A new study demonstrates a novel research strategy for studying juries, moving inquiry forward more rapidly and efficiently.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Avorn, J. Powerful Medicines: The Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Prescription Drugs (Knopf, New York, 2004).
Pearson, J. M. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0451-z (2018).
Bornstein, B. H. Law Hum. Behav. 23, 75–91 (1999).
Bornstein, B. H. et al. Law Hum. Behav. 41, 13–28 (2017).
Diamond, S. S. Law Hum. Behav. 41, 561–571 (1997).
Pezdek, K., Avila-Mora, E. & Sperry, K. App. Cog. Psych. 24, 673–690 (2010).
National Research Council Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2009).
Koehler, J. J., Schweitzer, N. J., Saks, M. J. & McQuiston, D. Psych. Public Policy Law 22, 401–413 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saks, M.J. Methodological triangulation. Nat Hum Behav 2, 806–807 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0458-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0458-5