Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) is characterized by marked short-term fluctuations occurring within a 24 h period (beat-to-beat, minute-to-minute, hour-to-hour, and day-to-night changes) and also by long-term fluctuations occurring over more-prolonged periods of time (days, weeks, months, seasons, and even years). Rather than representing 'background noise' or a randomly occurring phenomenon, these variations have been shown to be the result of complex interactions between extrinsic environmental and behavioural factors and intrinsic cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms. Although the adverse cardiovascular consequences of hypertension largely depend on absolute BP values, evidence from observational studies and post-hoc analyses of data from clinical trials have indicated that these outcomes might also depend on increased BP variability (BPV). Increased short-term and long-term BPV are associated with the development, progression, and severity of cardiac, vascular, and renal damage and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Of particular interest are the findings from post-hoc analyses of large intervention trials in hypertension, showing that within-patient visit-to-visit BPV is strongly prognostic for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This result has prompted discussion on whether antihypertensive treatment should be targeted not only towards reducing mean BP levels but also to stabilizing BPV with the aim of achieving consistent BP control over time, which might favour cardiovascular protection.
Key Points
-
Blood-pressure variability (BPV) is a complex phenomenon that includes short-term fluctuations occurring within a 24 h period as well as blood pressure changes over more-prolonged periods of time
-
The underlying mechanisms, clinical significance, and prognostic implications differ between types of BPV; thus, when interpreting BPV, the method and time interval of its measurement should be taken into account
-
Mounting evidence indicates that the adverse cardiovascular consequences of high blood pressure could also be the result of increased BPV, and not only of elevation of mean blood pressure values
-
Short-term and long-term BPV are independently associated with the development, progression, and severity of cardiac, vascular, and renal damage and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality
-
Post-hoc analyses of large intervention trials in patients with hypertension have shown that intraindividual and interindividual visit-to-visit BPVs are strong predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality
-
Whether treatment with antihypertensive agents should be targeted towards stabilizing BPV in addition to controlling mean blood pressure values, to achieve maximum cardiovascular protection, is uncertain
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
01 April 2014
In the version of this article originally published, the author affiliations were incorrectly stated. The addresses should have been: Department of Cardiology, S. Luca Hospital, IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Piazza Brescia 20, Milan 20149, Italy (G. Parati, J. E. Ochoa, C. Lombardi, G. Bilo). University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cador 48, Monza 20900, Italy (G. Parati, J. E. Ochoa). This error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
References
Mancia, G. Short- and long-term blood pressure variability: present and future. Hypertension 60, 512–517 (2012).
Rothwell, P. M. et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 375, 895–905 (2010).
Mancia, G. et al. Arterial baroreflexes and blood pressure and heart rate variabilities in humans. Hypertension 8, 147–153 (1986).
Conway, J., Boon, N., Davies, C., Jones, J. V. & Sleight, P. Neural and humoral mechanisms involved in blood pressure variability. J. Hypertens. 2, 203–208 (1984).
Schillaci, G. et al. Relationship between short-term blood pressure variability and large-artery stiffness in human hypertension: findings from 2 large databases. Hypertension 60, 369–377 (2012).
Mancia, G. et al. in Handbook of Hypertension: Pathophysiology of Hypertension (eds Mancia, G. & Zanchetti, A.) 117–169 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1997).
Mancia, G. & Grassi, G. Mechanisms and clinical implications of blood pressure variability. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 35, S15–S19 (2000).
Parati, G., Saul, J. P., Di Rienzo, M. & Mancia, G. Spectral analysis of blood pressure and heart rate variability in evaluating cardiovascular regulation. A critical appraisal. Hypertension 25, 1276–1286 (1995).
Parati, G., Faini, A. & Valentini, M. Blood pressure variability: its measurement and significance in hypertension. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 8, 199–204 (2006).
Kotsis, V. et al. Arterial stiffness and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in young healthy volunteers: the early vascular ageing Aristotle University Thessaloniki Study (EVA-ARIS Study). Atherosclerosis 219, 194–199 (2011).
Fukui, M. et al. Home blood pressure variability on one occasion is a novel factor associated with arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertens. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.177.
Parati, G. et al. Sequential spectral analysis of 24-hour blood pressure and pulse interval in humans. Hypertension 16, 414–421 (1990).
Berge, K. E. & Berg, K. No effect of a BglI polymorphism at the renin (REN) locus on blood pressure level or variability. Clin. Genet. 46, 436–438 (1994).
Berge, K. E. & Berg, K. No effect on blood pressure level or variability of polymorphisms in DNA at the locus for atrial natriuretic factor (ANF). Clin. Genet. 46, 433–435 (1994).
Berge, K. E. & Berg, K. No effect of insertion/deletion polymorphism at the ACE locus on normal blood pressure level or variability. Clin. Genet. 45, 169–174 (1994).
Julve, R. et al. Polymorphism insertion/deletion of the ACE gene and ambulatory blood pressure circadian variability in essential hypertension. Blood Press. Monit. 6, 27–32 (2001).
Etzel, J. P. et al. Genetic variation at the human alpha2B-adrenergic receptor locus: role in blood pressure variation and yohimbine response. Hypertension 45, 1207–1213 (2005).
Jira, M. et al. Association of eNOS gene polymorphisms T-786C and G894T with blood pressure variability in man. Physiol. Res. 60, 193–197 (2011).
Friedman, O. & Logan, A. G. Nocturnal blood pressure profiles among normotensive, controlled hypertensive and refractory hypertensive subjects. Can. J. Cardiol. 25, e312–e316 (2009).
Pickering, T. G. et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 45, 142–161 (2005).
Narkiewicz, K. et al. Relationship between muscle sympathetic nerve activity and diurnal blood pressure profile. Hypertension 39, 168–172 (2002).
Fujii, T. et al. Circadian rhythm of natriuresis is disturbed in nondipper type of essential hypertension. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 33, 29–35 (1999).
Verdecchia, P. et al. Blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure in hypertensive women with future cardiovascular morbid events. Circulation 88, 986–992 (1993).
Haynes, W. G. Role of leptin in obesity-related hypertension. Exp. Physiol. 90, 683–688 (2005).
Quinaglia, T. et al. Non-dipping pattern relates to endothelial dysfunction in patients with uncontrolled resistant hypertension. J. Hum. Hypertens. 25, 656–664 (2011).
Holt-Lunstad, J. & Steffen, P. R. Diurnal cortisol variation is associated with nocturnal blood pressure dipping. Psychosom. Med. 69, 339–343 (2007).
Panarelli, M. et al. 24-hour profiles of blood pressure and heart rate in Cushing's syndrome. Evidence for differential control of cardiovascular variables by glucocorticoids. Ann. Ital. Med. Int. 5, 18–25 (1990).
Murakami, S. et al. Weekly variation of home and ambulatory blood pressure and relation between arterial stiffness and blood pressure measurements in community-dwelling hypertensives. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 27, 231–239 (2005).
Muntner, P. et al. Reproducibility of visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure measured as part of routine clinical care. J. Hypertens. 29, 2332–2338 (2011).
Muntner, P. et al. The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension 57, 160–166 (2011).
Mancia, G. et al. Blood pressure control and improved cardiovascular outcomes in the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study. Hypertension 50, 299–305 (2007).
Okada, H. et al. Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure is correlated with diabetic nephropathy and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 220, 155–159 (2012).
Nagai, M., Hoshide, S., Ishikawa, J., Shimada, K. & Kario, K. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variations: new independent determinants for carotid artery measures in the elderly at high risk of cardiovascular disease. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 5, 184–192 (2011).
Parati, G. & Bilo, G. Calcium antagonist added to angiotensin receptor blocker: a recipe for reducing blood pressure variability? Evidence from day-by-day home blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension 59, 1091–1093 (2012).
Sega, R. et al. Seasonal variations in home and ambulatory blood pressure in the PAMELA population. Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni. J. Hypertens. 16, 1585–1592 (1998).
Modesti, P. A. et al. Weather-related changes in 24-hour blood pressure profile: effects of age and implications for hypertension management. Hypertension 47, 155–161 (2006).
Mancia, G. et al. Blood pressure and heart rate variabilities in normotensive and hypertensive human beings. Circ. Res. 53, 96–104 (1983).
Parati, G., Pomidossi, G., Albini, F., Malaspina, D. & Mancia, G. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J. Hypertens. 5, 93–98 (1987).
Parati, G., Omboni, S., Rizzoni, D., Agabiti-Rosei, E. & Mancia, G. The smoothness index: a new, reproducible and clinically relevant measure of the homogeneity of the blood pressure reduction with treatment for hypertension. J. Hypertens. 16, 1685–1691 (1998).
Mancia, G., Di Rienzo, M. & Parati, G. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use in hypertension research and clinical practice. Hypertension 21, 510–524 (1993).
Bilo, G. et al. A new method for assessing 24-h blood pressure variability after excluding the contribution of nocturnal blood pressure fall. J. Hypertens. 25, 2058–2066 (2007).
Mancia, G. et al. Long-term prognostic value of blood pressure variability in the general population: results of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni Study. Hypertension 49, 1265–1270 (2007).
Mena, L. et al. A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. J. Hypertens. 23, 505–511 (2005).
Stolarz-Skrzypek, K. et al. Blood pressure variability in relation to outcome in the International Database of Ambulatory blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome. Hypertens. Res. 33, 757–766 (2010).
Boggia, J. et al. Prognostic accuracy of day versus night ambulatory blood pressure: a cohort study. Lancet 370, 1219–1229 (2007).
Hansen, T. W. et al. Predictive role of the nighttime blood pressure. Hypertension 57, 3–10 (2011).
Lurbe, E. et al. Increase in nocturnal blood pressure and progression to microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 797–805 (2002).
Verdecchia, P. et al. Day-night dip and early-morning surge in blood pressure in hypertension: prognostic implications. Hypertension 60, 34–42 (2012).
Parati, G. et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J. Hypertens. 26, 1505–1526 (2008).
McManus, R. J. et al. Targets and self monitoring in hypertension: randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 331, 493 (2005).
Mancia, G., Facchetti, R., Parati, G. & Zanchetti, A. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis: methodological aspects and effects of antihypertensive treatment. J. Hypertens. 30, 1241–1251 (2012).
Stergiou, G. S. & Nasothimiou, E. G. Home monitoring is the optimal method for assessing blood pressure variability. Hypertens. Res. 34, 1246–1248 (2011).
Cappuccio, F. P., Kerry, S. M., Forbes, L. & Donald, A. Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 329, 145 (2004).
Rogers, M. A. et al. Home monitoring service improves mean arterial pressure in patients with essential hypertension. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 134, 1024–1032 (2001).
Mancia, G. et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J. Hypertens. 25, 1105–1187 (2007).
Whitworth, J. A. for the World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J. Hypertens. 21, 1983–1992 (2003).
Imai, Y. et al. Japanese society of hypertension (JSH) guidelines for self-monitoring of blood pressure at home. Hypertens. Res. 26, 771–782 (2003).
Parati, G. et al. Home blood pressure telemonitoring improves hypertension control in general practice. The TeleBPCare study. J. Hypertens. 27, 198–203 (2009).
Mancia, G. et al. Relation between blood pressure variability and carotid artery damage in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA). J. Hypertens. 19, 1981–1989 (2001).
Mancia, G. & Parati, G. The role of blood pressure variability in end-organ damage. J. Hypertens. 21, S17–S23 (2003).
Sega, R. et al. Blood pressure variability and organ damage in a general population: results from the PAMELA study (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni). Hypertension 39, 710–714 (2002).
Tatasciore, A. et al. Awake systolic blood pressure variability correlates with target-organ damage in hypertensive subjects. Hypertension 50, 325–332 (2007).
Manios, E. et al. Time rate of blood pressure variation is associated with impaired renal function in hypertensive patients. J. Hypertens. 27, 2244–2248 (2009).
Frattola, A., Parati, G., Cuspidi, C., Albini, F. & Mancia, G. Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability. J. Hypertens. 11, 1133–1137 (1993).
Sander, D., Kukla, C., Klingelhofer, J., Winbeck, K. & Conrad, B. Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis: a 3-year follow-up study. Circulation 102, 1536–1541 (2000).
Dawson, S. L., Manktelow, B. N., Robinson, T. G., Panerai, R. B. & Potter, J. F. Which parameters of beat-to-beat blood pressure and variability best predict early outcome after acute ischemic stroke? Stroke 31, 463–468 (2000).
Pringle, E. et al. Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population. J. Hypertens. 21, 2251–2257 (2003).
Kario, K. et al. Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives: a prospective study. Circulation 107, 1401–1406 (2003).
Kario, K. et al. Morning hypertension: the strongest independent risk factor for stroke in elderly hypertensive patients. Hypertens. Res. 29, 581–587 (2006).
Verdecchia, P., Angeli, F., Gattobigio, R., Rapicetta, C. & Reboldi, G. Impact of blood pressure variability on cardiac and cerebrovascular complications in hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 20, 154–161 (2007).
Hansen, T. W. et al. Prognostic value of reading-to-reading blood pressure variability over 24 hours in 8,938 subjects from 11 populations. Hypertension 55, 1049–1057 (2010).
Kikuya, M. et al. Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities: the Ohasama study. Hypertension 36, 901–906 (2000).
Stolarz-Skrzypek, K. et al. Short-term blood pressure variability in relation to outcome in the International Database of Ambulatory blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDACO). Acta Cardiol. 66, 701–706 (2011).
Staessen, J. A. et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. JAMA 282, 539–546 (1999).
Sega, R. et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. Circulation 111, 1777–1783 (2005).
Clement, D. L. et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2407–2415 (2003).
Fagard, R. H., Van Den Broeke, C. & De Cort, P. Prognostic significance of blood pressure measured in the office, at home and during ambulatory monitoring in older patients in general practice. J. Hum. Hypertens. 19, 801–807 (2005).
Redon, J. et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension 31, 712–718 (1998).
Kikuya, M. et al. Ambulatory blood pressure and 10-year risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality: the Ohasama study. Hypertension 45, 240–245 (2005).
Fagard, R. H. et al. Daytime and nighttime blood pressure as predictors of death and cause-specific cardiovascular events in hypertension. Hypertension 51, 55–61 (2008).
Dolan, E. et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study. Hypertension 46, 156–161 (2005).
Hansen, T. W., Jeppesen, J., Rasmussen, S., Ibsen, H. & Torp-Pedersen, C. Ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: a population-based study. Hypertension 45, 499–504 (2005).
Kawai, T. et al. Differences between daytime and nighttime blood pressure variability regarding systemic atherosclerotic change and renal function. Hypertens. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.162.
Metoki, H. et al. Prognostic significance for stroke of a morning pressor surge and a nocturnal blood pressure decline: the Ohasama study. Hypertension 47, 149–154 (2006).
Ohkubo, T. et al. Relation between nocturnal decline in blood pressure and mortality. The Ohasama Study. Am. J. Hypertens. 10, 1201–1207 (1997).
Willich, S. N., Goldberg, R. J., Maclure, M., Perriello, L. & Muller, J. E. Increased onset of sudden cardiac death in the first three hours after awakening. Am. J. Cardiol. 70, 65–68 (1992).
Rocco, M. B. et al. Circadian variation of transient myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 75, 395–400 (1987).
Muller, J. E. et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 313, 1315–1322 (1985).
Elliott, W. J. Circadian variation in the timing of stroke onset: a meta-analysis. Stroke 29, 992–996 (1998).
Amici, A. et al. Exaggerated morning blood pressure surge and cardiovascular events. A 5-year longitudinal study in normotensive and well-controlled hypertensive elderly. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 49, e105–e109 (2009).
Matsui, Y. et al. Maximum value of home blood pressure: a novel indicator of target organ damage in hypertension. Hypertension 57, 1087–1093 (2011).
Kikuya, M. et al. Day-by-day variability of blood pressure and heart rate at home as a novel predictor of prognosis: the Ohasama study. Hypertension 52, 1045–1050 (2008).
Johansson, J. K., Niiranen, T. J., Puukka, P. J. & Jula, A. M. Prognostic value of the variability in home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: the Finn-Home Study. Hypertension 59, 212–218 (2012).
Masugata, H. et al. Visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure over a 1-year period is a marker of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in treated hypertensive patients. Hypertens. Res. 34, 846–850 (2011).
Kilpatrick, E. S., Rigby, A. S. & Atkin, S. L. The role of blood pressure variability in the development of nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 33, 2442–2247 (2010).
Kawai, T. et al. The impact of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure on renal function. Hypertens. Res. 35, 239–243 (2012).
Yokota, K. et al. Impact of visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure on deterioration of renal function in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Hypertens. Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2012.145.
Brickman, A. M. et al. Long-term blood pressure fluctuation and cerebrovascular disease in an elderly cohort. Arch. Neurol. 67, 564–569 (2010).
Diaz, K. M. et al. Relationship of visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability to vascular function in African Americans. Hypertens. Res. 35, 55–61 (2012).
Nagai, M., Hoshide, S., Ishikawa, J., Shimada, K. & Kario, K. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variations: new independent determinants for cognitive function in the elderly at high risk of cardiovascular disease. J. Hypertens. 30, 1556–1563 (2012).
Hata, Y. et al. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of brain infarction in elderly hypertensive patients. Hypertens. Res. 23, 553–560 (2000).
Rothwell, P. M. et al. Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol. 9, 469–480 (2010).
Eguchi, K., Hoshide, S., Schwartz, J. E., Shimada, K. & Kario, K. Visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability as predictors of incident cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 25, 962–968 (2012).
Hata, Y. et al. Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. J. Hum. Hypertens. 16, 141–146 (2002).
Schutte, R. et al. Within-subject blood pressure level—not variability—predicts fatal and nonfatal outcomes in a general population. Hypertension 60, 1138–1147 (2012).
Muntner, P. et al. Within-visit variability of blood pressure and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. J. Clin. Hypertens. (Greenwich) 14, 165–171 (2012).
Liu, J. G., Xu, L. P., Chu, Z. X., Miao, C. Y. & Su, D. F. Contribution of blood pressure variability to the effect of nitrendipine on end-organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Hypertens. 21, 1961–1967 (2003).
Xie, H. H., Miao, C. Y., Jiang, Y. Y. & Su, D. F. Synergism of atenolol and nitrendipine on hemodynamic amelioration and organ protection in hypertensive rats. J. Hypertens. 23, 193–201 (2005).
Xie, H. H. et al. Reduction of blood pressure variability by combination therapy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Hypertens. 25, 2334–2344 (2007).
Ferrari, A. et al. Labetalol and 24-hour monitoring of arterial blood pressure in hypertensive patients. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 3 (Suppl. 1), S42–S52 (1981).
Mancia, G. et al. Evaluation of a slow-release clonidine preparation by direct continuous blood pressure recording in essential hypertensive patients. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 3, 1193–1202 (1981).
Mancia, G. et al. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure profile and blood pressure variability in untreated hypertension and during antihypertensive treatment by once-a-day nadolol. Am. Heart J. 108, 1078–1083 (1984).
Pomidossi, G., Parati, G., Motolese, M., Mancia, G. & Zanchetti, A. Hemodynamic effects of once a day administration of combined chlorthalidone and metoprolol slow-release in essential hypertension. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 22, 665–671 (1984).
Pomidossi, G. et al. Antihypertensive effect of a new formulation of slow release oxprenolol in essential hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 10, 593–598 (1987).
Parati, G. et al. 24-h ambulatory non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of the antihypertensive action of celiprolol. J. Int. Med. Res. 16 (Suppl. 1), 52A–61A (1988).
Mancia, G. et al. Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of once-a-day trandolapril by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The Italian Trandolapril Study Group. Am. J. Cardiol. 70, 60D–66D (1992).
Mancia, G., Omboni, S., Ravogli, A., Parati, G. & Zanchetti, A. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment: additional information from a large data base. Blood Press. 4, 148–156 (1995).
Rizzoni, D. et al. The smoothness index, but not the trough-to-peak ratio predicts changes in carotid artery wall thickness during antihypertensive treatment. J. Hypertens. 19, 703–711 (2001).
Collins, R. et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 335, 827–838 (1990).
Turnbull, F. for the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 362, 1527–1535 (2003).
Mancia, G., Facchetti, R., Parati, G. & Zanchetti, A. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, carotid atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis. Circulation 126, 569–578 (2012).
Matsui, Y. et al. Combined effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic on day-by-day variability of home blood pressure: the Japan Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium-Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study. Hypertension 59, 1132–1138 (2012).
Webb, A. J. & Rothwell, P. M. Effect of dose and combination of antihypertensives on interindividual blood pressure variability: a systematic review. Stroke 42, 2860–2865 (2011).
Webb, A. J., Fischer, U., Mehta, Z. & Rothwell, P. M. Effects of antihypertensive-drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 375, 906–915 (2010).
Zanchetti, A. Wars, war games, and dead bodies on the battlefield: variations on the theme of blood pressure variability. Stroke 42, 2722–2724 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors substantially contributed to the research, writing, and reviewing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
G. Parati has received honoraria from Pfizer. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parati, G., Ochoa, J., Lombardi, C. et al. Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability. Nat Rev Cardiol 10, 143–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2013.1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2013.1
This article is cited by
-
Non-invasive parameters of autonomic function using beat-to-beat cardiovascular variations and arterial stiffness in hypertensive individuals: a systematic review
BioMedical Engineering OnLine (2024)
-
Association between short-term blood pressure variability and target organ damage in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease
BMC Nephrology (2024)
-
Blood pressure variability and outcome in atherosclerosis versus cardioembolism cerebral large vessel occlusion after successful thrombectomy
Hypertension Research (2024)
-
Blood pressure in the longevous population with different status of hypertension and frailty
Hypertension Research (2024)
-
Importance of measuring indoor temperature to understand blood pressure levels and variability at home
Hypertension Research (2024)