Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Embracing field studies as a tool for learning

Field studies in social psychology tend to focus on validating existing insights. In addition to learning from the laboratory and bringing those insights to the field — which researchers currently favour — we should also conduct field studies that aim to learn in the field first.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Premachandra, B. & Lewis, N. A. Jr. Do we report the information that is necessary to give psychology away? a scoping review of the psychological intervention literature 2000–2018. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 226–238 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Milkman, K. L. et al. Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science. Nature 600, 478–483 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. IJzerman, H. et al. Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1092–1094 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vazire, S. Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 411–417 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatman, J. A. & Flynn, F. J. Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organ. Sci. 16, 434–447 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenhardt, K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 532–550 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranganathan, A. The artisan and his audience: identification with work and price setting in a handicraft cluster in southern india. Adm. Sci. Q. 63, 637–667 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jachimowicz, J. The study premortem: why publishing null results is only the first step. Behavioral Scientist, https://go.nature.com/3KONKNt (16 October 2018).

  9. Whillans, A. & West, C. Alleviating time poverty among the working poor: a pre-registered longitudinal field experiment. Sci. Rep. 12, 719 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perlow, L. A. The time famine: toward a sociology of work time. Adm. Sci. Q. 44, 57–81 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Z. Berry, M. Gorges, O. Hauser, K. Krautter, J. Murray, C. Vinluan and A. Whillans for their excellent comments on an earlier version of this Comment

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon M. Jachimowicz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jachimowicz, J.M. Embracing field studies as a tool for learning. Nat Rev Psychol 1, 249–250 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00047-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00047-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing