Abstract
Airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is the largest environmental risk factor for premature mortality worldwide, and the probable cause of several hundred thousand premature deaths every year in India. Indian households contribute to ambient PM2.5 directly from several sources, including biomass-burning cook stoves and transport, and indirectly through the manufacturing of products triggered by their purchases. Here, we quantify consumption-based PM2.5 contributions from, as well as the mortality burden suffered by, urban and rural households by income deciles. Indirect PM2.5 emissions contribute almost twice as much to ambient PM2.5 concentrations as direct emissions from biomass cook stoves. We find that the impacts are distributed differently from contributions. We show that the mortality risk from indirect sources falls disproportionately on lower-income households. This suggests that industry‐wide pollution controls can reduce inequity in the impacts of ambient air pollution. However, as low-income households face an order of magnitude higher mortality risks from indoor air pollution, clean cooking fuels remain the most effective way to reduce the number of premature deaths from air pollution in India.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets underlying the plots are available in the IIASA DARE repository (http://dare.iiasa.ac.at/121/).
References
Cushing, L., Morello-Frosch, R., Wander, M. & Pastor, M. The haves, the have-nots, and the health of everyone: the relationship between social inequality and environmental quality. Annu. Rev. Public Health 36, 193–209 (2015).
Elstad, J. I. Does the socioeconomic context explain both mortality and income inequality? Prospective register-based study of Norwegian regions. Int. J. Equity Health 10, 7 (2011).
Hajat, A., Hsia, C. & O’Neill, M. S. Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2, 440–450 (2015).
Tessum, C. W. et al. Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6001–6006 (2019).
Drabo, A. Intra-country health inequalities and air pollution in developing countries. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 41, 455–475 (2013).
Po, J. Y. T. & Subramanian, S. V. Mortality burden and socioeconomic status in India. PLoS ONE 6, e16844 (2011).
Rosengren, A. et al. Socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in 20 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiologic (PURE) study. Lancet Glob. Health 7, e748–e760 (2019).
Yang, T. & Liu, W. Does air pollution affect public health and health inequality? Empirical evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 203, 43–52 (2018).
Chowdhury, S. & Dey, S. Cause-specific premature death from ambient PM2.5 exposure in India: estimate adjusted for baseline mortality. Environ. Int. 91, 283–290 (2016).
Hooper, L. G. & Kaufman, J. D. Ambient air pollution and clinical implications for susceptible populations. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 15, S64–S68 (2018).
Apte, J. S. & Pant, P. Toward cleaner air for a billion Indians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10614–10616 (2019).
Chowdhury, S. et al. Indian annual ambient air quality standard is achievable by completely mitigating emissions from household sources. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10711–10716 (2019).
Tibrewal, K. & Venkataraman, C. Climate co-benefits of air quality and clean energy policy in India. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00666-3 (2020).
Karambelas, A. et al. Urban versus rural health impacts attributable to PM2.5 and O3 in northern India. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064010 (2018).
Conibear, L., Butt, E. W., Knote, C., Arnold, S. R. & Spracklen, D. V. Stringent emission control policies can provide large improvements in air quality and public health in India. GeoHealth 2, 196–211 (2018).
Chafe, Z. A. et al. Household cooking with solid fuels contributes to ambient PM2.5 air pollution and the burden of disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 1314–1320 (2014).
Zhao, H. et al. Inequality of household consumption and air pollution-related deaths in China. Nat. Commun. 10, 4337 (2019).
Amann, M. et al. Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 26, 1489–1501 (2011).
Amann, M. et al. Reducing global air pollution: the scope for further policy interventions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0331 (2020).
Pauliuk, S., Wood, R. & Hertwich, E. G. Dynamic models of fixed capital stocks and their application in industrial ecology. J. Ind. Ecol. 19, 104–116 (2015).
Södersten, C.-J. H., Wood, R. & Hertwich, E. G. Endogenizing capital in MRIO models: the implications for consumption-based accounting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 13250–13259 (2018).
Södersten, C.-J., Wood, R. & Hertwich, E. G. Environmental impacts of capital formation. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 55–67 (2018).
Rao, N. D., Poblete-Cazenave, M., Bhalerao, R., Davis, K. F. & Parkinson, S. Spatial analysis of energy use and GHG emissions from cereal production in India. Sci. Total Environ. 654, 841–849 (2019).
Schnell, J. L. et al. Exploring the relationship between surface PM2.5 and meteorology in northern India. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 10157–10175 (2018).
McCollum, D. L. et al. Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 3, 589–599 (2018).
Rao, S. et al. Better air for better health: forging synergies in policies for energy access, climate change and air pollution. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1122–1130 (2013).
The Cost of Air Pollution: Strengthening the Economic Case for Action (World Bank, 2016); http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/781521473177013155/The-cost-of-air-pollution-strengthening-the-economic-case-for-action
Jeuland, M. A. & Pattanayak, S. K. Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts. PLoS ONE 7, e30338 (2012).
Markandya, A. et al. Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e126–e133 (2018).
Cropper, M. L. et al. Applying benefit-cost analysis to air pollution control in the Indian power sector. J. Benefit Cost. Anal. 10, 185–205 (2019).
Henschel, S. & Chan, G. Health Risks of Air Pollution in Europe—HRAPIE Project (WHO, 2013); https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/108632?locale-attribute=en&
Lim, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380, 2224–2260 (2012).
Burnett, R. T. et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307049 (2014).
Burnett, R. et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9592–9597 (2018).
Forouzanfar, M. H. et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386, 2287–2323 (2015).
Min, J. & Rao, N. D. Estimating uncertainty in household energy footprints. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 1307–1317 (2018).
Ekholm, T., Krey, V., Pachauri, S. & Riahi, K. Determinants of household energy consumption in India. Energy Policy 38, 5696–5707 (2010).
Mastrucci, A., Min, J., Usubiaga-Liaño, A. & Rao, N. D. A framework for modelling consumption-based energy demand and emission pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 1799–1807 (2020).
Pope, C. A. et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287, 1132–1141 (2002).
Forouzanfar, M. H. et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1659–1724 (2016).
Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease (WHO, 2016); https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250141
Smith, K. R. et al. Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35, 185–206 (2014).
Amann, M. et al. Progress Towards the Achievement of the EU’s Air Quality and Emission Objectives (IIASA, 2018); http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/15556/
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Amann, W. Schöpp and P. Purohit for discussions; and J. Janke for her contributions to the transport analysis. This work was partially funded by the contributions of the National Member Organizations of IIASA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.K. and N.D.R. designed the research. G.K., J.M. and F.W. conducted the modelling. S.P. and N.D.R. provided and interpreted survey data. N.D.R. led the writing and all of the authors contributed to the writing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Sustainability thanks Zoe Chafe, Anil Markandya and Christopher Tessum for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary methods and data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rao, N.D., Kiesewetter, G., Min, J. et al. Household contributions to and impacts from air pollution in India. Nat Sustain 4, 859–867 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00744-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00744-0
This article is cited by
-
Indoor air pollution and cognitive function among older adults in India: a multiple mediation approach through depression and sleep disorders
BMC Geriatrics (2024)
-
Higher air pollution in wealthy districts of most low- and middle-income countries
Nature Sustainability (2024)
-
Investigating the temporal dynamics of sub-micron particles and particle-bound transition metals in indoor air of a metropolitan city
Environmental Geochemistry and Health (2024)
-
Forecasting PM2.5 Concentration in India Using a Cluster Based Hybrid Graph Neural Network Approach
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (2023)
-
Reducing environmental impacts through socioeconomic transitions: critical review and prospects
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering (2023)