Abstract
Study design
A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Objectives
To determine the effect of non-invasive transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on spasticity, activity limitations and participation restrictions in various upper motor neuron diseases.
Methods
Six databases including CINAHL plus, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science were searched for the relevant records from January 2008 to December 2022. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data on spasticity, activity limitations and participation restrictions. The risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale while the GRADE approach established the certainty of the evidence.
Results
Eleven studies were identified of which 5 (45.5%) were rated as having a low risk of bias and 8 (72.7%) were meta-analyzed. The meta-analyses did not show any significant differences between cathodal (SMD = −0.67, 95% CI = −1.50 to 0.15, P = 0.11, I2 = 75%, 6 RCTs) or anodal (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI = −0.43 to −0.64, p = 0.69, I2 = 0%, 2 RCTs) and sham tsDCS for spasticity. There was also no significant difference between active and sham tsDCS for activity limitations (SMD = −0.42, 95% CI = −0.04 to 0.21, p = 0.2, I2 = 0%, 2 RCTs) and participation restrictions (MD = −8.10, 95% CI = −18.02 to 1.82, p = 0.11, 1 RCT).
Conclusions
The meta-analysis of the available evidence provides an uncertain estimate of the effect of cathodal tsDCS on spasticity, activity limitation and participation restriction. It might be very helpful, or it may make no difference at all. However, considering the level of the evidence and the limitation in the quality of the majority of the included studies, further well-designed research may likely change the estimate of effect.
Trial registration
PROSPERO CRD42021245601.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analysed during this review are openly available within the article and its supplementary files.
References
Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, Van Wijck F, Burridge J, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:2–6.
Sheean G. The pathophysiology of spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9:3–9.
Ivanhoe CB, Reistetter TA. Spasticity: the misunderstood part of upper motor neuron syndrome. Am J Physl Med Rehabil. 2004;83:S3–9.
Faist M, Mazevet D, Dietz V, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. A quantitative assessment of presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents in spastics. Differences in hemiplegics and paraplegics. Brain. 1994;117:1449–55.
Crone C, Johnsen LL, Biering-Sørensen F, Nielsen JB. Appearance of reciprocal facilitation of ankle extensors from ankle flexors in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury. Brain. 2003;126:495–507.
Boulenguez P, Liabeuf S, Bos R, Bras H, Jean-Xavier C, Brocard C, et al. Down-regulation of the potassium-chloride cotransporter KCC2 contributes to spasticity after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2010;16:302–7.
Holtz KA, Lipson R, Noonan VK, Kwon BK, Mills PB. Prevalence and effect of problematic spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1132–8.
Pérez-Arredondo A, Cázares-Ramírez E, Carrillo-Mora P, Martinez-Vargas M, Cardenas-Rodriguez N, Coballase-Urrutia E, et al. Baclofen in the therapeutic of sequele of traumatic brain injury: spasticity. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2016;39:311–9.
Harb A, Kishner S. Modified ashworth scale. InStatPearls [Internet] 2022 May 8. StatPearls Publishing.
Ghai A, Garg N, Hooda S, Gupta T. Spasticity–Pathogenesis, prevention and treatment strategies. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013;7:453–60.
Martin A, Abogunrin S, Kurth H, Dinet J. Epidemiological, humanistic, and economic burden of illness of lower limb spasticity in adults: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:111–22.
Lundström E, Smits A, Borg J, Terént A. Four-fold increase in direct costs of stroke survivors with spasticity compared with stroke survivors without spasticity: the first year after the event. Stroke. 2010;41:319–24.
Sandstedt P, Johansson S, Ytterberg C, Ingre C, Holmqvist LW, Kierkegaard M. Predictors of health related quality of life in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurological Sci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.034
Patel AT, Wein T, Bahroo LB, Wilczynski O, Rios CD, Murie-Fernandez M. Perspective of an International Online Patient and Caregiver Community on the Burden of spasticity and impact of botulinum neurotoxin therapy: survey study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6:e17928.
Kheder A, Nair KPS. Spasticity: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. Practical Neurol. 2012;12:289–98.
Grunt S, Becher JG, Vermuelen RJ. Long-term outcome and adverse effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:490–8.
Chang E, Gosh N, Yanni D, Lee S, Alexandru D, Mozaffar T. A review of spasticity treatments: pharmacological and interventional approaches. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;25:11–22.
Dietz V, Sinkjaer T. Spasticity. In: Verhaagen J, McDonald JW editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier; 2012. p. 197–211.
Rayegani SM, Babee M, Raeissadat SA. Rehabilitation medicine management of spasticity. In: Larrivee D, Rayegani SM editors. Neurostimulation and neuromodulation in contemporary therapeutic practice. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen Limited; 2020. p. 87–109.
Eccles JC, Kostyuk PG, Schmidt RF. The effect of electric polarization of the spinal cord on central afferent fibres and on their excitatory synaptic action. J Physiol. 1962;162:138–50.
Winkler T, Hering P, Straube A. Spinal DC stimulation in humans modulates post-activation depression of the H-reflex depending on current polarity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:957–61.
Cogiamanian F, Vergari M, Schiaffi E, Marceglia S, Ardolino G, Barbieri S, et al. Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings. Pain. 2011;152:370–5.
Priori A, Ciocca M, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Ferrucci R. Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists. J Physiol. 2014;592:3345–69.
Ahmed Z. Effects of cathodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation on mouse spinal network and complex multi joint movements. J Neurosci. 2013;33:14949–57.
Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation alters muscle tone in mice with and without spinal cord injury with spasticity. J Neurosc.i. 2014;34:1701–9.
Wieraszko A, Ahmed Z. Direct current-induced calcium trafficking in different neuronal preparations. Neural Plast. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2823735
Hofstoetter US, Mckay WB, Tansey KE, Mayr W, Kern H, Minassian K. Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37:201–11.
Grecco LH, Li S, Michel S, Castillo-Saavedra L, Mourdoukoutas A, Bikson M, et al. Transcutaneous spinal stimulation as a therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury: state of art. J Neurorestoratol. 2015;3:73–82.
Powell ES, Carrico C, Raithatha R, Salyers E, Ward A, Sawaki L. Transvertebral direct current stimulation paired with locomotor training in chronic spinal cord injury: a case study. NeuroRehabil. 2016;38:27–35.
Gomez-Soriano J, Megia-Garcia A, Serrano-Munoz D, Osuagwu B, Taylor J. Non-invasive spinal direct current stimulation for spasticity therapy following spinal cord injury: mechanistic insights contributing to long-term treatment effects. J Physiol. 2019;597:2121–2.
Paget-Blanc A, Chang JL, Saul M, Lin R, Ahmed Z, Volpe BT. Non-invasive treatment of patients with upper extremity spasticity following stroke using paired trans-spinal and peripheral direct current stimulation. Bioelectronic Med. 2019;5:1–10.
Chenery B. Effect of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spasticity, mobility, pain and sleep in community dwelling individuals post-stroke: a single case withdrawal design. Thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Movement Science. School of Health Sciences, 2019, University of Iceland.
Ardolino G, Bocci T, Nigro M, Vergari M, Di Fonzo A, Bonato S, et al. Spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) in hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP): a sham-controlled crossover study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;44:46–53.
Burke D. Spasticity as an adaptation to pyramidal tract injury. Adv Neurol. 1988;47:401–22.
Savenkova AA, Sarana AM, Shcherbak SG, Gerasimenko YP, Moshonkina TR. Noninvasive spinal cord electrical stimulation in the complex rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury. Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult. 2019;96:11–18.
Couban R. Covidence and Rayyan. JCHLA/ JABSC. 2016;37:124–6.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Puzi AA, Sidek SN, Khairuddin IM, Yusof HM. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of quantitative upper limb spasticity evaluation based Modified Ashworth Scale tool. 2018 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES). (2018): 126–30.
Boyd R, Graham H. Objective measurement of clinical findings in the use of botulinum toxin type A for the management of children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Neurol. 1999;6:S23–35.
Nordmark E, Anderson G. Wartenberg pendulum test: objective quantification of muscle tone in children with spastic diplegia undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:26–33.
Schieppati M. The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28:345–76.
Capaday C. Neurophysiological methods for studies of the motor system in freely moving human subjects. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;74:201–18.
Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Hoffman MA. The Hoffmann Reflex: methodologic considerations and applications for use in sports medicine and athletic training research. J Athletic Training. 2004;39:268–77.
Verhagen AP, de Vet HCW, de Bie RA, Kessels AGH, Boers M, Bouter LM, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1235–41.
Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Moseley AM. PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2000;5:223–6.
Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher CG. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48:43–9.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
Dunlap WP, Cortina JM, Vaslow JB, Burke MJ. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psycholog Methods. 1996;1:170–7.
Picelli A, Chemello E, Castellazzi P, Roncari L, Waldner A, Saltuari L, et al. Combined effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33:357–68.
Solopova IA, Sukhotinab IA, Zhvanskya DS, Ikoeva GA, Vissarionov SV, Baindurashvili AG, et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. Neurosci Lett. 2017;639:192–8.
Inanici F, Brighton LN, Samejima S, Hofstetter CP, Moritz CT, et al. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation restores hand and arm function after spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabi Eng. 2021;29:310–9.
Estes SP, Iddings JA, Field-Fote EC. Priming neural circuits to modulate spinal reflex excitability. Front Neurol. 2017;8:17.
Estes S, Zarkou A, Hope JM, Suri C, Field-Fote EC. Combined transcutaneous spinal stimulation and locomotor training to improve walking function and reduce spasticity in subacute spinal cord injury: a randomized study of clinical feasibility and efficacy. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1167.
Berra E, Bergamaschi R, De Icco R, Dagna C, Perrotta A, Rovaris M, et al. The effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis: clinical and neurophysiological assessment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:31.
Freyvert Y, Yong NA, Morikawa E, Zdunowsk S, Sarino ME, Gerasimenko Y, et al. Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15546.
Ikoeva GA, Nikityuk IE, Kivoenko OI, Moshonkina TR, Solopova IA, Sukhotina IA, et al. Clinical, neurological, and neurophysiological evaluation of the efficiency of motor rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy using robotic mechanotherapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. Pediatr Traumatol Orthop Reconstr Surger. 2016;4:47–55.
Shapkova EY, Pismennaya EV, Emelyannikov DV, Ivanenko Y. Exoskeleton walk training in paralyzed individuals benefits from transcutaneous lumbar cord tonic electrical stimulation. Fronti Neurosci. 2020;14:416.
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:1–10.
Altman DG, Martin BJ. “Standard deviations and standard errors”. BMJ. 2005;331:903.
Lam M, Webb KA, Donnell. “Correlation between two variables in repeated measures,” in proceedings of the American Statistical Association Biometrics Section. Alexandria, VA, USA: 1999. p. 213–8.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Education and debate: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
Garcia AM, Serrano-Muñoz D, Taylor J, Avendaño-Coy J, Gómez-Soriano J. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and motor rehabilitation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair.2020;34:3–12.
Grey MJ, Klinge K, Crone C, Lorentzen J, Biering-Sørensen F, Ravnborg M, et al. Post-activation depression of soleus stretch reflexes in healthy and spastic humans. Exp Brain Res. 2008;185:189–97.
Lim C-Y, Shin H-I. Noninvasive DC stimulation on neck changes MEP. Neuroreport. 2011;22:819–23.
Lamy J-C, Ho C, Badel A, Arrigo RT, Boakye M. Modulation of soleus H reflex by spinal DC stimulation in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:906–14.
Hubli M, Dietz V, Schrafl-Altermatt M, Bolliger M. Modulation of spinal neuronal excitability by spinal direct currents and locomotion after spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:1187–95.
Bocci T, Vannini B, Torzini A, Mazzatenta A, Vergari M, Cogiamanian F, et al. Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2014;578:75–79.
Dongés SC, D’Amico JM, Butler JE, Taylor JL. The effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on motor pathways supplying the upper limb in humans. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172333.
Schmitt DE, Hill RH, Grillner S. The spinal GABAergic system is a strong modulator of burst frequency in the lamprey locomotor network. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:2357–67.
Ahmed Z, Wieraszko A. Trans-spinal direct current enhances corticospinal output and stimulation-evoked release of 2 glutamate analog, D-2, 33H-aspartic acid. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1576–92.
Sunnerhagen KS. Stop using the Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:2–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ABH conceived and designed the study with inputs from MSD, ATS, and AA. ATS searched the literature and uploaded the records to Covidence. ABH and MAM screened the studies against the eligibility criteria, extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies, while MSD settled the disagreements. ABH did the qualitative synthesis, and MSD and ATS did the meta-analysis. ABH wrote up the Manuscript which was critically reviewed by AA and MSD. The project was supervised by JM, HG, and RYA. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hassan, A.B., Salihu, A.T., Masta, M.A. et al. Effect of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on spasticity in upper motor neuron conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spinal Cord 61, 587–599 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00928-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00928-9