It is now well accepted that CD4+ T cells come in different flavours, including: T helper 1 (TH1) cells that produce interferon-γ (IFNγ) and are involved in responses to intracellular pathogens; TH2 cells that produce interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5 and IL-13, and respond to helminth infections; and TH17 cells that produce IL-17A and IL-17F, and deal with extracellular pathogens. This division of labour has led to specific CD4+ T cell subsets being associated with specific diseases (autoimmunity for TH1 and TH17 cells, and allergic responses for TH2 cells). However, ∼30 years ago, this level of complexity was only beginning to be appreciated, as documented in a landmark study by Robert Coffman and colleagues (Mossmann et al., 1986).
there was diversity within the CD4+ T cell pool, but the underlying mechanisms remained obscure
Beginning in the late 1970s, initial studies in mice had suggested that there were subsets of L3T4+Lyt2− (CD4+CD8−) T cells with different activities (Tada et al., 1978; and Kim et al., 1985). These groups, as well as others, showed that there were T cell populations that provided different forms of help in antibody responses. These studies suggested that there was diversity within the CD4+ T cell pool, but the underlying mechanisms remained obscure.
This changed in 1986, when Mossmann et al. used T cell clones to show that there were two distinct subsets of T helper cells. Using the nomenclature of Tada et al., they referred to these subsets as TH1 cells (producing IFNγ, IL-2 and lymphotoxin) and TH2 cells (producing BSF1 and TCGF2 (now both known as IL-4), and MCGF2 (now both known as IL-5)). The TH2 cell clones could also induce the expression of Ia antigens on B cells and enhance IgG1 and IgE synthesis. Importantly, IFNγ was capable of inhibiting both of these TH2 cell activities, which showed that the subsets cross-regulated each other.
The remarkable aspect of this work was that it was carried out at a time before enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, cytokine-specific antibodies, intracellular flow cytometry and quantitative PCR. The T helper cell clones were characterized using bioassays for the activities they produced. This work pioneered subsequent analysis of CD4+ T cell differentiation and represented a paradigm shift in how immune responses are assessed and studied.
References
Mossmann, T. R. et al. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J. Immunol. 136, 2348–2357 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Related links
Related links
Web links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, S. Division of labour by CD4+ T helper cells. Nat Rev Immunol 16, 403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.53
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.53
This article is cited by
-
A T cell-intrinsic function for NF-κB RelB in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
CD4: a vital player in the teleost fish immune system
Veterinary Research (2019)
-
Creating molecules that modulate immune responses
Nature Reviews Chemistry (2018)