Abstract
National institutions and policies could provide powerful levers to steer the global food system towards higher agricultural production and lower environmental impact. However, causal evidence of countries’ influence is scarce. Using global geospatial datasets and a regression discontinuity design, we provide causal quantifications of the way crop yield gaps, nitrogen pollution and nitrogen pollution per crop yield are influenced by country-level factors, such as institutions and policies. We find that countries influence nitrogen pollution much more than crop yields and there is only a small trade-off between reducing nitrogen pollution and increasing yields. Overall, countries that cause 35% less nitrogen pollution than their neighbours only show a 1% larger yield gap (the difference between attainable and attained yields). Explanations of which countries cause the most pollution relative to their crop yields include economic development, population size, institutional quality and foreign financial flows to land resources, as well as countries’ overall agricultural intensity and share in the economy. Our findings suggest that many national governments have an impressive capacity to reduce global nitrogen pollution without having to sacrifice much agricultural production.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data can be retrieved from Wuepper et al.46 and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
Code availability
Code can be retrieved from Wuepper et al.46 and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
References
Rockström, J., Edenhofer, O., Gaertner, J. & DeClerck, F. Planet-proofing the global food system. Nat. Food 1, 3–5 (2020).
Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
West, P. C. et al. Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345, 325–328 (2014).
Hunter, M. C., Smith, R. G., Schipanski, M. E., Atwood, L. W. & Mortensen, D. A. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67, 386–391 (2017).
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE 8, e66428 (2013).
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).
Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).
Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).
Folberth, C. et al. The global cropland-sparing potential of high-yield farming. Nat. Sustain. 3, 281–289 (2020).
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).
Stevens, C. J. Nitrogen in the environment. Science 363, 578–580 (2019).
Seitzinger, S. P. & Phillips, L. Nitrogen stewardship in the Anthropocene. Science 357, 350–351 (2017).
Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).
Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Global gray water footprint and water pollution levels related to anthropogenic nitrogen loads to fresh water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 12860–12868 (2015).
Townsend, A. R. et al. Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 240–246 (2003).
Kanter, D. R. et al. Nitrogen pollution policy beyond the farm. Nat. Food https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0001-5 (2019).
Wuepper, D., Borrelli, P. & Finger, R. Countries and the global rate of soil erosion. Nat. Sustain. 3, 51–55 (2020).
Yu, C. et al. Managing nitrogen to restore water quality in China. Nature 567, 516–520 (2019).
Searchinger, T. D. et al. Revising Public Agricultural Support to Mitigate Climate Change (World Bank, 2020).
Cui, Z. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).
Ju, X., Gu, B., Wu, Y. & Galloway, J. N. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Glob. Environ. Change 41, 26–32 (2016).
Wu, Y. et al. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7010–7015 (2018).
Alesina, A., Tabellini, G. & Trebbi, F. Is Europe An Optimal Political Area? (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017).
Alesina, A. & Giuliano, P. Culture and institutions. J. Econ. Lit. 53, 898–944 (2015).
Wuepper, D. Does culture affect soil erosion? Empirical evidence from Europe. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 47, 619–653 (2020).
Pinkovskiy, M. Growth discontinuities at borders. J. Econ. Growth 22, 145–192 (2017).
Keele, L. & Titiunik, R. Natural experiments based on geography. Polit. Sci. Res. Methods 4, 65–95 (2016).
Cattaneo, M. & Escanciano, J. Regression Discontinuity Designs: Theory and Applications (Emerald Group, 2017).
Lee, D. S. & Lemieux, T. Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econ. Lit. 48, 281–355 (2010).
Fiebig, D. G. in A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics (ed. Baltagi, B. H.) Ch. 5, 101–121 (Blackwell, 2001).
Smith, M. & Kohn, R. Nonparametric seemingly unrelated regression. J. Economet. 98, 257–281 (2000).
Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).
Gu, B. et al. Cleaning up nitrogen pollution may reduce future carbon sinks. Glob. Environ. Change 48, 56–66 (2018).
Kunčič, A. Institutional quality dataset. J. Inst. Econ. 10, 135–161 (2014).
Eskander, S. M. S. U. & Fankhauser, S. Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0831-z (2020).
Lesiv, M. et al. Estimating the global distribution of field size using crowdsourcing. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 174–186 (2019).
Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).
Mueller, N. D. et al. Declining spatial efficiency of global cropland nitrogen allocation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 245–257 (2017).
Lassaletta, L. et al. Nitrogen use in the global food system: past trends and future trajectories of agronomic performance, pollution, trade, and dietary demand. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 095007 (2016).
Pe’Er, G. et al. A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Science 365, 449–451 (2019).
Finger, R. Nitrogen use and the effects of nitrogen taxation under consideration of production and price risks. Agric. Syst. 107, 13–20 (2012).
Pretty, J. Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science 362, eaav0294 (2018).
Holden, S. T. Fertilizer and sustainable intensification in Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob. Food Secur. 18, 20–26 (2018).
Finger, R., Swinton, S. M., Benni, N. E. & Walter, A. Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment. Ann. Rev. Resour. Econ. 11, 1–23 (2019).
Walter, A., Finger, R., Huber, R. & Buchmann, N. Opinion: smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6148–6150 (2017).
Wuepper, D. et al. Data: Countries influence the trade-off between crop yields and nitrogen pollution. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000430354 (2020).
Keele, L. J. & Titiunik, R. Geographic boundaries as regression discontinuities. Polit. Anal. 23, 127–155 (2014).
Cattaneo, M. D. & Vazquez-Bare, G. The choice of neighborhood in regression discontinuity designs. Observ. Stud. 2, A146 (2016).
Gridded Population of the World (GPW) v.4 (SEDAC, 2019); https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4
Gilbert, M. et al. Global distribution data for cattle, buffaloes, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens and ducks in 2010. Sci. Data 5, 180227 (2018).
Wing, C. & Bello-Gomez, R. A. Regression discontinuity and beyond: options for studying external validity in an internally valid design. Am. J. Eval. 39, 91–108 (2018).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Borrelli, P. et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 8, 2013 (2017).
Carlson, K. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 63–68 (2016).
Leach, A. M. et al. A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ. Dev. 1, 40–66 (2012).
Gu, B. et al. The role of industrial nitrogen in the global nitrogen biogeochemical cycle. Sci. Rep. 3, 2579 (2013).
Fertistat: On-Line Database on Fertilizer Use by Crop (FAO, 2012).
Heffer, P. Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level (International Fertilizer Industry Association, 2009).
Fertilizer Use by Crop (International Fertilizer Industry Association, 2002).
Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, 1–19 (2008).
Hijmans, R., Cameron, S., Parra, J., Jones, P. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated global terrestrial climate surfaces. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Licker, R. et al. Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’of croplands around the world? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 769–782 (2010).
Global Livestock Densities (FAO, 2012); http://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/global-distributions/en
Dentener, F. et al. The global atmospheric environment for the next generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 3586–3594 (2006).
Lesschen, J., Stoorvogel, J., Smaling, E., Heuvelink, G. & Veldkamp, A. A spatially explicit methodology to quantify soil nutrient balances and their uncertainties at the national level. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 78, 111–131 (2007).
Liu, J. et al. A high-resolution assessment on global nitrogen flows in cropland. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8035–8040 (2010).
Bouwman, A., Boumans, L. & Batjes, N. Estimation of global NH3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 8-1–8-14 (2002).
Bouwman, A., Boumans, L. & Batjes, N. Modeling global annual N2O and NO emissions from fertilized fields. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 28-21–28-29 (2002).
Batjes, N. H. ISRIC-WISE Derived Soil Properties on a 5 by 5 Arc-Minutes Global Grid (ver. 1.2) (ISRIC-World Soil Information, 2012).
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration—Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 (FAO, 1998).
Mitchell, T. D. & Jones, P. D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high‐resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 693–712 (2005).
Potter, P., Ramankutty, N., Bennett, E. M. & Donner, S. D. Characterizing the spatial patterns of global fertilizer application and manure production. Earth Interact. 14, 1–22 (2010).
Smil, V. Nitrogen in crop production: an account of global flows. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 647–662 (1999).
Dentener, F. et al. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, 1–21 (2006).
Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook (USDA, 1999).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.W. conceived the project, prepared some of the data, and carried out the analysis. S.L.C. prepared most of the data. All authors contributed to the analysis and writing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and a discussion of our main explanatory variables and their data sources.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wuepper, D., Le Clech, S., Zilberman, D. et al. Countries influence the trade-off between crop yields and nitrogen pollution. Nat Food 1, 713–719 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00185-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00185-6
This article is cited by
-
Indian interstate trade exacerbates nutrient pollution in food production hubs
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Agri-environmental policies from 1960 to 2022
Nature Food (2024)
-
A better use of fertilizers is needed for global food security and environmental sustainability
Agriculture & Food Security (2023)
-
Nitrogen cycles in global croplands altered by elevated CO2
Nature Sustainability (2023)
-
Climate change unequally affects nitrogen use and losses in global croplands
Nature Food (2023)