Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: innovations in medical education

Abstract

Due to the changing complex healthcare environment, educational innovation is essential to meet the needs of current and future neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) leaders. Greater clinical demands, decreased academic funding, and expanded graduate medical education program requirements have negatively impacted time for teaching and educational scholarship potentially limiting innovation in the field. By focusing on adult learning principles, embracing technology, and promoting collaboration, today’s educators are preparing the next generation of neonatologists. Current innovations include regionalizing simulation boot camps, leveraging virtual learning to increase accessibility, developing niche training opportunities, and incorporating population health principles within existing quality initiatives. Areas in need of additional innovation include faculty and fellow development for teaching skills, expansion of educational networks, and dissemination and financial support of educational scholarship. These efforts and future innovations will require medical institutions and national NPM organizations to further invest in the medical educator as part of their missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Priorities for national efforts to innovate neonatology education.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DaRosa DA, Skeff K, Friedland JA, Coburn M, Cox S, Pollart S, et al. Barriers to effective teaching. Acad Med. 2011;86:453–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ACGME. Program Requirements For Graduate Medical Education In Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. 2020. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/329_NeonatalPerinatalMedicine_2020.pdf?ver=2020-06-29-162707-410.

  3. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Medicine as a community of practice: implications for medical education. Acad Med. 2018;93:185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar D, Vachharajani AJ, Wertheimer F, Vergales B, Glass K, Dannaway D, et al. Boot camps in neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship programs: a national survey. J Neonatal Perinat Med. 2019;12:231–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sawyer T, French H, Soghier L, Barry J, Johnston L, Anderson J, et al. Educational perspectives: boot camps for neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows. NeoReviews 2014;15:e46–e55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sawyer T, Stavroudis TA, Ades A, Dadiz R, Dammann CEL, Halamek LP, et al. Simulation in neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship programs. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:1258–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boss RD, Hutton N, Donohue PK, Arnold RM. Neonatologist training to guide family decision making for critically ill infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:783–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parham D, Reed D, Olicker A, Parrill F, Sharma J, Brunkorst J, et al. Families as educators: a family-centered approach to teaching communication skills to neonatology fellows. J Perinatol. 2019;39:1392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Varkey P, Karlapudi S, Rose S, Nelson R, Warner M. A systems approach for implementing practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84:335–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Backes CH, Reber KM, Trittmann JK, Huang H, Tomblin J, Moorehead PA, et al. Fellows as teachers: a model to enhance pediatric resident education. Med Educ Online. 2011;16:7205.

  11. Miloslavsky EM, Boyer D, Winn AS, Stafford DE, McSparron JI. Fellows as teachers: raising the educational bar. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:465–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. French H, Gray M, Gillam-Krakauer M, Bonachea EM, Carbajal M, Payne A, et al. Flipping the classroom: a national pilot curriculum for physiology in neonatal-perinatal medicine. J Perinatol. 2018;38:1420–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. French H, Arias-Shah A, Gisondo C, Gray MM. Perspectives: the flipped classroom in graduate medical education. NeoReviews 2020;21:e150–e156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller LE, Stoller JZ, Fraga MV. Point-of-care ultrasound in the neonatal ICU. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32:216–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen J, Amirnovin R, Ramanathan R, Noori S. The state of point-of-care ultrasonography use and training in neonatal-perinatal medicine and pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs. J Perinatol. 2016;36:972–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh Y, Tissot C, Fraga MV, Yousef N, Cortes RG, Lopez J, et al. International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Crit Care. 2020;24:65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27:759–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Byrne LM, Nasca TJ. Population health and graduate medical education: updates to the ACGME’s common program requirements. J Graduate Med Educ. 2019;11:357–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moriates C, Arora VM. Achieving alignment in graduate medical education to train the next generation of healthcare professionals to improve healthcare delivery. Healthcare. 2018;6:242–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahan JD, Clinchot D. Why medical education is being (inexorably) re-imagined and re-designed. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014;44:137–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sigurdson K, Morton C, Mitchell B, Profit J. Disparities in NICU quality of care: a qualitative study of family and clinician accounts. J Perinatol. 2018;38:600–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Improving Health and Health Care Worldwide. 2020. http://www.ihi.org/education/Pages/default.aspx.

  23. Ho T, Zupancic JAF, Pursley DM, Dukhovny D. Improving value in neonatal intensive care. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:617–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Celenza JF, Zayack D, Buus-Frank ME, Horbar JD. Family involvement in quality improvement: from bedside advocate to system advisor. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:553–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones T, Cohn F, Shapiro J. Minding the gap(s): narrativity and liminality in medical student writing. Lit Med. 2012;30:103–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:573–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sikka R, Morath JM, Leape L. The Quadruple Aim: care, health, cost and meaning in work. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:608–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE). 2020. http://inspiresim.com/what-is-inspire/.

  29. Schwartz A, King B, Mink R, Hicks PJ. The emergence and spread of practice-based medical education research networks. Acad Med. 2020;95:S12–s13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. American Academy of Pediatrics SoN-PM. 2019 Call for District Grants. 2019. https://services.aap.org/en/community/aap-sections/sonpm/district-grants/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

BS conceptualized, drafted, reviewed, and revised the paper, and provided oversight for all phases of manuscript preparation. JE, MG, DO, MCS, KS and AP conceptualized, drafted, reviewed, and revised the paper. HF, KL, JW, SK, and KR critically reviewed the paper. Consortium authors conceptualized the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brittany Schwarz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors have a leadership position within their respective neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship training program. There are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwarz, B., Enciso, J., Gray, M. et al. Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: innovations in medical education. J Perinatol 42, 677–682 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01126-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01126-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links