Abstract
Yemen is currently experiencing, to our knowledge, the largest cholera epidemic in recent history. The first cases were declared in September 2016, and over 1.1 million cases and 2,300 deaths have since been reported1. Here we investigate the phylogenetic relationships, pathogenesis and determinants of antimicrobial resistance by sequencing the genomes of Vibrio cholerae isolates from the epidemic in Yemen and recent isolates from neighbouring regions. These 116 genomic sequences were placed within the phylogenetic context of a global collection of 1,087 isolates of the seventh pandemic V. cholerae serogroups O1 and O139 biotype El Tor2,3,4. We show that the isolates from Yemen that were collected during the two epidemiological waves of the epidemic1—the first between 28 September 2016 and 23 April 2017 (25,839 suspected cases) and the second beginning on 24 April 2017 (more than 1 million suspected cases)—are V. cholerae serotype Ogawa isolates from a single sublineage of the seventh pandemic V. cholerae O1 El Tor (7PET) lineage. Using genomic approaches, we link the epidemic in Yemen to global radiations of pandemic V. cholerae and show that this sublineage originated from South Asia and that it caused outbreaks in East Africa before appearing in Yemen. Furthermore, we show that the isolates from Yemen are susceptible to several antibiotics that are commonly used to treat cholera and to polymyxin B, resistance to which is used as a marker of the El Tor biotype.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
We investigated the bacterial populations that caused the cholera epidemic in Yemen by sequencing 42 V. cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa isolates that were recovered during this epidemic. Thirty-nine of these isolates were collected from patients with cholera who lived in three different governorates of Yemen (Fig. 1a, b). They span both waves of the epidemic, having been collected between 5 October 2016 and 31 August 2017. The three remaining isolates were collected from patients from a temporary refugee centre on the Saudi Arabia–Yemen border on 30 August 2017 (Fig. 1b). We also sequenced 74 7PET isolates from South Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern and Central Africa (Extended Data Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). We placed these new isolates in the context of a global collection of 1,087 7PET genomic sequences2,3,4 (Supplementary Table 1) and constructed a maximum-likelihood phylogeny of 1,203 genomes, using 9,986 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) that were evenly distributed across the non-repetitive, non-recombinant core genome (Fig. 2a).
We also detected a strong temporal signal, making it possible to estimate time-scaled phylogenies (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Figs. 2–4), which showed that the epidemic in Yemen originated from a recently emerged 7PET wave 3 clade5, which contains the cholera toxin subunit B gene variant ctxB7 (Fig. 2). All of the isolates from Yemen clustered together (median pairwise SNV difference of 3 (range, 0–13)), confirming that the two epidemiological waves that were observed during the epidemic in Yemen, which had very different clinical attack rates1, were produced by a single clone rather than arising from two separate introductions. We estimated the date of the most recent common ancestor of the isolates from Yemen to January 2016 (95% Bayesian credible interval, September 2015 to June 2016) (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Fig. 3 and Extended Data Table 1). Our phylogenetic analysis shows that the isolates from Yemen are different from those that have been circulating in the Middle East over the last decade, such as those isolated in Iraq in 2007 and 2015, and in Iran from 2012 to 2015 (Fig. 2a). These isolates from the Middle East also belong to 7PET wave 3, but are attributed to different sublineages on the phylogenetic tree and were imported from South Asia on two separate occasions. The isolates from Yemen are most closely related to isolates that were collected from outbreaks in Eastern Africa (Kenya, Tanzania3 and Uganda4) from 2015 to 2016 (Fig. 2). Collectively, these isolates belong to a new sublineage (T13), which corresponds to the most recent, newly identified introduction of 7PET into East Africa. All of these T13 isolates are different from those previously recovered in West or East Africa (sublineages T12 and T10, respectively) (Fig. 2). Our data suggest that this 7PET wave 3 clade, which contains all isolates with the ctxB7 allele, first emerged in South Asia in the early 2000s (Fig. 2b), consistent with the first detection of ctxB7 isolates in Kolkata, India in 20066. This ctxB7 clade has been exported to areas outside Asia on at least three separate occasions: West Africa (T12 introduction event)2 in 2008 (estimates with 95% credible interval), Haiti in 20107,8 and East Africa (T13 introduction event)4 between 2013 and 2014 (estimates with 95% credible interval) (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Fig. 3 and Extended Data Table 1).
In addition to the ctxB7 allele, all of the analysed isolates from Yemen had the following genomic features (Table 1): (1) the toxin-coregulated pilus gene subunit A gene variant tcpACIRS101; (2) a deletion (ΔVC0495–VC0512) within Vibrio seventh pandemic island II (VSP-II); and (3) an SXT/R391-integrating conjugating element (ICE) called ICEVchInd5/ICEVchBan5, which is associated with multiple-drug resistance.
Consistent with the genomic evidence, all of the isolates from Yemen have a similar narrow phenotype of antimicrobial drug resistance to nalidixic acid, the vibriostatic agent O/129 and nitrofurantoin (Table 1). Mutations in the DNA gyrase gene gyrA that resulted in an S83I amino acid substitution and mutations in the topoisomerase IV gene parC that resulted in an S85L substitution explain the resistance of the isolates from Yemen to nalidixic acid and their decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. An approximately 10-kb deletion in ICE variable region III resulted in the loss of four genes that encode resistance to streptomycin (strA and strB), chloramphenicol (floR) and sulfonamides (sul2). The fifth gene of this region, which encodes resistance to the vibriostatic agent O/129 (dfrA1), is present in the isolates from Yemen. This deletion is not unique, as similar deletions that encompass the strA, strB, floR and sul2 genes, flanked by transposase genes, have independently arisen several times in 7PET wave 3 isolates2,9. The resistance of V. cholerae to nitrofurans is due to the loss of expression of a reductase enzyme that converts the drug into its active form10. By combining phenotypic and genotypic data, we found lesions in the VC0715 and VCA0637 genes of nitrofuran-resistant isolates (Extended Data Table 2). VC0715 and VCA0637 encode orthologues of the NfsA (52% amino acid identity) and NfsB (58% amino acid identity) proteins of Escherichia coli K12 (GenBank accession number NC_000913), respectively. In E. coli, disruption of the nitroreductases that are encoded by these genes confers nitrofuran resistance11. In all 7PET wave 3 isolates, including the isolates from Yemen, the observed mutations in VC0715 led to a R169C amino acid substitution and the mutation in VCA0637 introduced a premature stop codon (Q5Stop) that probably abolishes protein function.
The isolates from Yemen were also susceptible to polymyxins. This is an important finding, because resistance to polymyxin B has been used as a marker of the V. cholerae O1 El Tor biotype since the beginning of the seventh cholera pandemic in 196112,13. Unlike the El Tor biotype, the classical biotype (responsible for the six previous pandemics)14 is susceptible to polymyxin B. Polymyxin resistance is conferred by changes to the lipid A domain of the surface lipopolysaccharide, thereby altering its charge12,13. The vprA (VC1320) gene, disruption of which is known to restore susceptibility to polymyxin in 7PET isolates, is required for expression of the almEFG operon that encodes the genes that are required for the glycine modification of lipid A12. A specific non-synonymous SNV in vprA genes (predicted to result in a D89N substitution, Extended Data Fig. 5) was present in 97% (63 out of 65) of polymyxin B-susceptible isolates (Extended Data Table 2), including all of the isolates from Yemen. The first polymyxin-susceptible 7PET isolates with this VprA D89N substitution in our dataset were identified in South Asia in 2012 (Fig. 2b), consistent with microbiological data from Kolkata, India, where polymyxin B-susceptible V. cholerae O1 isolates emerged in 2012 and replaced polymyxin-resistant strains after 201415.
7PET isolates from the ctxB7 clade have been associated with the two largest cholera epidemics in recent history. In addition to the current Yemeni epidemic, the introduction of this sublineage into Haiti in 2010 in the wake of a devastating earthquake, resulted in one million cases and almost 10,000 deaths by 201716,17. These two major events highlight the threat that cholera continues to pose to public health in vulnerable populations. The UN (United Nations) estimates that 16 out of 29 million people in Yemen lack access to clean water and basic sanitation because of the destruction of public and health infrastructures during the years of civil conflict18. The complexity of the situation in Yemen before the epidemic was set against a backdrop of large acute watery diarrhoea or cholera outbreaks across the Horn of Africa (Extended Data Fig. 1), which serves as a major hub of migration into Yemen19,20. This region, which links Asia to Africa at the southern entrance of the Red Sea, has long been a crossroads of trade and communication routes. Several importations of 7PET cholera from Asia into the Horn of Africa are likely to have followed this route, such as T3 in 19702.
The available genomic data for the historical and current importations of the 7PET sublineage into Africa are not consistent with a local origin, but instead highlight the importance of human-mediated spread of the epidemic 7PET lineage from South Asia. An inability to obtain samples from countries in this region hampered our efforts to reconstruct the routes of transmission in East Africa before the appearance of this strain in Yemen more precisely.
In summary, a single recent 7PET sublineage with an unusual antimicrobial resistance phenotype is responsible for the cholera epidemic in Yemen. Our study illustrates the key role of genomic microbial surveillance and cross-border collaborations in understanding the global spread of cholera, the evolution of virulence and determinants of antibiotic resistance.
Methods
Data reporting
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
Bacterial isolates
The 116 7PET isolates sequenced in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1 and originated from the collections of the French National Reference Centre for Vibrios and Cholera, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France (n = 6); the Central Public Health Laboratory of Baghdad, Iraq (n = 11); the Ministry of Health of South Sudan (n = 14); the Pasteur Institute of Iran (n = 4); the Maharishi Valmiki Infectious Diseases Hospital, Delhi, India (n = 29); the Central Public Health Laboratory of Sana’a, Yemen (n = 39), Amref Health Africa, Kenya (n = 1), the Kenya Medical Research Institute (n = 9) and the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia (n = 3). The isolates were characterized by standard biochemical, culture and serotyping methods21.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disc diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar, in accordance with the guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology22. The following antimicrobial drugs (Bio-Rad) were tested: ampicillin, cefalotin, cefotaxime, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, azithromycin, sulfonamides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, vibriostatic agent O/129, tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E). E. coli CIP 76.24 (ATCC 25922) was used as a control. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin were determined by ETESTS (bioMérieux). The MICs of colistin and polymyxin B were determined with custom-produced Sensititre microtitre plates (ThermoFisher Scientific) and MIC test strips (Liofilchem), respectively, on 34 isolates chosen on the basis of resistance phenotype, year and country of isolation.
Total DNA extraction
Total DNA was extracted with the Wizard Genomic DNA Kit (Promega), the Maxwell 16-cell DNA purification kit (Promega) or the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Whole-genome sequencing
High-throughput genome sequencing was carried out at the genomics platform of Institut Pasteur (n = 107) or at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (n = 9) on Illumina platforms generating 92–295-bp paired-end reads, yielding a mean of 117-fold coverage (minimum 13.5-fold, maximum 639-fold). Short-read sequence data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena), under study accession numbers PRJEB24611 and ERP021285 and the genome accession numbers are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Genomic sequence analyses
The genomic sequences were processed and analysed as previously described2. In brief, for each sample, sequence reads were mapped against reference genome V. cholerae O1 El Tor N16961 (GenBank accession numbers LT907989 and LT907990) using SMALT version 0.7.4 (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/science/tools/smalt-0) to produce a BAM file. Variants were detected with samtools mpileup23 version 0.1.19 with parameters ‘-d 1000 –DsugBf’ and bcftools23 version 0.1.19 to produce a BCF file of all variant sites. The bcftools variant quality score had to be greater than 50 (quality > 50) and mapping quality greater than 30 (map quality > 30). The majority base call was required to be present in at least 75% of reads mapping to the base (ratio ≥ 0.75) and the minimum mapping depth required was four reads, at least two of which had to map to each strand (depth ≥ 4, depth strand ≥ 2). A pseudogenome for each sample was constructed by substituting the base call at each site (variant and non-variant) in the BCF file in the reference genome. While this paper was under review, another paper4 was published that included three genome sequences from Ugandan isolates that belonged to the T13 sublineage. These three genome sequences were available as contig files and were added to the alignment with Snippy version 4.1.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy), using the ‘–ctgs’ flag to call SNVs between the contigs and the reference genome. Short reads were assembled with SPAdes24 version 3.8.2 and annotated with Prokka25 version 1.5.
The code for the pipelines from the Sanger Institute used can be found here: https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/vr-codebase.
Phylogenetic analysis
Repetitive (insertion sequences and the TLC-RS1-CTX region) and recombinogenic (VSP-II) regions were masked from the alignment2. Putative recombinogenic regions were detected and masked with Gubbins26 version 1.4.10. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was built from an alignment of 9,986 chromosomal SNVs, with RAxML27 version 8.2.8 under the GTR model with 100 bootstraps.
BEAST28 version 1.10.1 was used to estimate time-resolved phylogenies for a spatially and temporally representative subset of 81 7PET isolates under the GTR nucleotide substitution model. We tested a combination of molecular clock and tree prior models to identify the best fit (Extended Data Table 1). Both path and stepping-stone sampling showed the best fit to be an uncorrelated relaxed clock (lognormal distribution of rates) model with a Bayesian skyline coalescent tree prior. Priors were kept at default values, with the exception of the ‘constant.popSize’ value, which was set to a lognormal distribution (initial value = 1, mu = 1, sigma = 10) under the constant population coalescence tree prior. The choice of model had little influence on the dating of key nodes in this analysis (Extended Data Table 1). For each model, we ran three independent Markov chain Monte Carlo chains over 50 million steps, sampling every 2,000 steps. We used a burn-in of 5 million steps for each chain and then combined chains, resampling every 10,000 steps. The effective sample size for all estimated parameters was greater than 200. We tested for an adequate temporal signal, using TempEst29 version 1.5, by calculating the linear regression between the root-to-tip distance and isolation date for each sample. We also performed 20 date-randomization tests with the R package TipDatingBeast30 to assess the mean rate under the uncorrelated lognormal relaxed molecular clock (ucld.mean parameter).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The whole-genome alignment for the 1,203 genomes and other files that support the findings of this study have been deposited in FigShare: https://figshare.com/s/b70a9efac9cf2625480e. Short-read sequence data were submitted to the ENA, under study accession numbers PRJEB24611 and ERP021285 and the genome accession numbers are provided in Supplementary Table 1. Phylogeny and metadata can be viewed interactively at https://microreact.org/project/globalcholera.
Change history
12 February 2019
In the HTML version of this Letter, the affiliations for authors Andrew S. Azman, Dhirendra Kumar and Thandavarayan Ramamurthy were inverted (the PDF and print versions of the Letter were correct); the affiliations have been corrected online.
References
Camacho, A. et al. Cholera epidemic in Yemen, 2016–18: an analysis of surveillance data. Lancet Glob. Health 6, e680–e690 (2018).
Weill, F. X. et al. Genomic history of the seventh pandemic of cholera in Africa. Science 358, 785–789 (2017).
Kachwamba, Y. et al. Genetic characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 isolates from outbreaks between 2011 and 2015 in Tanzania. BMC Infect. Dis. 17, 157 (2017).
Bwire, G. et al. Molecular characterization of Vibrio cholerae responsible for cholera epidemics in Uganda by PCR, MLVA and WGS. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, e0006492 (2018).
Mutreja, A. et al. Evidence for several waves of global transmission in the seventh cholera pandemic. Nature 477, 462–465 (2011).
Naha, A. et al. Development and evaluation of a PCR assay for tracking the emergence and dissemination of Haitian variant ctxB in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains isolated from Kolkata, India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 1733–1736 (2012).
Chin, C. S. et al. The origin of the Haitian cholera outbreak strain. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 33–42 (2011).
Domman, D. et al. Integrated view of Vibrio cholerae in the Americas. Science 358, 789–793 (2017).
Katz, L. S. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of Vibrio cholerae O1 following a single-source introduction to Haiti. mBio 4, e00398-13 (2013).
Ghosh Dastidar, P., Sinha, A. M., Ghosh, S. & Chatterjee, G. C. Biochemical mechanism of nitrofurantoin resistance in Vibrio el tor. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 24, 487–494 (1979).
Sandegren, L., Lindqvist, A., Kahlmeter, G. & Andersson, D. I. Nitrofurantoin resistance mechanism and fitness cost in Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62, 495–503 (2008).
Herrera, C. M. et al. The Vibrio cholerae VprA–VprB two-component system controls virulence through endotoxin modification. mBio 5, e02283-14 (2014).
Matson, J. S., Livny, J. & DiRita, V. J. A putative Vibrio cholerae two-component system controls a conserved periplasmic protein in response to the antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B. PLoS ONE 12, e0186199 (2017).
Devault, A. M. et al. Second-pandemic strain of Vibrio cholerae from the Philadelphia cholera outbreak of 1849. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 334–340 (2014).
Samanta, P., Ghosh, P., Chowdhury, G., Ramamurthy, T. & Mukhopadhyay, A. K. Sensitivity to polymyxin B in El Tor Vibrio cholerae O1 strain, Kolkata, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21, 2100–2102 (2015).
Hasan, N. A. et al. Genomic diversity of 2010 Haitian cholera outbreak strains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2010–E2017 (2012).
Zarocostas, J. Cholera outbreak in Haiti-from 2010 to today. Lancet 389, 2274–2275 (2017).
UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Humanitarian needs overview, Yemen. http://www.unocha.org/sites/unocha/files/dms/yemen_humanitarian_needs_overview_hno_2018_20171204.pdf (2017).
International Organization for Migration. Irregular migration in Horn of Africa increases in 2015. https://www.iom.int/news/irregular-migration-horn-africa-increases-2015 (2016).
Danish Refugee Council. Mixed migration in the Horn of Africa & Yemen region. RMMS https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/RMMS%20Mixed%20Migration%20Monthly%20Summary%20September%202016_0.pdf (2016).
Dodin, A. & Fournier, J. M. Laboratory Methods for the Diagnosis of Cholera Vibrio and Other Vibrios 59–82 (Institut Pasteur Paris, Paris 1992).
CA-SFM & EUCAST. Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie Recommandations 2017. http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/UserFiles/files/casfm/CASFMV1_0_MARS_2017.pdf (2017).
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Croucher, N. J. et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e15 (2015).
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973 (2012).
Rambaut, A., Lam, T. T., Max Carvalho, L. & Pybus, O. G. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol. 2, vew007 (2016).
Rieux, A. & Khatchikian, C. E. tipdatingbeast: an R package to assist the implementation of phylogenetic tip-dating tests using beast. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, 608–613 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Institut Pasteur, Santé publique France, the French government’s Investissement d’Avenir programme, Laboratoire d’Excellence ‘Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases’ (grant number ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID), the Wellcome Trust through grant 098051 to the Sanger Institute and the Department of Biotechnology of India. The Institut Pasteur Genomics Platform is a member of the France Génomique consortium (ANR10-INBS-09-08). We thank D. Legros, A. Fadaq, A. Alsomine, F. Bazel and H. A. Jokhdar for their support; M. Musoke and S. Vernadat for technical assistance; Z. M. Eisa for providing isolates; L. Ma, C. Fund, S. Sjunnebo and the sequencing teams at the Institut Pasteur and Wellcome Sanger Institute for sequencing the samples. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Reviewer information
Nature thanks J. Mekalanos, C. Stine, M. Waldor and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.-X.W. and M.-L.Q. designed the study. A.A.A., M.N., S.S.N., A.R., A.M.A., N.C.S., S.K., M.R.P., A.A., J.Y.C., J.F.W., C.S., B.B., H.H.N.A., D.K., S.M.N., M.R.M., J.K., F.J.L., A.S.A., T.R. and M.-L.Q. collected, selected and provided characterized isolates and their corresponding epidemiological information. J.R. performed the DNA extractions and phenotypic and molecular typing experiments. T.M. analysed protein data. C.B. performed the whole-genome sequencing. F.-X.W., D.D. and E.N. analysed the genomic sequencing data. F.-X.W. and D.D. wrote the manuscript, with major contributions from N.R.T. All authors contributed to the editing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Geographic location of the sequenced V. cholerae O1 El Tor isolates and number of reported cholera cases.
a, Geographic location of the 116 V. cholerae O1 El Tor isolates sequenced. The number of isolates collected per country is indicated. The three isolates collected in Jizan, Saudi Arabia (denoted by an asterisk) were from Yemeni refugees originating from Hajjah District. The map is a cropped version of the one available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMap-World.png. b, Number of cholera cases per country reported to the WHO (World Health Organisation) between 2014 and 2016. The total number of cholera cases reported to the WHO by the countries was 268,337. The maps were created using Paintmaps, a free online map generating tool (http://www.paintmaps.com/).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Assessment of the temporal signal within the dataset.
a, Linear regression of the root-to-tip distance against sampling time obtained with TempEst29 using a maximum-likelihood phylogeny of 81 representative seventh pandemic V. cholerae O1 isolates (that is, those used for the BEAST analysis). Bars on nodes indicate the precision of the isolation date (for example, if only the year of isolation is known, the bar spans the entire year). b, Comparison of the ucld.mean parameter estimated from 20 date-randomization BEAST experiments and the original dataset. The rate for the correctly dated tree is shown in red. The median and 95% Bayesian credible interval for the ucld.mean parameter are provided.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Timed phylogeny of the ctxB7 clade.
Maximum clade credibility tree produced with BEAST28 for a subset of 81 representative isolates of the distal part of the genomic wave 3 (that is, those with the ctxB7 allele). The nodes supported by posterior probability values ≥0.5 are indicated.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Visualization of the posterior distribution of trees from the BEAST Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis.
The opacity of the branches is scaled according to the number of times a clade is seen in the distribution. There is high support for the East Africa/Yemen clade. The uncertainty in the placement of the node for the Indian/East African isolates is the reason for the low posterior support value for this node in Extended Data Fig. 3.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Multiple sequence alignment of VprA (VC1320) with two-component response regulators.
A non-synonymous mutation at position 89 of VC1320 that resulted in a D-to-N amino acid change was associated with a phenotype of polymyxin B susceptibility.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table
This file contains Supplementary Table S1, which includes the details of Vibrio cholerae El Tor isolates and genomes used in this study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weill, FX., Domman, D., Njamkepo, E. et al. Genomic insights into the 2016–2017 cholera epidemic in Yemen. Nature 565, 230–233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0818-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0818-3
This article is cited by
-
Clinical surveillance systems obscure the true cholera infection burden in an endemic region
Nature Medicine (2024)
-
Spatiotemporal dynamics of cholera epidemics in Ethiopia: 2015–2021
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Genomic attributes of Vibrio cholerae O1 responsible for 2022 massive cholera outbreak in Bangladesh
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Understanding antimicrobial resistance to manage cholera
Nature Microbiology (2023)
-
Antibiotic perturbations to the gut microbiome
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.