Abstract
Acetylation of histones by lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) is essential for chromatin organization and function1. Among the genes coding for the MYST family of KATs (KAT5–KAT8) are the oncogenes KAT6A (also known as MOZ) and KAT6B (also known as MORF and QKF)2,3. KAT6A has essential roles in normal haematopoietic stem cells4,5,6 and is the target of recurrent chromosomal translocations, causing acute myeloid leukaemia7,8. Similarly, chromosomal translocations in KAT6B have been identified in diverse cancers8. KAT6A suppresses cellular senescence through the regulation of suppressors of the CDKN2A locus9,10, a function that requires its KAT activity10. Loss of one allele of KAT6A extends the median survival of mice with MYC-induced lymphoma from 105 to 413 days11. These findings suggest that inhibition of KAT6A and KAT6B may provide a therapeutic benefit in cancer. Here we present highly potent, selective inhibitors of KAT6A and KAT6B, denoted WM-8014 and WM-1119. Biochemical and structural studies demonstrate that these compounds are reversible competitors of acetyl coenzyme A and inhibit MYST-catalysed histone acetylation. WM-8014 and WM-1119 induce cell cycle exit and cellular senescence without causing DNA damage. Senescence is INK4A/ARF-dependent and is accompanied by changes in gene expression that are typical of loss of KAT6A function. WM-8014 potentiates oncogene-induced senescence in vitro and in a zebrafish model of hepatocellular carcinoma. WM-1119, which has increased bioavailability, arrests the progression of lymphoma in mice. We anticipate that this class of inhibitors will help to accelerate the development of therapeutics that target gene transcription regulated by histone acetylation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
In a screen of 243,000 diverse small-molecule compounds12, we obtained the acylsulfonylhydrazide compound CTx-0124143, a competitive KAT6A inhibitor (half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) 0.49 µM) in biochemical assays12. Medicinal chemistry optimization yielded the compound WM-8014 with an IC50 value of 8 nM (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1), representing a 60-fold increase in inhibitory activity towards KAT6A. This was consistent with the binding affinity measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR; equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) 5 nM; Fig. 1a, Extended Data Fig. 1). WM-8014 inhibits predominantly the closely related proteins KAT6A and KAT6B (IC50 8 nM and 28 nM, respectively), and is more than tenfold less active against KAT7 and KAT5 (IC50 342 nM and 224 nM, respectively; Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 1). Kinetic binding curves obtained from SPR demonstrated that the interaction of this class of compounds with immobilized proteins was fully reversible and consistent with a single-site binding interaction. The interaction of WM-8014 with KAT6A and KAT7, although relatively strong, was in both cases driven by fast association kinetics (association rate constant (ka) >1 × 106 M−1 s−1), whereas the dissociation kinetics (dissociation rate constant (kd) ~ 4 × 10−2 for KAT6A and 17 × 10−2 s−1 for KAT7) were indicative of a relatively short lifespan of the binary complex (Extended Data Fig. 1). WM-8014 displayed an order of magnitude weaker binding to KAT7 than to KAT6A (KD 52 nM versus 5.1 nM, respectively) (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig. 1). We also generated an inactive analogue, WM-2474 (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1). Notably, these compounds were almost inactive against KAT8, and no inhibition was observed for the more distantly related lysine acetyltransferases KAT2A, KAT2B, KAT3A and KAT3B (Fig. 1b, c, Supplementary Table 1).
WM-8014 has desirable, drug-like physicochemical properties (Supplementary Table 2). It is completely stable in cell culture medium (10% fetal calf serum); however, relatively high protein binding (97.5%) in this medium reduces its free concentration. Although WM-8014 has relatively low solubility in water (8–16 μM), it could readily permeate Caco-2 cells (apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) 78 ± 13 × 10−6 cm s−1). Testing of WM-8014 at 1 µM and 10 µM revealed no notable affinity for a pharmacological panel of 158 diverse biological targets; only eight targets were affected by more than 50% (Supplementary Table 3).
We solved the crystal structures of a modified MYST histone acetyltransferase domain (MYSTCryst) in complex with WM-8014 (1.85 Å resolution, Fig. 1d–f, Extended Data Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 4) or acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA; 1.95 Å resolution, Fig. 1g). The WM-8014 molecule occupies the acetyl-CoA-binding site on MYSTCryst, being partially enclosed between the α-helix formed by residues D685 to R704 and the loop extending from Q654 to G657. The MYSTCryst–acetyl-CoA complex adopts a globular fold (Fig. 1g), as seen in previously reported structures13, with a root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of 0.6 Å, and is nearly identical to the MYSTCryst–WM-8014 complex (r.m.s.d. of 0.3 Å for all aligned atoms). Accordingly, the core acylsulfonylhydrazide moiety of WM-8014 makes similar hydrogen bonds to MYSTCryst as does the diphosphate group of acetyl-CoA (Fig. 1f, g). This includes hydrogen bonds to the main-chain atoms of R655, G657 and R660—identical to acetyl-CoA—as well as additional hydrogen bonds to G659 and S690 (Extended Data Fig. 1). The biphenyl group of WM-8014 extends further into the acetyl-CoA-binding pocket, which enables van der Waals interactions with residues L601, I647, I649, S684 and L686 of MYSTCryst (Extended Data Fig. 1). WM-8014 therefore competes directly with acetyl-CoA in the substrate-binding domain.
Because KAT6A suppresses senescence9,10, we examined the ability of WM-8014 to induce cell cycle arrest in embryonic day (E)14.5 mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Cells treated with WM-8014 failed to proliferate after 10 days of treatment (Fig. 2a; IC50 2.4 µM), with similar kinetics to Cre-recombinase Kat6a recombination (Fig. 2b). Higher doses of WM-8014 (up to 40 µM) did not accelerate growth arrest, which after 8 days of treatment was irreversible (Extended Data Fig. 2). The inactive compound WM-2474 did not affect cell proliferation. Cell cycle analysis showed an increase in the proportion of cells in G0/G1 after 6 days of treatment and a corresponding reduction in cells in G2/M and S phases, both in Fucci cells14 and in 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assays (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 2).
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of MEFs treated with WM-8014 revealed a signature of cellular senescence, including upregulated expression of Cdkn2a mRNA and decreased expression of Cdc6, which is a KAT6A target gene9 and a regulator of DNA replication15 (Fig. 2d; day 10: false discovery rate (FDR) < 10−6). A substantial increase in β-galactosidase activity—a marker of senescent cells—was also observed (Fig. 2e), accompanied by morphological changes typical of senescence (Extended Data Fig. 2). WM-8014 caused a concentration-dependent reduction in the level of E2f2 mRNA (adjusted (adj.) R2 = 0.73; P < 0.0005) and Cdc6 mRNA (adj. R2 = 0.5; P = 0.002), accompanied by upregulation of both splice products of the Cdkn2a locus, Ink4a and Arf (day 10: P < 0.0005 and P = 0.005, respectively; Extended Data Fig. 3). Notably, MEFs treated for 4 days or 10 days with 10 µM WM-8014, the control compound WM-2474 or DMSO vehicle control showed no change in the levels of γH2A.X (Extended Data Fig. 4), which suggests that cell cycle arrest was not a consequence of DNA damage. No increase in apoptosis or necrosis was seen (Extended Data Fig. 4). Treatment of either Trp53-null MEFs (Trp53−/−) or Cdkn2a-null (Ink4a−/−Arf−/−) MEFs with WM-8014 had a minor effect and no effect on cell proliferation, respectively (Fig. 2f, Extended Data Fig. 2). These results show that WM-8014 acts through the p16INK4A–p19ARF pathway, causing irreversible cell cycle exit leading to senescence, and does not have a general cytotoxic effect.
KAT7 is essential for global histone 3 lysine 14 (H3K14) acetylation16. By contrast, KAT6A regulates H3K9 acetylation only at target loci17,18. We determined the effects of WM-8014 on global levels of acetylation at H3K9 and H3K14 by western blot after 5 days of treatment. Treatment with 10 µM WM-8014 caused a 49% decrease in the global levels of H3K14ac but, as expected on the basis of the locus-specific roles of KAT6A17,18, did not significantly affect the global levels of H3K9ac (Fig. 3a, b; all gel source data in Supplementary Fig. 1). The effects of WM-8014 on global H3K14ac levels were concentration-dependent (Fig. 3b; H3K14ac/H4 ratio regressed on log concentration of WM-8014; adj. R2 = 0.76, P < 0.001; IC50 1.2 µM). RNA-seq showed a strong correlation between the changes in gene expression seen in Kat6a−/− MEFs compared with Kat6a+/+ MEFs and the genes differentially expressed after WM-8014 treatment (WM-8014 compared with inactive WM-2474), with a 2.6-fold enrichment in upregulated genes (FDR = 0.0001; Fig. 3c) and a 2.1-fold enrichment in downregulated genes (FDR = 0.0001; Fig. 3c), and gene expression signatures characteristic of cellular senescence (Extended Data Fig. 5). Loss of KAT6A results in the downregulation of E2f2, Ezh2 and Melk9. Similarly, treatment with WM-8014 caused significant downregulation of Ezh2, Melk and E2f2 mRNA levels compared with controls (Fig. 3d), as determined by RNA-seq (Extended Data Fig. 5) and confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT–qPCR) (Extended Data Fig. 3). After treatment with WM-8014, there was a reduction of H3K9ac at the transcription start sites of these genes (Fig. 3e). Therefore, the treatment of cells with high concentrations of WM-8014 directly inhibits global H3K14 acetylation catalysed by KAT7, as well as KAT6A-specific H3K9 acetylation at transcription start sites.
Because WM-8014 induced cellular senescence, we reasoned that it might exacerbate oncogenic RAS-induced senescence. Accordingly, MEFs that express HRASG12V, a constitutively active form of RAS, were more sensitive to the induction of cell cycle arrest by WM-8014 (Extended Data Fig. 6). We then examined the effects of WM-8014 in a zebrafish model19 of KRASG12V-driven hepatocellular overproliferation. We observed a significant, concentration-dependent reduction in liver volume in response to treatment with WM-8014, and a substantial reduction in hepatocytes in S phase (Extended Data Fig. 6). Notably, WM-8014 did not impair the growth of the normal liver, demonstrating that the inhibitory effects of WM-8014 were specific to hepatocytes that express oncogenic RAS. Treatment with WM-8014 was found to robustly upregulate the cell cycle regulators Cdkn2a and Cdkn1a in hepatocytes that express oncogenic KRASG12V, but not control hepatocytes. Therefore, WM-8014 potentiates oncogene-induced senescence, but it does not affect normal hepatocyte growth.
The progression of lymphoma is highly dependent on KAT6A, as Kat6a heterozygous mice are protected from early-onset MYC-driven lymphoma11. However, the high levels of plasma-protein binding exhibited by WM-8014 (Supplementary Table 2) precluded in vivo studies in mice. Development of derivatives of WM-8014 resulted in WM-1119, which has reduced plasma-protein binding (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Table 2). The interaction of WM-1119 with KAT6A is similar to that of WM-8014: it is characterized by strong reversible binding (KD 2 nM, compared with 5 nM for WM-8014; Extended Data Fig. 7) that is competitive with acetyl-CoA, and driven by fast association kinetics (ka > 1 × 106 M−1 s−1; Extended Data Fig. 7). The structure of MYSTCryst in complex with WM-1119 was solved (Extended Data Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 5) and was found to be almost identical to that of MYSTCryst–WM-8014, with an r.m.s.d. for aligned main-chain atoms of 0.2 Å. There are two key differences between the complexes: an additional hydrogen bond is formed between the WM-1119 pyridine nitrogen and the main chain at I649 that is not present in the complex with WM-8014 (Extended Data Fig. 7), and the hydrophobic interaction that exists between the meta-methyl of the biphenyl group of WM-8014 and I663 is not present in the complex with WM-1119. WM-1119 is 1,100-fold and 250-fold more active against KAT6A than against KAT5 or KAT7, respectively (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 7), and so shows greater specificity for KAT6A than does WM-8014. The testing of WM-1119 at 1 µM and 10 µM against a pharmacological panel of 159 diverse biological targets revealed no affinity (Supplementary Table 6). Treatment of MEFs with WM-1119 resulted in cell cycle arrest in G1 and a senescence phenotype similar to that seen upon treatment with WM-8014 (Extended Data Fig. 8). Notably, the activity of WM-1119 in this cell-based assay is an order of magnitude greater than WM-8014 and WM-1119 is able to induce cell cycle arrest at 1 µM.
To test inhibitors of KAT6A in a cancer model, we investigated the effect of WM-1119 and WM-8014 on the proliferation of lymphoma cells. We selected the B cell lymphoma cell line EMRK1184, which was isolated from mice with a tumour resulting from the expression of Myc under the control of the IgH enhancer20, because it expressed the Cdnk2a-locus-encoded ARF and wild-type p53 (Extended Data Fig. 9). Treatment with WM-8014 or WM-1119 inhibited the proliferation of the EMRK1184 lymphoma cells in vitro (Fig. 4b); RNA-seq and western blot analysis showed that treatment with WM-1119 resulted in increased levels of Cdkn2a and Cdkn2b mRNA and p16INK4a and p19ARF proteins, as well as a delayed increase in Cdkn1a mRNA (Extended Data Fig. 9). WM-1119 (IC50 0.25 µM) was ninefold more active than WM-8014 (IC50 2.3 µM; Fig. 4b), as expected on the basis of reduced protein binding (Supplementary Table 2).
We tested the effectiveness of KAT6 inhibitors in the treatment of lymphoma in mice. Male C57BL/6-albino (B6(Cg)-Tyrc-2J/J) mice were injected intravenously with 100,000 EMRK1184 cells transfected with a luciferase-expression construct. Lymphoma growth was monitored using the IVIS imaging system. Three days after the lymphoma-cell transplant, all mice showed luciferase activity (Fig. 4c), which indicated the expansion of lymphoma cells. Mice were then divided randomly into WM-1119-treatment and vehicle-control groups. Because WM-1119 is rapidly cleared after intraperitoneal injection, with the plasma concentration decreasing to below 1 µM after 4–6 h (Extended Data Fig. 9), cohorts of mice were injected every 8 h (three times per day, two cohorts of three mice per treatment group) or every 6 h (four times per day, two cohorts of three and six mice per treatment group; Fig. 4d). Mice were imaged five times over the course of these experiments to monitor the growth of lymphoma. No significant difference between the treatment and control groups was seen before day 10 (Fig. 4d, Extended Data Fig. 10), which was expected as the inhibition of cell proliferation in vitro took approximately seven days. However, by day 14, the cohorts that were treated four times per day with WM-1119 had arrested tumour growth (Fig. 4c, Extended Data Fig. 10), with the exception of one mouse that did not respond (Fig. 4d). Spleen weights in the WM-1119-treatment group (treated four times per day) were substantially lower than spleen weights in the vehicle-treated group, and not significantly different from those of tumour-free eight-week-old mice (P < 0.0005 and P = 0.2, respectively; Fig. 4e, f). Treatment with WM-1119 three times per day led to a significant reduction in tumour burden and spleen weight, but was not as effective as treatment four times per day (Fig. 4d, f). WM-1119 was well-tolerated; mice showed no generalized ill effects and weight loss was not observed (Extended Data Fig. 10). WM-1119 treatment had no effect on haematocrit, erythrocytes or platelet numbers, but there was overall leukopenia (Extended Data Fig. 10). The proportion and overall number of tumour cells was substantially reduced by WM-1119 treatment (four times per day; Fig. 4g). Analysis by intracellular flow cytometry demonstrated a reduction in H3K9ac in tumour cells (P = 0.03; Extended Data Fig. 10). These results demonstrate that WM-1119 is effective in treating lymphoma in vivo.
In summary, using high-throughput screening followed by medicinal chemistry optimization, in-cell assays, biochemical assessment of target engagement and tumour models in mice and fish, we have developed a novel class of inhibitors for a hitherto unexplored category of epigenetic regulators. These inhibitors engage the MYST family of lysine acetyltransferases in primary cells, specifically induce cell cycle exit and senescence, and are effective in preventing the progression of lymphoma in mice.
Reporting summary
Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.
Data availability
The RNA-seq data of MEFs treated with WM-8014, WM-2474 and DMSO, of MEFs from Kat6a−/− and wild-type embryos and of lymphoma cell line EMRK1184 treated with vehicle and WM-1119 have been submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE108244. The crystal structure data for the MYST domain in complex with WM-8014, acetyl-CoA and WM-1119 have been submitted to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession numbers 6BA2, 6BA4 and 6CT2, respectively. Source Data for all graphs are provided.
References
Lee, K. K. & Workman, J. L. Histone acetyltransferase complexes: one size doesn’t fit all. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 284–295 (2007).
Allis, C. D. et al. New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying enzymes. Cell 131, 633–636 (2007).
Voss, A. K. & Thomas, T. MYST family histone acetyltransferases take center stage in stem cells and development. BioEssays 31, 1050–1061 (2009).
Katsumoto, T. et al. MOZ is essential for maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Genes Dev. 20, 1321–1330 (2006).
Thomas, T. et al. Monocytic leukemia zinc finger protein is essential for the development of long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells. Genes Dev. 20, 1175–1186 (2006).
Sheikh, B. N. et al. MOZ (KAT6A) is essential for the maintenance of classically defined adult hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 128, 2307–2318 (2016).
Borrow, J. et al. The translocation t(8;16)(p11;p13) of acute myeloid leukaemia fuses a putative acetyltransferase to the CREB-binding protein. Nat. Genet. 14, 33–41 (1996).
Huang, F., Abmayr, S. M. & Workman, J. L. Regulation of KAT6 acetyltransferases and their roles in cell cycle progression, stem cell maintenance, and human disease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 1900–1907 (2016).
Sheikh, B. N. et al. MOZ (MYST3, KAT6A) inhibits senescence via the INK4A–ARF pathway. Oncogene 34, 5807–5820 (2015).
Perez-Campo, F. M. et al. MOZ-mediated repression of p16 INK4a is critical for the self-renewal of neural and hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 32, 1591–1601 (2014).
Sheikh, B. N. et al. MOZ regulates B-cell progenitors and, consequently, Moz haploinsufficiency dramatically retards MYC-induced lymphoma development. Blood 125, 1910–1921 (2015).
Falk, H. et al. An efficient high-throughput screening method for MYST family acetyltransferases, a new class of epigenetic drug targets. J. Biomol. Screen. 16, 1196–1205 (2011).
Holbert, M. A. et al. The human monocytic leukemia zinc finger histone acetyltransferase domain contains DNA-binding activity implicated in chromatin targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 36603–36613 (2007).
Sakaue-Sawano, A. et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132, 487–498 (2008).
Yan, Z. et al. Cdc6 is regulated by E2F and is essential for DNA replication in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3603–3608 (1998).
Kueh, A. J., Dixon, M. P., Voss, A. K. & Thomas, T. HBO1 is required for H3K14 acetylation and normal transcriptional activity during embryonic development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 845–860 (2011).
Voss, A. K., Collin, C., Dixon, M. P. & Thomas, T. Moz and retinoic acid coordinately regulate H3K9 acetylation, Hox gene expression, and segment identity. Dev. Cell 17, 674–686 (2009).
Voss, A. K. et al. MOZ regulates the Tbx1 locus, and Moz mutation partially phenocopies DiGeorge syndrome. Dev. Cell 23, 652–663 (2012).
Chew, T. W. et al. Crosstalk of Ras and Rho: activation of RhoA abates Kras-induced liver tumorigenesis in transgenic zebrafish models. Oncogene 33, 2717–2727 (2014).
Adams, J. M. et al. The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice. Nature 318, 533–538 (1985).
Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein–ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 8, 127–134 (1995).
Yuan, H. et al. MYST protein acetyltransferase activity requires active site lysine autoacetylation. EMBO J. 31, 58–70 (2012).
Chang, H. Y. et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol. 2, e7 (2004).
Kong, L. J., Chang, J. T., Bild, A. H. & Nevins, J. R. Compensation and specificity of function within the E2F family. Oncogene 26, 321–327 (2007).
Tang, X., Milyavsky, M., Goldfinger, N. & Rotter, V. Amyloid-β precursor-like protein APLP1 is a novel p53 transcriptional target gene that augments neuroblastoma cell death upon genotoxic stress. Oncogene 26, 7302–7312 (2007).
Lujambio, A. et al. Non-cell-autonomous tumor suppression by p53. Cell 153, 449–460 (2013).
Huang, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457–D462 (2016).
Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S. W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997).
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Dabrowski, C. D’Alessandro, WEHI Bioservices, the WEHI FACS laboratory, the MX2 beamline staff at the Australian Synchrotron for their expert help and Z. Gong for the two transgenic zebrafish lines. This work was funded by the Australian Government through NHMRC project grants 1030704, 1080146, Research Fellowships (T.T., A.K.V., G.K.S., J.K.H., M.W.P. and J.B.), the NHMRC IRIISS and the Cancer Therapeutics Cooperative Research Centre. The Victorian State Government OIS Grants to WEHI, Monash and St Vincent’s Institute are gratefully acknowledged.
Reviewer information
Nature thanks P. Adams, R. Marmorstein and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.T. was responsible for initiating the project. T.T. and A.K.V. supervised the project, performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. Medicinal chemistry: supervised by J.B.B., team: D.J.L., N.N., B.C. and H.R.L. Structural biology: S.J.H., M.C.C., B.R., T.S.P. and M.W.P. Chemical screening, protein biochemistry and assays: M.d.S., J.B., P.P., M.H., O.D., M.L.D., H.F., I.P.S. and B.J.M. Pharmacology: S.A.C. and K.L.W. Bioinformatics: G.P., A.L.G. and G.K.S. Cell-based assays, molecular biology and biochemistry: N.L.D., J.W., H.M.M., Y.Y., H.K.V., M.I.B., R.E.M., B.K.D., B.W., N.Z., S.W., B.N.S. and B.J.A. Zebrafish model: S.M., K.J.M., A.J.S., K.D. and J.K.H. Mouse cancer models: G.L.K., M.S.B., J.R., A.N., E.D.H., R.W.J., N.D.H. and A.S.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Binding characteristics of the MYST domain–WM-8014 protein–ligand interaction and comparison of MYST family histone acetyltransferase domains.
a, SPR binding data for the interaction of WM-8014 with immobilized KAT6A and KAT7 MYST domains. Injected concentrations of WM-8014 are indicated. Binding responses (data; black sensorgrams) are overlaid, fitted curves of a 1:1 kinetic interaction model that included mass transport component (coloured lines), as well as derived kinetic rate constants (ka, kd) and equilibrium dissociation (KD) constant. One of at least two experiments is shown. b, WM-8014 bound to MYSTCryst, with the WM-8014 OMIT electron density map contoured to 3σ shown in green. c, Acetyl-CoA bound to MYSTCryst, with the acetyl-CoA OMIT map contoured to 3σ shown in green. d, Ribbon diagram showing WM-8014 and acetyl-CoA superimposed. e, Protein–ligand interactions (LIGPLOT)21 between WM-8014 and amino acids within the acetyl-CoA-binding pocket of the MYST domain. The amino acids that differ between MYST family members are indicated. Data collection and refinement statistics of the WM-8014 and acetyl-CoA co-crystal structures can be found in Supplementary Table 4. The overall structure of WM-8014 bound to MYSTCryst is nearly identical to the MYSTCryst–acetyl-CoA complex. The pantothenate arm of acetyl-CoA adopts an identical position to published MYST HAT domain structures; as observed previously, there are differing positions for the 3′-phosphate ADP13. Autoacetylation of K604 was observed, as expected22. Gol denotes glycerol. f, Comparison of the conserved MYST domain between MYST family proteins. MYSTCryst is a MYST domain modified to improve solubility and used in crystallization studies. Numbering as in KAT6A sequence, NP_006757.2; amino acids interacting with WM-8014 (depicted in the LIGPLOT) are shown in red.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Time course of MEF growth inhibition upon treatment with WM-8014, and requirement for INK4A/ARF and p53 for WM-8014-induced cell cycle arrest.
a, MEF proliferation after treatment with three high concentrations of WM-8014. MEFs were treated either continuously for 15 days, or treatment was discontinued after 1, 2, 4 or 8 days to determine whether cells could re-enter the cell cycle. b, Phase-contrast images of MEFs after 15 days of treatment with 10 µM WM-8014 or 10 µM WM-2474. Note cells with senescence morphology; that is, large nuclei indicating endoreplication without cell division and extensive cytoplasm (WM-8014 panel). c, Flow-cytometry gating strategy for the cell cycle analysis using incorporation of the nucleotide analogue BrdU to mark cells in S phase and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) to determine 2N (G0/G1) and 4N (G2/M) DNA content. d, Flow-cytometry gating strategy for the cell cycle analysis of transgenic Fucci cells that express Azami Green in mid-S phase, G2 and M, Kusabira Orange in mid–late G1, are double-positive yellow in early S phase and double-negative in early G1. e, Cell cycle analysis of Cdkn2a null (Ink4a−/−Arf−/−) and littermate control cells after treatment for 8 days with WM-8014, vehicle and the inactive compound WM-2474. MEFs were exposed to BrdU for 1 h before flow-cytometry analysis of BrdU incorporation during DNA synthesis (S phase) and DNA content of 2N (G0/G1) compared with 4N (G2/M) using 7-AAD. f, Senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity in Cdkn2a−/− and control MEFs after treatment for 15 days with 10 μM WM-8014, 10 µM WM-2474 or DMSO vehicle control. g, Cell cycle analysis of Trp53 null MEFs (Trp53−/−) and littermate control cells after treatment with WM-8014, vehicle and inactive compound WM-2474, as in c. n = 3 MEF isolates per genotype (a–e). Data are mean ± s.e.m., and were analysed by two-way ANOVA within duration of treatment with concentration and days of culture as the independent factors (a), or by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (e–g).
Extended Data Fig. 3 The effect of WM-8014 on cell proliferation is mediated through the cell cycle regulators p16INK4A and p19ARF.
a, RT–qPCR analysis of expression levels of cell cycle regulators Ink4a and Arf (alternative splice products of the Cdkn2a locus), Ink4b (also known as Cdkn2b) and Cdkn1a (encoding p21WAF1/CIP1) mRNA in MEFs treated for 4 days and 10 days with 10 µM WM-8014 or 10 µM control WM-2474. b, Dose–response plots of WM-8014 induction of Ink4a mRNA expression in MEFs. c, RT–qPCR analysis of expression changes in the KAT6A target gene detected by RNA-seq. MEFs were treated for 4 days and 10 days with 10 µM WM-8014, 10 µM control WM-2474 or DMSO. d, Dose–response plots of WM-8014-dependent reduction in E2f2 and Cdc6 mRNA levels in MEFs. e, Levels of mRNA coding for MYST-family proteins after treatment of MEFs for 4 days or 10 days with WM-8014, vehicle or the inactive compound WM-2474. n = 3 MEF isolates treated with WM-8014, WM-2474 or vehicle (a–e). Data are mean ± s.e.m. and are analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (a–c, e) and by regression analysis (d). mRNA levels normalized to housekeeping genes (HK) were regressed on the log(concentration) of WM-8014 (d).
Extended Data Fig. 4 WM-8014 causes cell cycle exit and senescence in MEFs, but not DNA damage or cell death.
a, Assessment of DNA damage using flow cytometry to detect γH2A.X. Top, exposure of MEFs to ultraviolet light (positive control). Bottom, experimental samples. Quantification is displayed in the bar graph. b, Flow-cytometry gating strategy for cell death analysis and representative experimental samples. Negative and positive controls (untreated and ultraviolet-light-irradiated cells, respectively) are shown in the left panels. Annexin V marks phosphatidylserine externalization on cells undergoing apoptosis, propidium iodine (PI) uptake marks cells undergoing other forms of cell death, annexin V/PI double-positive staining marks cells in late-stage apoptosis. n = 3 cultures (a, b). Data are mean ± s.e.m. and were analysed by one-way ANOVA with treatment as the independent factor.
Extended Data Fig. 5 WM-8014 treatment induces a gene signature of cellular senescence.
a, Multidimensional scaling plot (log2 fold changes) showing clustering of MEF expression profiles after treatment with WM-8014 or control WM-2474. MEFs were isolated from 3 different embryos, numbered 5, 6 and 7 and treated for 4 days (96 h, red) or 10 days (240 h, green). b, Scatter plot showing gene-wise t-statistics for differentially expressed (DE) genes (FDR < 0.05) between the compounds at day 4 and day 10. Most genes were equally affected by 4 days or 10 days of treatment (green). Genes differentially expressed at day 10 only are highlighted blue, those differentially expressed at day 4 only are highlighted red. c, Mean-difference plot of treatment, log2 fold changes versus average log2 expression. Treatment effects at 4 days and 10 days have been averaged. Differentially expressed genes are highlighted in red or blue as indicated (FDR < 0.05). d, Number of differentially expressed genes for MEFs treated with WM-8014 versus WM-2474 (FDR < 0.05). e, Mean-difference plot of treatment log2 fold changes versus average log2 expression comparing WM-2474 to vehicle DMSO. The four differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05) are marked in red. f, Mean-difference plot of log2 fold changes versus average log2 expression comparing Kat6a−/− MEFs with Kat6a+/+ control MEFs. Differentially expressed genes are highlighted in red or blue as indicated (FDR < 0.05). g, Genes typical of cycling cells23 and E2F3 target genes24 are downregulated in MEFs treated with WM-8014 versus WM-2474 (combined day 4 and day 10 treatment; ROAST gene set tests, P = 0.0001). h, Genes downregulated during p53-induced cellular senescence25 were downregulated in MEFs treated with WM-8014 versus WM-2474 (combined day 4 and day 10 treatment; ROAST P = 0.0001). Differentially expressed genes in cellular senescence26 are strongly correlated with differentially expressed genes in MEFs treated with WM-8014 versus WM-2474 (ROAST P = 0.0039). i, DAVID27 was used to test for functional enrichment in genes downregulated after treatment with WM-8014 versus WM-2474, with FDR < 0.05. Cell cycle regulation was the top enriched pathway (FDR = 1.58 × 10−16), with 85% of the genes downregulated after 10 days of treatment with WM-8014. Schematic drawing is based on mmu04110: cell cycle28. Downregulated genes are shaded blue; unchanged, green; upregulated genes (Ink4a, Arf, Ink4b and p21) are shaded red. Data were collected from n = 3 MEFs isolates from 3 different embryos per treatment group, WM-8014 or WM-2474 treatment, for 96 h or 240 h.
Extended Data Fig. 6 WM-8014 potentiates oncogene-induced senescence.
a, Growth curves of MEFs expressing empty vector control (pBABE) or oncogenic29 HRASG12V treated with increasing concentrations of WM-8014 as indicated or DMSO vehicle control. All experiments were performed in 3% O2. b, The effects of WM-8014 treatment in a zebrafish model of hepatocellular carcinoma19. Doxycycline-inducible, liver-specific expression of a GFP-krasG12V transgene leads to the accumulation of a constitutively active, GFP-tagged form of KRAS in hepatocytes. TO-krasG12V transgenic embryos were treated with doxycycline at 2 days post fertilization (dpf) and 5 dpf to initiate KRASG12V-driven hepatocyte proliferation. The size of the liver was measured by two-photon microscopy. Representative three-dimensional reconstructions of whole livers from image stacks after treatment of transgenic zebrafish Tg(TO-krasG12V) expressing KRASGV12 and GFP (green) in the liver or transgenic zebrafish Tg(lfabp10:RFP;elaA:eGFP) expressing only RFP (red). c, Quantification of liver volume. d, Incorporation of the nucleotide analogue 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) after treatment of transgenic zebrafish expressing KRASG12V or control zebrafish with WM-8014 or control compound WM-2474. e, RT–qPCR determination of Cdkn2a (Ink4a) and Cdkn1a (encoding p21WAF1/CIP1) mRNA levels in transgenic zebrafish Tg(TO-krasG12V) treated as described in b. n = 6 independent cultures (a), 20 zebrafish (b, c), 10–12 zebrafish (d) and 4–5 zebrafish (e). Data are mean ± s.e.m. and were analysed by two-way ANOVA (a) or one-way ANOVA (d, e) followed by Bonferroni post hoc test with treatment and with or without treatment duration as the independent factors or by linear regression analysis regressing liver volume on WM-8014 concentration (c).
Extended Data Fig. 7 Medicinal chemistry optimization of WM-8014, designed to reduce plasma-protein binding, resulted in compound WM-1119.
a, SPR binding data for the interaction of WM-1119 with immobilized KAT6A, KAT7 and KAT5, compared with the interaction of WM-8014. b, Crystal structure of WM-1119 bound to the MYST lysine acetyltransferase domain (MYSTCryst). Ribbon diagram of MYSTCryst (blue) showing WM-1119 (yellow, with element colouring) bound to the acetyl-CoA-binding site. Data collection and refinement statistics of the WM-1119 co-crystal structures (2.13 Å resolution) are listed in Supplementary Table 5. PDB: 6CT2. c, Space-filling model showing WM-1119 in the acetyl-CoA-binding pocket of MYSTCryst. d, WM-1119 bound to MYSTCryst with the OMIT electron density map contoured to 3σ shown in green. e, Ribbon diagram of MYSTCryst showing key amino acids interacting with WM-1119, in stick fashion with element colouring. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. f, Schematic diagram of protein–ligand interactions (LIGPLOT)21 showing interactions between the compound WM-1119 and amino acids within the acetyl-CoA-binding pocket of the MYST domain derived from the crystal structure.
Extended Data Fig. 8 WM-1119 causes retention of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle.
a, WM-1119 causes cell cycle arrest in MEFs grown in 3% O2. Epifluorescence phase contrast images of Fucci MEFs after 8 days of treatment with 10 µM WM-1119 compared to 10 µM control WM-2474-treated cells. b, WM-1119 was tested at concentrations from 1 to 10 µM, compared to DMSO or 10 µM inactive compound WM-2474. The cell number under each condition was assessed at passage. c, Flow-cytometry analysis of Azami Green (mAG1; mid-S, G2, M), Kusabira Orange (mKO2; mid–late G1), double-positive yellow (early S) and double-negative (DN, early G1). Dot plots are shown for DMSO and 10 µM WM-2474 control treatment groups, and after treatment with 1 µM and 2.5 µM active compound WM1119. d, Percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle, quantified for all treatment groups. A higher proportion of WM-1119-treated cells is in mid–late G1. n = 3 independent MEF isolates. Data are mean ± s.e.m. and were analysed by two-way ANOVA (b) or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (d) with treatment and with or without time as the independent factors.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Characterization of WM-1119 and lymphoma cell line EMRK1184.
a, Pharmacokinetic parameters for WM-1119 in mice following intraperitoneal injection. Note that the plasma concentration falls below 1 μM after 4 h. Data of n = 2 mice are shown. b, Characterization of the Eµ-Myc lymphoma cell line EMRK1184. Left, Western blot of p53 and p19ARF. The negative control cell line EMRK1263 lacks the ARF (p19ARF) band. Upregulation of p53 protein levels in positive control cell line EMRK1172 indicates non-functional p53 (commonly mutations in the DNA-binding domain). Right, EMRK1184 cells were sensitive to nutlin-3a-induced cell death, indicating intact p53. By contrast, EMRK1172 cells are insensitive to nutlin-3a. p53 exon sequencing of EMRK1184 using the MiSeq system (Illumina) confirmed wild-type p53 exon sequences. c, Multidimensional scaling plot showing two-dimensional clustering of the EMRK1184 lymphoma cell culture expression profiles. EMRK1184 lymphoma cells were treated for either 3 days or 6 days, in triplicate, with WM-1119 or vehicle before RNA-seq. Distances on the plot corresponding to leading log2 fold change between gene expression profiles. d, Mean-difference plot of treatment log2 fold changes versus average log2 expression for gene expression changes in the EMRK1184 lymphoma cell line after treatment for 3 days and 6 days with WM-1119 or DMSO vehicle control. Differentially expressed genes are highlighted (FDR < 0.05). e, mRNA levels assessed by RNA-seq of EMRK1184 cells treated with WM-1119 or vehicle. mRNA levels for Cdkn2a (coding for p16INK4A/p19ARF), Cdkn2b and Cdkn1a are shown. f, Western blot and densitometry analysis showing p16INK4A and p19ARF protein in EMRK1184 treated with WM-1119 or vehicle for 3 days. Each lane represents one independent culture, a total of 6 lanes (= 6 cultures) are shown. Data are mean ± confidence interval (a) or ± s.e.m. (e, f). Data in b were derived from three (EMRK1172) and two (EMRK1184) independent cell culture experiments, reflected by the individual data points. Data in c–e were derived from three independent cultures per treatment group and analysed as described under RNA-seq in the Supplementary Methods. Data in f were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test.
Extended Data Fig. 10 WM-1119 is effective in inhibiting tumour progression.
a, Tumour development monitored by luciferase activity and bioluminescence imaging. Lateral images of mice treated four times per day with either vehicle or WM-1119 between day 7 and day 14 after injection with tumour cells. Baseline tumour burden is shown at higher sensitivity setting for day 3 (before treatment) in Fig. 4. Here, images at days 7, 10, 12 and 14 after tumour cell transplant are shown on the same, less-sensitive scale. Mice are imaged in the same order. Red boxes indicate the area used for quantification. b, Mouse body weights are not affected by treatment three or four times per day. c, Concentration of WM-1119 in peripheral blood and spleen 6 h after the final injection (four times per day; n = 6 mice per treatment group). d, Flow-cytometry analysis of total spleen cells from vehicle- or WM-1119-treated groups (four times per day; analysis of spleens assayed in a to identify tumour cells independently of luciferase expression). The lymphoma cell line EMRK1184 has a cell surface phenotype of CD19+IgM−IgD−. Flow cytometry was used to quantify the CD19+IgD− population; this can be distinguished from normal splenic B cell populations, which are CD19+IgD+. e, Intracellular flow-cytometry analysis of H3K9ac in tumour cells. Left, the histogram shows H3K9ac levels in the remaining tumour cells (CD19+IgM−) in spleens of the WM-1119-treated mice (red profile) compared to the vehicle-treated mice (blue profile). The shift in the red (WM-1119-treated) profile compared to the blue (vehicle-treated) profile indicates a reduction in signal. Right, the median fluorescence intensity (mean ± s.e.m) is shown in the bar graph. f, Peripheral blood analysis of vehicle- or WM-1119-treated mice. The cohort of mice that was treated three times per day is compared to the cohort that was treated four times per day. Images representative of n = 9 mice per treatment group in the four-times-per-day treatment regime (a). n = 3 mice per treatment group (b, d–f) and n = 6 mice per treatment group in (c). Data are mean ± s.e.m. and were analysed by one-way ANOVA with treatment as the independent factor followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (b), or two sided t-test (c, d, f) or one-sided t-test (e).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains full images of all uncropped western blot gels.
Supplementary Information
This file contains supplementary methods; which includes supplementary tables 1-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baell, J.B., Leaver, D.J., Hermans, S.J. et al. Inhibitors of histone acetyltransferases KAT6A/B induce senescence and arrest tumour growth. Nature 560, 253–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0387-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0387-5
This article is cited by
-
KIT mutations and expression: current knowledge and new insights for overcoming IM resistance in GIST
Cell Communication and Signaling (2024)
-
A deep learning model of tumor cell architecture elucidates response and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors
Nature Cancer (2024)
-
METTL3 promotes cellular senescence of colorectal cancer via modulation of CDKN2B transcription and mRNA stability
Oncogene (2024)
-
Expression profiles and functional prediction of histone acetyltransferases of the MYST family in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma
BMC Cancer (2023)
-
Metabolic regulation of epigenetic drug resistance
Nature Chemical Biology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.