This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Püschel, H. P., Bertrand, O. C., O’Reilly, J. E., Bobe, R. & Püschel, T. A. Divergence-time estimates for hominins provide insight into encephalization and body mass trends in human evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 808–819 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01431-1 (2021).
Dembo, M., Matzke, N. J., Mooers, A. Ø. & Collard, M. Bayesian analysis of a morphological supermatrix sheds light on controversial fossil hominin relationships. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150943–20150949 (2015).
Dembo, M. et al. The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: an assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods. J. Hum. Evol. 97, 17–26 (2016).
Kimbel, W. H. Hesitation on hominin history. Nature 497, 573–574 (2013).
Carter, K., Worthington, S. & Smith, T. M. News and views: non-metric dental traits and hominin phylogeny. J. Hum. Evol. 69, 123–128 (2014).
Mongle, C. S., Strait, D. S. & Grine, F. E. Expanded character sampling underscores phylogenetic stability of Ardipithecus ramidus as a basal hominin. J. Hum. Evol. 131, 28–39 (2019).
Lee, M. S. Y. Multiple morphological clocks and total-evidence tip-dating in mammals. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160033 (2016).
Ho, S. Y. W. & Phillips, M. J. Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Syst. Biol. 58, 367–380 (2009).
Heath, T. A. A hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating estimates of species divergence times. Syst. Biol. 61, 793–809 (2012).
Barido-Sottani, J. et al. Ignoring fossil age uncertainty leads to inaccurate topology and divergence time estimates in time calibrated tree inference. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 183 (2020).
Püschel, H. P., O’Reilly, J. E., Pisani, D. & Donoghue, P. C. J. The impact of fossil stratigraphic ranges on tip‐calibration, and the accuracy and precision of divergence time estimates. Palaeontology 63, 67–83 (2020).
Strait, D. S. & Grine, F. E. Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: the role of fossil taxa. J. Hum. Evol. 47, 399–452 (2004).
Fu, Q. et al. DNA analysis of an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2223–2227 (2013).
Grine, F. E. in Africa from MIS 6-2: Population Dynamics and Paleoenvironments (eds Jones, S. C. & Stewart, B. A.) 323–381 (Springer, 2016).
Brown, F. H., McDougall, I. & Fleagle, J. G. Correlation of the KHS Tuff of the Kibish Formation to volcanic ash layers at other sites, and the age of early Homo sapiens (Omo I and Omo II). J. Hum. Evol. 63, 577–585 (2012).
Vidal, C. M. et al. Age of the oldest known Homo sapiens from eastern Africa. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04275-8 (2022).
Veeramah, K. R. & Hammer, M. F. The impact of whole-genome sequencing on the reconstruction of human population history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 149–162 (2014).
Henn, B. M., Steele, T. E. & Weaver, T. D. Clarifying distinct models of modern human origins in Africa. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 53, 148–156 (2018).
Rizal, Y. et al. Last appearance of Homo erectus at Ngandong, Java, 117,000–108,000 years ago. Nature 577, 381–385 (2020).
Pyron, R. A. Divergence time estimation using fossils as terminal taxa and the origins of Lissamphibia. Syst. Biol. 60, 466–481 (2011).
McHenry, H. M. Body size and proportions in early hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 87, 407–431 (1992).
Wood, B. Origin and evolution of the genus Homo. Nature 355, 783–790 (1992).
McHenry, H. M. Behavioral ecological implications of early hominid body size. J. Hum. Evol. 27, 77–87 (1994).
Boyle, E. K. & Desilva, J. M. A large Homo erectus talus from Koobi Fora, Kenya (KNM-ER 5428), and Pleistocene hominin talar evolution. PaleoAnthropology 1, 1-13 (2015).
Aiello, L. C. & Wood, B. A. Cranial variables as predictors of hominine body mass. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 95, 409–426 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.S.M. wrote the initial draft of the paper. K.D.P. carried out the re-analysis of geochronological data. C.S.M., K.D.P., D.S.S. and F.E.G. compiled data and contributed to the writing and revision of the submitted version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary text, Table 1 and references.
Supplementary Tables
Supplementary Table 2 Hominin first and last appearance dates and Table 3 Differences in divergence date estimates.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mongle, C.S., Pugh, K.D., Strait, D.S. et al. Modelling hominin evolution requires accurate hominin data. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 1090–1091 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01791-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01791-2
This article is cited by
-
From fossils to mind
Communications Biology (2023)
-
Reply to: Modelling hominin evolution requires accurate hominin data
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2022)