplings of S(J1a+J1b)=44, S J2=31±3 and S Jc=4.5±1 meV (where spin S=1) can best describe spin waves of CaFe2As2 below 100 meV (ref. 25). Although these results are interesting, they are similar to earlier work21,22,23,24 and have not determined the effective ground-state Hamiltonian because the signs of the effective change coupling constants (Fig. 1a, J1a and J1b) can be determined only by zone-boundary spin-wave data, which are lacking in ref. 25. A correct determination of all exchange coupling constants (J1a, J1b and so on) is important because it enables the formation of an appropriate ground-state Hamiltonian from which superconductivity can be derived.
We used inelastic neutron scattering to study low-temperature (T=10 K) spin waves of single crystals of CaFe2As2, which has a Néel temperature of TN≈170 K (refs 26, 27). Figure 1e–l shows two-dimensional constant-energy (E) images of spin-wave excitations of CaFe2As2 around the antiferromagnetic zone centre in the (H, K) scattering plane21,22,23,24,25. Previous low-energy measurements23 revealed that spin waves in CaFe2As2 are three-dimensional and centred at antiferromagnetic wave vector Q=(1,0,L=1,3,5,…)r.l.u. For energy transfers of E=48±6 (Fig. 1e) and 65±4 meV (Fig. 1f), spin waves are still peaked at Q=(1,0,L=1,3,5) r.l.u. in the centre of the Brillouin zone (shown as dashed rectangles). As the energy increases to E=100±10 (Fig. 1g), 115±10 (Fig. 1h), 137±15 (Fig. 1i), 135±10 (Fig. 1j) and 144±15 meV (Fig. 1k), counter-propagating spin-wave modes become apparent. The scattering changes from ring-like at 100 meV (Fig. 1g) to ellipses elongated along the K-direction for energies above 110 meV (Fig. 1h–k). For an energy transfer of 175±15 meV (Fig. 1l), spin waves show a broad square-like scattering already reaching the zone boundary in the K-direction.
To quantitatively determine the spin-wave dispersion, we cut through the two-dimensional images similar to Fig. 1 for various incident beam energies (Ei) aligned along the c axis. Figure 2a–g shows the outcome for different spin-wave energies in the form of constant-E scans along the K-direction around the antiferromagnetic zone centre. As the excitation energy increases from 25 meV (Fig. 2g) to 144 meV (Fig. 2a), well-defined counter-propagating spin waves approach the zone boundary. To illustrate the general feature of the high-energy spin waves, we have used the scattering near (2, 0, 0) r.l.u. as a background and assumed that the positive scattering at wave vectors below (2, 0, 0) r.l.u. is entirely magnetic. Figure 3a shows the outcome of the background-subtracted scattering for the Ei=450 meVdata projected in the wave vector (Q=[1,K]) and energy space. In spite of the spin-wave intensity modulation along the L-direction due to the exchange interaction Jc between the FeAs planes23 (Fig. 1a), one can see three clear plumes of scattering arising from the in-plane antiferromagnetic zone centres Q=(1,−2), (1, 0) and (1, 2) r.l.u. The spin-wave scattering disperses for energies above 100 meV and extends up to about 200 meV. As spin waves become less dispersive as the zone boundary is approached, we locate the spin-wave excitations through energy scans at a fixed wave vector. Figure 3c–h summarizes a series of such scans at different wave vectors that reveal clear dispersions near the zone boundary and a maximum spin-wave bandwidth of about 200 meV.
In addition to the results presented in Figs 1–3, we have also collected similar data at other wave vectors throughout the Brillouin zone. The filled circles in Fig. 4a,b summarize our measured spin-wave dispersions along the [H,0,1], [1,0,L] and [1,K,1] directions. To understand these data as well as the wave vector/energy (Q−E) dependence of the spin-wave intensities, we consider a Heisenberg Hamiltonian consisting of effective in-plane nearest-neighbours (Fig. 1a, J1a and J1b), next-nearest-neighbour (Fig. 1a, J2) and out-of-plane (Fig. 1a, Jc) exchange interactions. The dispersion relations are given by21,22,23,24,25: , where
Js is the single-ion anisotropy constant and q is the reduced wave vector away from the antiferromagnetic zone centre. The neutron scattering cross-section can be written as22:
where (γ r0/2)2=72.65 mb sr−1, g is the g-factor (≈2), f(Q) is the magnetic form factor of iron Fe2+, e−2W is the Debye–Waller factor (≈1 at 10 K), Qα is the α component of a unit vector in the direction of Q, Sαβ(Q,E) is the response function that describes the α βspin–spin correlations and ki and kf are incident and final wave vectors, respectively. Assuming that only the transverse correlations contribute to the spin-wave cross-section and finite excitation lifetimes can be described by a damped simple harmonic oscillator with inverse lifetime Γ (refs 28, 29, 30), we have
where kB is the Boltzmann constant, E0 is the spin-wave energy and Seff is the effective spin. We analysed our data by keeping S and Seff distinct following the practice of ref. 22.
We fitted the measured absolute intensity of spin-wave excitations and their dispersions in Figs 1–4 by convoluting the above-discussed neutron scattering spin-wave cross-section with the instrument resolution using the Tobyfit program28,29,30. As CaFe2As2 exhibits tetragonal to orthorhombic lattice distortion below the TN (ref. 27), care was taken to include the (H,K)/(K,H) twin domains in the computed scattering cross-section. We find that the Heisenberg Hamiltonian with only the nearest-neighbours effective exchange couplings (J1a and J1b are finite, and J2=0) cannot explain the data. Theoretically, it has been argued that the observed collinear spin structure in Fig. 1a is consistent with either S J1a≈J1b≈(1/2)S J2 or S J1a≈2S J2≫S J1b, and distinguishing these two models requires spin-wave data near the zone boundary22.
The red dashed lines in Fig. 3f–h show the expected zone-boundary spin waves assuming S J1a=27,S J1b=25,S J2=36 and S Jc=5.3 meV. It is obvious that such a model failed to describe the zone-boundary data. Our best fits to both the low-energy and zone-boundary spin waves by independently varying the effective exchange parameters are shown as solid black lines in Figs 2 and 3 with S J1a=49.9±9.9, S J1b=−5.7±4.5, S J2=18.9±3.4 and S Jc=5.3±1.3 meV. The broadening of the spin waves with increasing energy is accounted for through Γ∝0.15E and shown as a blue dotted line in Fig. 4a. From our best fit to all spin-wave data, we find Seff=0.22±0.06, which is smaller than previous measurements on powder samples of BaFe2As2 (ref. 22). The value of Seff and the measured 0.8 μB/Fe static moment27 suggest a S∼1/2 system.
From the fitting results in Figs 2–4, we see that the spin-wave dispersion and intensity in CaFe2As2 throughout the Brillouin zone can be well described by a Heisenberg Hamiltonian with effective nearest-neighbours and next-nearest-neighbour exchange interactions. Figure 4a,b summarizes the spin-wave dispersions along all three high-symmetry directions and Fig. 4c shows the energy dependence of the local susceptibility7, together with calculations using S J1a≈S J1b (red dashed lines) or our (solid lines) models. The former model clearly fails to describe the data. To test whether the spin-wave branch crosses the Stoner continuum as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1c, we plot spin-wave damping Γ versus E as a blue dotted line in Fig. 4a. Although Γ is approximately proportional to 0.15E, there is no steep increase in Γ at any wave vector indicative of a Stoner continuum (Fig. 1c). Instead, the observed spin-wave broadening at high energies may arise from magnon–electron scattering due to the low-temperature metallic nature of the system, similar to ferromagnetic metallic manganites28,29,30. Although these results may be consistent with ab initio calculations presented in ref. 25, our data show well-defined spin waves near the zone boundary, in contrast to a simple picture of an electron–hole Stoner continuum extending to very high energies as in the case of pure metal Cr (refs 9, 10).
The central message of our work is that one can fit spin waves of CaFe2As2 throughout the Brillouin zone with a simple Heisenberg Hamiltonian without the need for a Stoner continuum—the hallmark of an itinerant electron system. In a spin-density-wave state driven by Fermi surface nesting of itinerant electrons, a Stoner continuum is expected to have an energy scale around 2Δ, where Δ is the quasiparticle gap in the spin-density-wave state. Spin waves should be well-defined below 2Δ, and quickly damp into a particle–hole continuum above the characteristic energy. From Figs 1–4, we notice that there is no particular energy scale above which damped spin waves appear. This observation is in direct conflict with ref. 25, where a Stoner continuum is believed to set in above 100 meV. As our experiments were carried out on samples more than three times the mass and on an instrument with more neutron flux, the diminishing spin-wave scattering above 100 meV in ref. 25 may simply arise from a poor signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement due to insufficient sample mass. The lack of direct evidence for a Stoner continuum below 200 meV suggests weak low-energy electron–hole particle excitations. One local density approximation calculation has predicted essentially the correct in-plane magnetic exchange couplings20; these results, however, are obtained within the tetragonal and collinear antiferromagnetic ordered structures contrary to the experiments. Furthermore, band-structure calculations suggest that the Fermi velocity a/b anisotropy in CaFe2As2 is less than 8% in the low-temperature orthorhombic phase (D. J. Singh, personal communication). If spin-wave velocities in CaFe2As2 are proportional to (vevh/3)1/2 such as those in chromium9, they should be similar along the a/b directions. Although our results seem to favour a localized moment picture, a spin-1/2 model cannot be produced if all orbitals in iron are localized because there are even numbers of electrons per iron. Moreover, it is difficult to understand why direct and super-exchange interactions within the Fe–As–Fe plane are so different along the a/b directions of the orthorhombic structure because the tetragonal to orthorhombic lattice distortion below TN is small and only weakly affects the Fe–As–Fe bond distances/angles5,6. The observed large difference may hint at the involvement of other electronic degrees of freedom, such as orbital, in the magnetic transition. To achieve a comprehensive understanding of spin excitations, one must consider both the localized and itinerant electrons in these materials.
References
Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17–85 (2006).
Kamihara, Y., Watanabe, T., Hirano, M. & Hosono, H. Iron-based layered superconductor La[O1−xFx]FeAs (x=0.05–0.12) with Tc=26 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296–3297 (2008).
Chen, X. H. et al. Superconductivity at 43 K in SmFeAsO1−xFx . Nature 453, 761–762 (2008).
Rotter, M., Tegel, M. & Johrendt, D. Superconductivity at 38 K in the iron arsenide Ba1−xKxFe2As2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107006 (2008).
de la Cruz, C. et al. Magnetic order close to superconductivity in the iron-based layered LaO1−xFxFeAs systems. Nature 453, 899–902 (2008).
Zhao, J. et al. Structural and magnetic phase diagram of CeFeAsO1−xFx and its relation to high-temperature superconductivity. Nature Mater. 7, 953–959 (2008).
Hayden, S. M. et al. Comparison of the high-frequency magnetic fluctuations in insulating and superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1344–1347 (1996).
Coldea, R. et al. Spin waves and electronic interactions in La2CuO4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5377–5380 (2001).
Fawcett, E. Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 209–283 (1998).
Endoh, Y. & Böni, P. Magnetic excitations in metallic ferro- and antiferromagnets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 75, 111002 (2006).
Dai, J. H., Si, Q., Zhu, J. S. & Abrahams, E. Iron pnictides as a new setting for quantum criticality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4118–4121 (2009).
Fang, C., Yao, H., Tsai, W. F., Hu, J. P. & Kivelson, S. A. Theory of electron nematic order in LaOFeAs. Phys. Rev. B 77, 224509 (2008).
Xu, C. K., Müller, M. & Sachdev, S. Ising and spin orders in iron-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 78, 020501(R) (2008).
Ma, F., Lu, Z. Y. & Xiang, T. Electronic structures of ternary iron arsenides AFe2As2 (A=Ba, Ca, or Sr). Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.3526> (2008).
Manousakis, E., Ren, J., Meng, S. & Kaxiras, E. Is the nature of magnetic order in copper-oxides and in iron-pnictides different? Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3450> (2009).
Dong, J. et al. Competing orders and spin-density-wave instability in LaO1−xFxFeAs. Eur. Phys. Lett. 83, 27006 (2008).
Yildirim, T. Frustrated magnetic interactions, giant magneto-elastic coupling, and magnetic phonons in iron-pnictides. Physica C 469, 425–441 (2009).
Mazin, I. I. & Johannes, M. D. A key role for unusual spin dynamics in ferropnictides. Nature Phys. 5, 141–145 (2009).
Kariyado, T. & Ogata, M. Normal state spin dynamics of five-band model for ion-pnictides. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 78, 043708 (2009).
Han, M. J., Yin, Q., Pickett, W. E. & Savrasov, S. Y. Anisotropy, itinerancy, and magnetic frustration in high-Tc iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 107003 (2009).
Zhao, J. et al. Low energy spin waves and magnetic interactions in SrFe2As2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 167203 (2008).
Ewings, R. A. et al. High-energy spin excitations in BaFe2As2 observed by inelastic neutron scattering. Phys. Rev. B 78, 220501(R) (2008).
McQueeney, R. J. et al. Anisotropic three-dimensional magnetism in CaFe2As2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 227205 (2008).
Matan, K., Morinaga, R., Iida, K. & Sato, T. J. Anisotropic itinerant magnetism and spin fluctuations in BaFe2As2: A neutron scattering study. Phys. Rev. B 79, 054526 (2009).
Diallo, S. O. et al. Itinerant magnetic excitations in antiferromagnetic CaFe2As2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187206 (2009).
Wu, G. et al. Different resistivity response to spin density wave and superconductivity at 20 K in Ca1−xNaxFe2As2 . J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 422201 (2008).
Goldman, A. I. et al. Lattice and magnetic instabilities in CaFe2As2: A single-crystal neutron diffraction study. Phys. Rev. B 78, 100506(R) (2008).
Perring, T. G. et al. Spectacular doping dependence of interlayer exchange and other results on spin waves in bilayer manganites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217201 (2001).
Perring, T. G. et al. <http://tobyfit.isis.rl.ac.uk/Main_Page>.
Ye, F. et al. Spin waves throughout the Brillouin zone and magnetic exchange coupling in the ferromagnetic metallic manganites La1−xCaxMnO3 (x=0.25, 0.30). Phys. Rev. B 75, 144408 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. T. Boothroyd, T. Perring, D. Singh and A. Nevidomskyy for helpful discussions. This work is supported by the US National Science Foundation through DMR-0756568 and by the US Department of Energy, Division of Materials Science, Basic Energy Sciences, through DOE DE-FG02-05ER46202. This work is also supported in part by the US Department of Energy, Division of Scientific User Facilities, Basic Energy Sciences. The work at the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, is supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The work at USTC is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.D. and J.Z. planned the experiment. X.F.W., G.W. and X.H.C. fabricated the samples. J.Z. and S.L. co-aligned the samples. J.Z., D.T.A., R.B. and P.D. carried out the neutron experiments and data analysis. D.-X.Y. and J.H. helped with data analysis. P.D. and J.Z. wrote the paper with input from other coauthors.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, J., Adroja, D., Yao, DX. et al. Spin waves and magnetic exchange interactions in CaFe2As2. Nature Phys 5, 555–560 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1336
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1336
This article is cited by
-
Order from disorder phenomena in BaCoS2
Communications Physics (2024)
-
Long-lived spin waves in a metallic antiferromagnet
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Spin waves and phase transition on a magnetically frustrated square lattice with long-range interactions
Frontiers of Physics (2023)
-
Anisotropic magnon damping by zero-temperature quantum fluctuations in ferromagnetic CrGeTe3
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Strong band renormalization and emergent ferromagnetism induced by electron-antiferromagnetic-magnon coupling
Nature Communications (2022)