Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition

Using the optimal method—explained variance weighted genetic risk score to predict the efficacy of folic acid therapy to hyperhomocysteinemia

Abstract

Background

Genetic risk score (GRS) is a useful way to explore genetic architectures and the relationships of complex diseases. Several studies had revealed many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the efficacy of folic acid treatment to hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy).

Methods

We aimed to construct and screen out the optimal predictive model based on four GRSs and traditional risk factors. Four GRSs enrolled four SNPs (MTHFR rs1801131, MTHFR rs1801133, MTRR rs1801394, BHMT rs3733890) were presented as follows: (a) simple count genetic risk score (SC-GRS), (b) direct logistic regression genetic risk score (DL-GRS), (c) polygenic genetic risk score (PG-GRS), and (d) explained variance weighted genetic risk score (EV-GRS). We performed a prospective cohort study including 638 HHcy patients. Then we evaluated the associations of four GRSs with folic acid’s efficacy and the performance of four GRSs.

Results

Four GRSs were independently associated with efficacy of treatment (p < 0.05). When combining GRSs with traditional risk factors, the AUC of the four models were all above 0.900 in the training set (Tradition + SC-GRS: 0.909, Tradition + DL-GRS: 0.909, Tradition + PG-GRS: 0.904, Tradition + EV-GRS: 0.910). And EV-GRS got the highest AUC. When evaluating the models in the testing set, we got the same conclusion that EV-GRS was optimal among four GRSs with the highest AUC (0.878) and the highest increase of AUC (0.008).

Conclusion

A more precise predictive model combing the optimal GRS with traditional risk factors was constructed to predict the efficacy of folic acid therapy to HHcy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohishi T, Fujita T, Suzuki D, Nishida T, Asukai M, Matsuyama Y. Serum homocysteine levels are affected by renal function during a 3-year period of minodronate therapy in female osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Metab. 2019;37:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Messedi M, Frigui M, Chaabouni K, Turki M, Neifer M, Lahiyani A, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and variations of homocysteine concentrations in patients with Behcet’s disease. Gene. 2013;527:306–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peng HY, Man CF, Xu J, Fan Y. Elevated homocysteine levels and risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015;16:78–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaffer A, Verdoia M, Cassetti E, Marino P, Suryapranata H, De Luca G, et al. Relationship between homocysteine and coronary artery disease. results from a large prospective cohort study. Thromb Res. 2014;134:288–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng X. Updating the relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia lowering therapy and cardiovascular events. Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;31:e19–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke R, Smith AD, Jobst KA, Refsum H, Sutton L, Ueland PM. Folate, vitamin B12, and serum total homocysteine levels in confirmed Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1449–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhonukshe-Rutten RA, de Vries JH, de Bree A, van der Put N, van Staveren WA, de Groot LC. Dietary intake and status of folate and vitamin B12 and their association with homocysteine and cardiovascular disease in European populations. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:18–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmud N, Molloy A, McPartlin J, Corbally R, Whitehead AS, Scott JM, Weir DG, et al. Increased prevalence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T variant in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and its clinical implications. Gut. 2000;47:456–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yajnik CS, Chandak GR, Joglekar C, Katre P, Bhat DS, Singh SN, et al. Maternal homocysteine in pregnancy and offspring birthweight: epidemiological associations and Mendelian randomization analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:1487–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang B, Wu H, Li Y, Ban Q, Huang X, Chen L, et al. Effect of long-term low-dose folic acid supplementation on degree of total homocysteine-lowering: major effect modifiers. Br J Nutr. 2018;120:1122–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tian H, Tian D, Zhang C, Wang W, Wang L, Ge M, et al. Efficacy of folic acid therapy in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia. J Am Coll Nutr. 2017;36:528–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao X, Xing X, Xu R, Gong Q, He Y, Li S, et al. Folic acid and vitamins D and B12 correlate with homocysteine in Chinese patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease. Medicine. 2016;95:e2652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zappacosta B, Mastroiacovo P, Persichilli S, Pounis G, Ruggeri S, Minucci A, et al. Homocysteine lowering by folate-rich diet or pharmacological supplementations in subjects with moderate hyperhomocysteinemia. Nutrients. 2013;5:1531–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tian H, Tian D, Zhang C, Wang W, Wang L, Ge M, et al. Efficacy of folic acid therapy in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia. J Am Coll Nutr. 2017;36:528–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang X, Li D, Zhao Q, Zhang C, Ren B, Yue L, et al. Association between BHMT and CBS gene promoter methylation with the efficacy of folic acid therapy in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia. J Hum Genet. 2019;64:1227–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang X, Zhao Q, Li D, Ren B, Yue L, Shi F, et al. Association between gene promoter methylation of the one-carbon metabolism pathway and serum folate among patients with hyperhomocysteinemia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74:1677–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Du B, Tian H, Tian D, Zhang C, Wang W, Wang L, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of key enzymes in folate metabolism affect the efficacy of folate therapy in patients with hyperhomocysteinaemia. Br J Nutr. 2018;119:887–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Du B, Zhang C, Yue L, Ren B, Zhao Q, Li D, et al. Prediction model for the efficacy of folic acid therapy on hyperhomocysteinaemia based on genetic risk score methods. Br J Nutr. 2019;122:39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao Y, Ning Y, Zhang F, Ding M, Wen Y, Shi L, et al. PCA-based GRS analysis enhances the effectiveness for genetic correlation detection. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:2291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Natarajan P, Young R, Stitziel NO, Padmanabhan S, Baber U, Mehran R, et al. Polygenic risk score identifies subgroup with higher burden of atherosclerosis and greater relative benefit from statin therapy in the primary prevention setting. Circulation. 2017;135:2091–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marston NA, Kamanu FK, Nordio F, Gurmu Y, Roselli C, Sever PS, et al. Predicting benefit from evolocumab therapy in patients with atherosclerotic disease using a genetic risk score: results from the FOURIER trial. Circulation. 2020;141:616–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Talmud PJ, Hingorani AD, Cooper JA, Marmot MG, Brunner EJ, Kumari M, et al. Utility of genetic and non-genetic risk factors in prediction of type 2 diabetes: whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;340:b4838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carayol J, Tores F, Konig IR, Hager J, Ziegler A. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of genetic profiles in affected offspring families. Stat Med. 2010;29:2359–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Che R, Motsinger-Reif AA. A new explained-variance based genetic risk score for predictive modeling of disease risk. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2012;11:Article 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu CS, Chiang HC, Chen HW. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism determines the plasma homocysteine-lowering effect of large-dose folic acid supplementation in patients with cardiovascular disease. Nutrition. 2004;20:974–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang X, Qin X, Yang W, Liu L, Jiang C, Zhang X, et al. MTHFR gene and serum folate interaction on serum homocysteine lowering: prospect for precision folic acid treatment. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:679–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kruger WD, Evans AA, Wang L, Malinow MR, Duell PB, Anderson PH, et al. Polymorphisms in the CBS gene associated with decreased risk of coronary artery disease and increased responsiveness to total homocysteine lowering by folic acid. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;70:53–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Malinow M, Nieto F, Kruger W, Duell P, Hess D, Gluckman R, et al. The effects of folic acid supplementation on plasma total homocysteine are modulated by multivitamin use and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotypes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1157–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Janipalli C, Kumar M, Vinay D, Sandeep M, Bhaskar S, Kulkarni S, et al. Analysis of 32 common susceptibility genetic variants and their combined effect in predicting risk of Type 2 diabetes and related traits in Indians. Diabet Med. 2012;29:121–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ripatti S, Tikkanen E, Orho-Melander M, Havulinna AS, Silander K, Sharma A, et al. A multilocus genetic risk score for coronary heart disease: case-control and prospective cohort analyses. Lancet. 2010;376:1393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu J, Pfeiffer RM, Gail MH. Strategies for developing prediction models from genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2013;37:768–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dudbridge F. Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Yan Q, Xu J, Li X, Cheng M. High prevalence and factors contributing to hyperhomocysteinemia, folate deficiency, and vitamin b12 deficiency among healthy adults in Shanghai, China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2019;32:63–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Balavarca Y, Weigl K, Thomsen H, Brenner H. Performance of individual and joint risk stratification by an environmental risk score and a genetic risk score in a colorectal cancer screening setting. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:627–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hernandez RD, Uricchio LH, Hartman K, Ye C, Dahl A, Zaitlen N. Ultrarare variants drive substantial cis heritability of human gene expression. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1349–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sidore C, Busonero F, Maschio A, Porcu E, Naitza S, Zoledziewska M, et al. Genome sequencing elucidates Sardinian genetic architecture and augments association analyses for lipid and blood inflammatory markers. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1272–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fava C, Sjogren M, Olsson S, Lovkvist H, Jood K, Engstrom G, et al. A genetic risk score for hypertension associates with the risk of ischemic stroke in a Swedish case-control study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:969–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zupancic K, Skok K, Repnik K, Weersma RK, Potocnik U, Skok P. Multi-locus genetic risk score predicts risk for Crohn’s disease in Slovenian population. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3777–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Redondo MJ, Oram RA, Steck AK. Genetic risk scores for type 1 diabetes prediction and diagnosis. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2017;17:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vezzoli A, Dellanoce C, Maria Caimi T, Vietti D, Montorsi M, Mrakic-Sposta S, et al. Influence of dietary supplementation for hyperhomocysteinemia treatments. Nutrients. 2020;12:1957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the staff of the Department of Neurology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, for their support and assistance. All authors had read and approved the final manuscript. This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Henan Province (No.132102310431).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The responsibilities of all authors were as follows: XC had full access to all the study and was responsible for the integrity and the analysis of the data. CZ and XH acquired the data of this study. XW carried out the data analysis. WZ was in charge of supervision and reviewing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

41430_2021_1055_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Table 1 Association between different GRSs (category variable) and the efficacy of folic acid therapy for HHcy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Huang, X., Zheng, C. et al. Using the optimal method—explained variance weighted genetic risk score to predict the efficacy of folic acid therapy to hyperhomocysteinemia. Eur J Clin Nutr 76, 943–949 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-01055-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-01055-5

Search

Quick links