Abstract
PROF. MARCELLIN BOULE, Director of the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle in Paris, has written to me with reference to my Henderson Lecture, “The Significance of the Peking Man”, extracts from which appeared in NATURE of Feb. 7 (p. 202), to direct my attention to the fact that long before Dr. Weinert expressed doubt as to whether the Peking man should be excluded from the genus Pithecanthropus he had made the same protest. To quote his own words: “Je crois être le premier à avoir rapproché intimement le Sinanthropus du Pithécanthrope. Voyez L'Anthropologie, t. 39 (1929), pp. 455–460.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SMITH, G. Validity of the Genus Sinanthropus. Nature 127, 304–305 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1038/127304b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/127304b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.