Abstract
Land tenure security is increasingly recognized as a foundational element for advancing global sustainable development agendas, but questions remain about how it affects human well-being and environmental outcomes. We identify 117 studies that aimed to estimate the causal effect of land tenure security interventions on these outcomes. Approximately two-thirds of these studies reported positive links between improved tenure security and human well-being or environmental outcomes. Close to half of the studies that examined social and environmental outcomes reported positive impacts on both. The majority of studies assessed government-implemented interventions that statutorily recognized rights through land titling and formalization in the 1990s and 2000s. More research is needed to bolster the body of evidence on the effects of non-technical interventions (for example, capacity building and awareness raising) and the devolution of rights to inform future land policy efforts and accelerate sustainable development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data sets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available on reasonable request.
References
Safeguarding Land Tenure Rights in the Context of Agricultural Investment (FAO, 2015).
Deininger, K., Augustinus, C., Enemark, S. & Munro-Faure, P. Innovations in Land Rights Recognition, Administration, and Governance (World Bank, 2010).
Global Environment Outlook: GEO-6 Summary for Policymakers Report No. 978-1-108-70768-8 (UN Environment Programme, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Sunderlin, W. D., Hatcher, J. & Liddle, M. From Exclusion to Ownership? Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2008).
Home, R. ‘Culturally unsuited to property rights?’: colonial land laws and African societies. J. Law Soc. 40, 403–419 (2013).
Framework and Guidelines on Land Policy in Africa (UN Economic Commission for Africa, 2010).
Improving Access to Land and Tenure Security (IFAD, 2008); https://www.ifad.org/en/document-detail/asset/39500436
Securing land tenure and property rights for stability and prosperity. USAID https://www.usaid.gov/land-tenure (2017).
Deere, C. D. & Doss, C. R. The gender asset gap: what do we know and why does it matter? Fem. Econ. 12, 1–50 (2006).
Meinzen-Dick, R. et al. in Gender in Agriculture: Closing the Knowledge Gap (eds Quisumbing, A. R. et al.) Ch. 5 (FAO & Springer, 2014).
Rudel, T. K. & Hernandez, M. Land tenure transitions in the global south: trends, drivers, and policy implications. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 489–507 (2017).
Boone, C. Legal empowerment of the poor through property rights reform: tensions and trade-offs of land registration and titling in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Dev. Stud. 55, 384–400 (2019).
Chimhowu, A. The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm. Land Use Policy 81, 897–903 (2019).
Kerekes, C. B. & Williamson, C. R. Unveiling de Soto’s mystery: property rights, capital formation, and development. J. Inst. Econ. 4, 299–325 (2008).
de Soto, H. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in The West and Fails Everywhere Else (Basic Books, 2000).
Joireman, S. F. The mystery of capital formation in sub-Saharan Africa: women, property rights and customary law. World Dev. 36, 1233–1246 (2008).
Alchian, A. A. & Demsetz, H. The property right paradigm. J. Econ. Hist. 33, 16–27 (1973).
Robinson, B. E., Holland, M. B. & Naughton-Treves, L. Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Glob. Environ. Change 29, 281–293 (2014).
Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C. & Theis, S. Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: framework and review of available evidence. Agric. Syst. 172, 72–82 (2019).
O’Sullivan, M. B. Gender and Property Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Review of Constraints and Effective Interventions Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS8250 (World Bank, 2017).
Fenske, J. Land tenure and investment incentives: evidence from West Africa. J. Dev. Econ. 95, 137–156 (2011).
Lawry, S. et al. The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: a systematic review. J. Dev. Effect. 9, 61–81 (2017).
Holden, S. T. & Ghebru, H. Land tenure reforms, tenure security and food security in poor agrarian economies: causal linkages and research gaps. Glob. Food Sec. 10, 21–28 (2016).
Higgins, D., Balint, T., Liversage, H. & Winters, P. Investigating the impacts of increased rural land tenure security: a systematic review of the evidence. J. Rural Stud. 61, 34–62 (2018).
Lisher, J. Guidelines for Impact Evaluation of Land Tenure and Governance Interventions (UN-Habitat, 2019).
Kaplan-Hallam, M. & Bennett, N. J. Adaptive social impact management for conservation and environmental management. Conserv. Biol. 32, 304–314 (2018).
Albertus, M., Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B. & Weingast, B. R. Authoritarian survival and poverty traps: land reform in Mexico. World Dev. 77, 154–170 (2016).
Stamm, V. The World Bank on land policies: a West African look at the World Bank policy research report. Africa 74, 670–678 (2004).
Ito, J., Bao, Z. & Ni, J. Land rental development via institutional innovation in rural Jiangsu, China. Food Policy 59, 1–11 (2016).
Meinzen-Dick, R. & Mwangi, E. Cutting the web of interests: pitfalls of formalizing property rights. Land Use Policy 26, 36–43 (2009).
Deininger, K., Goyal, A. & Nagarajan, H. Inheritance Law Reform and Women’s Access to Capital: Evidence from India’s Hindu Succession Act Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS5338 (World Bank, 2010).
Mueller, V., Billings, L., Mogues, T., Peterman, A. & Wineman, A. Filling the legal void? Impacts of a community-based legal aid program on women’s land-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Oxford Dev. Stud. 46, 453–469 (2018).
Giné, X. Land Security in Rural Thailand: Evidence from a Property Rights Reform https://landportal.org/ru/library/resources/land-security-rural-thailand-evidence-property-rights-reform (World Bank, 2005).
Alix-Garcia, J., Kuemmerle, T. & Radeloff, V. C. Prices, land tenure institutions, and geography: a matching analysis of farmland abandonment in post-socialist Eastern Europe. Land Econ. 88, 425–443 (2012).
Naughton-Treves, L., Alix-Garcia, J. & Chapman, C. A. Lessons about parks and poverty from a decade of forest loss and economic growth around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13919–13924 (2011).
Zikhali, P. Fast track land reform programme, tenure security and investments in soil conservation: micro-evidence from Mazowe District in Zimbabwe. Nat. Resour. Forum 34, 124–139 (2010).
Christensen, G. & Miguel, E. Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. J. Econ. Lit. 56, 920–980 (2018).
Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).
Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 19, 640–648 (2008).
McCrary, J., Christensen, G. & Fanelli, D. Conservative tests under satisficing models of publication bias. PLoS ONE 11, e0149590 (2016).
Ban, N. C. et al. Well-being outcomes of marine protected areas. Nat. Sustain. 2, 524–532 (2019).
McKinnon, M. C. et al. What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries. Environ. Evid. 5, 8 (2016).
Brandt, J. S., Nolte, C. & Agrawal, A. Deforestation and timber production in Congo after implementation of sustainable forest management policy. Land Use Policy 52, 15–22 (2016).
Brottem, L. V. & Ba, L. Gendered livelihoods and land tenure: the case of artisanal gold miners in Mali, West Africa. Geoforum 105, 54–62 (2019).
Coomes, O. T., MacDonald, G. K. & de Waroux, Y. lP. Geospatial land price data: a public good for global change science and policy. BioScience 68, 481–484 (2018).
Robinson, B. E. et al. Incorporating land tenure security into conservation. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12383 (2018).
Pedersen, R. H. Decoupled implementation of new-wave land reforms: decentralisation and local governance of land in Tanzania. J. Dev. Stud. 48, 268–281 (2012).
Rudel, T. Defensive Environmentalists and the Dynamics of Global Reform (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Masuda, Y. J. et al. How do practitioners characterize land tenure security? Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e186 (2020).
Holland, M. B. et al. How Does Indigeneity Influence Socio-Ecological Conditions in Community Forests? A Systematic Review Protocol (Center for International Forestry Research, 2017).
Higgins, J. & Green, S. (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011).
Waddington, H. et al. How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit. J. Dev. Effect. 4, 359–387 (2012).
World Bank Country and Lending Groups. World Bank Data https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups (2020).
3ie Impact Evaluation Glossary (International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, 2012); https://www.3ieimpact.org/resources/Glossaries
Campbell Systematic Reviews: Policies and Guidelines Series No. 1 (The Campbell Collaboration, 2019).
Impact Evaluation in UN Agency Evaluation Systems: Guidance on Selection, Planning and Management (United Nations Evaluation Group, 2013).
Kulkarni, N., Huang, S.-T., Louis, E. & Fletschner, D. The potential for homestead microplots to contribute to food security in rural West Bengal. In 2017 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (2017).
Santos, F., Fletschner, D., Savath, V. & Peterman, A. Can government-allocated land contribute to food security? Intrahousehold analysis of West Bengal’s microplot allocation program. World Dev. 64, 860–872 (2014).
Habitats Classification Scheme (Version 3.1). IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme (2019).
Deininger, K., Ali, D. A. & Alemu, T. Impacts of land certification on tenure security, investment, and land market participation: evidence from Ethiopia. Land Econ. 87, 312–334 (2011).
Bogart, S. SankeyMATIC http://sankeymatic.com (2018).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2018-67261). W.Z. is supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.J.M., B.E.R. and T.-W.J.T. designed the research. T.-W.J.T. collected, compiled and coded the data. Y.J.M. and B.E.R. reviewed data coding. Y.J.M., B.E.R. and T.-W.J.T. conducted the data analysis and synthesis. T.-W.J.T. wrote an initial draft of the paper, Y.J.M., B.E.R., M.F.B., A. BenYishay, A. Blackman, T.B., M.C., M.B.H., T.K., B.L., M.D., L.N., T.R., J.S., P.S., P.V., W.S. and W.Z. reviewed and revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Sustainability thanks Tim Balint and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary background information, Tables 1–10 and Fig. 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tseng, TW.J., Robinson, B.E., Bellemare, M.F. et al. Influence of land tenure interventions on human well-being and environmental outcomes. Nat Sustain 4, 242–251 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00648-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00648-5
This article is cited by
-
Climate change affects multiple dimensions of well-being through impacts, information and policy responses
Nature Human Behaviour (2022)
-
Consistent cooling benefits of silvopasture in the tropics
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Land tenure drives Brazil’s deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation
Nature Climate Change (2021)
-
Reduced deforestation and degradation in Indigenous Lands pan-tropically
Nature Sustainability (2021)