Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Density Distribution Analysis of Lymphocyte Populations

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 January 1968

Abstract

DESPITE their suspected heterogeneity in origin, life span and precise function, lymphocytes are usually considered to be a single group because of the rather negative morphological criteria available. One morphological division of lymphocytes into immature (large and medium) and mature (small) cells is physiologically relevant, because the larger cells represent a population which synthesizes DNA and which divides, while the smaller cells are not usually engaged in DNA synthesis. Morphological criteria are as yet, however, inadequate to make possible identification of the classes of lymphocytes which are now studied by such functional tests as the ability to respond to antigen and to produce a colony of cells which form antibody, the ability to produce various classes of antibody or the ability to initiate a graft-versus-host reaction. This communication suggests equilibrium density gradient centrifugation as a technique which may prove valuable, not only in defining lymphocyte classes, but also in separating them from each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shortman, K., Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. (in the press).

  2. Jerne, N. K., Norden, A. A., and Henry, C., in Cell Bound Antibodies (edit. by Amos, B., and Koprowski, H.), 109 (Wistar Institute Press, Philadelphia, USA, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham, A. J., Smith, J. B., and Mercer, E. H., J. Exp. Med., 124, 701 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, T. N., Hummeler, K., and Harris, S., J. Exp. Med., 123, 161 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hummeler, K., Harris, T. N., Tomassini, N., Hechtel, M., and Farber, M. B., J. Exp. Med., 124, 255 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Szenberg, A., and Shortman, K., Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 129, 310 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnet, F. M., and Boyer, G. S., J. Pathol. Bacteriol., 81, 141 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haskill, J. S., (following communication).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SHORTMAN, K., HASKILL, J., SZENBERG, A. et al. Density Distribution Analysis of Lymphocyte Populations. Nature 216, 1227–1229 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2161227a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2161227a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing