Key Points
-
Cryptic genetic variation (CGV) is genetic variation that is not normally expressed, but that is available to modify abnormal phenotypes produced by environmental or genetic perturbation.
-
CGV is relevant to understanding the expressivity of disease phenotypes, mechanisms of animal and plant breeding, and the relationship between macro- and micro-evolution.
-
CGV is thought to arise as a result of unusually large genotype-by-environment and/or genotype-by-genotype (epistatic) interactions.
-
Threshold-dependent effects might help to hide CGV in natural populations.
-
Some alleles that contribute to CGV might modify standing variation for different (pleiotropic) traits, but in general, the factors that help to maintain CGV are unknown.
-
The same tools that are used to examine visible complex phenotypes can be used to examine CGV, including complementation testing, quantitative trait locus mapping and association studies.
Abstract
Cryptic genetic variation is the dark matter of biology: it is variation that is not normally seen, but that might be an essential source of physiological and evolutionary potential. It is uncovered by environmental or genetic perturbations, and is thought to modify the penetrance of common diseases, the response of livestock and crops to artificial selection and the capacity of populations to respond to the emergence of a potentially advantageous macro-mutation. We argue in this review that cryptic genetic variation is pervasive but under-appreciated, we highlight recent progress in determining the nature and identity of genes that underlie cryptic genetic effects and we outline future research directions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Merlo, C. A. & Boyle, M. P. Modifier genes in cystic fibrosis lung disease. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 141, 237–241 (2003).
Scharloo, W. Canalization — genetic and developmental aspects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22, 65–93 (1991).
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E. & Guyer, M. S. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 422, 835–847 (2003).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).
Mackay, T. F. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 303–339 (2001).
Nadeau, J. H. Modifier genes in mice and humans. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 165–174 (2001).
Lauter, N. & Doebley, J. Genetic variation for phenotypically invariant traits detected in teosinte: implications for the evolution of novel forms. Genetics 160, 333–342 (2002). An empirical study of cryptic genetic variation in which quantitative trait locus mapping was used to identify modifiers of traits that emerge in the cross between teosinte and maize, but that are invariant in teosinte.
Gibson, G. & Wagner, G. Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory? Bioessays 22, 372–380 (2000).
Dun, R. B. & Fraser, A. S. Selection for an invariant character; vibrissa number in the house mouse. Nature 181, 1018–1019 (1958).
Wagner, G. P., Booth, G. & Bagheri-Chaichian, H. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51, 329–347 (1997). Uses a mathematical model and simulations to explore the theoretical consequences of additive- by-additive epistasis for genetic and environmental canalization, and, therefore, the hiding of cryptic genetic variation.
Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1998).
Lewontin, R. C. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000).
Falconer, D. & Mackay, T. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, Essex, 1996).
Cheverud, J. M. & Routman, E. J. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139, 1455–1461 (1995).
Falconer, D. Selection for large and small size in mice. J. Genetics 51, 470–501 (1953).
Zhivotovsky, L. A. & Feldman, M. W. On models of quantitative genetic variability: a stabilizing selection-balance model. Genetics 130, 947–955 (1992).
Carlborg, S. & Haley, C. S. Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 618–625 (2004). Summarizes empirical approaches used to detect epistasis, and makes a strong case for more attention to epistasis in agricultural, medical and evolutionary genetics.
Ptashne, M. A Genetic Switch: Phage Lambda and Higher Organisms (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1992).
Driever, W., Thoma, G. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature 340, 363–367 (1989).
Nijhout, H. F., Berg, A. M. & Gibson, W. T. A mechanistic study of evolvability using the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Evol. Dev. 5, 281–294 (2003).
Ferrell, J. E. How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 288–289 (1997).
Rapp, J. P. Genetic analysis of inherited hypertension in the rat. Physiol. Rev. 80, 135–172 (2000).
Michael, N. L. et al. The role of CCR5 and CCR2 polymorphisms in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. Nature Med. 3, 1160–1162 (1997).
Turner, R. C., Levy, J. C. & Clark, A. Complex genetics of type 2 diabetes: thrifty genes and previously neutral polymorphisms. Quart. J. Med. 86, 413–417 (1993).
Mackay, T. F. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 11–20 (2001).
Dworkin, I. in Variation (eds Hallgrimsson, B. & Hall, B. K.) Ch. 14 (Academic, San Francisco, 2004).
Waddington, C. H. Genetic assimilation of the bithorax phenotype. Evolution 10, 1–13 (1956).
Gibson, G. & Hogness, D. S. Effect of polymorphism in the Drosophila regulatory gene Ultrabithorax on homeotic stability. Science 271, 200–203 (1996). This reconstitution of a classic experiment involving artificial selection on phenocopy induction by ether vapour was the first to pinpoint an actual gene that is responsible for cryptic genetic variation.
Phinchongsakuldit, J., MacArthur, S. & Brookfield, J. F. Evolution of developmental genes: molecular microevolution of enhancer sequences at the Ubx locus in Drosophila and its impact on developmental phenotypes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 348–363 (2004).
Rendel, J. M. Canalization of the scute phenotype of Drosophila. Evolution 13, 425–439 (1959).
Waddington, C. H. Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7, 118–126 (1953).
Dykhuizen, D. & Hartl, D. L. Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics 96, 801–817 (1980).
Hayes, F. Transposon-based strategies for microbial functional genomics and proteomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 3–29 (2003).
Tong, A. H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364–2368 (2001). The first systematic, synthetic lethal screen, demonstrating the enormous potential for two-locus interactions to produce novel phenotypes.
Lifschytz, E. & Falk, R. A genetic analysis of the killer-prune (K-pn) locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 62, 353–358 (1969).
Threadgill, D. W. et al. Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science 269, 230–234 (1995).
Leips, J. & Mackay, T. F. Quantitative trait loci for life span in Drosophila melanogaster: interactions with genetic background and larval density. Genetics 155, 1773–1788 (2000).
Dilda, C. L. & Mackay, T. F. The genetic architecture of Drosophila sensory bristle number. Genetics 162, 1655–1674 (2002).
Kondrashov, A. S. & Houle, D. Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 221–227 (1994).
Gibson, G., Wemple, M. & van Helden, S. Potential variance affecting homeotic Ultrabithorax and Antennapedia phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 151, 1081–1091 (1999).
Rutherford, S. L. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396, 336–342 (1998).
Queitsch, C., Sangster, T. A. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417, 618–624 (2002).
Bergman, A. & Siegal, M. L. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature 424, 549–552 (2003).
Zondervan, K. T. & Cardon, L. R. The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 89–100 (2004).
De Luca, M. et al. Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) affects variation in Drosophila longevity. Nature Genet. 34, 429–433 (2003).
Palsson, A. & Gibson, G. Association between nucleotide variation in Egfr and wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics (in the press).
Dworkin, I., Palsson, A., Birdsall, K. & Gibson, G. Evidence that Egfr contributes to cryptic genetic variation for photoreceptor determination in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 13, 1888–1893 (2003). Describes the first example of mapping cryptic genetic variation at the nucleotide level using association studies in inbred lines followed by replication in a natural population.
Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu. Rev. Genet. 23, 337–370 (1989).
Gillespie, J. H. The Causes of Molecular Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1991).
Whitlock, M. C. Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation. Genet. Res. 74, 215–221 (1999).
Turelli, M. & Barton, N. H. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection, pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G×E interactions. Genetics 166, 1053–1079 (2004).
Orr, H. A. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935–949 (1998). A classic theoretical analysis of adaptation that argues that any walk towards a new adaptive peak that involves new mutations should include fixation of at least one factor of large effect.
Orr, H. A. The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. Genetics 163, 1519–1526 (2003).
Schlotterer, C. A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps. Genetics 160, 753–763 (2002).
Galtier, N., Depaulis, F. & Barton, N. H. Detecting bottlenecks and selective sweeps from DNA sequence polymorphism. Genetics 155, 981–987 (2000).
Gibson, G. Hox genes and the cellared wine principle. Curr. Biol. 10, R452–R455 (2000).
Haag, E. S. & True, J. R. From mutants to mechanisms? Assessing the candidate gene paradigm in evolutionary biology. Evolution 55, 1077–1084 (2001).
Orr, H. A. & Turelli, M. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55, 1085–1094 (2001).
Schadt, E. E. et al. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422, 297–302 (2003).
Yvert, G. et al. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nature Genet. 35, 57–64 (2003).
Gibson, G. et al. Extensive non-additivity of gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics (in the press).
Waddington, C. H. The Stratgey of the Genes (Allen and Unwin, London, 1957).
Waddington, C. H. Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature 183, 1654–1655 (1959).
Eshel, I. & Matessi, C. Canalization, genetic assimilation and preadaptation: a quantitative genetic model. Genetics 149, 2119–2133 (1998).
Gibson, G. & van Helden, S. Is function of the Drosophila homeotic gene Ultrabithorax canalized? Genetics 147, 1155–1168 (1997).
Moreno, G. Genetic architecture, genetic behaviour, and character evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 31–44 (1994).
Huether, C. A. Exposure of natural genetic variability underlying pentamerous corolla constancy in Linanthus androsaceus ssp. androsaceus. Genetics 60, 123–146 (1968).
Pelabon, C., Carlson, M., Hansen, T., Yoccoz, N. & Armbruster, W. Consequences of inter-population crosses on developmental stability and canalization of floral traits in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 17, 19–32 (2004).
Hartman, J. L., Garvik, B. & Hartwell, L. Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291, 1001–1004 (2001).
de Visser, J. A. et al. Evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57, 1959–1972 (2003).
Nijhout, H. F. & Davidowitz, G. in Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences Vol. 1 (ed. Polak, M.) 1–12 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2003).
Meiklejohn, C. D. & Hartl, D. L. A single mode of canalization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 468–473 (2002).
Wagner, G. P., Chiu, C. H. & Hansen, T. F. Is Hsp90 a regulator of evolvability? J. Exp. Zool. 285, 116–118 (1999).
Rutherford, S. L. Between genotype and phenotype: protein chaperones and evolvability Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 263–274 (2003).
Bateman, K. G. The genetic assimilation of four venation phenocopies. J. Genetics 56, 443–474 (1959).
Milkman, R. D. The genetic basis of natural variation II. Analysis of a polygenic system in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 45, 377–391 (1960).
Milkman, R. D. Genetic basis of natural variation VI. Selection of a crossveinless strain of Drosophila by phenocopying at high temperature. Genetics 51, 87–96 (1965).
Mohler, J. D. Preliminary genetic analysis of crossveinless-like strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 51, 641–651 (1965).
Mohler, J. D. Influence of some crossveinless-like genes on crossveinless phenocopy sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 51, 329–340 (1965).
Wheeler, M. R. in Manual of Nearctic Diptera Vol. 2 (eds, McAlpine, J. F. et al.) 1011–1018 (Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, 1987).
Rendel, J. M. Canalization and gene control. (Logos, New York, 1967).
Sheldon, B. L. & Milton, M. K. Studies on the scutellar bristles of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Long-term selection for high bristle number in the Oregon RC strain and correlated responses in abdominal chaetae. Genetics 71, 567–595 (1972).
Wassarman, D. A., Therrien, M. & Rubin, G. M. The Ras signaling pathway in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 44–50 (1995).
Polaczyk, P. J., Gasperini, R. & Gibson, G. Naturally occurring genetic variation affects Drosophila photoreceptor determination. Dev. Genes Evol. 207, 462–470 (1998).
Shapiro, M. D. et al. Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 428, 717–723 (2004).
Bell, M. A., Aguirre, W. E. & Buck, N. J. Twelve years of contemporary armor evolution in a threespine stickleback population. Evolution 58, 814–824 (2004).
Bubliy, O. A., Loeschke, V. & Imashevae, A. G. Effect of stressful and non-stressful growth temperatures on variation of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 54, 1444–1449 (2000).
Comeron, J. M. & Kreitman, M. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. Genetics 161, 389–410 (2002).
Innan, H. & Kim, Y. Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10667–10672 (2004).
Rockman, M. V., Hahn, M. W., Soranzo, N., Goldstein, D. B. & Wray, G. A. Positive selection on a human-specific transcription factor binding site regulating IL4 expression. Curr. Biol. 13, 2118–2123 (2003).
Acknowledgements
We would particularly like to express our gratitude to the many colleagues who have encouraged and fostered our interest in this topic. Conversations with B. Hill and J. Hermisson helped us in thinking about some of the specific concepts, and the comments of three anonymous reviewers were enormously useful. G.G.'s research on cryptic genetic variation has been supported by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation and by the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Related links
DATABASES
Entrez
OMIM
FURTHER INFORMATION
Glossary
- MODERN SYNTHESIS
-
The theoretical synthesis of evolutionary biology with genetics, which occurred in the 1940s and included the recognition of the roles of genetic drift, genic selection and speciation in micro-evolutionary change.
- CANALIZATION
-
The tendency of traits to evolve a reduction in variability — namely, resistance to mutational or environmental perturbation. Canalization can be revealed by comparing the variance of a trait under normal and perturbed circumstances, or by measuring the robustness of a trait to new mutations in two different species.
- GENETIC ARCHITECTURE
-
General features of standing quantitative genetic variation in relation to a particular trait, including parameters such as the number of loci, the degree of dominance and epistasis, and the frequency of quantitative trait locus alleles in a population.
- ADDITIVE EFFECT
-
When two alleles have an effect on a trait, they are said to be additive if the average phenotype of heterozygotes is intermediate between those of the two classes of homozygote. Similarly, if the differences in phenotype among genotypes at two different loci are independent of one another, the effects at the two loci are said to be additive.
- QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS
-
(QTL). One of several loci that contributes to quantitative genetic variation. QTLs are usually detected by mapping the association between anonymous genetic markers and a continuous or discrete phenotype in the progeny of a cross between two lines.
- HOMEOTIC TRANSFORMATION
-
The conversion of one body part into another as a result of misexpression of a developmental regulatory gene. Another classic example is the antenna-to-leg transformations that result from misexpression of Antennapedia in Drosophila melanogaster.
- HALTERE
-
In Diptera (true flies), the pair of club-like balancing organs that act as gyroscopes during flight. They are evolutionarily modified hind wings.
- MUTATIONAL VARIANCE
-
Tendency towards dispersion of data about the mean due to new mutations that arise in each generation.
- ADMIXTURE
-
The mixture of two genetically differentiated populations of a species, generally as a result of the migration or breakdown of a reproductive barrier, which leads to rapid changes of even common allele frequencies.
- GENOTYPE-BY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
-
In quantitative genetics, an interaction in which the degree of additivity or dominance at the locus is a function of the environment. Consequently, the difference in the mean value of each of the homozygote and heterozygote classes varies according to the environment.
- EXPRESSIVITY
-
The degree to which a novel phenotype is aberrant. Not to be confused with penetrance, which is the proportion of individuals with a predisposing genotype that express the trait.
- THRESHOLD-DEPENDENT
-
A response marked by a phase transition once the causal variable exceeds some threshold. An example is the switch in cell fate that occurs when receptor–ligand interactions exceed a threshold. In statistical terms, threshold-dependence refers to discrete trait states that are thought to arise at high or low levels of an underlying continuous variable.
- SECOND-SITE MODIFIER SCREENS
-
Genetic screens designed to detect a mutation in a second locus that enhances or suppresses the effect of a dominant visible mutation.
- INTROGRESSION
-
The deliberate movement of a chromosomal interval into a different genetic strain, generally by repeated backcrossing with selection for the allele in each generation.
- ASSOCIATION STUDIES
-
An approach to identifying the genes that contribute to disease or other traits on the basis of a correlation between the genotype and some measure of the phenotype.
- EPISTASIS
-
In quantitative genetics, an interaction between two or more genotypes, such that the degree of additivity or dominance at one locus is a function of the genotype at another locus.
- SIGMOIDAL [RESPONSE]
-
A classic response in which the relationship between the dependent and independent variables shows a characteristic S-shaped curve, indicating a transition from slow-to-rapid response followed by a plateau.
- QUANTITATIVE TRAIT NUCLEOTIDE
-
(QTN). A nucleotide that associates with a quantitative trait, but that is detected in an outbred population or a set of unrelated inbred lines.
- HAPLOTYPE
-
An experimentally determined profile of genetic markers that is present on a single chromosome of any given individual.
- SYNTHETIC LETHAL MUTANTS
-
Pairs of mutations that are individually viable, but in combination result in lethality.
- RECOMBINANT INBRED LINES
-
A set of lines used in linkage mapping that consists of alternating patches of the genomes of two different parental lines.
- LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM MAPPING
-
A type of association study in which a locus is inferred to contribute to a trait on the basis of a correlation between one or more SNPs that are in linkage disequilibrium with the true causal site(s), which might not actually be genotyped.
- TRANSMISSION DISEQUILIBRIUM
-
A distortion from the expected ratio of 1:1 in the transmission of 2 alleles from a heterozygous parent to offspring of a particular class, typically affected individuals.
- CONDITIONAL SELECTION
-
Selection at the molecular level that operates only under a subset of environmental conditions or in the presence of particular modifying genotypes.
- HYBRID INCOMPATIBILITY
-
The inviability, infertility or infirmity of the progeny of a cross between two species, generally attributed to incompatibility between allelic combinations that never occurred in either lineage as they diverged.
- SOFT SELECTION
-
Natural selection that acts on an allele that is initially at an intermediate frequency, as opposed to hard selection, which acts on a newly arising mutation. Selection on cryptic variation will generally entail soft selection, as the perturbation exposes intermediate-frequency alleles that were previously neutral.
- F ST
-
A statistic that compares the level of genetic variation within two or more subpopulations relative to all subpopulations combined (that is, the total population).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gibson, G., Dworkin, I. Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 5, 681–690 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1426
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1426
This article is cited by
-
Dietary stress remodels the genetic architecture of lifespan variation in outbred Drosophila
Nature Genetics (2023)
-
Reduced within-population quantitative genetic variation is associated with climate harshness in maritime pine
Heredity (2023)
-
Higher-order epistasis shapes natural variation in germ stem cell niche activity
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Reciprocal causation and biological practice
Biology & Philosophy (2023)
-
Trait variation in a successful global invader: a large-scale analysis of morphological variance and integration in the brown trout
Biological Invasions (2023)